MS: PlayStation Plus "hasn't changed" us

  • 178 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

You mean the LBP for EU only? Yeah, thats about it. Everything else is tied to your sub to PS+...

Zune_HD

Sony said some content would be free forever. Either way irrelevant, I still proved my point. You guys should ask a lot more of Microsoft, it's this type of conformism that's led them to do so little even when they were making decent money.

Link? I feel fine with my gold subscription to XBL, as do millions of other users. I got MW2 on my 360 and PS3. I couldn't send invites on the PSN for the first week because of constant bugs, not to mention the mess that was Borderlands during launch. Both of which worked flawlessy on XBL at launch.

live actually has a lot of built in functionality for game services, things you do online will normally work better on live because of this.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Good for you. Then you should know that if you pay for PSN+ that you aren't getting anything involved with that for free right?

Eltormo

Let me destroy this argument again like i did with some similar ones.

PSN+ = $50 a year,get early access to demo,get discount on games,get some stuff that are 2 or 3 dollars,play PS1 clasics,play PS minis,play several games of PSN like wipeout,all this for a year.

You may or may not get what you pay for PSN+

Live gold = $50 for allowing a you to use the online multiplaying part of games ,which on PS3,PS2,DC,Wii,PC,PSP,DS,GC were always free.

You will never get what you invested in here.

Thats destroying an arguement? I can see that you clearly dont know what Live offers...

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="EdenProxy"][QUOTE="Zune_HD"] What are "some" of the things that are free? Nothing's free if you're paying for it. From what I understand, every game that is currently free you have to keep your PS+ subscription.DroidPhysX

And if you want to keep playing online parts of your games you must keep paying for gold.

Who's denying that? For the most part, I see users (or a user) glorifying PS+ as a service that gives you free stuff...when infact you have to have a PS+ sub, which costs money....

You are still winning even we estimated the value of what you get for ur 50$, i am sure it easily exceeds the 50$ + the discounts .... PSN>>>>>>X360 value wise.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Yeah, and Microsoft are such a great company disabiling everyones online unless they pay $50 yearly. Let's not even mention overpriced accessories like harddrives which you had to buy before the new models came out because Microsoft didn't allow 3rd party accessories to be used. Microsoft sure are great.Gamtrix

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

Ya let's ignore the fact that they sold a 600$ console that cost them over 800 dollars to make. How greedy of them... LOL Dude you need to do your homework, your examples are helping my case. That's not how your supposed to argue :P

Your point? It was still the most expensive console at launch....which still doesnt help

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

DroidPhysX

Ya let's ignore the fact that they sold a 600$ console that cost them over 800 dollars to make. How greedy of them... LOL Dude you need to do your homework, your examples are helping my case. That's not how your supposed to argue :P

Your point? It was still the most expensive console at launch....which still doesnt help

Your point? They underpriced the console. Expensive =\= overpriced. They were loosing money, that's the opposite of greed.
Avatar image for KaoSXFACTOR
KaoSXFACTOR

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 KaoSXFACTOR
Member since 2009 • 1059 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Good for you. Then you should know that if you pay for PSN+ that you aren't getting anything involved with that for free right?

Eltormo

Let me destroy this argument again like i did with some similar ones.

PSN+ = $50 a year,get early access to demo,get discount on games,get some stuff that are 2 or 3 dollars,play PS1 clasics,play PS minis,play several games of PSN like wipeout,all this for a year.

You may or may not get what you pay for PSN+

Live gold = $50 for allowing a you to use the online multiplaying part of games ,which on PS3,PS2,DC,Wii,PC,PSP,DS,GC were always free.

You will never get what you invested in here.

And all of those neat little perks you added for PSN+ has been on LIVE for years. Don't know where you have been really......

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

Thats destroying an arguement? I can see that you clearly dont know what Live offers...

DroidPhysX

Really why don't you make me a list of what live offer,take into account that Facebook,and Twitter are free on PSN,and that my PS3 has a browser,and last FM is also free on PC,and on PSN almost every one get the demo at the same time,until now that some demos not all are PSN+,unlike on live which that feature was on silver and then was strip and given to gold memeber in order to make them feel better about what they pay,now silver member have to wait a week.

And cross game chat ins't even close to worth $50 dollars.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Gamtrix"] 1 month of PS+ has brought more value then 5 years of Xbox Live Gold. Gamtrix
you said you didn't have a 360, nor a gamertag in an earlier thread.

I play on one, I know exactly how it works and what you get. You don't need to "own it" to know.

oh, okay...well how about that pic you keep promising?
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Ya let's ignore the fact that they sold a 600$ console that cost them over 800 dollars to make. How greedy of them... LOL Dude you need to do your homework, your examples are helping my case. That's not how your supposed to argue :PGamtrix

Your point? It was still the most expensive console at launch....which still doesnt help

Your point? They underpriced the console. Expensive =\= overpriced. They were loosing money, that's the opposite of greed.

Right...so it wasnt expensive? In fact, according to you, it was very cheap...

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Stop defending such a company? Yeah. Sony was such a GREAT company making its users with the PSP GO buy all of their games for their original PSP's all over again because of digital distribution. Don't make it compatible. Just make them buy it again. :roll:

Yeah, and Microsoft are such a great company disabiling everyones online unless they pay $50 yearly. Let's not even mention overpriced accessories like harddrives which you had to buy before the new models came out because Microsoft didn't allow 3rd party accessories to be used. Microsoft sure are great.

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

Sony overengineered the PS3 and were selling it at a LOSS not overpricing it. Second of all Sony paid the price by losing a ton of market share, billions of dollars and being in the red until just recently. That Wii knockoff will provide more of a hardcore gaming experience then Microsoft's evolved eyetoy ripoff so, myself and alot of gamers would rather have that.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Your point? It was still the most expensive console at launch....which still doesnt help

DroidPhysX

Your point? They underpriced the console. Expensive =\= overpriced. They were loosing money, that's the opposite of greed.

Right...so it wasnt expensive? In fact, according to you, it was very cheap...

He just said it was expensive, just not overpriced.

Avatar image for N-REAL
N-REAL

2515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#114 N-REAL
Member since 2003 • 2515 Posts

I'm going to get myself some popcorn and soda to enjoy this "amusing" thread..... :lol:

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="clone01"] you said you didn't have a 360, nor a gamertag in an earlier thread.clone01
I play on one, I know exactly how it works and what you get. You don't need to "own it" to know.

oh, okay...well how about that pic you keep promising?

Are you serious you want me to write your name on a piece of paper with the date put it in front of the 360 and send you a pic? Cause I could do that, it's just in the other room. Or are you going to continue stalking me asking for something else? If that'll end the stalking I'll do it.
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

And all of those neat little perks you added for PSN+ has been on LIVE for years. Don't know where you have been really......

KaoSXFACTOR

Really so live Gold let you play game from the DLM for without playing for them,no ou get a demo,PSN has been doing discount for ages as well dude,way before PSN+,so you can play xbox clasic games with xbox live gold without paying appart for them?

Demos were strip from live silver and gave exclusive for the first week to gold member but it was not even part of gold,MS make it like that to make live look more of a value,which is not.

On PSN+ i can play PS1 clasics because i am paying to play games,on xbox live gold you pay to play online and had to pay extra to play games,see you can't just buy live gold and head into the market place and download free games to play.lol no dude.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

Are you serious you want me to write your name on a piece of paper with the date put it in front of the 360 and send you a pic? Cause I could do that, it's just in the other room. Or are you going to continue stalking me asking for something else? If that'll end the stalking I'll do it. Gamtrix
why would you put my name? i said put your name. and i'm not stalking...you just haven't delivered on what you said you'd do.

Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#118 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Ya let's ignore the fact that they sold a 600$ console that cost them over 800 dollars to make. How greedy of them... LOL Dude you need to do your homework, your examples are helping my case. That's not how your supposed to argue :PGamtrix

Your point? It was still the most expensive console at launch....which still doesnt help

Your point? They underpriced the console. Expensive =\= overpriced. They were loosing money, that's the opposite of greed.

MS has lost tons of money from the Xbox and 360 hardware as well, that's not really a good example. And where do they make it up from? Their software and...XBL, the online service that is deemed overprices and unnecessary by people here while Sony blatantly shapes PSN in a very similar manner to try and recoup some of the money that MS has been making this whole time.

Avatar image for KaoSXFACTOR
KaoSXFACTOR

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 KaoSXFACTOR
Member since 2009 • 1059 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Thats destroying an arguement? I can see that you clearly dont know what Live offers...

