[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
When MS releases a game either visually on par, or better, than the current best looking PS3 game at the time. I won't say the 360 CAN'T do it, but it's yet to happen is all.PAL360
I dont know what 360 needs to do more to destroy that "not as capable as PS3" myth. I mean, Red Dead Redemption is technically more impressive than anything on consoles. It mixes an immense world with incredible vistas, physics, dinamic weather, dimanic shadows, no loadings, dozens of NPCs, etc, and 360 runs it perfectly.
If a game can prove 360 graphics are underhyped/rated arround these boards, that game is red Dead Redemption imo.
After I responded to this statement I walked away and thought, wait Gears 2 with a $12 million budget already dispelled that myth by matching or beating PS3's $45 million monster, MGS4 in gfx. I was too lazy to walk back to my comp and type it though.
I think they're about equal, with the PS3 being a little more powerful, but the guy who created the Cell CPU, Cevat from Crytek, John Carmack, and Gabe Newell all have gone on the record saying they're about equal.
Sony 1st party cooperation and massive buckets of cash have been the difference, though.
Log in to comment