Three exclusives, one of which is a remake, makes up for everything? Now that's some serious damage control.
I think the Wii's had more exclusives and that's a actually a dying console because of the 3DS and Wii-U! :lol:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Three exclusives, one of which is a remake, makes up for everything? Now that's some serious damage control.
I think the Wii's had more exclusives and that's a actually a dying console because of the 3DS and Wii-U! :lol:
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.PhazevarianceRight, because exclusives are the only games that get released for xbox......... ........ ........ oh wait, no they arent! Again, this thread is about exclusives.
[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="Lexter45"]Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.ChuteboxRight, because exclusives are the only games that get released for xbox......... ........ ........ oh wait, no they arent! Again, this thread is about exclusives.
I'm not sure if I understand though, the thread title said ms is making up for a slow year, not dominating. While I would state that their output this year hasn't been all that substantial I would say that between that kinect game and gears 3 and forza and halo anniversary coming out too they are doing substantially better then before.
Edit: Yeah I know Halo Annivrsary isn't "exclusive" but I relate it to REmake, its still a significant plus to the library and can't be played on any other current gen system. Not exclusive but a big plus if you ask me.
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.PhazevarianceRight, because exclusives are the only games that get released for xbox......... ........ ........ oh wait, no they arent! I think he's making a point that he can got those other multiplat games on other systems that he might own as well.
its funny that you would list a remake, considering the PS3 has had around 11 of those this year. Xbox fans have been quick to pan such things for not being "new" but if it has "halo" in the name than that's a different story altogether.
Again, this thread is about exclusives.[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Phazevariance"] Right, because exclusives are the only games that get released for xbox......... ........ ........ oh wait, no they arent!ActicEdge
I'm not sure if I understand though, the thread title said ms is making up for a slow year, not dominating. While I would state that their output this year hasn't been all that substantial I would say that between that kinect game and gears 3 and forza and halo anniversary coming out too they are doing substantially better then before.
Edit: Yeah I know Halo Annivrsary isn't "exclusive" but I relate it to REmake, its still a significant plus to the library and can't be played on any other current gen system. Not exclusive but a big plus if you ask me.
So are teh PS3 collections like the ICO collection and the God of War Collection etc... Yet cows get flack when bringing those up.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Again, this thread is about exclusives.JohnDead80
I'm not sure if I understand though, the thread title said ms is making up for a slow year, not dominating. While I would state that their output this year hasn't been all that substantial I would say that between that kinect game and gears 3 and forza and halo anniversary coming out too they are doing substantially better then before.
Edit: Yeah I know Halo Annivrsary isn't "exclusive" but I relate it to REmake, its still a significant plus to the library and can't be played on any other current gen system. Not exclusive but a big plus if you ask me.
So are teh PS3 collections like the ICO collection and the God of War Collection etc... Yet cows get flack when bringing those up.Well there are 2 things. ICO and GOW collections are more remasterings, some minor improvements but still the same assets and everything. REmake and Halo Anniversary are full blown remakes with everything redone from scratch which is a rather large difference. (not to put HA in the realm of REmake since it probably isn't but rather to make a point).
2, I see those collections as a big plus frankly, not exclusives but a big plus. I don't think they count (like HA) because they simply don't but its an awesome little addition for sure.
its funny that you would list a remake, considering the PS3 has had around 11 of those this year. Xbox fans have been quick to pan such things for not being "new" but if it has "halo" in the name than that's a different story altogether.
arbitor365
What 11 remakes are you talking about? HD rerelease =/= full blown remake.
Reach best MP this gen till gears came along imo
Gears 3 is just flat out amazing couldnt of been a better end to the the trilogy the mp is awesome i know ill be playing for many months
Forza 4 looks amazing too
Halo CE anniversary also has me really excited from the videos im seeing
so all in all im pretty satisfied exclusive wise especially with all the great multiplats so how do you fellow 360 owners feel about this? agree they are doing great making up for the slow start? disagree?
johnnyblazed88
Reach def is not the best MP this gen.
[QUOTE="arbitor365"]
its funny that you would list a remake, considering the PS3 has had around 11 of those this year. Xbox fans have been quick to pan such things for not being "new" but if it has "halo" in the name than that's a different story altogether.
ActicEdge
What 11 remakes are you talking about? HD rerelease =/= full blown remake.
Nice try Actic but those PS2 remasters are as much remakes as that Halo remaster. Calling it a remake is 100% wrong, it's the EXACT same game, witht he EXACT same physics etc. Same gameplay engine. Same game. Those PS2 collections have better graphics too, and have extras as well... Your clearly not informed here are you.Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.Lexter45You only play exclusives? :?
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="arbitor365"]
its funny that you would list a remake, considering the PS3 has had around 11 of those this year. Xbox fans have been quick to pan such things for not being "new" but if it has "halo" in the name than that's a different story altogether.
JohnDead80
What 11 remakes are you talking about? HD rerelease =/= full blown remake.
Nice try Actic but those PS2 remasters are as much remakes as that Halo remaster. Calling it a remake is 100% wrong, it's the EXACT same game, witht he EXACT same physics etc. Same gameplay engine. Same game. Those PS2 collections have better graphics too, and have extras as well... Your clearly not informed here are you.Ehhh no. PS2 remaster =/= equal remake.
Let me give you an example not about the PS3 or 360 to make this point clear.
This:
To this:
Is a remake. Entirely new assets, added features, everything built from the ground up to accomdate a new system.
This:
to this:
Is NOT a remake. Its an up in resolution with a few additional touches. Its the same game as before simply cleaned up. You actually are the one not informed, I am correct.
Actic are you not paying attention? I said they ARE NOT remakes, what I said is if you consider the Halo CE remaster a remake, THEN you can also consider the PS2 collections remakes because they are EQUAL. Halo CE is the SAME 10 year old gameplay engine, only with better graphics. Your the only one argueing otherwise, even the vast majority of 360 fans recoginize it's not a true remake, it's a good remaster.
Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.Lexter45
This. They need more exclusives.
[QUOTE="JohnDead80"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Again, this thread is about exclusives.ActicEdgeI'm not sure if I understand though, the thread title said ms is making up for a slow year, not dominating. While I would state that their output this year hasn't been all that substantial I would say that between that kinect game and gears 3 and forza and halo anniversary coming out too they are doing substantially better then before.Edit: Yeah I know Halo Annivrsary isn't "exclusive" but I relate it to REmake lolno...It's a Remaster too... "Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is a spectacularly remastered version of the original Halo campaign" http://halo.xbox.com/en-us/intel/titles/haloanniversary
lolno...It's a Remaster too... "Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is a spectacularly remastered version of the original Halo campaign" http://halo.xbox.com/en-us/intel/titles/haloanniversaryHeil68
The hell? I thought they rebuilt everything from scratch. The videos and screens I was looking at didn't seem to indicate they just up res'd the original halo.
Edit: No its definitely been redone. The fact that they use remaster instead of remake doesn't deter the point which is new assets are being used and additions and subtractions are being made to the game as opposed to just an up res'd straight port.
No its definitely been redone. The fact that they use remaster instead of remake doesn't deter the point which is new assets are being used and additions and subtractions are being made to the game as opposed to just an up res'd straight port.ActicEdgeno matter how much you want it to be so, it's not. I'll take the word of the people actually making game over you. :lol: AND it's still not exclusive. double whammy.
Three games exclusives in one year. Two of which are shooters(one being a remake) and the other being a racing game. The lack of games is bad but the lack of variety is even worse imo.Moriarity_I love how people say they don't care about racing games unless it's a Gran Turismo game, then it's like, "Omg the second coming, the second coming is upon us!"
lol wow dude. It's not a remake, leave it alone. How many people do you need to tell you this? How many links do you want? I remember this one video where Bungie repeated "it's still the exact same game right down to the gameplay engine and physics" every other minute for like 10mins... A remake requires a new engine, everything built from scracth, not use the old engine and update the graphics, that's a remaster, the better the graphics the more elaborate the remaster. Still the EXACT same game.The hell? I thought they rebuilt everything from scratch. The videos and screens I was looking at didn't seem to indicate they just up res'd the original halo.
Edit: No its definitely been redone. The fact that they use remaster instead of remake doesn't deter the point which is new assets are being used and additions and subtractions are being made to the game as opposed to just an up res'd straight port.
ActicEdge
no matter how much you want it to be so, it's not. I'll take the word of the people actually making game over you. :lol: AND it's still not exclusive. double whammy.[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"] No its definitely been redone. The fact that they use remaster instead of remake doesn't deter the point which is new assets are being used and additions and subtractions are being made to the game as opposed to just an up res'd straight port.ActicEdge
Its like you can't read. I specifically said it wasn't exclusive in my first post :|
And really, remaster, remake, it doesn't matter what you call it, re done assets, additions and subtractions, balancing, glitch fixing etc is not the same as straight port in a higher resolution. It shouldn't be much of a hard concept for a regular person to grasp.
He's not the one having a hard time grasping a simple concept dude. It's a remaster. End of.lol wow dude. It's not a remake, leave it alone. How many people do you need to tell you this? How many links do you want? I remember this one video where Bungie repeated "it's still the exact same game right down to the gameplay engine and physics" every other minute for like 10mins... A remake requires a new engine, everything built from scracth, not use the old engine and update the graphics, that's a remaster, the better the graphics the more elaborate the remaster. Still the EXACT same game.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
The hell? I thought they rebuilt everything from scratch. The videos and screens I was looking at didn't seem to indicate they just up res'd the original halo.
Edit: No its definitely been redone. The fact that they use remaster instead of remake doesn't deter the point which is new assets are being used and additions and subtractions are being made to the game as opposed to just an up res'd straight port.
JohnDead80
It looked like that to me but I'm willing to concede being wrong if its just updated graphics with nothing else. From what I've been following it strikes me much more as a remake than a traditional port though or those PS3/360 collections with essentially just up resolutions.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Heil68"] no matter how much you want it to be so, it's not. I'll take the word of the people actually making game over you. :lol: AND it's still not exclusive. double whammy.Heil68
Its like you can't read. I specifically said it wasn't exclusive in my first post :|
And really, remaster, remake, it doesn't matter what you call it, re done assets, additions and subtractions, balancing, glitch fixing etc is not the same as straight port in a higher resolution. It shouldn't be much of a hard concept for a regular person to grasp.
And yet here you are struggling with it...:lol:So you concede that a you didn't read my first post where I said it wasn't exclusive enforcing my point that you are ignoring what I'm saying because you care more about being right then the facts? Awesome :)
And yet here you are struggling with it...:lol:[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
Its like you can't read. I specifically said it wasn't exclusive in my first post :|
And really, remaster, remake, it doesn't matter what you call it, re done assets, additions and subtractions, balancing, glitch fixing etc is not the same as straight port in a higher resolution. It shouldn't be much of a hard concept for a regular person to grasp.
ActicEdge
So you concede that a you didn't read my first post where I said it wasn't exclusive enforcing my point that you are ignoring what I'm saying because you care more about being right then the facts? Awesome :)
Nope the exclusive comment was just to drive home the face the 360 has had 2 exclusives worthy to buy in a full year since Reach. It was like a bonus bit of sunshine for the dismal year the 360 has had. I'm glad you conceded to the facts of what the developer stated as well, it will help you in the long run to avoid making up your own facts on things. Good job! :)[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Heil68"] no matter how much you want it to be so, it's not. I'll take the word of the people actually making game over you. :lol: AND it's still not exclusive. double whammy.JohnDead80
Its like you can't read. I specifically said it wasn't exclusive in my first post :|
And really, remaster, remake, it doesn't matter what you call it, re done assets, additions and subtractions, balancing, glitch fixing etc is not the same as straight port in a higher resolution. It shouldn't be much of a hard concept for a regular person to grasp.
He's not the one having a hard time grasping a simple concept dude. It's a remaster. End of.Eh no, doing more research into this (because I wanted to be sure) the additions to the game are pretty damn numerous. What I read is they are running the original halo's engine to keep the same gameplay and physics (you're correct on that I appologoize for stating you weren't) under halo Reach's Graphics engine (hence why it looks significantly better then the original) to keep the old games exact feel while brining its visuals up to the current generation. They are also rerecording all the non voiced audio while keeping the voiced the same. You can switch between old and new graphics at any time. There is a new Firefight map (fire fight was not in the original halo) and 6 remake maps that will be the exact original and then modified versions with more current features. That sounds more like a remake to me than a simple HD collection which someone originally stated were remakes. That's pretty significant frankly.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Heil68"] And yet here you are struggling with it...:lol:Heil68
So you concede that a you didn't read my first post where I said it wasn't exclusive enforcing my point that you are ignoring what I'm saying because you care more about being right then the facts? Awesome :)
Nope the exclusive comment was just to drive home the face the 360 has had 2 exclusives worthy to buy in a full year since Reach. It was like a bonus bit of sunshine for the dismal year the 360 has had. I'm glad you conceded to the facts of what the developer stated as well, it will help you in the long run to avoid making up your own facts on things. Good job! :)So basically you are saying you didn't read where I said it wasn't exclusive? Good job, you have totally wasted my time, good day to you :)
He's not the one having a hard time grasping a simple concept dude. It's a remaster. End of.[QUOTE="JohnDead80"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
Its like you can't read. I specifically said it wasn't exclusive in my first post :|
And really, remaster, remake, it doesn't matter what you call it, re done assets, additions and subtractions, balancing, glitch fixing etc is not the same as straight port in a higher resolution. It shouldn't be much of a hard concept for a regular person to grasp.
