Sales for the game on Amazon increased by 8,206% after this announcement, now I don't know what it was selling previously, but an eight thousand plus percent increase in sales is pretty insane.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sales for the game on Amazon increased by 8,206% after this announcement, now I don't know what it was selling previously, but an eight thousand plus percent increase in sales is pretty insane.
No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.
No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?
They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.
Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.
Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?
See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol
So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol
You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?
Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
No wait wait ....
Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
OMFG...lol
Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..
MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.
Now lets move to PSN NOw.
Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.
Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.
But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.
No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.
No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?
They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.
Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.
Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?
See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol
So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol
You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?
Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
No wait wait ....
Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
OMFG...lol
Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..
MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.
Now lets move to PSN NOw.
Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.
Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.
But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.
Dial it back a notch, the guy wrote a few sentences and you decided to write a novel.
Ain't nobody got time for that...
Wait, does this mean the framerate issues are gone??
Anyone know the answer to this? Does emulation resolve technical limitations of previous hardware?
It would depend on the emulation software. Really good software........like PCSX2 or NullDC.........will of course iron out issues because of the hardware underneath. XB1 has an issue because of the processor speed being 1.75, about half of what 360's was. This is why CPU heavy games like Gears and Halo tend to slow down on BC and GPU heavy games are ironed out.
TL:DR: It depends on the hardware and software the emulator is running on.........and in XB1s case whether the game is CPU or GPU heavy
Thanks. So what do you see RDR being, more CPU or GPU dependent?
Wait, does this mean the framerate issues are gone??
Anyone know the answer to this? Does emulation resolve technical limitations of previous hardware?
It would depend on the emulation software. Really good software........like PCSX2 or NullDC.........will of course iron out issues because of the hardware underneath. XB1 has an issue because of the processor speed being 1.75, about half of what 360's was. This is why CPU heavy games like Gears and Halo tend to slow down on BC and GPU heavy games are ironed out.
TL:DR: It depends on the hardware and software the emulator is running on.........and in XB1s case whether the game is CPU or GPU heavy
Thanks. So what do you see RDR being, more CPU or GPU dependent?
Normally, RAGE engine tends to be more CPU intensive due to many NPCs, cars, AI, flying/driving fast, etc. Id imagine RDR would be the one RAGE game that doesnt push the CPU since there isnt much of that in the game. Seems like, if anything, it would be a balance, maybe leaning towards GPU.
No, it's Sony's version of BC. They don't want to, can't or simply refuse to have BC on the PS4 and why would they when they have suckers willing to pay for it. It's a money grab from Sony and you know it. Funny how cows except it though when all last gen they cried about MS charging for online. Isn't that the very definition of being a hypocrite? Oh I know, only lems are hypocrites.
No is not QUOTE any sony employee claiming PSN NOW is their version of backward compatibility,how the fu** a Samsung TV which is not a damn console be backward compatible with a Sony console,does Samsung do PS now.? Since when.?
They CANT have backward compatibility because unlike the shitty xbox 360 CPU which the Jaguar inside the xbox one at least can emulate with some problems,there is no fu**ing way in hell that Jaguar inside the PS4 can emulate Cell not way in hell.
Basically all games have to be re write to be make backward compatible and any process ran on Cell would have to be move to the GPU in the PS4,it is like it is and the xbox one can't emulate all games on xbox 360 and many games have performance issues and run slower than on 360 proven already by many DF test.
Second how the fu** you know for what they are paying for.? You can pay for PSN Now and not play a single game you own,and just play one of the hundred of games available,PSN Now is not for the games you own,it work with many games people don't own and many that do,for example there are hundred of games i don't own and never player on PS3,so if i would to pay for it i could play many games i never even touch so how i would be double dipping for a game i never owned or played.?
See this is the hypocrite side i denounce of you lemmings,so when it comes to PS3 every one who pays for PSN NOw is some how double dipping because you know for FACT (pulled out of your behind probably) that every one who is paying own every single game on PSN Now so they all are double dipping..lol
So if you didn't own a PS3 ever and you get a Samsung TV and can have PS NOw how is that double dipping.? Oh wait i get it Samsung TV have always being compatible with PS consoles because Samsung TV are consoles right..lol
You are comparing paying for ONLINE PLAY vs PSN NOW..?
Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
No wait wait ....
Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
OMFG...lol
Please tell me before MS charged for online play who charged for it.? Online play was totally free on PC,DC,PS2,PS3,GC,Wii,Wii U,DS,PSP,3DS,Vita basically in every platforms that supports online play it was free even on freaking Cell phones and some games even have cross platform play Between Ios and Android free..
