LIVE Activity, Halo Reach, bomba?

Ok, everyone stop.

Halo: Reach has been the #1 most played game on xbox live since it's release date on Sept. 14, 2010.

Bungie even has a post dedicated to it on their webpage saying "we do know that last week's numbers were well off the mark due to what's now being called a "manual reporting error."

And.

"Our sources tell us that we've been the number one title on Xbox LIVE for the last seven days. You complete us."

Here you go.

And here are some more Halo: Reach specific numbers from week-one that are just all kinds of kick ass in their own right:

• 70 Million+ Games have been played
• 235 Million+ Player-Games have been played
• 2 Million+ Files have been uploaded to File Shares
• 5,901 man-years have been spent in online Reach games (sorry, Corporate America!)
• 20 Million Daily challenges have been completed
• 709,840 Weekly challenges have been completed
• 165 Billion Credits have been earnedUltimately, Halo: Reach's online population for the first week dwarfed Halo 3's by comparison, snagging four times the number of total unique users and decimating Halo 3's all time high of concurrent users by more than 65%.

I wasn't asking about now i ask him how many players did Halo Reach got its first 24 hours the first day not now,now i know what it has i own the game and i can see that stat on the net.

Also why would i weep.?

MW2 is almost a 1 year old game,for sure Halo Reach will beat it,but to see how strong it really is we most wait until COD black ops release to see if it can actually hold its place.

Eltormo

You would weep because I've been skimming your highly arrogant posts, and you lack data to back up your claims. Let's make this simple. Twice as many people are currently playing Reach as MW2. The list that this troll thread provided is a load of crap, and fanboys have spun it's innaccurate data in order to claim ownage on Reach.

Reach just owned these fanboys. What now?

Xbox 360 Top LIVE Titles (based on UU's)
1 Modern Warfare 2
2 Halo 3
3 Halo: Reach
4 Call of Duty: WaW
5 Call of Duty 4
6 Mafia II Playable Demo
7 GTA IV
8 Red Dead Redemption
9 Gears of War 2
10 FIFA 10

Source.

loco145

Major Nelson

http://majornelson.com/archive/2010/09/23/live-activity-list-update.aspx

Yesterday I posted theTOP LIVE Activity listwhich I have since learned contained a manual error in the reporting data for the week of September 13th.

I have just the list but I also wanted to share an interesting data point: (that has been double checked)Halo: Reachwas the number one game on Xbox LIVE for the past seven days and had nearly four times as many unique users playing the game on Xbox LIVE vs.Halo 3for the week of Sept. 13.

You do know that's before the game was even offically released? Wait for next week and youll see what happens.

Cloud567kar

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

I wasn't asking about now i ask him how many players did Halo Reach got its first 24 hours the first day not now,now i know what it has i own the game and i can see that stat on the net.

Also why would i weep.?

MW2 is almost a 1 year old game,for sure Halo Reach will beat it,but to see how strong it really is we most wait until COD black ops release to see if it can actually hold its place.

Eltormo

You would weep because I've been skimming your highly arrogant posts, and you lack data to back up your claims. Let's make this simple. Twice as many people are currently playing Reach as MW2. The list that this troll thread provided is a load of crap, and fanboys have spun it's innaccurate data in order to claim ownage on Reach.

Reach just owned these fanboys. What now?

What arrogant post i ask him for Halo Rach first 24 hours of unique user and you reply with current data is not my fault you did not read my complete post dude,data to back what up.?

Reach owned no one dude stop been desilutional,i even stated that 700,000 was incredibly good,oh wait i also say that Halo Reach would beat MW2 next week as well.

What arrogant post i ask him for Halo Rach first 24 hours of unique user and you reply with current data is not my fault you did not read my complete post dude,data to back what up.?

Reach owned no one dude stop been desilutional,i even stated that 700,000 was incredibly good,oh wait i also say that Halo Reach would beat MW2 next week as well.

Eltormo

"on 360 MW2 easy get probably from half a million to close to a million i dare say." False

"i dare say that doring peak hours MW2 on 360 should be getting no less than 1 million players or at leas 900,000 for sure." False

"If i were you i would back up now silently .haha" Arrogance

---

So, you did nothing more than provide anecdotal evidence, which in the end was highly innacurate. Just like the numbers that spawned this thread.

At best, you provided proof that MW2 had 400k players online, yet made claims that it was no less than 900k on 360. No proof provided on your part. I just proved that MW2 was at 220k at peak hours, while Reach was at 500k+. Who's the one who should really be backing out silently? I doubt that will happen though.

LOL. The numbers TC used were bunk. Reach is top dog. Too bad for the haterz.

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

What arrogant post i ask him for Halo Rach first 24 hours of unique user and you reply with current data is not my fault you did not read my complete post dude,data to back what up.?

Reach owned no one dude stop been desilutional,i even stated that 700,000 was incredibly good,oh wait i also say that Halo Reach would beat MW2 next week as well.

gamecubepad

"on 360 MW2 easy get probably from half a million to close to a million i dare say." False

"i dare say that doring peak hours MW2 on 360 should be getting no less than 1 million players or at leas 900,000 for sure." False

"If i were you i would back up now silently .haha" Arrogance

---

So, you did nothing more than provide anecdotal evidence, which in the end was highly innacurate. Just like the numbers that spawned this thread.

