Killzone 3 VS Crysis 2 BETA

KZ3 looks and sounds lots better from I have seen so far.

crappy youtube beta compare. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujtf202V87U

Crysis 2 looks better. Killzone has better sound though.

When do the beta start anyway, i got invited 10 days ago.

*Crysis 2 that is.

Isn't Crysis 2 still in pre-alpha? PC gameplay in DX11 and 1080p is the only thing would be the only thing worth comparing to.

Better off comparing games that have already been released.

I don't care how good Cyrsis looks. There are way more fun FPS's than it. If Crysis 2 plays similarly to the others, it's a no buy for me.

I don't care how good Crysis looks.

Good for you

There are way more fun FPS's than it.

I disagree

If Crysis 2 plays similarly to the others, it's a no buy for me.

The only other sandbox FPS that comes to mind is Bulletstorm and it plays nothing like C2.

mD-

Isn't Crysis 2 still in pre-alpha? PC gameplay in DX11 and 1080p is the only thing would be the only thing worth comparing to.

Better off comparing games that have already been released.

Jebus213

[QUOTE="mD-"]

I don't care how good Crysis looks.

Good for you

There are way more fun FPS's than it.

I disagree

If Crysis 2 plays similarly to the others, it's a no buy for me.

The only other sandbox FPS that comes to mind is Bulletstorm and it plays nothing like C2.

windsquid9000

So to you, between the single and multiplayer, Crysis is one of the most fun FPS that you can buy today, correct?

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

[QUOTE="mD-"]

I don't care how good Crysis looks.

Good for you

There are way more fun FPS's than it.

I disagree

If Crysis 2 plays similarly to the others, it's a no buy for me.

The only other sandbox FPS that comes to mind is Bulletstorm and it plays nothing like C2.

mD-

So to you, between the single and multiplayer, Crysis is one of the most fun FPS that you can buy today, correct?

Singleplayer wise, sure. Throwing chickens at koreans never gets old. :P

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

[QUOTE="mD-"]

I don't care how good Crysis looks.

Good for you

There are way more fun FPS's than it.

I disagree

If Crysis 2 plays similarly to the others, it's a no buy for me.

The only other sandbox FPS that comes to mind is Bulletstorm and it plays nothing like C2.

mD-

So to you, between the single and multiplayer, Crysis is one of the most fun FPS that you can buy today, correct?

I'm going to say Killzone 3 looks a lot better. Crysis reminds me of how MS hyped Perfect Dark Zero, which turned out to be a large turd.

Was that Crysis 2 PS3?

Or was it 360?

It seemed to have better textures but hard to tell because of the quality and both seem low quality anyways. Also it had framerate problems. The Killzone 3 one showcased some nice smoke/wind effects. The Crysis one didn't showcased any physics stuff from what I noticed. About the same overall unless I missed something.

Wow, what a crappy comparison.

Wait wait wait wait.Is this Crysis 2 on Pc or on consoles?

If it's on PC then it wins by default, right?

Wait wait wait wait.Is this Crysis 2 on Pc or on consoles?

If it's on PC then it wins by default, right?

Pbjb989

That was really poor quality for both games, especially the beginning kz3 footage. As it is, i like the artstyle of KZ3 more, but i'd give technical to crysis 2, just by a hair though.

I'm hoping crytek's insistence on not showing what the pc version looks like means that it will knock my socks off.

I'm hoping crytek's insistence on not showing what the pc version looks like means that it will knock my socks off.

topgunmv

PC version.

Your name and avatar gave your choice away tc. Anyways KZ3 looks more of the same of KZ2 (which is not bad at all) but crysis 2 right now looks better.bigboss5ak

When do the beta start anyway, i got invited 10 days ago.

*Crysis 2 that is.

Robbazking

There is seriously no way to tell anything by that crap video.

Your name and avatar gave your choice away tc. Anyways KZ3 looks more of the same of KZ2 (which is not bad at all) but crysis 2 right now looks better.bigboss5ak

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I'm hoping crytek's insistence on not showing what the pc version looks like means that it will knock my socks off.

WhenCicadasCry

PC version.

Looks good, comparable to the first one at any rate. Hard to tell since the environments are so different. The closest thing to a skyscraper in the original is probably the carrier bridge at the end.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I'm hoping crytek's insistence on not showing what the pc version looks like means that it will knock my socks off.

topgunmv

PC version.

Looks good, comparable to the first one at any rate. Hard to tell since the environments are so different. The closest thing to a skyscraper in the original is probably the carrier bridge at the end.

Yeah, it's hard to compare because of the foilage and stuff. The deformation is gonna be awesome though, and more accurate SSAO and GI. Plus the character models are much better.

There is seriously no way to tell anything by that crap video.

Chutebox

I think that's the newest KZ3 beta vid floating around, but there's something weird about it. Either somebody changed the aspect ratio, or it's an offscreen vid shot at an angle.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

There is seriously no way to tell anything by that crap video.

gamecubepad

I think that's the newest KZ3 beta vid floating around, but there's something weird about it. Either somebody changed the aspect ratio, or it's an offscreen vid shot at an angle.