MS was the one who charged now for 3 generations,sony is charging now which is just as bad but can't you even lift the finger at them after you people defend live for 2 generations.? Because i certainly can complain about how dirty the move was,and i can say it like i have that i mounted a PC just to play multiplatforms because of sony charging for online play.
Now lets move to PSN NOw.
Please link me to the rental services that rented games free to any one.
Bloockbuster use to charged $4 dollars here for 3 days,gamefly charge a monthly fee,small video stores use to charge as well,so how the fu** you compare PSN NOW which is a rental service since you don't own any game or buy it,with live which was an still is a dirty toll both to charge get more out of people,the first 2 generations is was basically P2P in almost every game,using your own connection and platforms and you payed for that shit,when sony had more games on dedicated servers and free,is the reason why you didn't see 60 players online on xbox live unless it was a game from a 3rd party with dedicated servers,or 8 players co-op like Resistance 2 use to do,you didn't see games as Mag on xbox 360 because it was mostly P2P and for that crap you pay $50 then $60.
But again and since i proved by your reply you people sure have some very sad double standards.
Meltdown complete hahaha you're such a clown...go buy a PS4 and play some of these great exclusives you talk about.
Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...
Want new things people.
I agree.
This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.
Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...
Want new things people.
I agree.
This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.
Well, I have red dead redemption digitally, which means i will be able to play it on my xboxone, and I played some dark souls I on my xboxone just a couple of hours ago.
It may not be the best thing ever, but it sure is a lot better than not having it lol
Interestingly the DLC combo is now ranked 26 on game category on Amazon reported by Polygon. It is selling better than expected.
Lemmings are re buying this for xbox one,quite a shocker after all the cries about double dip on sony side supposedly for PSN Now.
Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.
Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.
The PS3 version was 640p the xbox 360 version 720p that is nothing compare to 1080p vs 900p or 1080p vs 720p like some extreme cases on xbox one vs PS4.
Dial it back a notch, the guy wrote a few sentences and you decided to write a novel.
Ain't nobody got time for that...
You mean like when you wrote a complete trilogy trying to prove Quantum Break wasn't a 77 game.?
Meltdown complete hahaha you're such a clown...go buy a PS4 and play some of these great exclusives you talk about.
No you are and considering that i have you on quote comparing PSN Now with the rip off that was xbox live is complete joke,no wonder you make a small sentence and ran away..lol
Whats next live fee compare to electricity bill.? lol
Interestingly the DLC combo is now ranked 26 on game category on Amazon reported by Polygon. It is selling better than expected.
Lemmings are re buying this for xbox one,quite a shocker after all the cries about double dip on sony side supposedly for PSN Now.
Not to mention the PS3 version of the game was vastly inferior. Didn't even play at 720p. Game looked like a NES game on the PS3.
I would kill for a NES version of Red Dead! I was fine with the PS3 version. Maybe because the NES is my favorite system ever.
Everytime I see a thread where a fanboy of a respective console holds a last gen or later game up as a reason why their console is better, I, along with the dynamic Era of gaming as I once knew it dies a little more...
Want new things people.
I agree.
This was not even close to being a "Megaton". What a joke.
Well, I have red dead redemption digitally, which means i will be able to play it on my xboxone, and I played some dark souls I on my xboxone just a couple of hours ago.
It may not be the best thing ever, but it sure is a lot better than not having it lol
Definitely.
Clock struck midnight and there she was in ready to download cue. Havent played it in 5 years or so. Going to be good. Thank you R* and MS
Anybody know how the game runs?
Downloading now, surprised it was so cheap, thought it would be like 19 euros or something. Couldn't buy it directly from Xbone though, had to use my PC, wonder what that was all about.
@MirkoS77: Absolutely fine, so far. Still looks good.
damn , just started the game and played like for 20 minutes, amazing how well this game holds up. What rockstar did back in 2009 is no short of revolutionary. But apart from the graphics, the atmosphere that this game has is simply stellar, I know what I'll be playing the next couple of days, or heck maybe weeks.
Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?
Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.
Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?
Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.
Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.
Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?
Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.
Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.
I think that's the case for all x360 bc games.
Game's great, framerate's much better, but I could've sworn there was a way to make manual saves on the 360. Now it appears it only cloud saves?? I can find no manual save option. This seriously blows. Why am I not allowed to save locally if I want to continue my game from a particular point?
Edit: never mind, I forgot I have to save at a safe house.
Yeah but even if you save manually, the game only saves in the cloud it seems.
Yea don't mind that too much, I just remember that it was only possible to save at houses (and campfires). For some reason I thought it was just going into the menu at any time.
https://m.facebook.com/?_rdr#!/rockstargames/photos/a.10150126067600097.319350.51752540096/10154228517790097/?type=3
Rock star just announced it on their official Facebook.
Game over, cows, you just got rekt. One of the best games of last generation now playable on Xbone and a superior version at that, as opposed to your lousy less than 600p sub-HD stuttering mess with inferior antialiasing.
Wow , a last generation game that 95% of all consolites , i repeat , ALL already played coming to X1 . Ill go buy one now !!! lol....
Had to have been posted with sarcasm. A game, any game, joining the bc list isn't in the same stratosphere as a "megaton" sort of announcement. Now if ya said that a new game in the series was a Xbox exclusive that would qualify.
Yea don't mind that too much, I just remember that it was only possible to save at houses (and campfires). For some reason I thought it was just going into the menu at any time.
Yup, every GTA before GTA V only allowed you to save at certain locations. (I count RDR as GTA here :p)
In fact GTA: The lost and Damned was the first GTA that had mission checkpoints, before you had to start the mission from scratch if you failed or died.
And GTA 2 had you pay 500.000 dollars if you want to save xD
@MirkoS77: That's cool that it runs better....honestly with how well the GTA5 remasters have been selling on current gen consoles, I'm surprised they didn't come out with a RDR remaster and instead let it come to BC first. Gonna try it tonight
Anybody know how the game runs?
Downloading now, surprised it was so cheap, thought it would be like 19 euros or something. Couldn't buy it directly from Xbone though, had to use my PC, wonder what that was all about.
@MirkoS77: Absolutely fine, so far. Still looks good.
damn , just started the game and played like for 20 minutes, amazing how well this game holds up. What rockstar did back in 2009 is no short of revolutionary. But apart from the graphics, the atmosphere that this game has is simply stellar, I know what I'll be playing the next couple of days, or heck maybe weeks.
Seemed to run fine, but it has to wait since I just got Tomb Raider (yay).
Edit: TR ****** hard crashed on me, couldn't load my save, had to uninstall it. Just read about a backup save trick, oh well... now I know. It's been a rocky start for me with the Bone.
with the Ultimate Sale going on, the game is only $7.50, a bargain for maybe one of the best games to grace consoles last gen, so far the performance is excellent, I've just started so it hasn't been put to the test in some stressful scenarios yet but I've heard from others it has been performing admirably
@freedomfreak: yeah, looks like it performs even better than Xbox 360, wasn't expecting that
I hope Rock Star San Diego makes another great game. Talented team and they shan't forget to put fun things to do.
@lamprey263: There's a stress test video and it's a solid 30FPS. And all screen tearing is gone.
Since there is no PC version, this seems to be the best on offer.
I'm gonna clear some games first, then go and replay Red Dead Redemption ^^
final nails in the ps4's coffin
LMAO
Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).
hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,
do I need to go on?
final nails in the ps4's coffin
LMAO
Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).
hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,
do I need to go on?
With a 20 million console lead, please, go on. My Xbox will be used for the few console exclusives it has (since I don't have Windows 10), BC and movies ( love the rentals). No reason to buy 3rd party games for it, since they run/look worse than the competition and none of my friends actually have an Xbone either.
Besides, Scorpio is what, almost a year and a half away, I don't have the patience for that. I don't even want to think about the NX and it comes way sooner than the Scorpio.
final nails in the ps4's coffin
LMAO
Lol hardly. I do like the BC on the Bone though, just scrolled through some games that are already compatible and I like the fact that they don't price them like Nintendo (19€ for Wii games ffs).
hardly, after the scorpio announcement, rise of tomb raider delay, fallout 4 far harbor performance issues, magic duels and elite dangerous delayed into infinity,
do I need to go on?
With a 20 million console lead, please, go on. My Xbox will be used for the few console exclusives it has (since I don't have Windows 10), BC and movies ( love the rentals). No reason to buy 3rd party games for it, since they run/look worse than the competition and none of my friends actually have an Xbone either.
Besides, Scorpio is what, almost a year and a half away, I don't have the patience for that. I don't even want to think about the NX and it comes way sooner than the Scorpio.
If you go by that reasoning then the wii was the best console last gen.
If you go by that reasoning then the wii was the best console last gen.
Well it sold more and had some of the highest rated exclusive for any console is hard argue it wasn't.
@lamprey263: There's a stress test video and it's a solid 30FPS. And all screen tearing is gone.
Since there is no PC version, this seems to be the best on offer.
I'm gonna clear some games first, then go and replay Red Dead Redemption ^^
Hahahaaha... When you have nothing anything sure seems great..
So the wii was the best console last gen
ok then my answer is this
pigs can fly
Sold better had higher rated games.
Hell Mario kart sold like 40 million copies it outsold,Halo 3,Gears 1,Forza 3,Uncharted 1 and Resistance 1 put together.
So is hard to argue again i say.
It got more sales and higher rated games.
The only place were the wii loss is multiplatforms.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment