NEW:Killzone SF updated in-game Models

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

faizan_faizan

I guess you will enjoy arma 3 more :cool:

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] Which means it doesn't look that great at 1080p :(-Unreal-

its just a silly fanboy thing to say but the gif is small,no duh gifs are meant to be small. most image site won't even allow gifs over around 3 mb.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] it would look even better at a higher resolution because more detail would be perceivable.

 

its just a silly fanboy thing to say but the gif is small,no duh gifs are meant to be small. most image site won't even allow gifs over around 3 mb.

killzowned24

2007 PC game with 3 free mods installed-

 

KZ-SF:

 

hartsickdiscipl

Dude... that Crysis shot is freaking horrible.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

2007 PC game with 3 free mods installed-

 

KZ-SF:

 

RawDeal_basic

Dude... that Crysis shot is freaking horrible.

here a better one for Crysis

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]It's just a silly fanboy thing to post a 400x225 gif image to show how a game that (apparently) runs at 3840×2160 resolution looks.-Unreal-

 

 

 

here a better one for Crysis

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  CroidX

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] so gifs are silly now? lol, at the butthurt!!!!killzowned24

he did reply, you even quoted his reply

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"] Strawman argument confirms you're butthurt.lostrib

he did reply, you even quoted his reply

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

 

 

 

here a better one for Crysis

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  mitu123

I seen other impressive mod for the game just like that one

Anyone who suggests that Killzone has anything less than the best-looking character models in a console game so far lacks all credibility. Quantum Break does not compare (much less detail on the character textures, blurrier, clothing doesn't seem to animate at all), nor does anything else that has been shown up to this point. Pointing to an old E3 demo is futile as those tend to be created several weeks or even months prior to E3 and using youtube videos to try to disprove it is even more transparent in its futility: video compression artifacts aren't hard to detect.

Guerilla has verified those models are in-game, not in-engine which is likely what the Quantum Break pics/gifs released so far were (notably the tweet claiming it was in-game was later deleted) and even if they were both in-game the Killzone character models are clearly superior. If you doubt that they can be done in-game, then you're mistaken: aside from the level of AA shown it is entirely possible given that those would be the highest LoD models in-game which means only one would be likely to be shown at a time.

If the game comes out and no such models are in-game then you can claim ownage, until then you'd do well to shut your mouth unless something is shown that matches what Killzone brings to the table because what they showed looks to match Crysis 2/3 on PC.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] just as expected,no reply =confirmed butthurt. only a fool would complain about small gifs when 99% of gifs are small.

killzowned24

he did reply, you even quoted his reply

he said your statement was a logical fallacy

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

faizan_faizan

I don't give a shit what you like.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

 

 

 

here a better one for Crysis

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  CroidX

I seen other impressive mod for the game just like that one

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  

No

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

StrongBlackVine

I don't give a shit what you like.

personal preference circle jerk time?

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

he did reply, you even quoted his reply

lostrib

he said your statement was a logical fallacy

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] I meant a real reply and not just some more fanboy talk.killzowned24

he said your statement was a logical fallacy

 just some more fanboy talk

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

he said your statement was a logical fallacy

lostrib

 just some more fanboy talk

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] I don't care what he said or thinks because he is wrong and that is a fact!killzowned24

 just some more fanboy talk

that doesn't make them good represenations of graphics/performance/etc.  Wait, why the fvck am i arguing this shit?

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

 just some more fanboy talk

lostrib

that doesn't make them good represenations of graphics/performance/etc.  Wait, why the fvck am i arguing this shit?

like I said ,it's silly.

Anyone who suggests that Killzone has anything less than the best-looking character models in a console game so far lacks all credibility. Quantum Break does not compare (much less detail on the character textures, blurrier, clothing doesn't seem to animate at all), nor does anything else that has been shown up to this point. Pointing to an old E3 demo is futile as those tend to be created several weeks or even months prior to E3 and using youtube videos to try to disprove it is even more transparent in its futility: video compression artifacts aren't hard to detect.

Guerilla has verified those models are in-game, not in-engine which is likely what the Quantum Break pics/gifs released so far were (notably the tweet claiming it was in-game was later deleted) and even if they were both in-game the Killzone character models are clearly superior. If you doubt that they can be done in-game, then you're mistaken: aside from the level of AA shown it is entirely possible given that those would be the highest LoD models in-game which means only one would be likely to be shown at a time.

If the game comes out and no such models are in-game then you can claim ownage, until then you'd do well to shut your mouth unless something is shown that matches what Killzone brings to the table because what they showed looks to match Crysis 2/3 on PC.

Aidenfury19

here a better one for Crysis

CroidX

Image is too small and it still looks pretty bad.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] Nope. anyone knows that 99% of gifs are small.only a complete fool would think otherwise.killzowned24

that doesn't make them good represenations of graphics/performance/etc.  Wait, why the fvck am i arguing this shit?

like I said ,it's silly.

they're not good representations of graphics

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

that doesn't make them good represenations of graphics/performance/etc.  Wait, why the fvck am i arguing this shit?

lostrib

like I said ,it's silly.

they're not good representations of graphics

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] so you also think gifs are now silly> :lol:

 

like I said ,it's silly.

killzowned24

they're not good representations of graphics

then just link that shit

[QUOTE="CroidX"]

here a better one for Crysis

RawDeal_basic

Image is too small and it still looks pretty bad.

How is the image too small and compared to what he showed it looked better

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

they're not good representations of graphics

lostrib

then just link that shit

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] they are when you have the 1080p videos on youtube which most do.killzowned24

then just link that shit

well they aren't good for trying to showcase the graphics of a game

But the party just started :(

But the party just started :(

faizan_faizan

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

Anyone who suggests that Killzone has anything less than the best-looking character models in a console game so far lacks all credibility. Quantum Break does not compare (much less detail on the character textures, blurrier, clothing doesn't seem to animate at all), nor does anything else that has been shown up to this point. Pointing to an old E3 demo is futile as those tend to be created several weeks or even months prior to E3 and using youtube videos to try to disprove it is even more transparent in its futility: video compression artifacts aren't hard to detect.

Guerilla has verified those models are in-game, not in-engine which is likely what the Quantum Break pics/gifs released so far were (notably the tweet claiming it was in-game was later deleted) and even if they were both in-game the Killzone character models are clearly superior. If you doubt that they can be done in-game, then you're mistaken: aside from the level of AA shown it is entirely possible given that those would be the highest LoD models in-game which means only one would be likely to be shown at a time.

If the game comes out and no such models are in-game then you can claim ownage, until then you'd do well to shut your mouth unless something is shown that matches what Killzone brings to the table because what they showed looks to match Crysis 2/3 on PC.

ShoulderOfOrion

Where is the proof of that? Even if I conceded that point outright, which I don't, it still doesn't come close to matching Killzone.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

For a game that no one cares about Killzone generates a lot of conversation.

Day One Buy.

StrongBlackVine

I don't give a shit what you like.

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

hartsickdiscipl

Dude, give it up. Even if you acknowledge Crysis was a great looking game for the time, it was still a great looking game FOR THE TIME. It's six years old and it shows in textures that lack detail, lighting that doesn't look right, and foliage which is poor by comparison to what can be done now.

If it some scenarios it does look better than Killzone Shadowfall it sure as heck isn't shown in any of the screenshots you've posted so far and you're really just spamming the thread at this point.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]

But the party just started :(

StrongBlackVine

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]

But the party just started :(

faizan_faizan

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

I have never posted anything saying Killzone SF surpasses or even equals Crysis 3 visuals. Crysis 3 was a critical failure and commercial flop...fact. It only gets mentioned as a graphics comparison.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]

But the party just started :(

faizan_faizan

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

It may have better character models (at least certain characters anyway), but that screenshot is too low resolution to say one way or another.

EDIT: Ok I see. Viewed the original image and there is no way this looks better than the Killzone models shown. Everything but his face is extremely blurry and undetailed in comparison.

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

 

 

 

hartsickdiscipl

First two look like shit. Since when did having a white sky make a game look good?

The last two are horrible. There's like almost no anistrophic filtering and the foliage looks like it blends into all one color.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

Aidenfury19

It may have better character models (at least certain characters anyway), but that screenshot is too low resolution to say one way or another.

Can we please stop quoting the forum breaking Crysis 1 image spam? Thanks.

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] When you have nothing else to counter with, you use irrelevant material to use it as a counter.faizan_faizan

It may have better character models (at least certain characters anyway), but that screenshot is too low resolution to say one way or another.

Already did, see my edit. The only thing that might be better is the skin shader and that is far from certain given that we haven't seen how light interacts with skin in Killzone.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

StrongBlackVine

I have never posted anything saying Killzone SF surpasses or even equals Crysis 3 visuals. Crysis 3 was a critical failure and commercial flop...fact. It only gets mentioned as a graphics comparison.

looks like total crap.killzowned24

Obvious troll.  

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

Aidenfury19

Dude, give it up. Even if you acknowledge Crysis was a great looking game for the time, it was still a great looking game FOR THE TIME. It's six years old and it shows in textures that lack detail, lighting that doesn't look right, and foliage which is poor by comparison to what can be done now.

If it some scenarios it does look better than Killzone Shadowfall it sure as heck isn't shown in any of the screenshots you've posted so far and you're really just spamming the thread at this point.

You can't honestly look at those pics and tell me that you have KZ-SF pics that look more like a photo... more like real life.  If you think KZ does, you need to go outside more.  

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Is that the game that was critical AND commercial flop?

StrongBlackVine

I have never posted anything saying Killzone SF surpasses or even equals Crysis 3 visuals. Crysis 3 was a critical failure and commercial flop...fact. It only gets mentioned as a graphics comparison.

That's moronic and false. Plenty of reviewers gave Crysis 3 scores in the 90s. I would take Crysis 3's gameplay over Killzone 3's gameplay any day.

Can we please stop quoting the forum breaking Crysis 1 image spam? Thanks.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

It may have better character models (at least certain characters anyway), but that screenshot is too low resolution to say one way or another.

Aidenfury19

Already did, see my edit. The only thing that might be better is the skin shader and that is far from certain given that we haven't seen how light interacts with skin in Killzone.

 

First two look like shit. Since when did having a white sky make a game look good?

 

The last two are horrible. There's like almost no anistrophic filtering and the foliage looks like it blends into all one color.

Jebus213

I take it you've never actually been outside in anything other than ideal weather conditions.  That would explain your statements.  

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

 

 

 

Jebus213

First two look like shit. Since when did having a white sky make a game look good?

The last two are horrible. There's like almost no anistrophic filtering and the foliage looks like it blends into all one color.

I see system wars is full of trolls and people who have never traveled outside their own back yards.  I'm not sure what I expected.  

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

For those who were complaining about the depth of field blurry distance effect in the other shots i posted-

hartsickdiscipl

Dude, give it up. Even if you acknowledge Crysis was a great looking game for the time, it was still a great looking game FOR THE TIME. It's six years old and it shows in textures that lack detail, lighting that doesn't look right, and foliage which is poor by comparison to what can be done now.

If it some scenarios it does look better than Killzone Shadowfall it sure as heck isn't shown in any of the screenshots you've posted so far and you're really just spamming the thread at this point.

You can't honestly look at those pics and tell me that you have KZ-SF pics that look more like a photo... more like real life.  If you think KZ does, you need to go outside more.  

Real life doesn't have uniform distribution of sunlight (almost entirely without shadows) so blinding that it makes the gaps between tree leaves look like snow. Oh and for the record, everything except for (maybe) the foliage that I've seen in Killzone so far looks distinctly better, the enormous flaws in those screenshots ruin it for whatever areas it might be superior in.