Mocrosoft DESPERATELY needs MORE EXCLUSIVES, because SONY is oozing BRAND NEW IP

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#101 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.arbitor365

so is activision. It isnt much of a defense

Dude, I have to say, what's wrong with Activision these days... Besides Kotick's mentality... yeah they release over priced DLC, but so do alot of devs... Elite isnt a bad service, it's their if players want to buy, but they dont have to. They can buy their DLC the old fashioned way. With MW3 not coming with any sort of online pass at all, I'm kind of impressed with Activision. I think they've received some hate they dont deserve... but Kotick deserves all the hate he gets...
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#102 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17931 Posts
[QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.carljohnson3456
For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007.

To be fair, during its building years, Sony was never in a position to have to "survive" as MS was last gen, so it was easier :P I agree overall though, Sony was pumping out games, paying 1st parties, and allowing creative freedom even when they were loosing hundreds of millions at the start of this gen. Kudos to them
Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] Why would I care about games I can play anywhere else, and often play better versions elsewhere as well? No matter how many over hyped, over rated, over budgeted, and over rehashed multiplats are released, exclusives will still be the determining factor for the quality of a system's library. meetroid8
Thats not what i said dude. How did you read what i said? You are saying things that i didnt even mention. You are responding as if every gamer out there likes every game you play, which is untrue. What if casual gamers are looking for a HD console? What if they like COD? What if they like Gears or Fable or whatever? Its obvious that people like the 360 because it sells. So its obvious that the INDUSTRY doesnt feel the way you do. So you ignore all of that? You think everyone has to like what you like? You dont think you are being just a little bit narrow minded?

It has nothing to do with what I like or don't like, this is all about quality of a system's library, which has nothing to do with games you can play everywhere else and everything to do with games you can't play anywhere else.

There are very few games which can be played on every single platform, but if you mean multi-plats, well, those certainly help a system's library.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#104 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"] I agree overall though, Sony was pumping out games, paying 1st parties, and allowing creative freedom even when they were loosing hundreds of millions at the start of this gen. Kudos to them

That's my favorite thing about Sony. I'm not stupid, I know they're a business trying to make money, but I feel that they are the last one of the big three to bow out of the hardcore battle and concede completely to the casual market. I'm not saying MS has completely gave up on their core market, but they stopped trying to bring in NEW core gamers... they're relying on mostly core hit titles that they know will sell and third party stuff. The rest of the stuff seems to be Kinect stuff. Dont get me wrong, they really really nailed it with LIVE, and that'll probably always be the biggest "hardcore" selling tool for the 360 as long as they have third party "core" games... but to me, Sony seems to have stayed the course with core games this gen and I'm glad they have. I just hope they inspire MS to make more core games than MS inspires Sony to make more casual games.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#105 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.carljohnson3456
For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007.

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#106 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.Mario1331

For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007.

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

That's totally fine, but I'm sure the majority of the core audiences of all four system could care less about Dance Party or whatever the hell that game is that sells for Kinect.
Avatar image for White_Dreams
White_Dreams

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 White_Dreams
Member since 2011 • 925 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.Mario1331

For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007.

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

Their in the video game business and should be actually producing video games.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007. carljohnson3456

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

That's totally fine, but I'm sure the majority of the core audiences of all four system could care less about Dance Party or whatever the hell that game is that sells for Kinect.

why is it bad to have games that everyone can enjoy?? not every game has to be an rpg or some deep meaningful game....
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#109 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

mems_1224

That's totally fine, but I'm sure the majority of the core audiences of all four system could care less about Dance Party or whatever the hell that game is that sells for Kinect.

why is it bad to have games that everyone can enjoy?? not every game has to be an rpg or some deep meaningful game....

No kiddin, but when it seems like they've completely abandoned the idea of making NEW core IP's instead all together, theres the problem.

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#110 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007. carljohnson3456

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

That's totally fine, but I'm sure the majority of the core audiences of all four system could care less about Dance Party or whatever the hell that game is that sells for Kinect.

thats my point the core audinece is seriously dying. the core is so hard to please and by how much Ms,Sony,Ninty spend each year pumping games out and shipping them each year they need to see an increase in profit just to stay comfortable.

i get we as the core are getting shafted and weve been there from the start but you really cant blame them

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#111 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] For themselves, yes. I know it's a business, I'm a business man myself. But I do right by my customers. MS isnt in my opinion. Maybe the industry is changing. Maybe Sony is behind, but to me, Sony is still delivering to the same audience it did in 1995. Microsoft isnt delivering to the same audience it did in 2002 or whenever it launched. Seems to me they're more worried about the audience the Wii pioneered in 2007. White_Dreams

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

Their in the video game business and should be actually producing video games.

wth are they producing then?

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]I'd say MS is doing pretty well for themselves right now.arbitor365

so is activision. It isnt much of a defense

They don't need defending because the world does not work the way SW thinks it does.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

i honestly believe personally sony pumps out so many New ips each gen because they need to find that it game for them, which theya re still struggling to find

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#114 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
i get we as the core are getting shafted and weve been there from the start but you really cant blame themMario1331
I guess you're right... and that's a shame.
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#115 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

i honestly believe personally sony pumps out so many New ips each gen because they need to find that it game for them, which theya re still struggling to find

Mario1331
No way. Sony has always invested in core titles from day one. From what I've read from multiple devs is Sony gives their developers freedom of what they want to make... and that's why you end up with mulitple IPs. If they didnt, we would have seen Sly Cooper already, Twisted Metal already, and Jak and Daxter already.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] That's totally fine, but I'm sure the majority of the core audiences of all four system could care less about Dance Party or whatever the hell that game is that sells for Kinect. carljohnson3456

why is it bad to have games that everyone can enjoy?? not every game has to be an rpg or some deep meaningful game....

No kiddin, but when it seems like they've completely abandoned the idea of making NEW core IP's instead all together, theres the problem.

yea cause sony was full of new ips this years. resistance 3, killzone 3, uncharted 3... infamous 2....oh wait
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#117 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

i honestly believe personally sony pumps out so many New ips each gen because they need to find that it game for them, which theya re still struggling to find

carljohnson3456

No way. Sony has always invested in core titles from day one. From what I've read from multiple devs is Sony gives their developers freedom of what they want to make... and that's why you end up with mulitple IPs. If they didnt, we would have seen Sly Cooper already, Twisted Metal already, and Jak and Daxter already.

yea but how man of those put halo and mario numbers?

i love sony and im not saying i dont love their new ips they really the only ones that stil do it besides nintendo(but they do it on handhelds) but i feel once they get a game that makes mario money they gona produce less ips

this is all my theory and im hoping im wrong btw because this is why i love sony

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#118 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

[QUOTE="mems_1224"] why is it bad to have games that everyone can enjoy?? not every game has to be an rpg or some deep meaningful game....mems_1224

No kiddin, but when it seems like they've completely abandoned the idea of making NEW core IP's instead all together, theres the problem.

yea cause sony was full of new ips this years. resistance 3, killzone 3, uncharted 3... infamous 2....oh wait

Oh wait... all of them are new franchises from this gen... right? Didnt they just release Heavy Rain last year? And announce a new IP a few days ago? And probably some more franchises I could make a point with if I wanted to but wont bother with right now.


EDIT: Oops, all of them except for Killzone, of course. :)

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#119 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
i love sony and im not saying i dont love their new ips they really the only ones that stil do it besides nintendo(but they do it on handhelds) but i feel once they get a game that makes mario money they gona produce less ipsMario1331
Hmm, maybe you're right. Who knows. All I know is if Sony keeps bringing new franchises each generation and new IPs every couple of years... let's hope they never get a HALO seller... :lol:
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#120 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

MS just sold 1.7 million systems last month...in its 6th year. Highly doubt MS cares about exclusives right now.

Kingpin0114

Yea but most of them where the Kinect bundles so MS needs new IP and not more Kinect IP.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] No kiddin, but when it seems like they've completely abandoned the idea of making NEW core IP's instead all together, theres the problem.

carljohnson3456

yea cause sony was full of new ips this years. resistance 3, killzone 3, uncharted 3... infamous 2....oh wait

Oh wait... all of them are new franchises from this gen... right? Didnt they just release Heavy Rain last year? And announce a new IP a few days ago? And probably some more franchises I could make a point with if I wanted to but wont bother with right now.


EDIT: Oops, all of them except for Killzone, of course. :)

gears

alan wake

viva pinata

crack down

saints row

mass effect

bioshock

dead rising

left 4 dead

prey

off the top of my head all of those were decent games and console exclusives that debuted only on the 360. im sure im forgetting some

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="Kingpin0114"]

MS just sold 1.7 million systems last month...in its 6th year. Highly doubt MS cares about exclusives right now.

HaloPimp978

Yea but most of them where the Kinect bundles so MS needs new IP and not more Kinect IP.

what does it matter if its a kinect game?
Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

Desperately??

Yeah... let me know when more than two PS3 exclusives sell over 5 million copies, or at least one PS3 exclusive sells over 10 million copies.

At least lemmings and sheep buy their exclusives, no matter how mediocre the game is (Fable 3/Mario Kart).

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#124 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

[QUOTE="mems_1224"] yea cause sony was full of new ips this years. resistance 3, killzone 3, uncharted 3... infamous 2....oh waitmems_1224

Oh wait... all of them are new franchises from this gen... right? Didnt they just release Heavy Rain last year? And announce a new IP a few days ago? And probably some more franchises I could make a point with if I wanted to but wont bother with right now.


EDIT: Oops, all of them except for Killzone, of course. :)

gears

alan wake

viva pinata

crack down

saints row

mass effect

bioshock

dead rising

left 4 dead

prey

off the top of my head all of those were decent games and console exclusives that debuted only on the 360. im sure im forgetting some

Aaaaanndd only 3 or 4 of them are 360 exclusive franchises? I never denied that MS has third party core games, I'm saying MS probably would have invested more into first party core games rather than the Kinect trash they've been creating, like Sony.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#125 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

They're definitely going to have to get a new Gears next gen. Maybe 2 new Gears.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] Oh wait... all of them are new franchises from this gen... right? Didnt they just release Heavy Rain last year? And announce a new IP a few days ago? And probably some more franchises I could make a point with if I wanted to but wont bother with right now.


EDIT: Oops, all of them except for Killzone, of course. :)

carljohnson3456

gears

alan wake

viva pinata

crack down

saints row

mass effect

bioshock

dead rising

left 4 dead

prey

off the top of my head all of those were decent games and console exclusives that debuted only on the 360. im sure im forgetting some

Aaaaanndd only 3 or 4 of them are 360 exclusive franchises? I never denied that MS has third party core games, I'm saying MS probably would have invested more into first party core games rather than the Kinect trash they've been creating, like Sony.

they're all exclusive franchises and new ips that were only on 360 when they released. whether its 3rd or 1st party is irrelevant

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#127 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="HaloPimp978"]

[QUOTE="Kingpin0114"]

MS just sold 1.7 million systems last month...in its 6th year. Highly doubt MS cares about exclusives right now.

mems_1224

Yea but most of them where the Kinect bundles so MS needs new IP and not more Kinect IP.

what does it matter if its a kinect game?

Because Kinect isnt delivering to the core fan base, ya know, the fan base that sold the first 40,000,000 360s?!?! Yeah yeah, you can act like that there's nothing wrong with Kinect or a game delivering to a casual audience, and there isnt... what's wrong is that it's clear that MICROSOFT (not Ubisoft, EA, Activision, Capcom, etc) has clearly slowed it's first party core game development in favor of Kinect garbage. We'll always have Gears, Halo, Forza, yada, yada from MS, but how many games will we NOT see because they'd rather invest in Kinect than to take a "chance" on a new core IP?
Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts
saints row mass effect bioshock left 4 dead Arent they all on pc?... i believe the thread is about microsoft needing more exclusives... because at the moment they are kinda sucking (unless u like kinect that is)
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#129 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]gears

alan wake

viva pinata

crack down

saints row

mass effect

bioshock

dead rising

left 4 dead

prey

off the top of my head all of those were decent games and console exclusives that debuted only on the 360. im sure im forgetting some

mems_1224

Aaaaanndd only 3 or 4 of them are 360 exclusive franchises? I never denied that MS has third party core games, I'm saying MS probably would have invested more into first party core games rather than the Kinect trash they've been creating, like Sony.

they're all exclusive franchises and new ips that were only on 360 when they released. whether its 3rd or 1st party is irrelevant

Hahaha, ok, play that card. No kidding that MS was more concentrated on core games back in 2006, 2007, and 2008. They arent NOW, which is what I've been saying, and what I've been saying is the PROBLEM.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#130 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]gears

alan wake

viva pinata

crack down

saints row

mass effect

bioshock

dead rising

left 4 dead

prey

off the top of my head all of those were decent games and console exclusives that debuted only on the 360. im sure im forgetting some

mems_1224

Aaaaanndd only 3 or 4 of them are 360 exclusive franchises? I never denied that MS has third party core games, I'm saying MS probably would have invested more into first party core games rather than the Kinect trash they've been creating, like Sony.

they're all exclusive franchises and new ips that were only on 360 when they released. whether its 3rd or 1st party is irrelevant

And for the record, Prey, Left 4 Dead, Dead Rising, Bioshock, and Mass Effect are not EXCLUSIVE franchises to the 360s.
Avatar image for White_Dreams
White_Dreams

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 White_Dreams
Member since 2011 • 925 Posts

[QUOTE="White_Dreams"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

thats where the money is at for them and peopel here really need to understand these companies ARE businesses and nothing more

Mario1331

Their in the video game business and should be actually producing video games.

wth are they producing then?

Not enough games, thats the problem.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#132 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="joel_c17"]saints row mass effect bioshock left 4 dead Arent they all on pc?... i believe the thread is about microsoft needing more exclusives... because at the moment they are kinda sucking (unless u like kinect that is)

Not to mention Saints Row, Mass Effect, and Bioshock games can be found on PS3... and if L4D3 ever gets released, Im willing to be it's going to be on PS3 as well.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="HaloPimp978"]

Yea but most of them where the Kinect bundles so MS needs new IP and not more Kinect IP.

carljohnson3456

what does it matter if its a kinect game?

Because Kinect isnt delivering to the core fan base, ya know, the fan base that sold the first 40,000,000 360s?!?! Yeah yeah, you can act like that there's nothing wrong with Kinect or a game delivering to a casual audience, and there isnt... what's wrong is that it's clear that MICROSOFT (not Ubisoft, EA, Activision, Capcom, etc) has clearly slowed it's first party core game development in favor of Kinect garbage. We'll always have Gears, Halo, Forza, yada, yada from MS, but how many games will we NOT see because they'd rather invest in Kinect than to take a "chance" on a new core IP?

and who cares if they're trying something new and pushing kinect when there are soooo many great multiplats?? they dont need 12 mediocre exclusives when they can just release gears or halo(better multiplayer games than anything on ps3) every years. i have so many games to play right now i really dont care about exclusives. hell i still haven't played assassins creed revelations, forza 4 and a bunch of other games

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#135 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] what does it matter if its a kinect game? mems_1224

Because Kinect isnt delivering to the core fan base, ya know, the fan base that sold the first 40,000,000 360s?!?! Yeah yeah, you can act like that there's nothing wrong with Kinect or a game delivering to a casual audience, and there isnt... what's wrong is that it's clear that MICROSOFT (not Ubisoft, EA, Activision, Capcom, etc) has clearly slowed it's first party core game development in favor of Kinect garbage. We'll always have Gears, Halo, Forza, yada, yada from MS, but how many games will we NOT see because they'd rather invest in Kinect than to take a "chance" on a new core IP?

and who cares if they're trying something new and pushing kinect when there are soooo many great multiplats?? they dont need 12 mediocre exclusives when they can just release gears or halo(better multiplayer games than anything on ps3) every years. i have so many games to play right now i really dont care about exclusives. hell i still haven't played assassins creed revelations, forza 4 and a bunch of other games

Oh ok. If that's your line of thinking, then I wouldnt expect you to care about MS's dwindling attention to core games.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="joel_c17"]saints row mass effect bioshock left 4 dead Arent they all on pc?... i believe the thread is about microsoft needing more exclusives... because at the moment they are kinda sucking (unless u like kinect that is)

Not to mention Saints Row, Mass Effect, and Bioshock games can be found on PS3... and if L4D3 ever gets released, Im willing to be it's going to be on PS3 as well.

i said they were all console exclusives when they first launched. mass effect and bioshock only got ps3 ports because they were so popular on 360
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] Because Kinect isnt delivering to the core fan base, ya know, the fan base that sold the first 40,000,000 360s?!?! Yeah yeah, you can act like that there's nothing wrong with Kinect or a game delivering to a casual audience, and there isnt... what's wrong is that it's clear that MICROSOFT (not Ubisoft, EA, Activision, Capcom, etc) has clearly slowed it's first party core game development in favor of Kinect garbage. We'll always have Gears, Halo, Forza, yada, yada from MS, but how many games will we NOT see because they'd rather invest in Kinect than to take a "chance" on a new core IP?carljohnson3456

and who cares if they're trying something new and pushing kinect when there are soooo many great multiplats?? they dont need 12 mediocre exclusives when they can just release gears or halo(better multiplayer games than anything on ps3) every years. i have so many games to play right now i really dont care about exclusives. hell i still haven't played assassins creed revelations, forza 4 and a bunch of other games

Oh ok. If that's your line of thinking, then I wouldnt expect you to care about MS's dwindling attention to core games.

no i really dont. especially when sony just releases uncharted, LBP, MLB the show and like 8 mediocre, forgettable games. to me halo and gears are waaay better than anything on ps3
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#138 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
no i really dont. especially when sony just releases uncharted, LBP, MLB the show and like 8 mediocre, forgettable games. to me halo and gears are waaay better than anything on ps3mems_1224
Good for you man.
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

They need to go out and buy some studios. I bet Insomniac like to be bought by MS. :D

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
well dont think sony is responsible for ni no kuni... but ye...they definitely have great new ips coming.. gravity rush just looks amazing.. Bout time sony japan releases something which looks like a blockbuster
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

Doesn't matter about having lots of exclusives because the 360 is still kicking the PS3's butt. :lol: Also Halo is worth 90% of Sony's exclusives they are never going to beat it! :cool:

Avatar image for White_Dreams
White_Dreams

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 White_Dreams
Member since 2011 • 925 Posts

Doesn't matter about having lots of exclusives because the 360 is still kicking the PS3's butt. :lol: Also Halo is worth 90% of Sony's exclusives they are never going to beat it! :cool:

xhawk27
I don't think it is kicking the ps3's butt, ps3's been selling more this year
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

Doesn't matter about having lots of exclusives because the 360 is still kicking the PS3's butt. :lol: Also Halo is worth 90% of Sony's exclusives they are never going to beat it! :cool:

White_Dreams
I don't think it is kicking the ps3's butt, ps3's been selling more this year

not in the US. which is all that matters ;)
Avatar image for gc88
gc88

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 gc88
Member since 2009 • 713 Posts

Microsoft is releasing a new console. Why make new IP's for the 360? Save them for next gen

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
[QUOTE="White_Dreams"][QUOTE="xhawk27"]

Doesn't matter about having lots of exclusives because the 360 is still kicking the PS3's butt. :lol: Also Halo is worth 90% of Sony's exclusives they are never going to beat it! :cool:

mems_1224
I don't think it is kicking the ps3's butt, ps3's been selling more this year

not in the US. which is all that matters ;)

That doesn't make any sense I would think selling more world wide means a lot more than selling in one country . .. you're pretty unintelligent.
Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#146 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

its funny how the most common excuse being used here is

"microsoft is making plenty of money off of the kinect and multiplats, so it doesnt even matter"

do you guys hear yourselves? last I checked, you guys arent gaining anything from microsoft's monetary success. The Xbox is basically a self perpetuating multiplat machine (a poor man's PC), and micosoft is barely providing any original material, despite supposedly being the most succesful console.

if you look back at any of the consoles of previous generations like the SNES, PS1, N64, PS2, and gamecube, they all provided a vast number of exclusive titles. why? because, being the big players in the gaming world and they had this crazy idea that consoles should be positioned on the stregnth of the libraries and original content.

microsoft doesnt share that ideology. microsoft doesnt seem to care about actually producing content for the public, like a console maker should be doing. why? because they realize that they are making enough money with their casual kinect garbage, their horrendously desaturated library of exclusives, and their overpriced online service, that they dont need to produce new content. money is the only thing that matters to them. and you dumbasses are rewarding them and praising them for it.

arbitor365
This... I have been questioning lemmings for years.. and I still don't get it. What do they see in the crapy halo and fable games... when other consoles deliver tons of great exclusives year after year. Sony has a proven track record of supporting gaming with original content...but lemmings are happy with a casual crap, halo, fable, and are estatic like they own stock if ms is making money, even though they don't gain crap from it. They seem delusional. I have seen this for years. And predicted the demise of the xbox exclusive game back in 2008 when they killed off their developers, when the xbox creators left the company... its when the "Suits" took over and ruled everything. They don't do anything for the good of gaming... it's all to line their pockets. How do you lemmings not see this? And how do you not see the tons of games that you don't get to play on ps3?
Avatar image for DrHousesCane
DrHousesCane

773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 DrHousesCane
Member since 2011 • 773 Posts

This... I have been questioning lemmings for years.. and I still don't get it. What do they see in the crapy halo and fable games... when other consoles deliver tons of great exclusives year after year. Sony has a proven track record of supporting gaming with original content...but lemmings are happy with a casual crap, halo, fable, and are estatic like they own stock if ms is making money, even though they don't gain crap from it. They seem delusional. I have seen this for years. And predicted the demise of the xbox exclusive game back in 2008 when they killed off their developers, when the xbox creators left the company... its when the "Suits" took over and ruled everything. They don't do anything for the good of gaming... it's all to line their pockets. How do you lemmings not see this? And how do you not see the tons of games that you don't get to play on ps3?Midnightshade29

Well that was one of the most Fanboy drivvel filled posts I've ever seen.

Avatar image for Frostbite24
Frostbite24

4536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Frostbite24
Member since 2003 • 4536 Posts

I love how if a low level user makes threads bashing Sony it's "oh you're a terrible person" but if some low level person bashes MS, everyone acknowledges the slime like they actually have a ****ing clue what they're talking about.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="White_Dreams"] I don't think it is kicking the ps3's butt, ps3's been selling more this year

not in the US. which is all that matters ;)

That doesn't make any sense I would think selling more world wide means a lot more than selling in one country . .. you're pretty unintelligent.

yea but the US matters more than any other country so it should really count twice.
Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#150 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

i am seeing countless lemmings (especially in this thread) using sales and monetary success as the "be all, end all" factor to vindicate the 360. I see them standing up to cheer for a desaturated exclusive librariy, bloated milked franchises, and shameless casual-ware. i see them praising the company who has profited greatly off of these tactics and who apparently they see as the ideal example of what a current gen console should be.

this invokes various feelings in me. including: disgust, dread, pity, indifference, nausea and a general fear for the future of gaming