Knight's Guide to understanding WHY Pc is superior

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zerkrender
Zerkrender

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Zerkrender
Member since 2007 • 633 Posts

[QUOTE="knight0151"]

Aww, I wanted my thread to have a lot of console gamers to come in and cry, but it's Pc guys arguing about specs haha. carry on.

thespywholied

PC fans vs PC fans lol

Console fanboys argue other thirst parties, PC fanboys argue over C/GPU makers. :P
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

Wasdie

The PC I put together for $604 will last longer than 6 months. It includes everything aside from a monitor.

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts

I do like it ho hermits are using consolites lack of pc knowledge to make arguements, which are not even true.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Max = "Run at maximum graphical capability at a decent frame rate" Decent frame rate = 20+ FPS

Crysis, Assassin's Creed 2, Dragon Age, I'm already tired of listing. Almost any game I put on it.

EDIT: At 1680x1050.

EDIT again: It's just now getting outclassed. If I bought a brand new game that came out yesterday, it probably couldn't max it. But 3 years is still longer than 6 months.

dgwutka

The basics, off the top of my head.
AMD X2 4600+
2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2
GPU was originally a 8600 GTX but I dropped in a GTX 260 a while back, so I guess the system is 2 years old, not 3. I don't know the exact cost but I figure it to be around $500, and I don't include keyboard, mouse, monitors, etc in that figure because I already had them when I bought it.

dgwutka

sorry no, I dont believe that setup plays crysis at high settings at even 20 fps. maybe 5-10 fps. and 20 fps is quite bad.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

[QUOTE="dgwutka"]

The basics, off the top of my head.
AMD X2 4600+
2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2
GPU was originally a 8600 GTX but I dropped in a GTX 260 a while back, so I guess the system is 2 years old, not 3. I don't know the exact cost but I figure it to be around $500, and I don't include keyboard, mouse, monitors, etc in that figure because I already had them when I bought it.

WilliamRLBaker

sorry no, I dont believe that setup plays crysis at high settings at even 20 fps. maybe 5-10 fps. and 20 fps is quite bad.

Because you don't believe it doesn't make it "untrue":

gtx 260 280

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-gtx-280,1953-18.html

Also this build would do it even better:

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62038 Posts

sorry no, I dont believe that setup plays crysis at high settings at even 20 fps. maybe 5-10 fps. and 20 fps is quite bad.

WilliamRLBaker

Link

His FPS ranged from 5-35 at 1680x1050 and 11-31 at 1920x1080 supposedly. Both on V.High settings.

I'm thinking the RAM held it back quite a bit, but I wonder what his avg. fps was.

High fps was fine, but the fact it dips so low seems to break the idea that the comp runs it all that well.

Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
all you have to do is look at MW2, pc and console versions side by side. the resolution of the console version is purely laughable. you get what you pay for.
Avatar image for gangstaa9
gangstaa9

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#58 gangstaa9
Member since 2007 • 258 Posts

Aww, I wanted my thread to have a lot of console gamers to come in and cry, but it's Pc guys arguing about specs haha. carry on.

knight0151

Dont worry I got you.

What if someone does not care about graphics and 50% of his time spent gaming uses local multi player.

(off topic)

Why do no games have split screen online its so fun.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#59 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18123 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

Silenthps

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

Not only were those games not at a very high resolution, the framerates weren't that good. I guess you could blame that on fraps, but still I think you're really missing the point with PC gaming.

PC gaming is all about ultra high resolutions and settings, it isn't about skimping by. That is what the consoles were made for, people who didn't want to have to skimp by with a crap PC that bearly runs the games.

um... says who? PC gaming is about whatever the PC gamer wants it to be. The whole point is to customize your gaming experience however you like, even if you want it to be like a console experience.

Agreed. I know plenty of people who surf a few years behind the curve to save money, but their rigs are still better than consoles. Many of them are just now getting like HD3870's for $50 and picking up games like World in Conflict, TF2 and Supreme Commander that the rest of us played years ago on the cheap.

That's the thing people forget about PC gaming: The reason PC games have such long shelf-life is because those of us who buy the game when it first comes out are just the first wave of purchasers. The game will continue to sell well for years as people upgrade their rigs. And most PC gamers don't buy $300 video cards...they wait for that card to drop to $50 and then pick it up.

They may be a few years behind but hey, they aren't as far behind technologically as the consoles, which are stuck in 2005 forever.

Avatar image for king_bobo
king_bobo

2099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#60 king_bobo
Member since 2007 • 2099 Posts

Fact: PC GAMES ARE RATED AT A HIGHER STANDARD THAN CONSOLE GAMES. Any questions will be answered on request.

knight0151


I disagree, but I am interested to hear your point of view.

One of the main things that puts me off PC gaming is that, whilst (with services like Steam) it constantly offers a ready supply of Indie-games and projects from smaller developers, many publishers and developers are actively choosing to avoid developing for the PC due to piracy. It's a shame, as it means that people who don't own consoles are missing out on greats like Red Dead Redemption. But that brings me back to the most important point of all - Alan Wake, Heavy Rain, Halo 3, Uncharted 2 - they're all incredible experiences that are only available on consoles, regardless of how inferior the hardware may be. Even with different hardware, the likes of Killzone 2 and God of War 3 prove that consoles, when fully taken advantage of, have a lot of potential.

Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts

i really freaking hate that word "superior" it seems so elitist, while i do think that pc gaming is better, for me atleast, i dont go off telling people that my gaming experience is better

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

NVIDIATI

But that doesn't change the fact that the more you invest, the better off you'll be, especially if you hope to have some semblance of future proofing. Why pickup a Phenom 9850 when you can get a much, much better Phenom II X4 955 for $159? If you're putting down a large sum of money, it's natural to try and pickup a CPU that won't just get you by for a couple of years. 2GB of RAM, and a 160GB HDD? That's smaller than the default 360 hard drive now. It won't be easy to get by on that when games like the "The Force Unleashed" insist on taking up 28gb of hard drive space. So it makes sense to swap in a 1TB drive for about $70 (you'll probably want a backup hard drive too eventually, but never mind that). 4GB of memory will set people back around $90.

So those are subtle additions, but they raise the price by about $166. Now for a little over $750, people can actually build themselves a good gaming rig... but there was still a lot of skimping on the core parts, more than I'd be comfortable with for my own gaming rig.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

NVIDIATI
only 5 years later and a better computer is still more expensive then consoles original prices. when ps3/360 first came out you would have been spending 800 at least for a comparable system, technology lowered in price now you can spend $600 for a PC better then a $300 consoles.
Avatar image for asylumni
asylumni

3304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 asylumni
Member since 2003 • 3304 Posts

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

NVIDIATI

Just out of curiosity, do you have something against AMD CPUs? This is the second time I've seen you suggest running an AMD cpu without cooling (OEM parts).

Avatar image for Zerkrender
Zerkrender

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Zerkrender
Member since 2007 • 633 Posts

i really freaking hate that word "superior" it seems so elitist, while i do think that pc gaming is better, for me atleast, i dont go off telling people that my gaming experience is better

linkin_guy109
Or even worst create insults for other gamers like 'consolites'. :(
Avatar image for megapikachu101
megapikachu101

1386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 megapikachu101
Member since 2007 • 1386 Posts
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

woah i didnt know a pc at that price range could max out a game like dirt 2 O_o damn i cant wait till i get to build me a rig ^_^
Avatar image for asylumni
asylumni

3304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 asylumni
Member since 2003 • 3304 Posts

FACT: You save MONEY in the long run because of the PC, steam says hello. I will lay down some examples.

Bfbc2 for consoles: 60 dollars.

For PC: 46.99, and look guys, IT WAS ON SALE ON EA a while back ago for around 20 bucks. Amazing. Yes, we Pc gamers save money.

THQ Metro 2033 was on sale for 12.50, how much was it for you console folks, 60 dollars?

KNIGHT LOL'S.

Steam sales are amazing, I don't even need to say anything. You guys just download steam and see.

knight0151

Since this hasn't been addressed, I'll take it. Gee, sales, never see these for consoles. :roll:

Right now, Target has Transformers War for Cybertron for PS3 clearance priced at $20. It's $40 on Steam.

Gamestop has Battlefield Bad Company 2 for $40. It's currently $50 on Steam. Modern Warfare 2 is $50, $60 on Steam. Left 4 Dead 2 is $30 on both.

This isn't even going into used sales or holiday B2G1free or B1G2 half off sales. If you shop around, you can always find deals, it's not exclusive to PC games.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="knight0151"]

FACT: You save MONEY in the long run because of the PC, steam says hello. I will lay down some examples.

Bfbc2 for consoles: 60 dollars.

For PC: 46.99, and look guys, IT WAS ON SALE ON EA a while back ago for around 20 bucks. Amazing. Yes, we Pc gamers save money.

THQ Metro 2033 was on sale for 12.50, how much was it for you console folks, 60 dollars?

KNIGHT LOL'S.

Steam sales are amazing, I don't even need to say anything. You guys just download steam and see.

asylumni

Since this hasn't been addressed, I'll take it. Gee, sales, never see these for consoles. :roll:

Right now, Target has Transformers War for Cybertron for PS3 clearance priced at $20. It's $40 on Steam.

Gamestop has Battlefield Bad Company 2 for $40. It's currently $50 on Steam. Modern Warfare 2 is $50, $60 on Steam. Left 4 Dead 2 is $30 on both.

This isn't even going into used sales or holiday B2G1free or B1G2 half off sales. If you shop around, you can always find deals, it's not exclusive to PC games.

Steam's normal prices are quite lousy, actually. I see right now that Resident Evil 5 -- the original, non-Gold edition -- is going for $49.99. Sheesh.

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts

Hermits seem to be assuming that console players buy all their games for 60$

I bought bc2, metreo 2033, and me2, for 80 together. These games were all still at over 40 dollars on steam when i bought these.

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts

[QUOTE="asylumni"]

[QUOTE="knight0151"]

FACT: You save MONEY in the long run because of the PC, steam says hello. I will lay down some examples.

Bfbc2 for consoles: 60 dollars.

For PC: 46.99, and look guys, IT WAS ON SALE ON EA a while back ago for around 20 bucks. Amazing. Yes, we Pc gamers save money.

THQ Metro 2033 was on sale for 12.50, how much was it for you console folks, 60 dollars?

KNIGHT LOL'S.

Steam sales are amazing, I don't even need to say anything. You guys just download steam and see.

SakusEnvoy

Since this hasn't been addressed, I'll take it. Gee, sales, never see these for consoles. :roll:

Right now, Target has Transformers War for Cybertron for PS3 clearance priced at $20. It's $40 on Steam.

Gamestop has Battlefield Bad Company 2 for $40. It's currently $50 on Steam. Modern Warfare 2 is $50, $60 on Steam. Left 4 Dead 2 is $30 on both.

This isn't even going into used sales or holiday B2G1free or B1G2 half off sales. If you shop around, you can always find deals, it's not exclusive to PC games.

Steam's normal prices are quite lousy, actually. I see right now that Resident Evil 5 -- the original, non-Gold edition -- is going for $49.99. Sheesh.

Also, bc2 is going for 30 at my store
Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

asylumni

Just out of curiosity, do you have something against AMD CPUs? This is the second time I've seen you suggest running an AMD cpu without cooling (OEM parts).

rofl. I guess he just keeps bottles of water arround xD

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="dgwutka"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

Wasdie

My $500 PC is 3 years old and will still max almost anything.

Define "max" and what games?

I can say my old $300, 10 year old PC can max almost anything too.

That doesn't make it true.

My $1200 PC built in 2007 with a 8800 gts 640mb struggled to keep decent framerates with any modern game. I don't know how your $500 PC from the same time could do any better.

