[QUOTE="Peredith"][QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]the Catalyst reminds me of the Architect in the Matrix sequels. It was stupid then, and not only is it stupid now but it is also unoriginal. Those matrix sequels were bad movies too so I don't get why video games are copying them. Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 2, probably the next Dead Space too.texasgoldrush
The Catalyst is nothing like the Architect. The Architect makes senses, and drops some epic bombshell twists which turn the entire story on it's head.
The Catalyst retconns both Mass Effect 1 and 2s main plot for a nonsensical twist with no foreshadowing, making Sovereign sound like a clueless moron, all in 14 lines of dialog.
Wrong The Catalyst is in itself a plot twist....the MacGuffin turns out to really be the main antagonist. Face it, he does NOT come out of nowhere. He is set up to be the missing piece, the twist is that he was actually the architech of the Reapers. Nevermind that there is NO evidence of any retconning. How is ME2 retconned? BS....it was all a plan to get TIM Reaper tech as well as revealing the desire for the Reapers to target humans for growing more Reapers...WHICH THEY ARE SHOWN TO BE DOING ON EARTH. Nevermind that Shepard and Anderson specifically describe the Citadel on Earth like the Collector Base. Really, there is no proof that Soverign is wrong as well, in fact the very fact that the Reapers can destroy the Crucible AFTER Shepard talks with the Catalyst proves that Reapers do act undependantly, as Soverign said in ME1.Tex....I haveto ask you this...What proof is there that the star child is real?
Log in to comment