At best, you provided proof that MW2 had 400k players online, yet made claims that it was no less than 900k on 360. No proof provided on your part. I just proved that MW2 was at 220k at peak hours, while Reach was at 500k+. Who's the one who should really be backing out silently? I doubt that will happen though.

LOL. The numbers TC used were bunk. Reach is top dog. Too bad for the haterz.

Firts up you quoted different parts from different post how picky.

Second you posted a picture to something that show some numbers on MW2 but the picture doesn't even show the xbox controller letters like B or A which will completely distint it from the PS3 version no live logo nothing,so why focus on just a small part down.?

But if that is really the case i was wrong dude,but you know what i find that so impossible to believe because you people always say that live games had bigger communities than PS3 ones on the same version of games,isn't that the whole complain always that PS3 games had small communities and low numbers.?

If those numbers for MW2 you posted are correct that would mean that MW2 on PSN>> MW2 on live for sure which i find incredibly hard to believe do to the fact that MW2 has been the most played live game since it launch until now and taking into account the MW2 sold almost double on 360 as well.

Your screen show 223,000 + player for MW2 on live right.?

This a picture i just take from MW2 on PSN now it show 293,000+ players 60,000+ more player on PS3 playing MW2 than on xbox live.? that doesn't add up.

Firts up you quoted different parts from different post how picky.

Second you posted a picture to something that show some numbers on MW2 but the picture doesn't even show the xbox controller letters like B or A which will completely distint it from the PS3 version no live logo nothing,so why focus on just a small part down.?

But if that is really the case i was wrong dude,but you know what i find that so impossible to believe because you people always say that live games had bigger communities than PS3 ones on the same version of games,isn't that the whole complain always that PS3 games had small communities and low numbers.?

If those numbers for MW2 you posted are correct that would mean that MW2 on PSN>> MW2 on live for sure which i find incredibly hard to believe do to the fact that MW2 has been the most played live game since it launch until now and taking into account the MW2 sold almost double on 360 as well.

Your screen show 223,000 + player for MW2 on live right.?

This a picture i just take from MW2 on PSN now it show 293,000+ players 60,000+ more player on PS3 playing MW2 than on xbox live.? that doesn't add up.

Eltormo

Alright. First off, sorry about my harsh overtone. I'm trying to get away from that sort of attitude.

Here's the dealy-o:

-The only numbers I can find for MW2 sales data show the 360 at 11.59million, and the PS3 at 8.59million. That's a difference of 3 million.

-I took the screenshot up close on my 2MP cell phone camera, then I cropped it to fit nicely along with the Reach data.

-It's very simple why the numbers for MW2 are down, and below MW2 on PS3. What game just came out on 360, but not PS3, and is causing users to migrate from MW2? I'm sure you know the answer to this one.

---

Anyway, I should have been more civil about the situation. Sorry man. Nonetheless, the numbers TC used were junk, Reach has been #1 on Live for 7 days according to Bungie. Simple as that.

The list cant be right. MW2 hovers around 150,000-200,000 nowadays, Reach has been hitting around 1 million people online, even at 4am in the morning it has 300,000 players online...

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

Firts up you quoted different parts from different post how picky.

Second you posted a picture to something that show some numbers on MW2 but the picture doesn't even show the xbox controller letters like B or A which will completely distint it from the PS3 version no live logo nothing,so why focus on just a small part down.?

But if that is really the case i was wrong dude,but you know what i find that so impossible to believe because you people always say that live games had bigger communities than PS3 ones on the same version of games,isn't that the whole complain always that PS3 games had small communities and low numbers.?

If those numbers for MW2 you posted are correct that would mean that MW2 on PSN>> MW2 on live for sure which i find incredibly hard to believe do to the fact that MW2 has been the most played live game since it launch until now and taking into account the MW2 sold almost double on 360 as well.

Your screen show 223,000 + player for MW2 on live right.?

This a picture i just take from MW2 on PSN now it show 293,000+ players 60,000+ more player on PS3 playing MW2 than on xbox live.? that doesn't add up.

gamecubepad

Alright. First off, sorry about my harsh overtone. I'm trying to get away from that sort of attitude.

Here's the dealy-o:

-The only numbers I can find for MW2 sales data show the 360 at 11.59million, and the PS3 at 8.59million. That's a difference of 3 million.

-I took the screenshot up close on my 2MP cell phone camera, then I cropped it to fit nicely along with the Reach data.

-It's very simple why the numbers for MW2 are down, and below MW2 on PS3. What game just came out on 360, but not PS3, and is causing users to migrate from MW2? I'm sure you know the answer to this one.

---

Anyway, I should have been more civil about the situation. Sorry man. Nonetheless, the numbers TC used were junk, Reach has been #1 on Live for 7 days according to Bungie. Simple as that.

No need to be sorry i also got carry away,the true is Reach is a great game with great numbers no shame to say it,now back to play some firefight..:D