alien 3 was first movie aliens they used cgi on.
They used a puppet and cgi for some parts but you can definitely tell which parts are cgi alien and look fake as sh1t compared to the puppet.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
alien 3 was first movie aliens they used cgi on.
They used a puppet and cgi for some parts but you can definitely tell which parts are cgi alien and look fake as sh1t compared to the puppet.
using real puppets for movie is cooler because you have real objects left over after the movie is completed.
it's not just a file on a computer.
alien 3 was first movie aliens they used cgi on.
They used a puppet and cgi for some parts but you can definitely tell which parts are cgi alien and look fake as sh1t compared to the puppet.
youpieceopoo
Really, that Alien looked pretty real to me.
jurassic park 1 movie they actually built real full sized animatronic moving puppet dinosaurs for like t-rex.
They used cgi on some parts and look fake as hell compared to animatronics.
second jurassic park lost world is when they started using cgi alot and dinosaurs look really fake compared to first movie.
That T-rex was bad ass.jurassic park 1 movie they actually built real full sized animatronic moving puppet dinosaurs for like t-rex.
They used cgi on some parts and look fake as hell compared to animatronics.
youpieceopoo
[QUOTE="youpieceopoo"]That T-rex was bad ass. watch part 3 it's all cgi pretty much and that was the death of the franchise.jurassic park 1 movie they actually built real full sized animatronic moving puppet dinosaurs for like t-rex.
They used cgi on some parts and look fake as hell compared to animatronics.
Lightning_fan
The next MS console will deliver the powahful, phenom gaming goods at launch, just like the last two MS consoles did... Bank. :P
it's cool because these puppets can be in some hollywood movie museum these props were used for this movie.
unlike a file on a computer.
[QUOTE="Lightning_fan"][QUOTE="youpieceopoo"]That T-rex was bad ass. watch part 3 it's all cgi pretty much and that was the death of the franchise. The one with the Jeep.jurassic park 1 movie they actually built real full sized animatronic moving puppet dinosaurs for like t-rex.
They used cgi on some parts and look fake as hell compared to animatronics.
youpieceopoo
They pay much less to AMD, they dont pay retail price.....this is common sense[QUOTE="fr3ddiemercury"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]
Who pays ?
adamosmaki
and common sense is while they pay lower price those cards still cost way to much to be made so unless AMD is a good samaritan and gives those gpu's at a loss you can bet MS wont pay $500-600 for each of those cards
MS would not pay $500 or $600 for those GPU,i say like $140 for each one probably the first year,and like $70 the second year for each one,but i don't think either way that the console will have 1 8XXX series GPU let alone 2,even at $140 they are already pushing it,$270 in GPU chips alone will basically send the xbox 720 into a money pit. The manufacturing cost of the xbox 720 with 2 of those chips would be over $600 dollars probably,between the GPU,CPU,blu-ray,all other components,like wifi N,assembly it would be to much for MS to make profits,MS is not sony they are not hardware makers they pay to have everything done,so they can't play and lower cost like sony does. With 2 of those GPU the xbox 720 would never ever make any profits.http://www.sockshare.com/file/0BC4BFA87B27FC79#
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The the dinosaurs definitely look fake as sh1t compared to jurassic park 1 1993.
Thanks to the use of cgi dinosaurs instead of animatronic.
I agree with this concept. The end all be all argument is the first 3 Starwars vs. the last 3 Starwars. Jar Jar looked so fake it was like who framed roger rabbit.second jurassic park lost world is when they started using cgi alot and dinosaurs look really fake compared to first movie.
youpieceopoo
One thing i've learned from the current gen is " don't buy the first model of the console , it will break ", unless its Nintendo.dantesergeiPretty much. But I always am impatient and buy launch consoles with 3 year warranty, it doesnt cost that much
They are not certain though, I highly doubt it will be 7k series. And even IF it is, 2 crossfire 7990s + console optimization will produce graphics that current pc can only DREAM of[QUOTE="fr3ddiemercury"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]
I assume you're a troll, but in the case that you're just a delusional fanboy I should inform you that your own link cites a source that says they'll be using a custom tailored 7xxx series GPU.
I still think the best either system is getting is a 7750/70 setup.
gamecubepad
You're devoted to the troll art, I'll give you that much.
Just for the hell of it, though, even a single 7970M consumes 200W under load in BF3. 2 of those in a console...lulz.
7970M consumes about 65 watts http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-radeon-7970m-alienware-m17x-r4-review
The Pitcairn core is fairly small, occupying 212mm2 of area. Compare that with the 240mm2 of the RSX in the launch version of the PlayStation 3 and the 180mm2 of the Xbox 360's original 90nm Xenos GPU and we have a ballpark match. Of more interest is power consumption: at full tilt, the 7970M sucks up around 65 watts of power. That's not going to be especially good news for a laptop running on battery power alone, but considering that the launch versions of the Xbox 360 and PS3 both consumed around 200W in total, again we see an eminently suitable match.
8990s in crossfire is unlikely since Xbox1 and Xbox 360 has remain with 128bit wired PCB.http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2413873,00.asp
Cannot wait!
I am predicting 720 will have 2 GTX 8990s in crossfire. Dunno about the cpu, too many rumors on that but it will probably be strong. When you add optimization on top of these specs...WOW. I bet AMD's avatar graphics prediction will come true.
And for those who are going to say "ya right and it will cost $1000"....720 is rumored to have subscription model so can easily price it low for intial purchase for the masses (just like how $1000 phones/tablets can be had for $400)... Whos excited!?
fr3ddiemercury
So AMD says 720 will have almost avatar and you expect weak gpus....like that is goin to achieve it.Wow this is really sad. OP knows practically nothing about computer hardware.
Wasdie
You have the peak in the right range, but the idle for two 7990's would be ~60w.*facepalms* (yes I really did that)
Freddie before you float off to your own dreamworld again, lets just restate that MS can NOT alter the laws of physics, 2 of the highest end of the new amd series of GPU would have an idle power consumption at atleast 400 Watts, and a peak at 700-800 that would be for the GPUs alone. Maddie_Larkin
That was a lousy and disappointing article because there is no new information in it.
Indeed, the entire thing is based off Semi-Accurate's months old reporting and doesn't even attempt to answer the core question around timing that is raised in the title.
Schlock journalism...perfect for fanboys.
He's been doing this for the past few days.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Wow this is really sad. OP knows practically nothing about computer hardware.
Wasdie
Yeah I've noticed that.
Yep I know nothing. AMD say 720 will have near avatar graphics. Yet, you guys say it will not have that. Seems you guys know everything about 720, and know more about 720 than the actual chipmaker themself. Amazing.yeah avatar graphics.... just like sony toy story graphics,4D, graphics and dual TV support at 120FPS.TessellationExcept Sony and Microsoft lie a lot. AMD doesn't.
yeah avatar graphics.... just like sony toy story graphics,4D, graphics and dual TV support at 120FPS.Tessellationlol toy story released in 1995 still no games cant do the same style of graphics in realtime.
[QUOTE="CwlHeddwyn"][QUOTE="fr3ddiemercury"] amd said "close to avatar graphics or something like that. Basically they will be close enough, just with some jaggies even at 1080p. But actual technical graphics can come close. AMD said this, they make the chips. I trust them more than any random system wars posterfr3ddiemercuryForgive me for being skeptical but ill believe it when I see it. Well, AMD doesn't lie to gamers. Maybe sony and microsoft....but AMD said this and I trust them
Yeah... I mean what reason could AMD have for spouting lies... I can't imagine a single reason...... oh wait, $.
Unless you believe companies don't lie (bend the truth) for something like MONEY!
[QUOTE="Tessellation"]yeah avatar graphics.... just like sony toy story graphics,4D, graphics and dual TV support at 120FPS.youpieceopoolol toy story released in 1995 still no games cant do the same style of graphics in realtime.
Someone could make a game with Toy Story 1 visuals quite easily with hardware thats available on the PC today.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="clyde46"] He's been doing this for the past few days. fr3ddiemercury
Yeah I've noticed that.
Yep I know nothing. AMD say 720 will have near avatar graphics. Yet, you guys say it will not have that. Seems you guys are so smart, and know more about 720 than the actual chipmaker themself. Amazing. You can't have Avatar level graphics that are rendered in real time. The hardware is too weak. You are an idiot to believe every word of a press release.lol toy story released in 1995 still no games cant do the same style of graphics in realtime.[QUOTE="youpieceopoo"][QUOTE="Tessellation"]yeah avatar graphics.... just like sony toy story graphics,4D, graphics and dual TV support at 120FPS.moistsandwich
Someone could make a game with Toy Story 1 visuals quite easily with hardware thats available on the PC today.
nah the lighting wouldnt comparePlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment