Megaton - Read Dead Redemption officially added to Xbone BC in a few days

  • 172 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101  Edited By dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

Sales for the game on Amazon increased by 8,206% after this announcement, now I don't know what it was selling previously, but an eight thousand plus percent increase in sales is pretty insane.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

@kingtito said:

No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.

No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?

They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.

Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.

Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?

See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol

So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol

You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?

Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

No wait wait ....

Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

OMFG...lol

Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..

MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.

Now lets move to PSN NOw.

Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.

Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.

But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103  Edited By dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

@tormentos said:
@kingtito said:

No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.

No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?

They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.

Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.

Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?

See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol

So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol

You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?

Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

No wait wait ....

Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

OMFG...lol

Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..

MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.

Now lets move to PSN NOw.

Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.

Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.

But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.

Dial it back a notch, the guy wrote a few sentences and you decided to write a novel.

Ain't nobody got time for that...

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#104 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

@navyguy21 said:
@MirkoS77 said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Wait, does this mean the framerate issues are gone??

Anyone know the answer to this? Does emulation resolve technical limitations of previous hardware?

It would depend on the emulation software. Really good software........like PCSX2 or NullDC.........will of course iron out issues because of the hardware underneath. XB1 has an issue because of the processor speed being 1.75, about half of what 360's was. This is why CPU heavy games like Gears and Halo tend to slow down on BC and GPU heavy games are ironed out.

TL:DR: It depends on the hardware and software the emulator is running on.........and in XB1s case whether the game is CPU or GPU heavy

Thanks. So what do you see RDR being, more CPU or GPU dependent?

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#105 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17931 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:
@navyguy21 said:
@MirkoS77 said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Wait, does this mean the framerate issues are gone??

Anyone know the answer to this? Does emulation resolve technical limitations of previous hardware?

It would depend on the emulation software. Really good software........like PCSX2 or NullDC.........will of course iron out issues because of the hardware underneath. XB1 has an issue because of the processor speed being 1.75, about half of what 360's was. This is why CPU heavy games like Gears and Halo tend to slow down on BC and GPU heavy games are ironed out.

TL:DR: It depends on the hardware and software the emulator is running on.........and in XB1s case whether the game is CPU or GPU heavy

Thanks. So what do you see RDR being, more CPU or GPU dependent?

Normally, RAGE engine tends to be more CPU intensive due to many NPCs, cars, AI, flying/driving fast, etc. Id imagine RDR would be the one RAGE game that doesnt push the CPU since there isnt much of that in the game. Seems like, if anything, it would be a balance, maybe leaning towards GPU.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@tormentos said:
@kingtito said:

No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.

No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?

They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.

Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.

Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?

See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol

So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol

You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?

Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

No wait wait ....

Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

OMFG...lol

Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..

MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.

Now lets move to PSN NOw.

Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.

Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.

But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.

Meltdown complete hahaha you're such a clown...go buy a PS4 and play some of these great exclusives you talk about.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24532 Posts

Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...

Want new things people.

Avatar image for remiks00
remiks00

4249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#108 remiks00
Member since 2006 • 4249 Posts

@TheEroica said:

Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...

Want new things people.

I agree.

This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#109 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@remiks00 said:
@TheEroica said:

Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...

Want new things people.

I agree.

This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.

Well, I have red dead redemption digitally, which means i will be able to play it on my xboxone, and I played some dark souls I on my xboxone just a couple of hours ago.

It may not be the best thing ever, but it sure is a lot better than not having it lol

Avatar image for deactivated-60c3d23d2738e
deactivated-60c3d23d2738e

3934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-60c3d23d2738e
Member since 2009 • 3934 Posts

@tormentos said:
@magicalclick said:

Interestingly the DLC combo is now ranked 26 on game category on Amazon reported by Polygon. It is selling better than expected.

Lemmings are re buying this for xbox one,quite a shocker after all the cries about double dip on sony side supposedly for PSN Now.

Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.

Avatar image for Fuhrer_D
Fuhrer_D

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Fuhrer_D
Member since 2011 • 1136 Posts

Never played it, my buddies always recommended it, so I picked it up today for $7.49.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

@sleepnsurf said:

Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.

The PS3 version was 640p the xbox 360 version 720p that is nothing compare to 1080p vs 900p or 1080p vs 720p like some extreme cases on xbox one vs PS4.

@dynamitecop said:

Dial it back a notch, the guy wrote a few sentences and you decided to write a novel.

Ain't nobody got time for that...

You mean like when you wrote a complete trilogy trying to prove Quantum Break wasn't a 77 game.?

@kingtito said:

Meltdown complete hahaha you're such a clown...go buy a PS4 and play some of these great exclusives you talk about.

