NEW:Killzone SF updated in-game Models

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for raging_user
raging_user

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#501 raging_user
Member since 2013 • 467 Posts

glad to know SW hasn't changed in 6 years :lol:

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#502 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

What are you trying to prove by posting these screenshots?

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#503 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

how come in ever killzone thread, crysis has to come up? System wars is nothing but a broken record

Avatar image for Mrmedia01
Mrmedia01

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#504 Mrmedia01
Member since 2007 • 1917 Posts

Looks great. Love the models. Killzone looks better everytime I see it.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#505 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

glad to know SW hasn't changed in 6 years :lol:

raging_user
I remember the 2009 Crysis vs Killzone 2 thread where it got out of hand.XD And there was a Crysis 2 vs Killzone 3 one from what I remember. Now it's Crysis 3 vs KIllzone: Shadow Fall. Oh man this place sometimes...
Avatar image for kalipekona
kalipekona

2492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#506 kalipekona
Member since 2003 • 2492 Posts

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] From the same guys who made one of the lowest resolution games this gen :lol:killzowned24

Yeah, but it's also one of the most amazing looking games this gen. Sure, the 360 wasn't powerful enough to run it at full 720p resolution, but that is because of everything it is doing. It still has some of the best lighting I have seen in a game. The PC version looks amazing.

It's far from the best when needed to drop to 540p :lol: Uncharted takes a huge dump on Alan Wake in graphics /lighting and runs in HD.

I'm just saying that it is a pretty advanced engine in terms of geometry, lighting and effects and that is why there had to be compromises on the 360. I think Uncharted is a fantastic series with really great graphics, but I don't think in terms of lighting it really beats Alan Wake. I noticed more areas with baked in shadows and lights that didn't cast shadows from the player character and NPCs in Uncharted than in Alan Wake.

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#507 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts
[QUOTE="raging_user"]

glad to know SW hasn't changed in 6 years :lol:

mitu123
I remember the 2009 Crysis vs Killzone 2 thread where it got out of hand.XD And there was a Crysis 2 vs Killzone 3 one from what I remember. Now it's Crysis 3 vs KIllzone: Shadow Fall. Oh man this place sometimes...

you are one of the main ones behind it.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#508 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="raging_user"]

glad to know SW hasn't changed in 6 years :lol:

Chris_Williams

I remember the 2009 Crysis vs Killzone 2 thread where it got out of hand.XD And there was a Crysis 2 vs Killzone 3 one from what I remember. Now it's Crysis 3 vs KIllzone: Shadow Fall. Oh man this place sometimes...

you are one of the main ones behind it.

Because those threads are hilariously entertaining.

Avatar image for JasonDarksavior
JasonDarksavior

9323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#509 JasonDarksavior
Member since 2008 • 9323 Posts
Wish we had a chance to play from the Helghan point of view ...
Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#510 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

Looks fantastic. Can't wait for Titanfall as well though...which it's amazing that was mentioned so quickly. Ridiculous fanboys.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#511 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

Dude, I lived around 2000 miles from the equator for the vast majority of my life in what would be classified as a subtropical area, I've been in actual deserts in summer during high noon multiple times, and I've traveled as close as 1000 miles to the equator, I know something about sunlight and it doesn't look like that.

StrongBlackVine

Yeah it does. Bright sunlight can definitely produce a similar kind of a scene. I've seen it with my own eyes. I've traveled to tropical countries several times and I, too, live in a sub-tropical desert area. 

I think you are just being overly critical of Crysis and not critical enough of Killzone Shadow Fall. They are both clearly very good looking games, but some people are overhyping KZSF again just like they do with most Sony exclusives.

Keep playing your great graphics while we play great overall games.

 

Crysis Metacritic Score- 91/100

Crysis PC GS score- 9.5

What was that?

Avatar image for legalize82
legalize82

2293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#512 legalize82
Member since 2013 • 2293 Posts

look at all those haters bahahha...:lol::lol:

 

bbut my crysis is better lookingon my 2000 dollar machine..:lol::lol:

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#513 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

Yeah it does. Bright sunlight can definitely produce a similar kind of a scene. I've seen it with my own eyes. I've traveled to tropical countries several times and I, too, live in a sub-tropical desert area. 

I think you are just being overly critical of Crysis and not critical enough of Killzone Shadow Fall. They are both clearly very good looking games, but some people are overhyping KZSF again just like they do with most Sony exclusives.

hartsickdiscipl

Keep playing your great graphics while we play great overall games.

 

Crysis Metacritic Score- 91/100

Crysis PC GS score- 9.5

What was that?

LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#514 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Keep playing your great graphics while we play great overall games.

StrongBlackVine

 

Crysis Metacritic Score- 91/100

Crysis PC GS score- 9.5

What was that?

LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...

Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses.
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#515 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Crysis Metacritic Score- 91/100

Crysis PC GS score- 9.5

What was that?

faizan_faizan

LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...

Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses.

Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :P
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#516 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...

Mozelleple112
Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses.

Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :P

Im not gonna lie, Yeah the gameplay was "ok" but Crysis got a 9.5 purely for its graphical prowess. There is nothing about Crysis that makes the game play exactly stand out. Its a decent shooter with some cool power suit mechanics. If it had come out with normal graphics back then, I guarantee you it would never have made AAAE status. But those graphics were so off the charts freaking amazing that even if you gave us alien colonial marines back then with those graphics, it would have gotten atleast an 8.5 on graphics alone.
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#517 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
Im not gonna lie, Yeah the gameplay was "ok" but Crysis got a 9.5 purely for its graphical prowess. There is nothing about Crysis that makes the game play exactly stand out. Its a decent shooter with some cool power suit mechanics. If it had come out with normal graphics back then, I guarantee you it would never have made AAAE status. But those graphics were so off the charts freaking amazing that even if you gave us alien colonial marines back then with those graphics, it would have gotten atleast an 8.5 on graphics alone.II_Seraphim_II
:| Get out.
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#518 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...

Mozelleple112

Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses.

Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :P

Apparently, after The Last Of Us review, GameSpot doesn't matter anymore according to cows.

Avatar image for ManatuBeard
ManatuBeard

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#519 ManatuBeard
Member since 2012 • 1121 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses.faizan_faizan

Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :P

Apparently, after The Last Of Us review, GameSpot doesn't matter anymore according to cows.

Its a bit silly to relly on the review of a single site. Metacritic is more reliable since it shows the average of both site reviews and gamers reviews.

The Last of Us is a great experience, and the MP is actually very good!

MS just needs to stop buying and destroying studios, and create a good 4 or 5 fixed studios with talented developers.

MS also needs to risk a bit more in new IPs, take some chances! Dont stick to whats safe, safe gets boring quickly.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#520 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"] Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :PManatuBeard

Apparently, after The Last Of Us review, GameSpot doesn't matter anymore according to cows.

Its a bit silly to relly on the review of a single site. Metacritic is more reliable since it shows the average of both site reviews and gamers reviews.

The Last of Us is a great experience, and the MP is actually very good!

MS just needs to stop buying and destroying studios, and create a good 4 or 5 fixed studios with talented developers.

MS also needs to risk a bit more in new IPs, take some chances! Dont stick to whats safe, safe gets boring quickly.

You can't change the SW rules, your opinion is invalid.
Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#521 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.
Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#522 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts
Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.gpuking
ibuADrmYWywNb9.jpg
Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#523 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
[QUOTE="gpuking"]Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.superclocked
8fSsAR7.jpg

The face looks good but the skin shaders are not as advanced. Also the rest of the body textures are awful in comparison to KZ's.
Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#524 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62865 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.superclocked
ibuADrmYWywNb9.jpg


This clearly looks at least 6 and a half times better than Killzone Shadow Fall. Once again (repetitive) pc keeps on winning.

At this point, it's like a puppy getting beaten. It's just cruel.

Avatar image for kalipekona
kalipekona

2492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#525 kalipekona
Member since 2003 • 2492 Posts

Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.gpuking

Again, it's always all about the character models with you guys. It's like that's all you look at in a game. I guess I could make a game with amazing character models and put them in a plain room and you guys would still be calling that game graphics king (well, as long as it was exclusive to a Playstation console).

These character models don't crap on those in Crysis 3 in any case. Especially when you compare actual screenshots from the characters within the game environments. These KZSF character shots are using much higher quality lighting and shadows than you will see in the game during gameplay. I absolutely guarantee it.

Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#526 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts
The face looks good but the skin shaders are not as advanced. Also the rest of the body textures are awful in comparison to KZ's.gpuking
People can blame consoles for holding back the visuals in multiplats. Next gen multiplats will look amazing on PC...
Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#527 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.gpuking

Cutscene models. All the cutscenes in Crysis 3 are realtime, try again, dumb dumb. And C3 just don't have Psycho. ;) And no in game enemy models in KZ:SF is 40K. I have now seen the GG's presentation slides, they never said anything about enemy models, you deliberately lied, now I won't believe anything you say untill I recheck it my self. And oh, KZ:SF has no realtime GI, cry more, hell the things they showed in slides Crytek did it 10 times better and before them and actually the ones who pioneered them. GG just followed along. ;)

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#528 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

BF3 :P

battlefield_3___faces__pilot_of_shark_4_

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#529 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.kalipekona

Again, it's always all about the character models with you guys. It's like that's all you look at in a game. I guess I could make a game with amazing character models and put them in a plain room and you guys would still be calling that game graphics king (well, as long as it was exclusive to a Playstation console).

These character models don't crap on those in Crysis 3 in any case. Especially when you compare actual screenshots from the characters within the game environments. These KZSF character shots are using much higher quality lighting and shadows than you will see in the game during gameplay. I absolutely guarantee it.

They aren't in game models. If they really want to compare thenn Crysis 3 models stand on their own but take the models from Crytek's presentations and they really look out of the world.

Standalone models in the renderer of the 3D modeling software always look better.

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#530 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.zeeshanhaider

Cutscene models. All the cutscenes in Crysis 3 are realtime, try again, dumb dumb. And C3 just don't have Psycho. ;) And no in game enemy models in KZ:SF is 40K. I have now seen the GG's presentation slides, they never said anything about enemy models, you deliberately lied, now I won't believe anything you say untill I recheck it my self. And oh, KZ:SF has no realtime GI, cry more, hell the things they showed in slides Crytek did it 10 times better and before them and actually the ones who pioneered them. GG just followed along. ;)

They did a live stage presentation and they specifically referred 40k tris to this Helghast model. At14:40 mark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JVihWUoOG8
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#531 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Jesus those character models are really insanely good looking. Absolutely craps on anything in Crysis 3.kalipekona

Again, it's always all about the character models with you guys. It's like that's all you look at in a game. I guess I could make a game with amazing character models and put them in a plain room and you guys would still be calling that game graphics king (well, as long as it was exclusive to a Playstation console).

These character models don't crap on those in Crysis 3 in any case. Especially when you compare actual screenshots from the characters within the game environments. These KZSF character shots are using much higher quality lighting and shadows than you will see in the game during gameplay. I absolutely guarantee it.

Given that is what the thread is about, why should we be debating anything but the character models?