Eltormo

Really why don't you make me a list of what live offer,take into account that Facebook,and Twitter are free on PSN,and that my PS3 has a browser,and last FM is also free on PC,and on PSN almost every one get the demo at the same time,until now that some demos not all are PSN+,unlike on live which that feature was on silver and then was strip and given to gold memeber in order to make them feel better about what they pay,now silver member have to wait a week.

And cross game chat ins't even close to worth $50 dollars.

Bu bu bu I can just go to my PC and use da web browser there as well as facebook and twitter, and everyting else fa free!

Avatar image for DarkerKamikaze
DarkerKamikaze

1011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 DarkerKamikaze
Member since 2007 • 1011 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Thats destroying an arguement? I can see that you clearly dont know what Live offers...

KaoSXFACTOR

Really why don't you make me a list of what live offer,take into account that Facebook,and Twitter are free on PSN,and that my PS3 has a browser,and last FM is also free on PC,and on PSN almost every one get the demo at the same time,until now that some demos not all are PSN+,unlike on live which that feature was on silver and then was strip and given to gold memeber in order to make them feel better about what they pay,now silver member have to wait a week.

And cross game chat ins't even close to worth $50 dollars.

Bu bu bu I can just go to my PC and use da web browser there as well as facebook and twitter, and everyting else fa free!

That's why Steam >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XBL and PSN, and Steam is free!

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

MS has lost tons of money from the Xbox and 360 hardware as well, that's not really a good example. And where do they make it up from? Their software and...XBL, the online service that is deemed overprices and unnecessary by people here while Sony blatantly shapes PSN in a very similar manner to try and recoup some of the money that MS has been making this whole time.

tempest91

On the xbox i agree dude,but that was the price they pay for trying to beat the PS2 with pure tech,on the xbox 360 they deserver to loose money,they knew the hardware was a piece of crap and still carry on with the launch,knowing it was failing all around,they knew and they deserve the 1 billion loss,for their denial of the problem and how thay play you,me and many other costumer who invested more than $500 dollars to get a 360 with games and live only to have it dead on arrival,any company that does that deserve what comes to them.

Thank god they don't make airplanes or cars.

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

And all of those neat little perks you added for PSN+ has been on LIVE for years. Don't know where you have been really......

Eltormo

Really so live Gold let you play game from the DLM for without playing for them,no ou get a demo,PSN has been doing discount for ages as well dude,way before PSN+,so you can play xbox clasic games with xbox live gold without paying appart for them?

Demos were strip from live silver and gave exclusive for the first week to gold member but it was not even part of gold,MS make it like that to make live look more of a value,which is not.

On PSN+ i can play PS1 clasics because i am paying to play games,on xbox live gold you pay to play online and had to pay extra to play games,see you can't just buy live gold and head into the market place and download free games to play.lol no dude.

What you can download demoes with gold and xbox 1 games.What you talking bout willis????????
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#123 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

as long as PSN is free im happy with it when im forced to pay to play online thats when i start getting upset

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

What you can download demoes with gold and xbox 1 games.What you talking bout willis????????genaroll

Can you play xbox clasics without actually paying for them,just because you own live gold.?

Avatar image for KaoSXFACTOR
KaoSXFACTOR

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 KaoSXFACTOR
Member since 2009 • 1059 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Yeah, and Microsoft are such a great company disabiling everyones online unless they pay $50 yearly. Let's not even mention overpriced accessories like harddrives which you had to buy before the new models came out because Microsoft didn't allow 3rd party accessories to be used. Microsoft sure are great.FlamesOfGrey

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

Sony overengineered the PS3 and were selling it at a LOSS not overpricing it. Second of all Sony paid the price by losing a ton of market share, billions of dollars and being in the red until just recently. That Wii knockoff will provide more of a hardcore gaming experience then Microsoft's evolved eyetoy ripoff so, myself and alot of gamers would rather have that.

That "Eyetoy" rip-off is far more advanced than the Eyetoy itself. The Move is a blatant ripoff, and will have no impact whatsoever.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Yeah, and Microsoft are such a great company disabiling everyones online unless they pay $50 yearly. Let's not even mention overpriced accessories like harddrives which you had to buy before the new models came out because Microsoft didn't allow 3rd party accessories to be used. Microsoft sure are great.FlamesOfGrey

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

Sony overengineered the PS3 and were selling it at a LOSS not overpricing it. Second of all Sony paid the price by losing a ton of market share, billions of dollars and being in the red until just recently. That Wii knockoff will provide more of a hardcore gaming experience then Microsoft's evolved eyetoy ripoff so, myself and alot of gamers would rather have that.

kinect has more potential though, much more flexibility in the long run if they did decide to add some sort of navigational controller.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#127 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

MS has lost tons of money from the Xbox and 360 hardware as well, that's not really a good example. And where do they make it up from? Their software and...XBL, the online service that is deemed overprices and unnecessary by people here while Sony blatantly shapes PSN in a very similar manner to try and recoup some of the money that MS has been making this whole time.

Eltormo

On the xbox i agree dude,but that was the price they pay for trying to beat the PS2 with pure tech,on the xbox 360 they deserver to loose money,they knew the hardware was a piece of crap and still carry on with the launch,knowing it was failing all around,they knew and they deserve the 1 billion loss,for their denial of the problem and how thay play you,me and many other costumer who invested more than $500 dollars to get a 360 with games and live only to have it dead on arrival,any company that does that deserve what comes to them.

Thank god they don't make airplanes or cars.

MS has had it's problems with hardware, but many of the early PS3's are failing too with no warranty (i would know since I've bought nearly a dozen and fixed them for next to nothing) so no one is perfect. My point was that MS was not making money on the systems when the 360 launched either, so it's not as bad as sony losing $200 per system (which helped win the format war so it's really not that big of a deal) but it's not like MS pulled an Apple with 200% margin rips on their hardware.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"]

What you can download demoes with gold and xbox 1 games.What you talking bout willis????????

Can you play xbox clasics without actually paying for them,just because you own live gold.?

nope. but once you buy them, they're yours forever. really not that much different than having to continuously pay a monthly fee to keep playing free gmaes. its just a different payment structure. in the end, its just two companies trying to make money.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

ok so you guys know i'm a pretty damn cynical guy but you know what?

this part...

"We have a responsibility to continue to innovate on it. Part of that comes from what we owe to the consumer. Part of it comes down to the passion and the people I work with on a daily basis want to continue to innovate on this as well.

"We continue to innovate because we can and we know the consumer wants it.

i believe it.

normally i'd pick a crappy public relations statement like this to pieces but from day one of paying for xbl i have felt i have gotten my $$$ worth out of it.

it has evolved far beyond my expectations.

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

To be honest, if SONY dosent improve PS Plus from what it is now, MS dont have anything to worry about.

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"]

What you can download demoes with gold and xbox 1 games.What you talking bout willis????????clone01

Can you play xbox clasics without actually paying for them,just because you own live gold.?

nope. but once you buy them, they're yours forever. really not that much different than having to continuously pay a monthly fee to keep playing free gmaes. its just a different payment structure. in the end, its just two companies trying to make money.

Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too. Xbox

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Or a $600 at launch gaming console. Let's ignore that right? Or $80 for a Wii chuck and Wii mote knockoff right?

savagetwinkie

Sony overengineered the PS3 and were selling it at a LOSS not overpricing it. Second of all Sony paid the price by losing a ton of market share, billions of dollars and being in the red until just recently. That Wii knockoff will provide more of a hardcore gaming experience then Microsoft's evolved eyetoy ripoff so, myself and alot of gamers would rather have that.

kinect has more potential though, much more flexibility in the long run if they did decide to add some sort of navigational controller.

IMO hybrid gaming with a controller takes away what Kinect is supposed to be in the first place. Falling back on a controller when the biggest draw of Kinect is not having one means they should have just went Sony's route and made a Wii Mote. Kinect in it's purest form isn't going far with hardcore gaming but who knows maybe Microsoft or a 3rd party companywill prove me wrong.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

Gamtrix

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/

from this link:

in about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone ****cs. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license.

by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

clone01

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/ from this link: n about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone classics. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license. by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

Anything you buy at discount is permanent.

The monthly titles that are given "free" are linked to remaining a subscriber.

I have no idea what this thread is even supposed to be discussing.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Sony overengineered the PS3 and were selling it at a LOSS not overpricing it. Second of all Sony paid the price by losing a ton of market share, billions of dollars and being in the red until just recently. That Wii knockoff will provide more of a hardcore gaming experience then Microsoft's evolved eyetoy ripoff so, myself and alot of gamers would rather have that.FlamesOfGrey

kinect has more potential though, much more flexibility in the long run if they did decide to add some sort of navigational controller.

IMO hybrid gaming with a controller takes away what Kinect is supposed to be in the first place. Falling back on a controller when the biggest draw of Kinect is not having one means they should have just went Sony's route and made a Wii Mote. Kinect in it's purest form isn't going far with hardcore gaming but who knows maybe Microsoft or a 3rd party companywill prove me wrong.

you can do everything + more on kinect you could make nearly identical games with move and kinect because they do the same thing with a camera almost, except kinect attempts to identify along with tracdking alot more, move is dumbed down to track colored balls... but they both need a navigational input, like a joystick to navigate 3d space. I really don't see a problem if they just had a small device with a joystick on it and everything else is gesture based.

edit: thinking about it, probably the only game that would work better that would be considered hard core on kinect is black and white. moving forward is simply grabbing the land and moving forward, all the movements in the game could be brocken down into hand gesters so it would be cool to see lionhead studios do it.

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

clone01

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/ from this link: n about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone classics. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license. by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

clone01

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/

from this link:

in about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone ****cs. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license.

by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

Yeah why would they let you keep content that you get for paying for the service? If you buy something with the discounts you get to keep it. It would be complete nonsense any other way.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] kinect has more potential though, much more flexibility in the long run if they did decide to add some sort of navigational controller.savagetwinkie

IMO hybrid gaming with a controller takes away what Kinect is supposed to be in the first place. Falling back on a controller when the biggest draw of Kinect is not having one means they should have just went Sony's route and made a Wii Mote. Kinect in it's purest form isn't going far with hardcore gaming but who knows maybe Microsoft or a 3rd party companywill prove me wrong.

you can do everything + more on kinect you could make nearly identical games with move and kinect because they do the same thing with a camera almost, except kinect attempts to identify along with tracdking alot more, move is dumbed down to track colored balls... but they both need a navigational input, like a joystick to navigate 3d space. I really don't see a problem if they just had a small device with a joystick on it and everything else is gesture based.

It lacks buttons.

Even with a navigation controller, it would still lack buttons.

You could add a second controller with buttons.

But then you'd basically have Move with a better camera.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]

kinect has more potential though, much more flexibility in the long run if they did decide to add some sort of navigational controller.savagetwinkie

IMO hybrid gaming with a controller takes away what Kinect is supposed to be in the first place. Falling back on a controller when the biggest draw of Kinect is not having one means they should have just went Sony's route and made a Wii Mote. Kinect in it's purest form isn't going far with hardcore gaming but who knows maybe Microsoft or a 3rd party companywill prove me wrong.

you can do everything + more on kinect you could make nearly identical games with move and kinect because they do the same thing with a camera almost, except kinect attempts to identify along with tracdking alot more, move is dumbed down to track colored balls... but they both need a navigational input, like a joystick to navigate 3d space. I really don't see a problem if they just had a small device with a joystick on it and everything else is gesture based.

The future will tell everything but as of right now Kinect is looking like a casual parade with a drop of hope. Child Of Eden is the only game that looks interesting and worth playing with Kinect and it's not worth $150 for that IMO.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

Anything you buy at discount is permanent.

The monthly titles that are given "free" are linked to remaining a subscriber.

shinrabanshou

what do you mean by "discount?" does that just refer to titles you actually have to purchase? if so, sorry, i misunderstood the article.

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

Gamtrix

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/ from this link: n about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone classics. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license. by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.

What are you talking about,you dont rent games on live(only with +)everything you download from live can forever be kept silver or gold.Ps+ rips you off twice because free games are gone after suscription and you need psn+ to rent a 1 hour game.
Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]Anything you buy at discount is permanent.

The monthly titles that are given "free" are linked to remaining a subscriber.

clone01

what do you mean by "discount?" does that just refer to titles you actually have to purchase? if so, sorry, i misunderstood the article.

PS+ encompasses discounted games, themes etc. which you can purchase, as well as monthly titles that can be downloaded as a subscriber for no additional charge. There's probably other stuff I'm forgetting but that was the jist of it as far as I recall.

It would make absolutely no sense for them to give you games as part of the service, and let you retain them even if you stop subscribing.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]Bad damage control clone, anything you buy on PSN is your forever too.

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/ from this link: n about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone classics. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license. by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.

its not damage control...i didn't know and i just received the correct information. why do you even insist on calling it "damage control." unlike yourself, i don't really try to push an agenda, and try to approach things with objectivity, rather than ally myself with an inanimate piece of plastic. and again, why the hearts? was that some sort of joke that i missed?
Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.joystiq.com/2010/08/16/playstation-plus-games-expired/ from this link: n about a month, people who purchased a 3-month subscription to PlayStation Plus will be faced with one crucial question. What happens to my games when my subscription ends? Joystiq had access to a press-only 1 month trial, and recently found out the answer. Sony's premium online subscription service has offered a number of "free" games -- full PSN games, like WipEout HD and Critter Crunch, and a variety of Minis and PSone classics. However, these titles were all made available with a caveat: they'd remain accessible for as long as your subscription remained active. Attempting to launch an expired game will trigger this prompt: "This content can be used if you renew the license in PlayStation Store." You'll be able to launch directly into the PlayStation Store, where you will be able to purchase the expired title. For example, we could purchase Aero Racer for its full price of $2.99 from the PlayStation Store. We could also choose to purchase a new PlayStation Plus subscription to extend the license. by the way, thanks for the pic. pretty quick to get across the street and take a picture of your friends 360. why the hearts?

clone01

It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.

its not damage control...i didn't know and i just received the correct information. why do you even insist on calling it "damage control." unlike yourself, i don't really try to push an agenda, and try to approach things with objectivity, rather than ally myself with an inanimate piece of plastic. and again, why the hearts? was that some sort of joke that i missed?

You were sort of stalking so... lol. Dude I'm sorry if I'm being arrogant but from where I'm standing it seems like people are pretending they don't understand just to keep "fighting".

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Gamtrix"] It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.Gamtrix

What are you talking about,you dont rent games on live(only with +)everything you download from live can forever be kept silver or gold.Ps+ rips you off twice because free games are gone after suscription and you need psn+ to rent a 1 hour game.

Wow you have no idea how it works, I kinda feel bad for PS+ haters, they don't even understand the concept of "free" stuff :lol: It confuses them. ANYTHING you buy on PSN wheter or not your a PS+ member is your to keep forever. If you SUBSCRIBE to PS+ you get around 4 games a month, as well as some DLC and other content that'll acumulate every month as long as your a member to play. Understand?

Notice how I said free games,I already know you keep things you bought.Your whole post is..............far away from what I typed.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#147 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Gamtrix"] It is my friends, but he lives in the same house as I do. And once again terrible damage control. You didn't buy those games, you rented them. Any game you BUY, as in buying a game on Xbox Live, going to the store and purchasing you keep forever. You loose the ones that are part of the rental service. If a PSN or a PS+ member go to the PS Store and buy a game it's theres forever. This was explained day 1.Gamtrix

What are you talking about,you dont rent games on live(only with +)everything you download from live can forever be kept silver or gold.Ps+ rips you off twice because free games are gone after suscription and you need psn+ to rent a 1 hour game.

Wow you have no idea how it works, I kinda feel bad for PS+ haters, they don't even understand the concept of "free" stuff :lol: It confuses them. ANYTHING you buy on PSN wheter or not your a PS+ member is your to keep forever. If you SUBSCRIBE to PS+ you get around 4 games a month, as well as some DLC and other content that'll acumulate every month as long as your a member to play. Understand?

I understand the concepts of plus and have looked at all the content. I don't hate plus, it just doesn't have anything that interests me yet. Also, nothing involved with plus is free.

Avatar image for VladJasonDrac
VladJasonDrac

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 VladJasonDrac
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

I get my PSN email once a week and I keep looking for a reason to get PSN+ and I have to say $5 off High Velocity Bowling isn't doin it. Neither is a free Nebula Tunnels theme or the free Aero Racer Mini game. This free stuff costs less than $3 and it's not even anything I would ever play or use. If people really want free garbage there is a dumpster out in the parking lot of my apt building and they can pay me $4 a month to go dumpster diving.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

You were sort of stalking so... lol. Dude I'm sorry if I'm being arrogant but from where I'm standing it seems like people are pretending they don't understand just to keep "fighting".

Gamtrix

perhaps if you'd start posting a little bit more objectively, and stop posting in a matter thatmight aggravate other users, people here might stop "fighting" you all the time.

Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#150 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]You were sort of stalking so... lol. Dude I'm sorry if I'm being arrogant but from where I'm standing it seems like people are pretending they don't understand just to keep "fighting".

clone01

perhaps if you'd start posting a little bit more objectively, and stop posting in a matter thatmight aggravate other users, people here might stop "fighting" you all the time.

almost reminds me of aku101, except without the advertisement in the sig