No you are and considering that i have you on quote comparing PSN Now with the rip off that was xbox live is complete joke,no wonder you make a small sentence and ran away..lol

Whats next live fee compare to electricity bill.? lol

Avatar image for mark1974
mark1974

4261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 mark1974
Member since 2015 • 4261 Posts

@sleepnsurf said:
@tormentos said:
@magicalclick said:

Interestingly the DLC combo is now ranked 26 on game category on Amazon reported by Polygon. It is selling better than expected.

Lemmings are re buying this for xbox one,quite a shocker after all the cries about double dip on sony side supposedly for PSN Now.

Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.

I would kill for a NES version of Red Dead! I was fine with the PS3 version. Maybe because the NES is my favorite system ever.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22687 Posts

@commander said:
@remiks00 said:
@TheEroica said:

Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...

Want new things people.

I agree.

This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.

Well, I have red dead redemption digitally, which means i will be able to play it on my xboxone, and I played some dark souls I on my xboxone just a couple of hours ago.

It may not be the best thing ever, but it sure is a lot better than not having it lol

Definitely.

Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

Heads up: RDR DLC are free right now, not the Undead one though.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#116 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts

Clock struck midnight and there she was in ready to download cue. Havent played it in 5 years or so. Going to be good. Thank you R* and MS

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

I'm not able to buy the game, wtf? Tells me to try again later, very nice...

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#118 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

Anybody know how the game runs?

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:

Anybody know how the game runs?

Downloading now, surprised it was so cheap, thought it would be like 19 euros or something. Couldn't buy it directly from Xbone though, had to use my PC, wonder what that was all about.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts

@MirkoS77: Absolutely fine, so far. Still looks good.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#121 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

Yea, I'm too lazy to hook up my 360 in comparison, but from what I've seen so far it's really smooth. Playing great!

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49071 Posts

Downloading right now ^^

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#123 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@Epak_ said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Anybody know how the game runs?

Downloading now, surprised it was so cheap, thought it would be like 19 euros or something. Couldn't buy it directly from Xbone though, had to use my PC, wonder what that was all about.

@freedomfreak said:

@MirkoS77: Absolutely fine, so far. Still looks good.

damn , just started the game and played like for 20 minutes, amazing how well this game holds up. What rockstar did back in 2009 is no short of revolutionary. But apart from the graphics, the atmosphere that this game has is simply stellar, I know what I'll be playing the next couple of days, or heck maybe weeks.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#124  Edited By MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?

Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49071 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:

Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?

Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.

Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#126 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?

Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.

Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.

I think that's the case for all x360 bc games.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#127 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?

Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.

Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.

Yea don't mind that too much, I just remember that it was only possible to save at houses (and campfires). For some reason I thought it was just going into the menu at any time.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#128  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries said:

https://m.facebook.com/?_rdr#!/rockstargames/photos/a.10150126067600097.319350.51752540096/10154228517790097/?type=3

Rock star just announced it on their official Facebook.

Game over, cows, you just got rekt. One of the best games of last generation now playable on Xbone and a superior version at that, as opposed to your lousy less than 600p sub-HD stuttering mess with inferior antialiasing.

Wow , a last generation game that 95% of all consolites , i repeat , ALL already played coming to X1 . Ill go buy one now !!! lol....

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Had to have been posted with sarcasm. A game, any game, joining the bc list isn't in the same stratosphere as a "megaton" sort of announcement. Now if ya said that a new game in the series was a Xbox exclusive that would qualify.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#130 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

RDR one the Bone is a marked improvement over the 360 in terms of framerate, it really is. I'm having a blast playing this without having it look like it's being dragged through mud at certain spots that plagued the 360 version.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49071 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:

Yea don't mind that too much, I just remember that it was only possible to save at houses (and campfires). For some reason I thought it was just going into the menu at any time.

Yup, every GTA before GTA V only allowed you to save at certain locations. (I count RDR as GTA here :p)

In fact GTA: The lost and Damned was the first GTA that had mission checkpoints, before you had to start the mission from scratch if you failed or died.

And GTA 2 had you pay 500.000 dollars if you want to save xD

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#132 Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

@MirkoS77: That's cool that it runs better....honestly with how well the GTA5 remasters have been selling on current gen consoles, I'm surprised they didn't come out with a RDR remaster and instead let it come to BC first. Gonna try it tonight

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133  Edited By Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

@commander said:
@Epak_ said:
@MirkoS77 said:

Anybody know how the game runs?

Downloading now, surprised it was so cheap, thought it would be like 19 euros or something. Couldn't buy it directly from Xbone though, had to use my PC, wonder what that was all about.

@freedomfreak said:

@MirkoS77: Absolutely fine, so far. Still looks good.

damn , just started the game and played like for 20 minutes, amazing how well this game holds up. What rockstar did back in 2009 is no short of revolutionary. But apart from the graphics, the atmosphere that this game has is simply stellar, I know what I'll be playing the next couple of days, or heck maybe weeks.

Seemed to run fine, but it has to wait since I just got Tomb Raider (yay).

Edit: TR ****** hard crashed on me, couldn't load my save, had to uninstall it. Just read about a backup save trick, oh well... now I know. It's been a rocky start for me with the Bone.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45472 Posts

with the Ultimate Sale going on, the game is only $7.50, a bargain for maybe one of the best games to grace consoles last gen, so far the performance is excellent, I've just started so it hasn't been put to the test in some stressful scenarios yet but I've heard from others it has been performing admirably

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts

@lamprey263: There's a stress test video and it's a solid 30FPS. And all screen tearing is gone.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#136 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45472 Posts

@freedomfreak: yeah, looks like it performs even better than Xbox 360, wasn't expecting that

Loading Video...

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60831 Posts

Might have to play it again.

Avatar image for I_AM_MEGATRON
I_AM_MEGATRON

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 I_AM_MEGATRON
Member since 2008 • 427 Posts

final nails in the ps4's coffin

LMAO

Avatar image for Kruiz_Bathory
Kruiz_Bathory

4765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#139 Kruiz_Bathory
Member since 2009 • 4765 Posts

I hope Rock Star San Diego makes another great game. Talented team and they shan't forget to put fun things to do.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49071 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

@lamprey263: There's a stress test video and it's a solid 30FPS. And all screen tearing is gone.

Since there is no PC version, this seems to be the best on offer.

I'm gonna clear some games first, then go and replay Red Dead Redemption ^^

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts
@I_AM_MEGATRON said:

final nails in the ps4's coffin

LMAO

Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#142  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@Epak_ said:
@I_AM_MEGATRON said:

final nails in the ps4's coffin

LMAO

Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).

hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,

do I need to go on?

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#143 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

@commander said:
@Epak_ said:
@I_AM_MEGATRON said:

final nails in the ps4's coffin

LMAO

Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).

hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,

do I need to go on?

With a 20 million console lead, please, go on. My Xbox will be used for the few console exclusives it has (since I don't have Windows 10), BC and movies ( love the rentals). No reason to buy 3rd party games for it, since they run/look worse than the competition and none of my friends actually have an Xbone either.

Besides, Scorpio is what, almost a year and a half away, I don't have the patience for that. I don't even want to think about the NX and it comes way sooner than the Scorpio.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#144 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts
@Epak_ said:
@commander said:
@Epak_ said:
@I_AM_MEGATRON said:

final nails in the ps4's coffin

LMAO

Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).

hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,

do I need to go on?

With a 20 million console lead, please, go on. My Xbox will be used for the few console exclusives it has (since I don't have Windows 10), BC and movies ( love the rentals). No reason to buy 3rd party games for it, since they run/look worse than the competition and none of my friends actually have an Xbone either.

Besides, Scorpio is what, almost a year and a half away, I don't have the patience for that. I don't even want to think about the NX and it comes way sooner than the Scorpio.

If you go by that reasoning then the wii was the best console last gen.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

@commander said:

If you go by that reasoning then the wii was the best console last gen.

Well it sold more and had some of the highest rated exclusive for any console is hard argue it wasn't.

@R4gn4r0k said:
@freedomfreak said:

@lamprey263: There's a stress test video and it's a solid 30FPS. And all screen tearing is gone.

Since there is no PC version, this seems to be the best on offer.

I'm gonna clear some games first, then go and replay Red Dead Redemption ^^

Hahahaaha... When you have nothing anything sure seems great..

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#146 tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

"megaton"

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#147 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@tormentos said:
@commander said:

If you go by that reasoning then the wii was the best console last gen.

Well it sold more and had some of the highest rated exclusive for any console is hard argue it wasn't.

So the wii was the best console last gen

ok then my answer is this

pigs can fly

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148  Edited By tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

@commander said:

So the wii was the best console last gen

ok then my answer is this

pigs can fly

Sold better had higher rated games.

Hell Mario kart sold like 40 million copies it outsold,Halo 3,Gears 1,Forza 3,Uncharted 1 and Resistance 1 put together.

So is hard to argue again i say.

It got more sales and higher rated games.

The only place were the wii loss is multiplatforms.

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

@commander: Well the HD twins sure couldn't beat it.