NEW:Killzone SF updated in-game Models

I can turn the depth of field off completely if I want to, and the game still runs great!  That's the beauty of it.  Here is another shot with DOF still turned on.

 

hartsickdiscipl

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]Crysis doesn't even look playable. Looks like a blurry mess..

 

I have Crysis 1 and 2 and run em with and without mods. KZ:SF looks better than it without a doubt. Stop embarassing yourself

XVision84

:lol:

A console gamer saying that a PC game looks like a blurry mess.  Now I've heard it all!  

It is you who is embarassing yourself.  You can't honestly look at that KZ shot and tell me that it looks more realistic than that Crysis shot.  

Problem is, PC games these days are too sharp.

In real life there is a slight blur making the image easier for your eyes and brain to process and allowing your eyes to smoothly transition frames.

Console games have this blur which makes them more realistic while PC games are way too sharp. I think Crysis is too sharp while KZ is just right.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]Crysis doesn't even look playable. Looks like a blurry mess..

 

I have Crysis 1 and 2 and run em with and without mods. KZ:SF looks better than it without a doubt. Stop embarassing yourself

XVision84

:lol:

A console gamer saying that a PC game looks like a blurry mess.  Now I've heard it all!  

It is you who is embarassing yourself.  You can't honestly look at that KZ shot and tell me that it looks more realistic than that Crysis shot.  

Problem is, PC games these days are too sharp.

In real life there is a slight blur making the image easier for your eyes and brain to process and allowing your eyes to smoothly transition frames.

Console games have this blur which makes them more realistic while PC games are way too sharp. I think Crysis is too sharp while KZ is just right.

lol at first glance that KZSF shot looks like a video game.  At first glance that crysis shot looks like a photo.   To me it's a clear difference.  Not saying KZSF looks bad.  It looks great but no amount of rationalization is going to change what I'm seeing with my eyes. 

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]Shut up.

 

Douevenlift_bro

Oh and btw, you STTIIIIILLLLL didn't read my post. You're a complete moron plain and simple. Here's the bit I'm now referring to:

"what will the PC hardware be like? What will the current PC hardware cost?"

You're upset kiddo.

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

Douevenlift_bro

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

:lol:

 

A console gamer saying that a PC game looks like a blurry mess.  Now I've heard it all!  

It is you who is embarassing yourself.  You can't honestly look at that KZ shot and tell me that it looks more realistic than that Crysis shot.  

NFJSupreme

Problem is, PC games these days are too sharp.

In real life there is a slight blur making the image easier for your eyes and brain to process and allowing your eyes to smoothly transition frames.

Console games have this blur which makes them more realistic while PC games are way too sharp. I think Crysis is too sharp while KZ is just right.

lol at first glance that KZSF shot looks like a video game.  At first glance that crysis shot looks like a photo.   To me it's a clear difference.  Not saying KZSF looks bad.  It looks great but no amount of rationalization is going to change what I'm seeing with my eyes. 

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

killzowned24

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]Jimmies rustled.

Oh and btw, you STTIIIIILLLLL didn't read my post. You're a complete moron plain and simple. Here's the bit I'm now referring to:

"what will the PC hardware be like? What will the current PC hardware cost?"

-Unreal-

You're upset kiddo.

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

Douevenlift_bro

This thread

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I can turn the depth of field off completely if I want to, and the game still runs great!  That's the beauty of it.  Here is another shot with DOF still turned on.

 

Douevenlift_bro

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

Everry Killzone thread.. atleast 20 pages

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I can turn the depth of field off completely if I want to, and the game still runs great!  That's the beauty of it.  Here is another shot with DOF still turned on.

 

hartsickdiscipl

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

You think we're saying console>>>PC? LOL. No

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]You can't run a game as good looking as KZ:SF on a $400 PC. Thats a fact.

You're upset kiddo.

Douevenlift_bro

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]You can't run a game as good looking as KZ:SF on a $400 PC. Thats a fact.

You're upset kiddo.

Douevenlift_bro

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

Hate to join a quote chain but let me just add that Crysis 3 on High is no slouch either and looks just as good as next gen games as as well.  People like to forget this.  The game scales very well visually with the different settings.  Its not till you get to bellow medium on most settings you start to see it look like its console counterparts.  So if you are talking crysis 3 you don't need to max it out to have it look next gen.  But anyway carry along.  Just wanted to add that point. :)

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]You can't run a game as good looking as KZ:SF on a $400 PC. Thats a fact.

You're upset kiddo.

Douevenlift_bro

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

You can't buy a console to play KZ:SF yet. You're comparing current hardware (and factoring in hardware costs) with future hardware costs. So any argument you have about a $400 console running KZ:SF and looking better than Crysis on anything but ultra is pointless.

If you want to talk about how KZ:SF looks as good as Crysis 3 on anything below highest settings we can debate that instead. But as soon as you start factoring in current hardware versus future hardware your argument is rendered pointless.

So let's compare Crysis 3 on below highest settings with KZ:SF.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]That shit foilage and rock textures next to the character can't be hidding by mods.

Douevenlift_bro

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

You think we're saying console>>>PC? LOL. No

The foliage in KZ: SF looks like absolute crap compared to what I've posted.  The rocks on the whole aren't any better either.  Just give up..  Killzone just doesn't look that great.  It looks about as good as a run of the mill PC shooter from a few years ago.  

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]Third time you've failed to read comments I bolded and made red.

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

NFJSupreme

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

Hate to join a quote chain but let me just add that Crysis 3 on High is no slouch either and looks just as good as next gen games as as well.  People like to forget this.  The game scales very well visually with the different settings.  Its not till you get to bellow medium on most settings till you get to see it look like its console counterparts.  So if you are talking crysis 3 you don't need to max it out to have it look next gen.  But anyway carry along.  Just wanted to add that point. :)

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

killzowned24

Sad to see it only runs at 400x225 resolution.

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I can turn the depth of field off completely if I want to, and the game still runs great!  That's the beauty of it.  Here is another shot with DOF still turned on.

 

hartsickdiscipl

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]Third time you've failed to read comments I bolded and made red.

You can't buy a $400 console and run a game that looks as good as Crysis 3. That's a fact.

Your jimmies are rustled. Illiterate moron.

-Unreal-

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

You can't buy a console to play KZ:SF yet. You're comparing current hardware (and factoring in hardware costs) with future hardware costs. So any argument you have about a $400 console running KZ:SF and looking better than Crysis on anything but ultra is pointless.

If you want to talk about how KZ:SF looks as good as Crysis 3 on anything below highest settings we can debate that instead. But as soon as you start factoring in current hardware versus future hardware your argument is rendered pointless.

So let's compare Crysis 3 on below highest settings with KZ:SF.

Are you trolling or do you honestly think those are good textures? :lol:

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

I'm still not sure what hermits beef with KZ is...

-Unreal-

Sad to see it only runs at 400x225 resolution.

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

hartsickdiscipl

You think we're saying console>>>PC? LOL. No

The foliage in KZ: SF looks like absolute crap compared to what I've posted.  The rocks on the whole aren't any better either.  Just give up..  Killzone just doesn't look that great.  It looks about as good as a run of the mill PC shooter from a few years ago.  

Tone down your fanboyism. I don't need to argue with a Quasi lemming

Great, KS:SF gets more bullshots for me to adblock and 19 pages of derp.

Are you trolling or do you honestly think those are good textures? :lol:

-Unreal-

Everry Killzone thread.. atleast 20 pages

Douevenlift_bro

I can turn the depth of field off completely if I want to, and the game still runs great!  That's the beauty of it.  Here is another shot with DOF still turned on.

 

hartsickdiscipl

Pic of Crysis with horrible amounts of DOF #1345425234. My eyes would bleed by the time I'd be done with that.

Crysis 1 looks like ass. Deal with it.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]KZ:SF can look as good as Crysis unless, your PC can run Crysis on highest settings. Thats a fact.

Pretty DAMN good for a console.

Douevenlift_bro

You can't buy a console to play KZ:SF yet. You're comparing current hardware (and factoring in hardware costs) with future hardware costs. So any argument you have about a $400 console running KZ:SF and looking better than Crysis on anything but ultra is pointless.

If you want to talk about how KZ:SF looks as good as Crysis 3 on anything below highest settings we can debate that instead. But as soon as you start factoring in current hardware versus future hardware your argument is rendered pointless.

So let's compare Crysis 3 on below highest settings with KZ:SF.

You should relax, accept the facts I've shown and brush up on your reading skills..

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

Are you trolling or do you honestly think those are good textures? :lol:

killzowned24

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

Are you trolling or do you honestly think those are good textures? :lol:

-Unreal-

Crysis 3 is texture king.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] they have nothing to hype and are jelly.

killzowned24

Sad to see it only runs at 400x225 resolution.

Been fun guys. I have some drawing to do now

and thus SDC.

People please stop.

Crysis 1 doesn't look good in anyway shape or form in the year 2013. It hasn't looked good the last 4 years.

Now it's time for everybody to respond to this post with nit-picked Crysis 1 screenshots and downsampled pics running sh!t graphics mods that make the sky look white and horrible amounts of DOF.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

Sad to see it only runs at 400x225 resolution.

faizan_faizan

its just a silly fanboy thing to say but the gif is small,no duh gifs are meant to be small. most image site won't even allow gifs over around 3 mb.

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

16 pages ahoy!

XVision84

Damn Zai, right on the money! :P

Everyone.... just CALM THE F DOWN!

Direct Feed from E3 from their website KZSF

Arma 3 open world :lol:

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]That shit foilage and rock textures next to the character can't be hidding by mods.

killzowned24

Show me something better on consoles.  We'll be waiting awhile. 

The textures are comparable.  The pic that you showed looks like it's taken in a cave, in a completely different type of environment with different lighting.  The Crysis shot looks more like someone took a photo.  

 

Direct Feed from E3 from their website KZSF

 

Arma 3 open world :lol:

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  CroidX

That Arma 3 shot looks damn good.  

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] as if I'm going to post a 1080p gif at 20mb lol.killzowned24

its just a silly fanboy thing to say but the gif is small,no duh gifs are meant to be small. most image site won't even allow gifs over around 3 mb.

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

 

Direct Feed from E3 from their website KZSF

 

Arma 3 open world :lol:

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  hartsickdiscipl

That Arma 3 shot looks damn good.  

yea there a bunch of them at the arma 3 website

THE LEMMINGS HAVE BEEN OWNED

call_of_duty_10

You criticize PC gamers for supposedly being elitist then you cows turn around and act all elitist towards Xbox and Wii owners.

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

 

 

Arma 3 open world :lol:

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  CroidX

Blurry and crappy textures.

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

 

 

Arma 3 open world :lol:

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  Douevenlift_bro

Blurry and crappy textures.

really? because the direct feed E3 KZSF screenshot from the website don't look that much better than Arma 3 screenshot I showed

 legalize82

She looks like she can give a mean BJ :cool:

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

 

 

Arma 3 open world :lol:

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  Douevenlift_bro

Blurry and crappy textures.

You seem to lack the ability to look at a screenshot and see the big picture.  The ARMA 3 shot looks far more like reality than any KZ shot.  

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

StrongBlackVine