Newest screenshots of Killzone 3(56k NOOO)!!!!

Crysis was a horrendous shooter. I don't understand how anyone could find that game fun. Horrible game.

nhh18

[QUOTE="WAIW"]Substantiate pleasefoxhound_fox

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"] We have no idea which tech is better honestly. I'm eager to see the epic duel between these two shooters though :) :P. I do prefer KZ's art style.Episode_Eve

Actually we have.There is no point to discuss that,CE3>>any engine in the world as far as tech advance goes.

Well im talking about generally engine.We still dont know just how KZ3 looks like or Crysis 2...but Crysis 2 on consoles will feature some never seen before graphical solutions that are also on PC:real time global illumination,procedural deformation(very cool feature,whatever you shoot at like metal,cars,mailboxes...deforms)realtime destruction...

It will be epic that i know :D

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I bet on contrary...there will be some major fight at E3 between Crysis 2 on consoles and KZ3 but my money is on C2,better tech is better tech...

Bus-A-Bus

Actually we have.There is no point to discuss that,CE3>>any engine in the world as far as tech advance goes.

(btw a crystal ball is not proof)

It's looking so good that i'm doubting that they'll manage to implement 3D.

&qu

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Actually we have.There is no point to discuss that,CE3>>any engine in the world as far as tech advance goes.

Bus-A-Bus

Well im talking about generally engine.We still dont know just how KZ3 looks like or Crysis 2...but Crysis 2 on consoles will feature some never seen before graphical solutions that are also on PC:real time global illumination,procedural deformation(very cool feature,whatever you shoot at like metal,cars,mailboxes...deforms)realtime destruction...

It will be epic that i know :D

We haven't seen a single piece of gameplay footage or a confirmed console screenshot...I have my doubts about Crytek's claims about their engine on consoles.

The proof shall be in the pudding, I suppose.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"] We have no idea which tech is better honestly. I'm eager to see the epic duel between these two shooters though :) :P. I do prefer KZ's art style.toast_burner

Actually we have.There is no point to discuss that,CE3>>any engine in the world as far as tech advance goes.

(btw a crystal ball is not proof)

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

[QUOTE="themyth01"] Looks like a KZ2 expansion pack, graphics haven't been changed. They're using the same engine after all. Lucky for them, KZ2 is one of the best looking console games so it still holds up. Episode_Eve

&qu[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"] Maybe on PC. I'm not sold on the fact that CE3 will outright outperform the KZ Game engine on PS3. We'll see. There's honestly no way to prove that, until we know every feature of the enhanced KZ engine and the games actually come out. It could go either way, but I'm not claiming anything as of now.BigBoss154

Well im talking about generally engine.We still dont know just how KZ3 looks like or Crysis 2...but Crysis 2 on consoles will feature some never seen before graphical solutions that are also on PC:real time global illumination,procedural deformation(very cool feature,whatever you shoot at like metal,cars,mailboxes...deforms)realtime destruction...

It will be epic that i know :D

We haven't seen a single piece of gameplay footage or a confirmed console screenshot...I have my doubts about Crytek's claims about their engine on consoles.

The proof shall be in the pudding, I suppose.

Im just saying...your pudding will be served at E3 :P

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

&qu[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Well im talking about generally engine.We still dont know just how KZ3 looks like or Crysis 2...but Crysis 2 on consoles will feature some never seen before graphical solutions that are also on PC:real time global illumination,procedural deformation(very cool feature,whatever you shoot at like metal,cars,mailboxes...deforms)realtime destruction...

It will be epic that i know :D

Bus-A-Bus

We haven't seen a single piece of gameplay footage or a confirmed console screenshot...I have my doubts about Crytek's claims about their engine on consoles.

The proof shall be in the pudding, I suppose.

Im just saying...your pudding will be served at E3 :P

I sure as hell hope so. I do love my pudding. Especially good looking ones. :P

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

We haven't seen a single piece of gameplay footage or a confirmed console screenshot...I have my doubts about Crytek's claims about their engine on consoles.

The proof shall be in the pudding, I suppose.

BigBoss154

Im just saying...your pudding will be served at E3 :P

I sure as hell hope so. I do love my pudding. Especially good looking ones. :P

We all do...especially since those will come on both platforms so there is no reason for hatin good puding :D

Here's a quote from Gamesradar

"When Killzone 2 dropped last year, it was widely hailed as a high-water mark for PS3 graphics. And that's all fine and good, but Killzone 3 brings just enough graphical prowess that makes its predecessor look like a tech demo. There's the 3D to consider, and that looks pretty great, but overall the game sports noticeably sharper textures, more detailed structures and cool environmental touches that KZ2's dingy cityscapes and blasted deserts lacked."

:D

Link

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

Here's a quote from Gamesradar

"When Killzone 2 dropped last year, it was widely hailed as a high-water mark for PS3 graphics. And that's all fine and good, but Killzone 3 brings just enough graphical prowess that makes its predecessor look like a tech demo. There's the 3D to consider, and that looks pretty great, but overall the game sports noticeably sharper textures, more detailed structures and cool environmental touches that KZ2's dingy cityscapes and blasted deserts lacked."

:D

Link

FIipMode

Do we believe those previews?I do,i just wonder if others do cus when i posted 15+ previews for games like Crysis 2 and RAGE people told me its a fud and we should wait to see with our own eyes :D

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Im just saying...your pudding will be served at E3 :P

Bus-A-Bus

I sure as hell hope so. I do love my pudding. Especially good looking ones. :P

We all do...especially since those will come on both platforms so there is no reason for hatin good puding :D

I just hope it tastes as well as it looks...if you know what I mean. :)

ANyone who compare these graphics to reach is straight up delusional

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Actually we have.There is no point to discuss that,CE3>>any engine in the world as far as tech advance goes.

Bus-A-Bus

(btw a crystal ball is not proof)

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

ANyone who compare these graphics to reach is straight up delusional

Zaibach

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"]I must question people that criticize KZ's art style.razgriz_101

Same. It's like people fell asleep during art class, and define "Art Style" by how many flashing/colorful lights can fill the screen. Killzone has amazing art style, in my opinion.

The Mona Lisa has nothing but dark hues of color in it, doesn't mean it's not art.

all i can say is thank god im not alone on the feel of artstyles, seriously what does everyone expect KZ to have rainbows and unicorns? xD

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"] Proof?

(btw a crystal ball is not proof)

Episode_Eve

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

That is true but many dont know that Crytek actually started with console research and development in 07.As Cevat said,his programmers find new amazing ways of doing lightning,it looks cool,it runs on PC but on consoles it takes 2ms.They say its what we could get with them,he says,it has to be 1ms and i dont care how you get it just do it,so thats what got them here where they are according to Cevat.If we are here to post previews here is sweet one :D

"Crytek are visual masterminds. Crysis is still considered as one of the best looking games to be released, and Crysis 2 outshines it in every fashionable way. Though early, this build looked amazing and was already running beautifully on the Xbox 360 hardware. It's a shame we couldn't see the PS3 version in action, but if it's performing this well on the 360, then we can expect great things from the PS3 and PC version, as well. The destructible environments gave off realistic physics, all the soldiers and aliens were heavily detailed and fluid in their movements. Killzone 2 was the best looking FPS for the generation, but, based on this footage, it has just been trumped. The intensity of the atmosphere and overall feel presented in the demonstration was mind-blowing. With the music, sound effects, and debris flying all over the place, it put you in the shoes of the war-zone. The city of New York was amazing rendered so realistically you'll feel like you are protecting the city from these invaders, from the small portion of the city we saw. It's still many months away from completion, but what was shown will impress all shooting fans."

http://www.examiner.com/x-12218-Video-Game-Examiner~y2010m4d9-Crysis-2-The-best-console-FPS-of-the-decade

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

ANyone who compare these graphics to reach is straight up delusional

themyth01

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

gamecubepad

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

Bus-A-Bus

That is true but many dont know that Crytek actually started with console research and development in 07.As Cevat said,his programmers find new amazing ways of doing lightning,it looks cool,it runs on PC but on consoles it takes 2ms.They say its what we could get with them,he says,it has to be 1ms and i dont care how you get it just do it,so thats what got them here where they are according to Cevat.If we are here to post previews here is sweet one :D

"Crytek are visual masterminds. Crysis is still considered as one of the best looking games to be released, and Crysis 2 outshines it in every fashionable way. Though early, this build looked amazing and was already running beautifully on the Xbox 360 hardware. It's a shame we couldn't see the PS3 version in action, but if it's performing this well on the 360, then we can expect great things from the PS3 and PC version, as well. The destructible environments gave off realistic physics, all the soldiers and aliens were heavily detailed and fluid in their movements. Killzone 2 was the best looking FPS for the generation, but, based on this footage, it has just been trumped. The intensity of the atmosphere and overall feel presented in the demonstration was mind-blowing. With the music, sound effects, and debris flying all over the place, it put you in the shoes of the war-zone. The city of New York was amazing rendered so realistically you'll feel like you are protecting the city from these invaders, from the small portion of the city we saw. It's still many months away from completion, but what was shown will impress all shooting fans."

http://www.examiner.com/x-12218-Video-Game-Examiner~y2010m4d9-Crysis-2-The-best-console-FPS-of-the-decade

I cant beleive we're back here again, yuore telling me that halo reach looks as good as KZ3 is looking right now? Is that what youre saying? I dont care what is using AA, MSAA, MLAA, NASAAA, QTA or what ever other abbreviations you want to out

Zaibach

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"] Proof?

(btw a crystal ball is not proof)

Episode_Eve

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

What proof?That CE3 is most technically advanced engine in the world?Look at Crysis,3 years ago,still not surpassed on ANY platform,now picture new optimized engine,with MUCH better lightning and destruction,add to that procedural deformation and film like color grading.Add to that also sandbox interface where you develop game simultaneously on all 3 platforms and you get the technically most advanced engine in the world.If you know any better,fell free to post.

Zero_epyon

target render Bullshots.

Vinegar_Strokes

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

Zero_epyon

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

I cant beleive we're back here again, yuore telling me that halo reach looks as good as KZ3 is looking right now? Is that what youre saying? I dont care what is using AA, MSAA, MLAA, NASAAA, QTA or what ever other abbreviations you want to out

themyth01

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

themyth01

They seem to disagree with you. And with plenty or reasons.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=4192

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

themyth01

[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] MGS 4 was named best graphics of the year... When has reach crysis 2 and geow 3 done this? Neither is out yet... To date no 360 game has matched killzone 2...Zero_epyon

They seem to disagree with you. And with plenty or reasons.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=4192

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

themyth01

Unreal Engine 3 games are piss poor by today's standards. Gears 2 ain't more technically impressive than KZ2. If your argument is just AA techniques...then God Of War 3 trumps them all. And that's not true at all.

[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] MGS 4 was named best graphics of the year... When has reach crysis 2 and geow 3 done this? Neither is out yet... To date no 360 game has matched killzone 2...BigBoss154

Unreal Engine 3 games are piss poor by today's standards. Gears 2 ain't more technically impressive than KZ2. If your argument is just AA techniques...then God Of War 3 trumps them all. And that's not true at all.

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

Zero_epyon

Gears 2 easily matched MGS4. Gamespy and GT both gave best gfx to GeOW2 over MGS4, but I agree with IGN's choice of Warhead.

The games I mentioned have already shown that they are on KZ2 graphics level, even in pre-alpha/alpha stages of development.

Once they release the next level of DC will begin, with people saying 360 can never have gfx on level with KZ3, but it will happen nonetheless.

Technically Gears 2 surpassed KZ2 but is matched by Uncharted 2. Given that Gears is 720p and uses 2xAA same as Uncharted 2, both of which are better techniques than QAA which KZ2 uses with 720p. themyth01

GeOW2 was a little better than MGS4 graphically, but KZ2 is step beyond Gears 2 in lighting, animation, and destructibility.

From what I've seen Reach, C2, and GeOW 3 all match or exceed KZ2, even in alpha form.

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"] Technically Gears 2 surpassed KZ2 but is matched by Uncharted 2. Given that Gears is 720p and uses 2xAA same as Uncharted 2, both of which are better techniques than QAA which KZ2 uses with 720p. themyth01

Unreal Engine 3 games are piss poor by today's standards. Gears 2 ain't more technically impressive than KZ2. If your argument is just AA techniques...then God Of War 3 trumps them all. And that's not true at all.

But...in a technical sense, having the amount of AA that GOW3 does and use very little resources is technically impressive. Something we've never seen on an Unreal Engine game.

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

I remember when people claimed the 360 could never do MGS4 level gfx. GeOW 2 proved otherwise.

Then it became 360 can never do KZ2 level gfx. Reach, Crysis 2, and GeOW 3 are already showing otherwise.

Now it's gonna be 360 games can never match KZ3.

When will it all end? :?

gamecubepad

Gears 2 easily matched MGS4. Gamespy and GT both gave best gfx to GeOW2 over MGS4, but I agree with IGN's choice of Warhead.

The games I mentioned have already shown that they are on KZ2 graphics level, even in pre-alpha/alpha stages of development.

Once they release the next level of DC will begin, with people saying 360 can never have gfx on level with KZ3, but it will happen nonetheless.

Matching MGS4 in graphics is an easy thing to do. It looks rather horrible.

gears2 surpassed kz2 in graphics? i think you are confused.

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="themyth01"] Technically Gears 2 surpassed KZ2 but is matched by Uncharted 2. Given that Gears is 720p and uses 2xAA same as Uncharted 2, both of which are better techniques than QAA which KZ2 uses with 720p. themyth01

Resolution is 720p of course, and the aliasing techniques are different, but the end result is a better looking game period. I understand that the aliasing technique used in Gears 2 is more demanding that the one KZ2, but you have to consider the remaining aspects. I don't even think Epic would argue that Gears 2 is more technically impressive than KZ2. It's not Epic's fault, the engine is just older.

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] MGS 4 was named best graphics of the year... When has reach crysis 2 and geow 3 done this? Neither is out yet... To date no 360 game has matched killzone 2...BigBoss154

Gears 2 easily matched MGS4. Gamespy and GT both gave best gfx to GeOW2 over MGS4, but I agree with IGN's choice of Warhead.

The games I mentioned have already shown that they are on KZ2 graphics level, even in pre-alpha/alpha stages of development.

Once they release the next level of DC will begin, with people saying 360 can never have gfx on level with KZ3, but it will happen nonetheless.

Matching MGS4 in graphics is an easy thing to do. It looks rather horrible.

I thought we established that random website made MGS4 more technically impressive than Gears.

Way bigger levels with less blur. And they would show ya if it wasnt for the constant snowy blizzard weather.:P

Gears was the best looking console game hands down till UC came,then UC1 was king.Next year came MGS4 and Gears 2,and to be honest Gears 2 looked better.In 2009 KZ2 and UC2 came and MS had little games,their best card as far as gfx goes(Epic) was taking a "nap" so cows said 360 is over and maxed.Now we are in position where Crysis 2,RAGE and Gears 3 could surpass those games on E3,i dont see if people dont see it but every year games get surpassed,its natural for consoles but some people took it to another level saying one console(even with much better gpu with edram and more ram) is old and outdated and could never achieve what ps3 can.Now it might come to some pretty major ownage if something like that happens at E3.

Frankly I dislike the art. But if its fun then oh well, I can get over it.

Way bigger levels with less blur. And they would show ya if it wasnt for the constant snowy blizzard weather.:P

vaderhater

Don't worry, the confirmed illuminating jungle level will do a fine job showing off the game.

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Gears 2 easily matched MGS4. Gamespy and GT both gave best gfx to GeOW2 over MGS4, but I agree with IGN's choice of Warhead.

The games I mentioned have already shown that they are on KZ2 graphics level, even in pre-alpha/alpha stages of development.

Once they release the next level of DC will begin, with people saying 360 can never have gfx on level with KZ3, but it will happen nonetheless.

BigBoss154

Matching MGS4 in graphics is an easy thing to do. It looks rather horrible.

Yet cows claimed the 360 could never match it in graphics quality. :P

Then they claimed no 360 game could ever match KZ2. It will happen this year.

Soon they will say no 360 game can match KZ3. When will it end?