ActicEdge
Eh no, doing more research into this (because I wanted to be sure) the additions to the game are pretty damn numerous. What I read is they are running the original halo's engine to keep the same gameplay and physics (you're correct on that I appologoize for stating you weren't) under halo Reach's Graphics engine (hence why it looks significantly better then the original) to keep the old games exact feel while brining its visuals up to the current generation. They are also rerecording all the non voiced audio while keeping the voiced the same. You can switch between old and new graphics at any time. There is a new Firefight map (fire fight was not in the original halo) and 6 remake maps that will be the exact original and then modified versions with more current features. That sounds more like a remake to me than a simple HD collection which someone originally stated were remakes. That's pretty significant frankly.
Good thing it doesn't matter what it sound like TO YOU, but what it is in the real world. And funny enough you just described what a remaster is, not what a remake is.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="JohnDead80"]He's not the one having a hard time grasping a simple concept dude. It's a remaster. End of. JohnDead80
Eh no, doing more research into this (because I wanted to be sure) the additions to the game are pretty damn numerous. What I read is they are running the original halo's engine to keep the same gameplay and physics (you're correct on that I appologoize for stating you weren't) under halo Reach's Graphics engine (hence why it looks significantly better then the original) to keep the old games exact feel while brining its visuals up to the current generation. They are also rerecording all the non voiced audio while keeping the voiced the same. You can switch between old and new graphics at any time. There is a new Firefight map (fire fight was not in the original halo) and 6 remake maps that will be the exact original and then modified versions with more current features. That sounds more like a remake to me than a simple HD collection which someone originally stated were remakes. That's pretty significant frankly.
Good thing it doesn't matter what it sound like TO YOU, but what it is in the real world. And funny enough you just described what a remaster is, not what a remake is.Why don't you enlighten me with full examples then of what a remake is vs a remaster if you seem to know so much? (and don't back out if you wanna be so snarky)
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.PhazevarianceRight, because exclusives are the only games that get released for xbox......... ........ ........ oh wait, no they arent! That's the reason I bought the 360 and Wii, for its exclusives. PC is for my Multplats.
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]Doesn't excuse me having to wait almost 10 months for a new exclusive. Gear 3 and Halo 4 are the only things keeping me from selling the Xbox right now. I'll be sticking with the Wii-U and PC next gen if MS doesn't get it together exclusive wise.FunconsoleYou only play exclusives? :? On my 360 yes.
Good thing it doesn't matter what it sound like TO YOU, but what it is in the real world. And funny enough you just described what a remaster is, not what a remake is.[QUOTE="JohnDead80"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
Eh no, doing more research into this (because I wanted to be sure) the additions to the game are pretty damn numerous. What I read is they are running the original halo's engine to keep the same gameplay and physics (you're correct on that I appologoize for stating you weren't) under halo Reach's Graphics engine (hence why it looks significantly better then the original) to keep the old games exact feel while brining its visuals up to the current generation. They are also rerecording all the non voiced audio while keeping the voiced the same. You can switch between old and new graphics at any time. There is a new Firefight map (fire fight was not in the original halo) and 6 remake maps that will be the exact original and then modified versions with more current features. That sounds more like a remake to me than a simple HD collection which someone originally stated were remakes. That's pretty significant frankly.
ActicEdge
Why don't you enlighten me with full examples then of what a remake is vs a remaster if you seem to know so much? (and don't back out if you wanna be so snarky)
A remake is a game built from scratch, with a new game engine. A remaster is when you take an old game's engine and touch up the graphcis add some features. It's very simple.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="JohnDead80"]Good thing it doesn't matter what it sound like TO YOU, but what it is in the real world. And funny enough you just described what a remaster is, not what a remake is. JohnDead80
Why don't you enlighten me with full examples then of what a remake is vs a remaster if you seem to know so much? (and don't back out if you wanna be so snarky)
A remake is a game built from scratch, with a new game engine. A remaster is when you take an old game's engine and touch up the graphcis add some features. It's very simple.I wouldn't exactly call HA's graphics touched up and they added quite a lot of new featres as well. Basically for something to be a remake to you it needs to be a new engine? Is that what I'm getting?
As excellent as Gears 3 is, and as Forza 4 and Halo Ainniversary will undoubtedly be, 3 great games do not make up for 9 months of nothing.
A remake is a game built from scratch, with a new game engine. A remaster is when you take an old game's engine and touch up the graphcis add some features. It's very simple.[QUOTE="JohnDead80"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
Why don't you enlighten me with full examples then of what a remake is vs a remaster if you seem to know so much? (and don't back out if you wanna be so snarky)
ActicEdge
I wouldn't exactly call HA's graphics touched up and they added quite a lot of new featres as well. Basically for something to be a remake to you it needs to be a new engine? Is that what I'm getting?
That's THE most important factor ofcourse. Graphics don't make or break a game, playing a game on the PC in low or in high with mods it's still the same game. I played Crysis maxed with the 2.0 Natural Mod, did I play a remake of Crysis? The difference between that and low setting is WAAAAAY bigger then what's being discussed here.i got a question have you tried all those mediocre ps3 games or do you just like gears because gamespot tells you to like it? or don't find ps3 exclusives that amazing because gamespot gave them 8.5's?I've been playing so much Gears. It is better than all the mediocre exclusives that PS3 has received this year.
jimmypsn
Lol dude even LittleBigPlanet 2 has a higher metascore then gears.I've been playing so much Gears. It is better than all the mediocre exclusives that PS3 has received this year.
jimmypsn
lol. Whatever you like to think. No reason for it being "better." No reason why they are "mediocre." Stinks of classic lem speak. Then again, no one needed that blatant outcry to see that bit of info. Your reputation precedes you. In short, you'll have to provide some actual relevant and true ideas behind this before anyone should ever take you seriously.I've been playing so much Gears. It is better than all the mediocre exclusives that PS3 has received this year.
jimmypsn
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]lol. Whatever you like to think. No reason for it being "better." No reason why they are "mediocre." Stinks of classic lem speak. Then again, no one needed that blatant outcry to see that bit of info. Your reputation precedes you. In short, you'll have to provide some actual relevant and true ideas behind this before anyone should ever take you seriously.I've been playing so much Gears. It is better than all the mediocre exclusives that PS3 has received this year.
lx_theo
You have seen the review scores for those games have you not?
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="JohnDead80"]A remake is a game built from scratch, with a new game engine. A remaster is when you take an old game's engine and touch up the graphcis add some features. It's very simple. JohnDead80
I wouldn't exactly call HA's graphics touched up and they added quite a lot of new featres as well. Basically for something to be a remake to you it needs to be a new engine? Is that what I'm getting?
That's THE most important factor ofcourse. Graphics don't make or break a game, playing a game on the PC in low or in high with mods it's still the same game. I played Crysis maxed with the 2.0 Natural Mod, did I play a remake of Crysis? The difference between that and low setting is WAAAAAY bigger then what's being discussed here.I don't really get your point though. What is a new engine going to afford you? The most visible change will be graphics. Its a remake so the game will still have the exact same gameplay will it not? Most Remakes do bar a few lke REmake. With HA they also re recorded all the audio and added a lot of new feautres (not gameplay features except for firefight granted) as well/ the way you describe remaster vs remake is rather blurred. It makes games clearly labeled as remakes seem like remasters due to some behind the scenes stuff most people wouldn't even know.
lol. Whatever you like to think. No reason for it being "better." No reason why they are "mediocre." Stinks of classic lem speak. Then again, no one needed that blatant outcry to see that bit of info. Your reputation precedes you. In short, you'll have to provide some actual relevant and true ideas behind this before anyone should ever take you seriously.[QUOTE="lx_theo"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"]
I've been playing so much Gears. It is better than all the mediocre exclusives that PS3 has received this year.
jimmypsn
You have seen the review scores for those games have you not?
Killzone 3 got an 8.5. Great score.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment