yeah like the aphrodite mini game part,jaggies and low re textures all over the place.I've never thought GOW3 looked as good as some PS3 fans claimed. I've played through it and have the trophies to prove it. It is a pretty nice looking console game, but definitely not the best looking...on either console. It's fixed perspective and mediocre textures just don't look that impressive. The chains on Kratos's arms look pathetically bad. Not even close to the detail seen in Geralt's character model in The Witcher 2.
kalipekona
No game on the XBOX360 looks better than GoW3 on PS3...not even on the WiiU.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="T-razor1"]
[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]
.... since its in sub HD and consistently dips below 10 to 15 fps.themajormayor
Digital Foundry:
"Put simply, on certain stages, frame-rate varies rather drastically to the point where the game can feel almost unplayable. Thankfully these areas don't account for the majority of the gameplay by any stretch of the imagination"
Keep the lies and exaggeration coming cows. You're definitely good at it. Also the sub-hd argument is weak. If a game looks great it looks great. It's as simple as that. Ooooh it's 1152x720. Big loss there. Oh and **cough** Metal **cough** Gear **cough**Solid 4 **cough** 1024x768 **cough**
omg the majority of the game is playable. Graphics king for sure.
Too bad it looks like pure garbage. And you're not doing yourself any favours by comparing it to MGS4 which also looks pretty bad. Not as bad as Crysis 2 though obviously.
This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):
UC3:
Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.
Maybe we're not playing the same games!
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]
[QUOTE="T-razor1"]
Digital Foundry:
"Put simply, on certain stages, frame-rate varies rather drastically to the point where the game can feel almost unplayable. Thankfully these areas don't account for the majority of the gameplay by any stretch of the imagination"
Keep the lies and exaggeration coming cows. You're definitely good at it. Also the sub-hd argument is weak. If a game looks great it looks great. It's as simple as that. Ooooh it's 1152x720. Big loss there. Oh and **cough** Metal **cough** Gear **cough**Solid 4 **cough** 1024x768 **cough**
Pro_wrestler
omg the majority of the game is playable. Graphics king for sure.
Too bad it looks like pure garbage. And you're not doing yourself any favours by comparing it to MGS4 which also looks pretty bad. Not as bad as Crysis 2 though obviously.
This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):
UC3:
Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.
Maybe we're not playing the same games!
lmao ok[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]
omg the majority of the game is playable. Graphics king for sure.
Too bad it looks like pure garbage. And you're not doing yourself any favours by comparing it to MGS4 which also looks pretty bad. Not as bad as Crysis 2 though obviously.
themajormayor
This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):
UC3:
Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.
Maybe we're not playing the same games!
lmao okHe's talking about the scale of the two places.The uncharted3 pic is barely showing anything besides drake and a bunch of houses while the crysis2 pic is showing a whole city.Which will be more taxing to a console's hardware.
lmao ok[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]
This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):
UC3:
Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.
Maybe we're not playing the same games!
super600
He's talking about the scale of the two places.The uncharted3 pic is barely showing anything besides drake and a bunch of houses while the crysis2 pic is showing a whole city.Which will be more taxing to a console's hardware.
And both are bullshots :|
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]
[QUOTE="T-razor1"]
Digital Foundry:
"Put simply, on certain stages, frame-rate varies rather drastically to the point where the game can feel almost unplayable. Thankfully these areas don't account for the majority of the gameplay by any stretch of the imagination"
Keep the lies and exaggeration coming cows. You're definitely good at it. Also the sub-hd argument is weak. If a game looks great it looks great. It's as simple as that. Ooooh it's 1152x720. Big loss there. Oh and **cough** Metal **cough** Gear **cough**Solid 4 **cough** 1024x768 **cough**
Pro_wrestler
omg the majority of the game is playable. Graphics king for sure.
Too bad it looks like pure garbage. And you're not doing yourself any favours by comparing it to MGS4 which also looks pretty bad. Not as bad as Crysis 2 though obviously.
This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):
UC3:
Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.
Maybe we're not playing the same games!
:lol: comapiring a high end PC shot agianst PS3 in an effort to hype graphics for 360? I've never seen this before...
Classic lem move. I remember 360 fans did the same thing for Alan Wake, RAGE, and Splinter Cell . How come nobody pointed this out? I have already posted direct feed shots of what C2 looks like on both PS3 and 360. lol, hey kid if you want C2 to look like that you will need a high end gaming PC...you must be confused because the argument is revolving around Crysis 2 on xbox360.
CRYSIS 2 don't look blurred like most sub HD games and is only 10% hit of the actual 720p...its technically impossible to notice that.(thats on xbox 360)[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
And?
casharmy
:lol: bashing something that's low res to praise something else that is low res...classic.
10% and not blurred > 25% and horrible blurred Crysis 2 on Xbox 360 still looks like a 720p game,the ps3 version doesn't at all Xbox 360
Ps3 
[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] CRYSIS 2 don't look blurred like most sub HD games and is only 10% hit of the actual 720p...its technically impossible to notice that.(thats on xbox 360)Tessellation
:lol: bashing something that's low res to praise something else that is low res...classic.
10% and not blurred > 25% and horrible blurred Crysis 2 on Xbox 360 still looks like a 720p game,the ps3 version doesn't at all Xbox 360 Ps3 Well if it's bluryness you want to point out then C2 is horrible blurred compared to KZ3 and every other standard resolution game that has realsed this gen. At the end of the day you are still trying to hype the resolution of a sub-HD game...
KZ3 vs Crysis 2 (on 360)...so you won't have to ask these are native res shots from Lense of Truth
10% and not blurred > 25% and horrible blurred Crysis 2 on Xbox 360 still looks like a 720p game,the ps3 version doesn't at all Xbox 360[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
:lol: bashing something that's low res to praise something else that is low res...classic.
casharmy
Ps3 Well if it's bluryness you want to point out then C2 is horrible blurred compared to KZ3 and every other standard resolution game that has realsed this gen. At the end of the day you are still trying to hype the resolution of a sub-HD game...
KZ3 vs Crysis 2 (on 360)...so you won't have to ask these are native res shots from Lense of Truth
Log in to comment