lets not start this chain of events again.......I'm not gonna lie, I just read all of the responses since I've been away, and I have yet to see 1 single person list 1 single valid advantage that the 360 controller has over the DualShock 3. The only 2 things I have seen are people saying they think the 360 controller is more comfortable, which is completely subjective and modified by individual bias, and the other being that people like the triggers more, which is also completely subjective modified by individual bias.
This far into the thread, no one has listed 1 single objective advantage that the 360 controller has over the DualShock 3.
The Dualshock 3 has all of the objective advantages.
- Better battery in the DualShock 3 (Lithium Ion) vs the 360 controller (Nickel Metal Hydride). The DualShock 3 battery also comes standard, not as a $20 add-on.
- Not only does the DualShock 3 come with a better battery as standard than the 360 controller aftermarket battery, but the DualShock 3 lithium ion battery also offers more playtime than the nickel metal hydride 360 controller's alternative.
- The charging cable for the DualShock 3 is a universal USB cable, whereas the 360 controller uses a proprietary cable.
- Sixaxis technology is in the DualShock 3 and completely absent in the 360 controller. The 360 controller also offers no alternative.
- All buttons on the DualShock 3 are analog/pressure sensitive. Triangle, Circle, Square, L1, R1, Select, Start, as well as the D-Pad are all analog/pressure sensitive. Every button on the 360 controller is digital, and lacks analog/pressure sensitivity, including the D-Pad.
- The DualShock 3 features finer analog sensitivity than the 360 controller, increased to 10-bit precision from the 8-bit precision of the 360 controller. The DualShock 3 controller also uses both analog and digital signals simultaneously at all times during gameplay, while the 360 controller does not. 8-bit analog precision technology that the 360 controller uses is very dated, and was used in last generation controllers.
- The Bluetooth wireless technology used in the DualShock 3 is newer, more expensive, and more advanced than the proprietary wireless 2.4GHz protocol used for the 360 controller. Bluetooth also eliminates interference which would otherwise be troublesome when using the 360's alternative.
- The D-Pad on the DualShock 3 works, while the D-Pad on the 360 controller does not work.
I'd say it is also worth mentioning that the DualShock 3 is a cooler name than Xbox 360 controller. The 360 controller just can't catch a break, can it?
So, can anyone list me an objective advantage that the 360 controller has over the DualShock 3? Because all I've seen so far has been just a bunch of subjective, biased opinions from people who probably don't even have a PS3. Where are the objective arguments? Things like comfort which are entirely subjective are useless arguments because that's all in the eye of the beholder. Just as many people think the PS3 controller is more comfortable, and comfort is all a matter of opinion which is heavily swayed by individual preference and bias.
I'll come back in an hour or 2 and see if anyone has contributed a single objective advantage for the 360 controller, which if it hasn't happened yet, I doubt it will ever happen.
arkephonic
Log in to comment