My 2007 8800gtOC 700USD PC can max out most games with only a handful not.

Metro 2033 1440x900 very high directx 10

Or at 1680x1050 with directx 9 which looks the same.

That is one of the most demanding games and it runs fine.

Your 8800gts 640mb version is weaker than my 8800GT OC though...

Also a computer does more than just game and is practically a necessity in life.

PC > Consoles

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="asylumni"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

coreybg

Just out of curiosity, do you have something against AMD CPUs? This is the second time I've seen you suggest running an AMD cpu without cooling (OEM parts).

rofl. I guess he just keeps bottles of water arround xD

A heatsink for the cpu is only like 15-25 USD for a regular good one.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

asylumni

Just out of curiosity, do you have something against AMD CPUs? This is the second time I've seen you suggest running an AMD cpu without cooling (OEM parts).

*facepalm* lol I just realised that its only the CPU and no fan :p, w/e a $8 CPU fan is fine.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835200042&cm_re=cpu_fan-_-35-200-042-_-Product

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

UPDATE: Thanks to asylumni for pointing out I forgot a CPU fan :D

$612.88

· Nvidia GTX 460 GPU

· 160GB 7200rpm HDD

· Windows 7

· DVD Drive

· KB/M + Speakers

· 2GB DDR2 800 RAM

· Case

· CPU Fan

· AMD Phenom 2.5ghz quad core black edition CPU

· AM2+ MOBO

· 680watt PSU

· FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/5535/600pc.jpg

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

But that doesn't change the fact that the more you invest, the better off you'll be, especially if you hope to have some semblance of future proofing. Why pickup a Phenom 9850 when you can get a much, much better Phenom II X4 955 for $159? If you're putting down a large sum of money, it's natural to try and pickup a CPU that won't just get you by for a couple of years. 2GB of RAM, and a 160GB HDD? That's smaller than the default 360 hard drive now. It won't be easy to get by on that when games like the "The Force Unleashed" insist on taking up 28gb of hard drive space. So it makes sense to swap in a 1TB drive for about $70 (you'll probably want a backup hard drive too eventually, but never mind that). 4GB of memory will set people back around $90.

So those are subtle additions, but they raise the price by about $166. Now for a little over $750, people can actually build themselves a good gaming rig... but there was still a lot of skimping on the core parts, more than I'd be comfortable with for my own gaming rig.

Sure the more money you invest the better it will be, but Wasdie said a $600 PC does not last longer than 6 months, while the PC I built should be good for longer than that. PC gaming is as expensive as you want it to be.
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#77 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

Let's start with the hardware. PC's have superior hardware, and no, the Ps3 cell processor does not dwarf the pc hardware. Which means that developers can PUSH the technological limits of the PC as the hardware is ALWAYS improving so developers have VERY LITTLE restriction, this allows open world gameplay without annoying loading screens as PC's have more RAM than the 512 MB that consoles have. We enjoy 1920x1200 resolution and EVEN HIGHER, yes, that's right console guys, EVEN HIGHER that that. Especially with ATI Eyefinity, and if you got the money, then go for that, 3 screens with triplehead2go.

FACT:, PC hardware is better, and developers have more room to create gaming master pieces on PC because of that.

Now, time to debunk arguments

"BUT U HAZ TO PAY 9000 DOLLARS A MONTH TO UPGRADE IT"

No, my console troll friend, you don't have to, those with money certainly can, but they're not really spending their money wisely."

FACT: Pc gaming DOES NOT cost thousands of dollars, budget machines CAN be built for about 400-500 dollars. And when you think about it, when you buy a console, that's 200-300 bucks, not counting the XBL Live membership, or the extra peripherals that you have to buy with it. Such as an extremely overpriced hard drive *looks at microsoft*

FACT: You save MONEY in the long run because of the PC, steam says hello. I will lay down some examples.

Bfbc2 for consoles: 60 dollars.

For PC: 46.99, and look guys, IT WAS ON SALE ON EA a while back ago for around 20 bucks. Amazing. Yes, we Pc gamers save money.

THQ Metro 2033 was on sale for 12.50, how much was it for you console folks, 60 dollars?

KNIGHT LOL'S.

Steam sales are amazing, I don't even need to say anything. You guys just download steam and see.

"BUT KNIGHT, PC GAMING IS DYING NO GOOD PC SALES" Wrong.

48 percent, that's right, 48, are on digital distribution services, such as steam an Direct2Drive.

Fact: Digital Distribution has been growing at a very fast pace.

"But knight, PC GAMERS HAZ NO AAAA"

Fact: PC GAMES ARE RATED AT A HIGHER STANDARD THAN CONSOLE GAMES. Any questions will be answered on request.

knight0151

My computer is 2008. And it played Neverwinter Nights. Okay? Now My Dad (the one who plays it) comes in the house with Neverwinter Nights 2. I Installed it and it was SLOW, Laggy (not even online).

I asked my Dad what was wrong with it, and he said we needed a new video card.

Another day, my Dad walks in with Assassin's Creed (number 1).

Once we got the new video card ( $60 ) and installed it, Neverwinter Nights 2 ran great!! :D Once my dad finished it, he put in Assassin's Creed, and it didn't work... Same situation.

Gaming will only get more expensive, and in this economy, my family cannot afford an upgrade every two years. Its just not worth it. :x And Computers have more technical problems than consoles, (viruses mostly)

It just costs more, no matter how cheaper the games are.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

only 5 years later and a better computer is still more expensive then consoles original prices. when ps3/360 first came out you would have been spending 800 at least for a comparable system, technology lowered in price now you can spend $600 for a PC better then a $300 consoles.

:? I can make a PC more powerful than consoles for less than that... On the otherhand while that PC is equiped with a GTX 460 is can handle just about any game you toss at it at max settings. To make a PC more powerful than a console I'd need a standard Dual Core and somethign like an 8800GT and that would be less than $600 considering the GTX 260 is $200 and you can find an 8800GT now for $40-$60. Anyways the PC build was addressed at Wasdie.
Avatar image for these_nuts
these_nuts

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 these_nuts
Member since 2009 • 203 Posts

Your reasons are the specs, which is obvious and some games being cheaper, which I agree with.However, the PC has a limited library. It excels in FPS and strategy games. There are a lot of games across all consoles that ARE NOT on PC. That's reason enough for me to appreciate PCs and consoles. One is not better than the other.

Avatar image for Brendissimo35
Brendissimo35

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 1

#80 Brendissimo35
Member since 2005 • 1934 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

Wasdie

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

Not only were those games not at a very high resolution, the framerates weren't that good. I guess you could blame that on fraps, but still I think you're really missing the point with PC gaming.

PC gaming is all about ultra high resolutions and settings, it isn't about skimping by. That is what the consoles were made for, people who didn't want to have to skimp by with a crap PC that bearly runs the games.

While higher resolutions is a given with PC gaming, to say that's what PC gaming is about is misleading. How long have you been gaming on the PC anyway?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62038 Posts

Icame in here expecting valid reasons, and I gottechnical specs and all that jazz. The PC has a limited library. It excels in FPS and strategygames. There are a lot of games across all consoles that ARE NOT on PC.

these_nuts

There are plenty of games on the PC that are not on the consoles... In fact, many more, due to its insane amount of exclusives.

PC also excels in genres such as Adventure, RPG's (including MMO's) and Sims (including race sims, flight sims etc).

The PC library is pretty much far from limited.

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#82 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts
buying a 400-500 dollars PC will just result in having to run the games at high settings with minimum AA and at a resolution around 1300 or 1400.and with framerate of about 20-30 FPS with regular drops on crowded areas thanks but I preffer sticking to consoles
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#83 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system. All that alone adds up to about $300 extra to any price. Also a 600 PC will beable to play all of the games, but very few of the new ones on high settings and NO new games on high or even medium settings.

You want a PC that is going to last, that isn't going to break from cheap parts, that is going to not require an upgrade for 2-3 years? Drop at least 1 grand on the PC alone, not including software and extra hardware you will need (mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers).

PC gaming can be superior because of the hardware and open platform but developers need to take advantage of it. If you just port a console game over to the PC, it just isn't right. Everything from the optimization of the engine to the UI will be wrong.

Good PC gaming requires money. There is no escaping it. If PC gaming were cheap, the consoles wouldn't be necessary. Consoles are there to provide another way to play games at a much lower cost than it costs to build and maintain a PC.

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer, I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Wasdie
!!!!!! Hells yeah. This is basically what I end up arguing to every "$500 PC" flag-waver, I should just copy/paste your reply from now on, it carries more weight coming from you. ;) Also TC, preferences are just that, there is no "superior" unless you mean technical superiority in specific instances, what ends up being "superior" aka "the best" is whichever gaming platform best suits your needs.
Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#84 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

Max = "Run at maximum graphical capability at a decent frame rate" Decent frame rate = 20+ FPS

Crysis, Assassin's Creed 2, Dragon Age, I'm already tired of listing. Almost any game I put on it.

EDIT: At 1680x1050.

EDIT again: It's just now getting outclassed. If I bought a brand new game that came out yesterday, it probably couldn't max it. But 3 years is still longer than 6 months.

dgwutka
20 fps? you do know that 20 is semi-fluid right? most of those games run at 60 fps or 30 in console (cept for crysis, for logical reasons) and what about the AA?
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

buying a 400-500 dollars PC will just result in having to run the games at high settings with minimum AA and at a resolution around 1300 or 1400.and with framerate of about 20-30 FPS with regular drops on crowded areas thanks but I preffer sticking to consoleslightleggy

My computer is around 400 to be build right now.

It can play just about any game fine.

whether it is Dragon Age, Prince of Persia, Gears of War or most other games.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="these_nuts"]

Icame in here expecting valid reasons, and I gottechnical specs and all that jazz. The PC has a limited library. It excels in FPS and strategygames. There are a lot of games across all consoles that ARE NOT on PC.

lundy86_4

There are plenty of games on the PC that are not on the consoles... In fact, many more, due to its insane amount of exclusives.

PC also excels in genres such as Adventure, RPG's (including MMO's) and Sims (including race sims, flight sims etc).

The PC library is pretty much far from limited.

Also the PC covers all genres just look at the awesome indie dev support.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Oh and Metro 2033 works fine on 1680x1050.

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#88 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

It's pretty obvious that pc gaming is more expensive than console gaming. But a lot of people blow it out of proportion. The way I see it, basically everyone has a computer. If you want to pc game, you could just shell out a few hundred extra dollars and then you have a decent pc for gaming. It'll still be more expensive though, if you want to keep new games looking great. You'll have to upgrade every so often, something you don't have to do as often with consoles.

Avatar image for deangallop
deangallop

3811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 deangallop
Member since 2004 • 3811 Posts

Quick question if PC games standards were higher then logically wouldn't multiplat games on PC would be scored lower?

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system. All that alone adds up to about $300 extra to any price. Also a 600 PC will beable to play all of the games, but very few of the new ones on high settings and NO new games on high or even medium settings.

You want a PC that is going to last, that isn't going to break from cheap parts, that is going to not require an upgrade for 2-3 years? Drop at least 1 grand on the PC alone, not including software and extra hardware you will need (mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers).

PC gaming can be superior because of the hardware and open platform but developers need to take advantage of it. If you just port a console game over to the PC, it just isn't right. Everything from the optimization of the engine to the UI will be wrong.

Good PC gaming requires money. There is no escaping it. If PC gaming were cheap, the consoles wouldn't be necessary. Consoles are there to provide another way to play games at a much lower cost than it costs to build and maintain a PC.