That was really poor quality for both games, especially the beginning kz3 footage. As it is, i like the artstyle of KZ3 more, but i'd give technical to crysis 2, just by a hair though.

ferret-gamer

How is crysis 2 on the 360 more technical than killzone 3? killzone 3 doesn't have screen tearing or framerate problems, and it certainly doesn't have sign posts pop up in your face ;) And then killzone 3 just looks better. Oh and crysis 2 not only has object pop up, but terrible texture pop up as well. I would like to hear your opinion on this.

The entire vid is from a different aspect ratio. whoever made that vid didnt do a very good job, im almost tempted to go and make a comparison vid of decent quality.ferret-gamer

I would make one, but I don't know where to find the downloadable version of the newest KZ3 trailer, and I'd catch too much flak for using an older build, even if the vid from Crysis 2 was older as well.

Both look great. Haven't really seen much Crysis 2 MP console footage. Just some 360p offscreen vid.

Rage, KZ3, Gears 3, and Crysis 2 all match up really well. Almost to close to call, as much as extremely devoted fans would disagree. Seriously, this is Crytek, GG, id, and Epic we're talking about. They're the top dogs when it comes to gfx, and the games show it.

WOOOW.... what a HUGE difference... just from sound FX

Here's a better vid for the actual gameplay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fz4M8fHAoQU

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

That was really poor quality for both games, especially the beginning kz3 footage. As it is, i like the artstyle of KZ3 more, but i'd give technical to crysis 2, just by a hair though.

theuncharted34

How is crysis 2 on the 360 more technical than killzone 3? killzone 3 doesn't have screen tearing or framerate problems, and it certainly doesn't have sign posts pop up in your face ;) And then killzone 3 just looks better. Oh and crysis 2 not only has object pop up, but terrible texture pop up as well. I would like to hear your opinion on this.

I wish guerrilla would give the community more info about the tech behind their games like crytek does :( If you want to read more about the tech behind crysis 2 you can go here: http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=896&Itemid=1

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I'm hoping crytek's insistence on not showing what the pc version looks like means that it will knock my socks off.

topgunmv

PC version.

Looks good, comparable to the first one at any rate. Hard to tell since the environments are so different. The closest thing to a skyscraper in the original is probably the carrier bridge at the end.

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

That was really poor quality for both games, especially the beginning kz3 footage. As it is, i like the artstyle of KZ3 more, but i'd give technical to crysis 2, just by a hair though.

ferret-gamer

How is crysis 2 on the 360 more technical than killzone 3? killzone 3 doesn't have screen tearing or framerate problems, and it certainly doesn't have sign posts pop up in your face ;) And then killzone 3 just looks better. Oh and crysis 2 not only has object pop up, but terrible texture pop up as well. I would like to hear your opinion on this.

I wish guerrilla would give the community more info about the tech behind their games like crytek does :( If you want to read more about the tech behind crysis 2 you can go here: http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=896&Itemid=1

somehow I don't think your being 100% honest. I mean having screen tearing means the engine just can't keep up, and pop up means it can't handle as many things on screen. Seems like a clear cut winner to me when you take this and kz's awsome animation, and it's amzing art style. I saw no framerate problems with kz3 :( Wouldn't you say killzone has some pretty good lighting too?

I prefer RAGE. A game that looks that good, and runs at 60 FPS? Mmmm.... good stuff.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

PC version.

windsquid9000

Looks good, comparable to the first one at any rate. Hard to tell since the environments are so different. The closest thing to a skyscraper in the original is probably the carrier bridge at the end.

I'm on a wireless modem so I watched it in 360p, but ya, looked comparable.

I prefer RAGE. A game that looks that good, and runs at 60 FPS? Mmmm.... good stuff.

DarkLink77

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Looks good, comparable to the first one at any rate. Hard to tell since the environments are so different. The closest thing to a skyscraper in the original is probably the carrier bridge at the end.

topgunmv

I'm on a wireless modem so I watched it in 360p, but ya, looked comparable.

Lol, I was watching the justin.tv that the Crysis gameplay came from. Sad to say, but the Killzone footage looks better. Can't wait to get Crysis 2 running on my PC though, then it will look better.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

How is crysis 2 on the 360 more technical than killzone 3? killzone 3 doesn't have screen tearing or framerate problems, and it certainly doesn't have sign posts pop up in your face ;) And then killzone 3 just looks better. Oh and crysis 2 not only has object pop up, but terrible texture pop up as well. I would like to hear your opinion on this.

theuncharted34

I wish guerrilla would give the community more info about the tech behind their games like crytek does :( If you want to read more about the tech behind crysis 2 you can go here: http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=896&Itemid=1

somehow I don't think your being 100% honest. I mean having screen tearing means the engine just can't keep up, and pop up means it can't handle as many things on screen. Seems like a clear cut winner to me when you take this and kz's awsome animation, and it's amzing art style. I saw no framerate problems with kz3 :( Wouldn't you say killzone has some pretty good lighting too?