MS: PlayStation Plus "hasn't changed" us

  • 178 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Hmm yeah. I can't wait until I get the chance to say what plays I want to do out loud in Madden. Just like a real QB! Especially when I'm versing people in the same room! "4th and long. Punt? No way. Hail Mary!" full of grace the lord is...

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

yeah we already knew psn plus wouldnt change them. i was hoping normal psn would force them to go free or at least make them lower it to 19.99 a year. psn+ isnt even half as good as xboxlive. they only give rentals and long demos while xbl gives us much better lag free online play and to be able to talk to our friends no matter what games we are playing. soon we will be able to talk on our 360s to people on their phone. psn+ cant touch xbl imo

Avatar image for sky_rend
sky_rend

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 sky_rend
Member since 2005 • 207 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

Except for the fact that they let you demo every arcade game they release. Can you say the same for Sony?

KaoSXFACTOR

DEMO. D.E.M.O. They even force devs like Valve to charge for their DLC on top of the Live fee's and Dev's WANTING to release it free. Stop defending such a company.

Stop defending such a company? Yeah. Sony was such a GREAT company making its users with the PSP GO buy all of their games for their original PSP's all over again because of digital distribution. Don't make it compatible. Just make them buy it again. :roll:

Yea, because Sony forced people to buy the GO. Hint: 3000's still available. Learn how to make an argument please. As of now, MS is the only company to charge for p2p online play.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#154 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] DEMO. D.E.M.O. They even force devs like Valve to charge for their DLC on top of the Live fee's and Dev's WANTING to release it free. Stop defending such a company. sky_rend

Stop defending such a company? Yeah. Sony was such a GREAT company making its users with the PSP GO buy all of their games for their original PSP's all over again because of digital distribution. Don't make it compatible. Just make them buy it again. :roll:

Yea, because Sony forced people to buy the GO. Hint: 3000's still available. Learn how to make an argument please. As of now, MS is the only company to charge for p2p online play.

Some would call that innovative...

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Why would PS+ change MS? Yeah, like MS will quite charging because Sony came out with a discount subscription.
Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#156 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

That sucks. I was hoping MS would give better "deals of the week" I don't want a 240 MSP discount on a trash arcade game I wouldn't accept for free.

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts
Why would PS+ change MS? Yeah, like MS will quite charging because Sony came out with a discount subscription.djsifer01
specialy when ms offers new deals every week. mvc 2 for half price was a sweet deal imo....
Avatar image for VladJasonDrac
VladJasonDrac

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 VladJasonDrac
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

That sucks. I was hoping MS would give better "deals of the week" I don't want a 240 MSP discount on a trash arcade game I wouldn't accept for free.

Grawse

Assassin's Creed 2 DLC 50% off. Borderlands DLC 50% off. Dragon Age DLC 50% off. All within the last 30 days. I wasn't aware those were trash arcade games but alrighty.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#159 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

MS not considering giving discounts to XBL Gold Members?? Who would have thunk it?? :o:P

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#161 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

I will never pay for online gaming. Sorry Microsoft, but this is the single biggest beef I have with you.

Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

Well I never owned wipeout before PSN+ and now I do. I've pretty much made my $50 back in downloadable games and whatever already so I don't mind. But it turns on in the middle of the night and downloades demos, patches and firmware updates for me. Pretty nifty feature:) I'm still waiting for some PSN+ ONLY features to come though. stuff like x game chat, cloud storage, better party system, etc.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#163 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

I would hope so, the PSN+ launch and so far evolution has been lame and piss poor.

WilliamRLBaker
you always have something bad to say about the playstation brand dispite having a PSN account you no matter what the subject is, is always on the 360 side just found that interesting.
Avatar image for bigboss5ak
bigboss5ak

2962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#164 bigboss5ak
Member since 2007 • 2962 Posts
Interesting thread ive read arguments from both sides and both sides share good points. One statement i read was that you pay full price for a game and ms charges you extra for the multiplayer part of your game. That is a valid argument cant lie because paying for live is becoming a nuisance to me while psn is free. But in ms defense live is a better service and offers better online play, early demos and early arcade games. I mean castle crashers is just now coming to psn after 2 years and castlevania HOD might follow suit. Im going to stay out of this one because both sides have valid arguments
Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

I would hope so, the PSN+ launch and so far evolution has been lame and piss poor.

Santesyu

you always have something bad to say about the playstation brand dispite having a PSN account you no matter what the subject is, is always on the 360 side just found that interesting.

He barely plays the thing http://us.playstation.com/publictrophy/index.htm?onlinename=williamrlbaker...too lazy to link that.

I prettty much think he has it just to say he has one so he cant be biased.

Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
Innovating with Kinect :lol:.....
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

I will never pay for online gaming. Sorry Microsoft, but this is the single biggest beef I have with you.

ImaPirate0202
i don't think you're alone. i personally don't have that much of an issue, as i like XBL as a service, but i certainly understand why some folks would.
Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts
Interesting thread ive read arguments from both sides and both sides share good points. One statement i read was that you pay full price for a game and ms charges you extra for the multiplayer part of your game. That is a valid argument cant lie because paying for live is becoming a nuisance to me while psn is free. But in ms defense live is a better service and offers better online play, early demos and early arcade games. I mean castle crashers is just now coming to psn after 2 years and castlevania HOD might follow suit. Im going to stay out of this one because both sides have valid argumentsbigboss5ak
The argument of ''having a better online service'' is void. There is no competition on the 360 for online networking. You only have $BL. You don't have a choice on the 360, you don't get to choose between a core online gameplay and and supposedly awesome online gameplay service If I were to believe lemmings. So there is no point in saying; ''XBL has the better service'' because it's the only service available on the 360... M$ never gives you an option...just pony up 50$ or you have no online gameplay at all. That's BAD use of monopoly. People don't care how ''awesome'' XBL is, THEY JUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF PLAYING TO PLAY ONLINE. They don't want to pay extra money. Is that an difficult thing to grasp? And they're right, who in their right minds would pay for online gameplay when about over 9000 other platforms now and in the past have been for free? 360 users that don't want to pay, explore the possibilities with Xlink Kai. It will, if possible and set up right, to play online with the help of your PC. And for free!
Avatar image for xx360shotsxx
xx360shotsxx

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 xx360shotsxx
Member since 2010 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]Interesting thread ive read arguments from both sides and both sides share good points. One statement i read was that you pay full price for a game and ms charges you extra for the multiplayer part of your game. That is a valid argument cant lie because paying for live is becoming a nuisance to me while psn is free. But in ms defense live is a better service and offers better online play, early demos and early arcade games. I mean castle crashers is just now coming to psn after 2 years and castlevania HOD might follow suit. Im going to stay out of this one because both sides have valid argumentsLocutus_Picard
The argument of ''having a better online service'' is void. There is no competition on the 360 for online networking. You only have $BL. You don't have a choice on the 360, you don't get to choose between a core online gameplay and and supposedly awesome online gameplay service If I were to believe lemmings. So there is no point in saying; ''XBL has the better service'' because it's the only service available on the 360... M$ never gives you an option...just pony up 50$ or you have no online gameplay at all. That's BAD use of monopoly. People don't care how ''awesome'' XBL is, THEY JUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF PLAYING TO PLAY ONLINE. They don't want to pay extra money. Is that an difficult thing to grasp? And they're right, who in their right minds would pay for online gameplay when about over 9000 other platforms now and in the past have been for free? 360 users that don't want to pay, explore the possibilities with Xlink Kai. It will, if possible and set up right, to play online with the help of your PC. And for free!

is $50 a year really that much money when we pay $60 for games
Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts
[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"][QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]Interesting thread ive read arguments from both sides and both sides share good points. One statement i read was that you pay full price for a game and ms charges you extra for the multiplayer part of your game. That is a valid argument cant lie because paying for live is becoming a nuisance to me while psn is free. But in ms defense live is a better service and offers better online play, early demos and early arcade games. I mean castle crashers is just now coming to psn after 2 years and castlevania HOD might follow suit. Im going to stay out of this one because both sides have valid argumentsxx360shotsxx
The argument of ''having a better online service'' is void. There is no competition on the 360 for online networking. You only have $BL. You don't have a choice on the 360, you don't get to choose between a core online gameplay and and supposedly awesome online gameplay service If I were to believe lemmings. So there is no point in saying; ''XBL has the better service'' because it's the only service available on the 360... M$ never gives you an option...just pony up 50$ or you have no online gameplay at all. That's BAD use of monopoly. People don't care how ''awesome'' XBL is, THEY JUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF PLAYING TO PLAY ONLINE. They don't want to pay extra money. Is that an difficult thing to grasp? And they're right, who in their right minds would pay for online gameplay when about over 9000 other platforms now and in the past have been for free? 360 users that don't want to pay, explore the possibilities with Xlink Kai. It will, if possible and set up right, to play online with the help of your PC. And for free!

is $50 a year really that much money when we pay $60 for games

So you wouldn't mind paying $80 a year because you pay $60 anyway? Is this how lemming logic works? I might need to write a thesis on this.
Avatar image for Darth_DuMas
Darth_DuMas

2687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#171 Darth_DuMas
Member since 2006 • 2687 Posts

I still don't get the point of PSN+ though.

I've only heard about the perks, but what is the aim of it.

Discounts is a perk.

Freebies (games that mostly require continued subscription from what I hear) is a perk.

Demos, I guess a perk but should be free.

Beta access should be free, since your doing them a favour by playing it.

What else?

For example, Xbox live centres around online play through a unified service and the rest are perks.

I don't mean this in an argumentative way, I just don't get it.

Avatar image for xx360shotsxx
xx360shotsxx

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 xx360shotsxx
Member since 2010 • 155 Posts

[QUOTE="xx360shotsxx"][QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"] The argument of ''having a better online service'' is void. There is no competition on the 360 for online networking. You only have $BL. You don't have a choice on the 360, you don't get to choose between a core online gameplay and and supposedly awesome online gameplay service If I were to believe lemmings. So there is no point in saying; ''XBL has the better service'' because it's the only service available on the 360... M$ never gives you an option...just pony up 50$ or you have no online gameplay at all. That's BAD use of monopoly. People don't care how ''awesome'' XBL is, THEY JUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF PLAYING TO PLAY ONLINE. They don't want to pay extra money. Is that an difficult thing to grasp? And they're right, who in their right minds would pay for online gameplay when about over 9000 other platforms now and in the past have been for free? 360 users that don't want to pay, explore the possibilities with Xlink Kai. It will, if possible and set up right, to play online with the help of your PC. And for free!Locutus_Picard
is $50 a year really that much money when we pay $60 for games

So you wouldn't mind paying $80 a year because you pay $60 anyway? Is this how lemming logic works? I might need to write a thesis on this.

hey i just think it's sad when ppl cry over paying $50 every 12months i guess when they have to start paying actual billsmonthly they'll just shoot themselves in the head and end it all

Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts

[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"][QUOTE="xx360shotsxx"] is $50 a year really that much money when we pay $60 for gamesxx360shotsxx

So you wouldn't mind paying $80 a year because you pay $60 anyway? Is this how lemming logic works? I might need to write a thesis on this.

hey i just think it's sad when ppl cry over paying $50 every 12months i guess when they have to start paying actual billsmonthly they'll just shoot themselves in the head and end it all

You know...when you need to cut down unneeded expenses...guess which one is the first one to go? That's right...gaming, hobby's in general. That ''awesome'' XBL argument isn't going to make you cut it out like some deformed tumour out of your expenses. Even if you earn loads of money, you would never want to make unneeded purchases. And that includes XBL.
Avatar image for xx360shotsxx
xx360shotsxx

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 xx360shotsxx
Member since 2010 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"][QUOTE="xx360shotsxx"]

So you wouldn't mind paying $80 a year because you pay $60 anyway? Is this how lemming logic works? I might need to write a thesis on this.Locutus_Picard
hey i just think it's sad when ppl cry over paying $50 every 12months i guess when they have to start paying actual billsmonthly they'll just shoot themselves in the head and end it all

You know...when you need to cut down unneeded expenses...guess which one is the first one to go? That's right...gaming, hobby's in general. That ''awesome'' XBL argument isn't going to make you cut it out like some deformed tumour out of your expenses. Even if you earn loads of money, you would never want to make unneeded purchases. And that includes XBL.

man your just being cheap. i pay for xbl every january and i haven't once thought it was a problem when i compare it to the amount of money i spend paying other things off. the only time i can see paying 50 bucks a year as a problem is if im dead broke.
Avatar image for VladJasonDrac
VladJasonDrac

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 VladJasonDrac
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"][QUOTE="xx360shotsxx"] hey i just think it's sad when ppl cry over paying $50 every 12months i guess when they have to start paying actual billsmonthly they'll just shoot themselves in the head and end it all

xx360shotsxx

You know...when you need to cut down unneeded expenses...guess which one is the first one to go? That's right...gaming, hobby's in general. That ''awesome'' XBL argument isn't going to make you cut it out like some deformed tumour out of your expenses. Even if you earn loads of money, you would never want to make unneeded purchases. And that includes XBL.

man your just being cheap. i pay for xbl every january and i haven't once thought it was a problem when i compare it to the amount of money i spend paying other things off. the only time i can see paying 50 bucks a year as a problem is if im dead broke.

I enjoy and pay for XBL Gold but the bottom line is we have $50 less than the other guy for doing the same exact thing. You can try and spin and slant it any way you want and say how cheap it is but that simple fact still remains. If its no big deal to you then you could just buy a PS3 and burn a $50 bill every year as long as you own the console.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="xx360shotsxx"]

[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"] So you wouldn't mind paying $80 a year because you pay $60 anyway? Is this how lemming logic works? I might need to write a thesis on this.Locutus_Picard

hey i just think it's sad when ppl cry over paying $50 every 12months i guess when they have to start paying actual billsmonthly they'll just shoot themselves in the head and end it all

You know...when you need to cut down unneeded expenses...guess which one is the first one to go? That's right...gaming, hobby's in general. That ''awesome'' XBL argument isn't going to make you cut it out like some deformed tumour out of your expenses. Even if you earn loads of money, you would never want to make unneeded purchases. And that includes XBL.

eating out would be the first thing to go, bepending on the person, people who game alot would keep paying $50 for the deals on Live, same reason why people pay for PLUS

Avatar image for sky_rend
sky_rend

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 sky_rend
Member since 2005 • 207 Posts
Let me just give a scenario and people can tell me how paying $50/year makes it better. I want to play some SSFIV online. I go online, find some matches, get some games in. And I'm done. For free.
Avatar image for fanboy999
fanboy999

1444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#178 fanboy999
Member since 2003 • 1444 Posts

PSN was total garbage until it started to copy all of XBL's features. Now it is shaping up to be a better service but still behind XBL in my opinion. I did notice they finally are up to par with XBL as far as game and video content goes. Honestly I have been a PS3 owner for about 3 years but I've only shopped on PSN about 10 times and made about 3 or 4 game purchases. Some of the exclusives like Flower and Wipeout are totally awesome and Live players are missing out on a couple of great exclusives there. But the games on demand on Xbox Live is starting to get some alot of great full games for download. There is just more interesting arcade games on Live I think.