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer, I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Hahadouken

!!!!!! Hells yeah. This is basically what I end up arguing to every "$500 PC" flag-waver, I should just copy/paste your reply from now on, it carries more weight coming from you. ;) Also TC, preferences are just that, there is no "superior" unless you mean technical superiority in specific instances, what ends up being "superior" aka "the best" is whichever gaming platform best suits your needs.

Wasdie has said what we've been saying forever. But coming from someone who has actually invested in modern PC gaming, for some reason, it holds more weight.

I've been longing to get back into gaming on the PC the way I want to. That means spending some big bucks on a top-of-the-line rig separate from addition costs. I also wanted to take advantage of the latest epic, Steam sale (having the games ready for me whenever I delve into investing seriously), but I'm currently broke :(.

EDIT: @Haha below - Funny thing, I'm using a Compaq computer now. And it's my mom's :|.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#91 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
^^ Those screens don't look particularly impressive, those are not taxing games, and that doesn't show us how they run, at all. I also seriously doubt any of you are taking into account the entire kit, and only counting the $400 you put in to use an old case/power supply, old or pirated OS, mouse and keyboard, speakers or headphones, etc. Bottom line is you can't take mom's Compaq, toss a GPU and some RAM in there and claim it's a "$400 PC". :s
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

^^ Those screens don't look particularly impressive, those are not taxing games, and that doesn't show us how they run, at all. I also seriously doubt any of you are taking into account the entire kit, and only counting the $400 you put in to use an old case/power supply, old or pirated OS, mouse and keyboard, speakers or headphones, etc. Bottom line is you can't take mom's Compaq, toss a GPU and some RAM in there and claim it's a "$400 PC". :sHahadouken

Nope my PC is worth 400 USD all in all.

And those are impressive pics.

Consoles don't have that kind of quality.

They have low res and blurry graphics.

Metro 2033 is in a tie with Crysis as best looking video game ever.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Also a console couldn;t even dream to run those games at the res and higher settings on the PC.

They can barely run Metro 2033 at the lowest settings and 720P.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#94 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

All the things TC mentioned are what the pc is good for on paper only.

The one advantage pc has over consoles is 'upgradable' hardware. so if you're gonna go for a 400-500 dollar pc, assuming you buy it the same time as a console's release, the pc will last no longer than the console in terms of graphics. If you upgrade, then it's an additional cost and it contradicts the whole 'cheap pc' thing

And if you are truely right about superior gaming on pc, why are more devs focusing on consoles except for a few like blizzard? Obviously pc isn't a better choice for devs, and in the long run, whatever isn't better for devs will eventually not be better for gamers, due to lack of support.

Do i need to mention DRM? It's like a thorn in the back especially for pc gaming. Our beloved Starcraft 2 too can't stay away from it. Mandatory internet connections? Mandatory signing in even during LAN? What if Microsoft or Sony one day said that if your friend came over to your house, he needed a registered account to play the 2nd controller? OMG, that will be the bomb....and that's what Blizzard is doing to pc gaming now. Everything is under some form of control.

In short, pc gaming is better is some ways. Overall superiority? Not quite.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
That Metro screen looks heavily aliased.

It's pretty obvious that pc gaming is more expensive than console gaming. But a lot of people blow it out of proportion. The way I see it, basically everyone has a computer. If you want to pc game, you could just shell out a few hundred extra dollars and then you have a decent pc for gaming. It'll still be more expensive though, if you want to keep new games looking great. You'll have to upgrade every so often, something you don't have to do as often with consoles.

cain006
No, that simply isn't the case at all, especially these days. Maybe 8-10 years ago every nuclear family had a "home PC" that was an Acer, Compaq, HP, etc., some junky packaged PC that costs $1200 and can't do anything very well. That is only every "nuclear family", which is assuming that every person on this forum is a middle-class preppy suburban family and they all live together under one roof. These days more people have laptops, they have Macs, they use the internet on phones or even consoles and not an actual PC. In fact the only people I can even think of who own an actual PC with a tower are fellow PC gamers who built their rig for this specific purpose. If I had to hazard a guess based on what I have seen, I would say laptops have eclipsed home PCs in most homes.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

All the things TC mentioned are what the pc is good for on paper only.

The one advantage pc has over consoles is 'upgradable' hardware. so if you're gonna go for a 400-500 dollar pc, assuming you buy it the same time as a console's release, the pc will last no longer than the console in terms of graphics. If you upgrade, then it's an additional cost and it contradicts the whole 'cheap pc' thing

And if you are truely right about superior gaming on pc, why are more devs focusing on consoles except for a few like blizzard? Obviously pc isn't a better choice for devs, and in the long run, whatever isn't better for devs will eventually not be better for gamers, due to lack of support.

Do i need to mention DRM? It's like a thorn in the back especially for pc gaming. Our beloved Starcraft 2 too can't stay away from it. Mandatory internet connections? Mandatory signing in even during LAN? What if Microsoft or Sony one day said that if your friend came over to your house, he needed a registered account to play the 2nd controller? OMG, that will be the bomb....and that's what Blizzard is doing to pc gaming now. Everything is under some form of control.

In short, pc gaming is better is some ways. Overall superiority? Not quite.

jhcho2

Console have more high scoring exclusives than console by far.

Also there are many games not reviewed by GS so it could be even more.

There are only a few games with mandatory internet connections and you can get rid of that too.

Also just use steam and you have no worries about drm.

What some people spend on Xbox live I could make it go towards a simple upgrade.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#97 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]^^ Those screens don't look particularly impressive, those are not taxing games, and that doesn't show us how they run, at all. I also seriously doubt any of you are taking into account the entire kit, and only counting the $400 you put in to use an old case/power supply, old or pirated OS, mouse and keyboard, speakers or headphones, etc. Bottom line is you can't take mom's Compaq, toss a GPU and some RAM in there and claim it's a "$400 PC". :sHakkai007

Nope my PC is worth 400 USD all in all.

And those are impressive pics.

Consoles don't have that kind of quality.

They have low res and blurry graphics.

Metro 2033 is in a tie with Crysis as best looking video game ever.

Still don't believe you. No, those pictures really aren't impressive, but I guess that's subjective. You might be impressed by them but there are plenty of console games that look better than the screens you posted. Metro 2033 isn't in a tie for best graphics on PC on John Random's rig on a Wednesday at 7:00 PM, let alone "best graphics ever". :lol:
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

That Metro screen looks heavily aliased.

Hahadouken

So what Consoles could never dream of playing it at those settings.

In motion you don't even notice it.

Also that 400-450 USD PC is around 4x more powerful than any consoles.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]^^ Those screens don't look particularly impressive, those are not taxing games, and that doesn't show us how they run, at all. I also seriously doubt any of you are taking into account the entire kit, and only counting the $400 you put in to use an old case/power supply, old or pirated OS, mouse and keyboard, speakers or headphones, etc. Bottom line is you can't take mom's Compaq, toss a GPU and some RAM in there and claim it's a "$400 PC". :sHahadouken

Nope my PC is worth 400 USD all in all.

And those are impressive pics.

Consoles don't have that kind of quality.

They have low res and blurry graphics.

Metro 2033 is in a tie with Crysis as best looking video game ever.

Still don't believe you. No, those pictures really aren't impressive, but I guess that's subjective. You might be impressed by them but there are plenty of console games that look better than the screens you posted. Metro 2033 isn't in a tie for best graphics on PC on John Random's rig on a Wednesday at 7:00 PM, let alone "best graphics ever". :lol:

It is.....omg you must be blind nothing on consoles match those technical graphics.

The consoles are using old outdated 5 year old gimped hardware.

There are over 30 PC games that look better technically than any console game.

.....zzzz console fanboys....

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#100 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Also a console couldn;t even dream to run those games at the res and higher settings on the PC.

They can barely run Metro 2033 at the lowest settings and 720P.

Hakkai007
The screens you are posting don't back up what you say at all. You are posting screens of graphically unimpressive games that STILL have heavy aliasing, and we have no way of knowing what framerate they run at with that resolution.