This topic is locked from further discussion.
I doubt they are trying to reduce the 'camper mentality' since that's like 80% of their fanbase.gamebreakerz__:D That's a good point and also hilarious. And this thread gave me a good laugh. Thanks for making my day start off nicely again, activision. And for free too! Maybe they should start charging for press releases and interviews.
considering BO has been the best MP since 4....its gonna be pretty easy.
For starters nerf Killstreaks and for the love of god drop akimbo :(
That's good to hear :) I can't wait to play it.
EDIT: I just hope they get rid of the ability to QuickScope. So annoying!!!
Ok this both bad and good
good in making MW3 similar to CoD4 since that was too fun
Bad as in Cod had only 3 typle killstreaks and i dont want that! i need a nuke! a chopper gunner! an AC130!
[QUOTE="vashkey"]so whats bad company and 1943 then? I thought they were battlefield games:? Or Battlefield Heroes, Battlefield Play 4 Free, Battlefield 2142 and Battlefield 2: Modern Combat. Theres really no reason not to count them, they were all from Dice. Selective memory. Still, it's a complete joke to call Battlefield 3 fresh or innovative. Since BF2 and 2142, no, there havent been actual battlefield games. All the ones released on console were spinoffs of the series and do not contain nearly the same features found in BF1942, BF2, and 2142. It's true, there hasn't been a real BF game in years[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]
[QUOTE="Remmib"]
Yep, fresh. There hasn't been a Battlefield game is 6 years.
Try again.
wis3boi
I see you've been drinking the koolaid Dice has been handing out.
If it's from Dice, has Battlefield in the name, plays like Battlefield, it's a Battlefield game. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. Don't be a tool.
[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
[QUOTE="Remmib"]
Yep, fresh. There hasn't been a Battlefield game is 6 years.
Try again.
mitu123
...wut?
Those are spinoffs, not main BF games, and they sure as hell don't play exactly like PC exclusive BF games.Wow, Dice fans must be baking a pie, cuz they're cherry-picking their games like crazy! :P
[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
[QUOTE="Remmib"]
Yep, fresh. There hasn't been a Battlefield game is 6 years.
Try again.
mitu123
...wut?
Those are spinoffs, not main BF games, and they sure as hell don't play exactly like PC exclusive BF games.Well MW3 won't play "exactly" like it's predecessors either. In fact MW in and of itself is a spin-off series of CoD. That doesn't matter though, because MW3 is a CoD game just as Bad Company is a Battlefield game.[QUOTE="mitu123"]Those are spinoffs, not main BF games, and they sure as hell don't play exactly like PC exclusive BF games.Well MW3 won't play "exactly" like it's predecessors either. In fact MW in and of itself is a spin-off series of CoD. That doesn't matter though, because MW3 is a CoD game just as Bad Company is a Battlefield game. What did they say about it that makes it play differently? And I thought it took this direction to be modern with every other year being non-modern.[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
...wut?
enterawesome
Isnt every CODs MP after COD4 inspired by COD4s mp? :|Solid_Tangono you actually think MW2 was aspired byt COD4 :?.... If that was the case it would have been a good game.
^There is no way in hell Bad Company is a traditional Battlefield game, is it a Battlefield game, yes, is it like the BF games on PC(1942, Vietnam, 2, 2142), not even close.
But on topic: We need proof IW, it needs to be seen in action.
mitu123
So what if it is slightly different? I could say Killzone 3 is nothing like Killzone 2, but that doesn't mean it isn't a true Killzone game. :lol:
Do you even read what you type? I guess ignorance is bliss.
[QUOTE="viper-kid"] That's the reason BF3 will never overtake COD on consoles.Mograine
Quite an odd reason considering how many CoD players don't even know what frames per second means.
Well to be fair, Mograine, wen i was a 13 - 15 year old child, i didn't know much of technology.
[QUOTE="viper-kid"] That's the reason BF3 will never overtake COD on consoles.Mograine
Quite an odd reason considering how many CoD players don't even know what frames per second means.
But every Cod player's reason for not liking BF, is the control not being smooth like cod.If Cod is 'piece of ancient trash' what does that say about BF3?[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="Lucianu"]
So this piece of ancient trash is going to play similary to every single CoD game?
No ***, Sherlock.
Lucianu
I don't care about BF3 at all.
So you just bash games which you dont care about?[QUOTE="mitu123"]
^There is no way in hell Bad Company is a traditional Battlefield game, is it a Battlefield game, yes, is it like the BF games on PC(1942, Vietnam, 2, 2142), not even close.
But on topic: We need proof IW, it needs to be seen in action.
xYamatox
So what if it is slightly diffeent? I could say Killzone 3 is nothing like Killzone 2, but that doesn't mean it isn't a true Killzone game. :lol:
Do you even read what you type? I guess ignorance is bliss.
It's not slightly different, are you honestly saying BF2 and BC2 play alike because I spent hundreds of hours on both and they certainly do not play alike.That's a bad comparison, Killzone 3 is canon to the series even with all the changes, Bad Company isn't canon to BFs before it, still a spinoff.
no you actually think MW2 was aspired byt COD4 :?.... If that was the case it would have been a good game.[QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]
[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]Isnt every CODs MP after COD4 inspired by COD4s mp? :|Mograine
We don't know if MW3 is any good either.
We sure dont, but takling input from COD4 sure as hell better than trying to make a more chaotic MW2.
So you just bash games which you dont care about?viper-kid
I didn't bash BF3.
Though why pay attention to haters if you're mearly wanting to have a good time with your prefered game. I don't see how one's opinion affects your enjoyment with your prefered game. Dissagreements are fine and dandy, but lets see a little more meat to it.
[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"]
^There is no way in hell Bad Company is a traditional Battlefield game, is it a Battlefield game, yes, is it like the BF games on PC(1942, Vietnam, 2, 2142), not even close.
But on topic: We need proof IW, it needs to be seen in action.
mitu123
So what if it is slightly diffeent? I could say Killzone 3 is nothing like Killzone 2, but that doesn't mean it isn't a true Killzone game. :lol:
Do you even read what you type? I guess ignorance is bliss.
It's not slightly different, are you honestly saying BF2 and BC2 play alike because I spent hundreds of hours on both and they certainly do not play alike.That's a bad comparison, Killzone 3 is canon to the series even with all the changes, Bad Company isn't canon to BFs before it, still a spinoff.
So baecause the older Battlefield games doesn't have a single player campaign, but the Bad Company series does, it doesn't make the old games related to the new ones AT ALL?
Yeah, the STORIES might not be canon, but they are still within the same series. You just got suckered into Dice's PR bullcrap by saying that Battlefield 3 is the first "TRUE" Battlefield game since BF2. It's nothing but PR to get weak minded people to buy their game, just like they did with the "Free DLC Maps" for BC2.
Again, don't be a tool. If it is made by Dice, has Battlefield in the name, and plays anything at all like a Battlefield game, IT IS A BATTLEFIELD GAME!!!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment