[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
So what if it is slightly diffeent? I could say Killzone 3 is nothing like Killzone 2, but that doesn't mean it isn't a true Killzone game. :lol:
Do you even read what you type? I guess ignorance is bliss.
xYamatox
It's not slightly different, are you honestly saying BF2 and BC2 play alike because I spent hundreds of hours on both and they certainly do not play alike.That's a bad comparison, Killzone 3 is canon to the series even with all the changes, Bad Company isn't canon to BFs before it, still a spinoff.
So baecause the older Battlefield games doesn't have a single player campaign, but the Bad Company series does, it doesn't make the old games related to the new ones AT ALL?
Yeah, the STORIES might not be canon, but they are still within the same series. You just got suckered into Dice's PR bullcrap by saying that Battlefield 3 is the first "TRUE" Battlefield game since BF2. It's nothing but PR to get weak minded people to buy their game, just like they did with the "Free DLC Maps" for BC2.
Again, don't be a tool. If it is made by Dice, has Battlefield in the name, and plays anything at all like a Battlefield game, IT IS A BATTLEFIELD GAME!!!
You don't know the changes in multiplayer do you? Have you even played BF2 for that matter or the others I listed? Single player isn't all either, the fact that the multiplayer are so different don't make them even close, people would laugh to even think Bad Company compares to the PC exclusive BFs.And if you had kept up with the news, you would know BF3 on PC is even bringing back what the other PC BF games had, like 64 players, huge maps, squad leaders, various vehicles like jets for example and is even bringing back Team Deathmatch from 1942 along with gameplay changes and the class system is like 2142. That's far more than what either Bad Company did.
Since when do we count spinoffs as main games? We count them as games, but not main ones, would you count Killzone Liberation as a main game? Still a game though.
Log in to comment