LETS END THIS NOW: Killzone 2 > Halo 3

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

movies = games????

teh logic!!!

GS is bias, DMC2 should have been better than DMC3... correct?

WHAT???????? PIRATES 3 Was AWESOME!:evil:rey06

I thought so as well, Shrek 3 on the other hand...

Killzone series is on its third game too. Killzone for PS2, Killzone Liberation for PSP, and now Killzone 3 for PS3.

/thread (although there wasn't much of a thread to begin with.

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

So far we have only seen part of Halo 3's MP, we have not seen anything about it's SP. Also, we haven't seen anything at all about KZ2.

Calling it this early on is foolish.

But, based on how earlier instalments of those games did, I would say that Halo 3 will do better, although nothing is for certain.

ROTFL :lol:

*slams head on keyboard* One of the dumbest reasonings I've ever heard. You have yet to see real footage of Killzone 2.

*laughs uncontrollably and leaves thread*

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

so by your logic, playstation 3 sucks, because it's 3

[QUOTE="rey06"]WHAT???????? PIRATES 3 Was AWESOME!:evil:Bansheesdie

I thought so as well, Shrek 3 on the other hand...

what??:o i loved Shrek 3, the only thing i didnt like was justin timberlakes character . pirates 3 wasfunny and had the great action scenes like 1 and 2but the story was blah imo. on topic perhaps...

[QUOTE="ScrunchMuppet"]

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

jiggawho2006

so by your logic, playstation 3 sucks, because it's 3

ouch!!!

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

What a case built on absolutely NOTHING :lol:

[what??:o i loved Shrek 3, the only thing i didnt like was justin timberlakes character . pirates 3 wasfunny and had the great action scenes like 1 and 2but the story was blah imo.AsadMahdi59

I hated all of Shrek 3 besides the one time when the band boy did that solo after Shrek got the news he needed to go to Far Far Away. It has an hour and a half of torture.

There is very little known about Killzone 2... We haven't even seen gameplay of it yet either. So you are basing your opinion on what? Killzone 1, hopes and dreams?

Gotcha! :lol:

... Wow. :lol:Not-A-Stalker

Exactly what I'm thinking

Bungie = decades of AAA games on Mac, PC and Xbox.

Guerilla = a massively hyped failure of a console game, an even bigger failure of a console multi-plat, and a decent but not great game on a handheld.

Xbox 360 must be way better than PS3. After all, 360 is the second Xbox, and PS3 is the third playstation...

your logic = phails.

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3.ScrunchMuppet

lets stop there, though I didn't personally enjoy LOTR, Halo 3 is being likened to Return of the king, not Pirates 3.

However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

Since when was Empire strikes back the peoples favourite star wars? everyone hated the ending, ala Halo 2.

Killzone has neither the developer talent, nor the storyline to compete with the juggernaut halo 3 will become.

[QUOTE="ScrunchMuppet"]

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

jiggawho2006

so by your logic, playstation 3 sucks, because it's 3

you just pwned the TC

[QUOTE="jiggawho2006"][QUOTE="ScrunchMuppet"]

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

oback

so by your logic, playstation 3 sucks, because it's 3

you just pwned the TC

but playstation 3 really suks

By the way - Killzone PS3 is considered Killzone 3. (Guerilla even said Killzone: Liberation is the second game, and Killzone PS3 is Killzone 3)Not-A-Stalker

If that's the case,thenyour logic indicates that GTAlV is considered Grand Theft Auto 9. You could also say,"Oh, but Vice City was the forth GTA so I'm going to call it GTAlV".:roll:

Are you freaking kidding me? :|

Halo has nothing to prove. Killzone does.

Both iterations of Halo have been AAA, Killzone 1 was a 6.9.

LMAO :lol: Oh Star Wars 3 was good. :D

[QUOTE="ScrunchMuppet"]

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

jiggawho2006

so by your logic, playstation 3 sucks, because it's 3

Why didn't I think of that?

I guess that means that the ps3 and the xbox 360 both suck right?

But wait wii rymes with three! I guess they all suck! ;)

Since when was Empire strikes back the peoples favourite star wars? everyone hated the ending, ala Halo 2.

braydee1234

Actually Empire has always been the general publics favorite star wars movie......... and the ending was one of the best in any movie ever...........

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]By the way - Killzone PS3 is considered Killzone 3. (Guerilla even said Killzone: Liberation is the second game, and Killzone PS3 is Killzone 3)ball_of_air

If that's the case,thenyour logic indicates that GTAlV is considered Grand Theft Auto 9. You could also say,"Oh, but Vice City was the forth GTA so I'm going to call it GTAlV".:roll:

No, thats not my logic. You're putting words in my mouth. :|

Liberation was apart of the Killzone canon. It is not a spin off or anything, but an actual sequel to Killzone. Thus, Guerilla refers to Liberation as Killzone 2.

GTA VC and SA on the otherhand, were spin offs.

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]By the way - Killzone PS3 is considered Killzone 3. (Guerilla even said Killzone: Liberation is the second game, and Killzone PS3 is Killzone 3)ball_of_air

If that's the case,thenyour logic indicates that GTAlV is considered Grand Theft Auto 9. You could also say,"Oh, but Vice City was the forth GTA so I'm going to call it GTAlV".:roll:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killzone_liberation

KZ: L is the second game chronologicly.

I guess that means that the ps3 and the xbox 360 both suck right?

But wait wii rymes with three! I guess they all suck!

zerooslo7990

I guess that means that the ps3 and the xbox 360 both suck right?

But wait wii rymes with three! I guess they all suck!

zerooslo7990

Actually thats really stupid even based on his logic,

LOL!! Dude, you do realize spider man 3 broke like... all the records for sales?ko_threat

WHAT???????? PIRATES 3 Was AWESOME!:evil:rey06

no it wasn't i had no idea what was going on the entire time. It wasnt a bad movie but certainly not a good one either. It was

talking-fighting-new pirate-talking-fighting-sailing-talking-fighting-sailing-talking-secret ending meanwhile you undersatnd nothing

still halo3>killzone2

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

A group of intelligent people don't run out of ideas. Halo 3 developer team knows what they are doing.

[QUOTE="zerooslo7990"]

I guess that means that the ps3 and the xbox 360 both suck right?

But wait wii rymes with three! I guess they all suck!

Sir_Marwin

Like Wii is the third Nintendo console. :roll:

See what I did there?

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

So maybe the film industry isnt a perfect parallel but its certinally accurate. Killzone 2 means that the developers can learn from KIllzone 1s mistakes and make a better game, whereas Halo 3 developers will become complacent and run out of ideas.

My money is on Killzone 2.

ScrunchMuppet

Which all made a boatload of cash on their first weekends. Also, didn't MGS and Ratchet and Clank get big acclaim for their 3rd games?

EDIT: Ooops, MGS and R&C didn't score higher with their 3rd games than their 2nd, but they didn't drop bigtime like Shrek & Spidey (the 2nd Pirates wasn't very acclaimed by critics either).

Okay, Halo 1 and Halo 2 may have sold loads and be critically acclaimed but...it's the unlucky number 3. Have you been to the cinema recently? Shrek 3. Spiderman 3. Pirates 3. However, sequels are always sucsesful - Godfather 2, Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 2...

ScrunchMuppet

Ever hear of a little movie called Speed 2: Cruise Control?

No, thats not my logic. You're putting words in my mouth. :|

Liberation was apart of the Killzone canon. It is not a spin off or anything, but an actual sequel to Killzone. Thus, Guerilla refers to Liberation as Killzone 2.

GTA VC and SA on the otherhand, were spin offs.

Not-A-Stalker

You're talking absolute nonsense. Vice City was the fully-fledged sequel to GTAIII. San Andreas was the sequel to Vice City. And GTAIV is the sequel to San Andreas. None of them are "spin-offs". A spin-off is smaller project spawned from a larger one.

GTA on the PSP could be described as a spin-off. And Liberation on the PSP, is a spin-off. Simple as that. It's killzone, watered down to something playable on a handheld.