[QUOTE="killzowned24"]K2/R2/MGS4 all look better:)thrones
Only one of those can realistically be said to look better.
GUESS WHICH!?
I dont agree, I see nothing in gears that make it much better.This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]K2/R2/MGS4 all look better:)thrones
Only one of those can realistically be said to look better.
GUESS WHICH!?
I dont agree, I see nothing in gears that make it much better.class. WOW would you look at that I can use style and class now in posts.
Style, class. This game has great style it also looks like it has a lot of class. Wow, I bet I never use those words now.
samusarmada
.... the DEVIL! How do the heck do you type those two words?
STYLE
CLASS
NOW I'M FREE!
[QUOTE="terdoo"]Killzone 2 looks very boring imo.The gameplay doesent actually look "fun".And the graphics style is depressing and boring.Bloodseeker23
wow...this is coming from a player who played Stealth games i believe.
If he plays stealth games, that makes his point even stronger... KZ2... is a run n gun.......
[QUOTE="thrones"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]K2/R2/MGS4 all look better:)killzowned24
Only one of those can realistically be said to look better.
GUESS WHICH!?
I dont agree, I see nothing in gears that make it much better.Yes, it does. In all likelihood, you're "a" blind "fanboy".
[QUOTE="thrones"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]K2/R2/MGS4 all look better:)killzowned24
Only one of those can realistically be said to look better.
GUESS WHICH!?
I dont agree, I see nothing in gears that make it much better.Those look like cool aliens. Why do they look like that as opposed to the normal chimera?
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Lol, try posting a gears pic to compare.
TheUtmost
What's the point when you're blind?
really?
[QUOTE="samusarmada"]class. WOW would you look at that I can use style and class now in posts.
Style, class. This game has great style it also looks like it has a lot of class. Wow, I bet I never use those words now.
justforlotr2004
That wont last; Ive had a few times it works then it randomly stops.
:(
[QUOTE="samusarmada"]class. WOW would you look at that I can use style and class now in posts.
Style, class. This game has great style it also looks like it has a lot of class. Wow, I bet I never use those words now.
thrones
.... the DEVIL! How do the heck do you type those two words?
STYLE
CLASS
NOW I'M FREE!
hehe, I feel I should use these words more often given that apparantly I only have a limited amount of time to use them. Quick, say something clever so I can say class post :D
hehe, I feel I should use these words more often given that apparantly I only have a limited amount of time to use them. Quick, say something clever so I can say class post :D
samusarmada
Well I could be wrong, maybe they fixed the problem. :P
Wow Cows always hype graphics way to much, wait for the damn game to come out, I'm sick of hearing about it by now, so much hype around it, its crazy. If this don't get AAA wow this place will explode.With all that said I still can't wait to play this game, I am one of the very few who kinda liked the first one.
[QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="kostmpekir"]Gears 2 simply looks miles ahead of anything on PS3, it is amazing
Chutebox
I'm sorry that I have to double post but Gears 2 looks exactly like the first one.
I wouldn't say exactly, it does look slightly beter.
And? Gears 1 is still an amazing look game.
And Gears 2 has a much larger scale.
[QUOTE="kostmpekir"]Gears 2 simply looks miles ahead of anything on PS3, it is amazing
trizzle_a
I'm sorry that I have to double post but Gears 2 looks exactly like the first one.
lol so I gotta dig up that other comparison I made a while back too?
-----------
Left: PC Gears (Looks better than the original 360 version with higher res textures)
Right: 360 Gears 2
As you can see, Gears 2 destroys even the higher res PC version of Gears 1.
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="kostmpekir"]Gears 2 simply looks miles ahead of anything on PS3, it is amazing
thrones
I'm sorry that I have to double post but Gears 2 looks exactly like the first one.
I wouldn't say exactly, it does look slightly beter.
And? Gears 1 is still an amazing look game.
And Gears 2 has a much larger scale.
I'm not complaining.
[QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="kostmpekir"]Gears 2 simply looks miles ahead of anything on PS3, it is amazing
justforlotr2004
I'm sorry that I have to double post but Gears 2 looks exactly like the first one.
lol so I gotta dig up that other comparison I made a while back too?
-----------
Left: PC Gears (Looks better than the original 360 version with higher res textures)
Right: 360 Gears 2
As you can see, Gears 2 destroys even the higher res PC version of Gears 1.
It's probably because they share art **** so people won't look in the details and think like that.
[QUOTE="justforlotr2004"][QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="kostmpekir"]Gears 2 simply looks miles ahead of anything on PS3, it is amazing
thrones
I'm sorry that I have to double post but Gears 2 looks exactly like the first one.
lol so I gotta dig up that other comparison I made a while back too?
-----------
Left: PC Gears (Looks better than the original 360 version with higher res textures)
Right: 360 Gears 2
As you can see, Gears 2 destroys even the higher res PC version of Gears 1.
It's probably because they share art **** so people won't look in the details and think like that.
lol see style doesn't work anymore. Anyway yeah its mainly because it has the same direction as the first that causes people to say it looks exactly like that last.
[QUOTE="stephant_6"]That's right. Take that Gears of Rehash 1.5!dkhw
HAHAHHAA!!!! At least Gears was FUN and was a quality game.
the shortest game i ever played. the story would be done in about two hours even on the hardest mode too. how is that a quality game. and i had the game, i had to say that before some one claims i've never played it[QUOTE="johnnyblazed88"]its amazing how a sequal to mediocre game like killzone can have so much hypeGUNpoint_
GTA did a complete overhaul of it's system whereas Killzone just prettied up the graphics and offers nothing.
[QUOTE="GUNpoint_"][QUOTE="johnnyblazed88"]its amazing how a sequal to mediocre game like killzone can have so much hypethegame1980
GTA did a complete overhaul of it's system whereas Killzone just prettied up the graphics and offers nothing.
And it also likely won't have more glitches than nukes in Iran this time around, Killzone could have been a solid game the first time around. Could have been :|[QUOTE="TheUtmost"][QUOTE="thegame1980"][QUOTE="Cooldude224"] The game looks really dull IMO.EmperorSupreme
Killzone 2 indeed does look dull. It actually looksl ike a better looking version of the first game which was indeed very dull, we'll see what happens.
It unquestionably does.
How?? Or is that just the cool thing to say now for lemmings? Since the color argument is now old since Gears2 looks even more bland than Killzone.
Killzone 2 looks EXACTLY like Killzone one in terms of what's going on, where you fight and so on. I played the first game and i was VERY boring. It was the same old, same old FPS stuff. The story was a snooze fest and I didn't really care at all for any of the playable characters. Thr online was also boring.
Does that help?
The question was how does Killzone look dull? Not if I played Gears. There is crap exploding everywhere, enemies, friendlies etc all in a battle that seems to be much bigger than yourself. How do lemmings honestly say thats dull? EmperorSupreme
I'm solely basing my opinion on KZ2 from my expierences with KZ which was dull. These incredible battlefield presentations you speak of are NOTHING I haven't already done 300 times in an FPS game already and since the first one was dreadful those scenarios do not excite me. Like I said though we will see what happens when it releases. Perhaps it will be much better then I'm expecting and I can ignore the fact that it has nothing new to bring to the table.
[QUOTE="thegame1980"][QUOTE="GUNpoint_"][QUOTE="johnnyblazed88"]its amazing how a sequal to mediocre game like killzone can have so much hypethrones
GTA did a complete overhaul of it's system whereas Killzone just prettied up the graphics and offers nothing.
And it also likely won't have more glitches than nukes in Iran this time around, Killzone could have been a solid game the first time around. Could have been :|
Oh god the glitches! Those were painful.
Can anybody admit that both games look good and will be fun. whodey8584
Well, if PS3 fanboys had not filled forums with the Killozne 2 graphics hype for more than a year now, would be cool, but given Gears 2 looks miles better and more advanced in graphics, i think there is a point to be made
Never hype a PS3 game is the point, for anything, and that clearly PS3 is an inferior in visuals machine
Can anybody admit that both games look good and will be fun. whodey8584
I have multiple times graphics wise, but gameplay wise I cant comment since I havent played either. From what Ive seen though they both look to be fun.
[QUOTE="caseypayne69"][QUOTE="Nolan16"]Graphics go to kill zone 2 looks better then Gears 2 IMO but let me ask you all serious and honest questions and answer it truly even though the graphics are better on Kill zone 2 what game will get more sales will have funnier game play and get a higher score?
jeezers
Gears will have more sales due to a larger base of system owners but who cares.
They made less then 2,000 to 4,000 Ford GT in the two years of its production but it is still better then any car that sells over 100,000 models a year. Quanity don't mean smack, remember Nintendo 64 slogin? Quality over quantity, in this case its Sony taking there time polishing this game instead of making two in the same time period hint hint Gears 1 and 2. Again Quality over Quantity.
Funnier? who knows really. High score? Hype only means so much.
quanity doesnt mean anything, but gameplay does, and thats why gears 2 will be the better game.
So if gears outsells it 4:1 then killzone is the better game?
[QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]That's right. Take that Gears of Rehash 1.5!gipps85
HAHAHHAA!!!! At least Gears was FUN and was a quality game.
the shortest game i ever played. the story would be done in about two hours even on the hardest mode too. how is that a quality game. and i had the game, i had to say that before some one claims i've never played itIt's one of the greatest "shooters" ever "made". Do not shed tears because "Gears of War" "outscored" and outsold "Killzone".
[QUOTE="gipps85"][QUOTE="dkhw"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]That's right. Take that Gears of Rehash 1.5!TheUtmost
HAHAHHAA!!!! At least Gears was FUN and was a quality game.
the shortest game i ever played. the story would be done in about two hours even on the hardest mode too. how is that a quality game. and i had the game, i had to say that before some one claims i've never played itIt's one of the greatest "shooters" ever "made". Do not shed tears because "Gears of War" "outscored" and outsold "Killzone".
how can you compare the first killzone with gears of war. one came out in a older consule. Gears was fun for only the online play, and even then you could only have played with seven other lemmings which is whack.Yep the graphics look good. But I am still disappointed with the lack of color in the game. A war does not change the color of the world, just the look (destroyed buildings, holes in the ground, bodies on the ground, ect. ect.).Bubblehash
But an industrious militaristic nazi based society on a WH40k styled death planet does.
For the people complaining about lack of colors, last time I checked war usually isnt very colorfull. The fact that this game takes place on a very polluted different planet warzone should make the colors chosen expected.Very poor choice in picture to argue your point. The first is lacking color because it is just a old picture that would have lacked color if it was a picture of a rainbow. The second is of two guys standing in the desert with nothing in the background (unless you count the bridge that is miles away).
EVOLV3
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment