No game on the XBOX360 looks better than GoW3 on PS3...not even on the WiiU.

I don't think people who state massive differences have actually seen both consoles on the same screen. It's pretty obvious that both systems are virtually identical in overall output, and any advantage in visuals should result in praise of a development team. Ravensmash

Perfectly summed up. If you want to see a real difference in visuals, build a gaming PC.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] Crysis 2 runs at 1152x720 resolution on the Microsoft platform, PS3 operates at a base resolution of 1024x720. Metal Gear Solid 4 : 1024x768Tessellation

And?

:lol:

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

And?

themajormayor

:lol:

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Um, C2 on consoles has higher res than MGS4.

mitu123

lol, and?

They are both sub-HD. Is there some kind of award for being the best version of something that doesn't meet the standard?

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] CRYSIS 2 don't look blurred like most sub HD games and is only 10% hit of the actual 720p...its technically impossible to notice that.(thats on xbox 360)Tessellation

:lol:

It's probably the blurriest game in existence.

It's probably the blurriest game in existence.

themajormayor

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

:lol:

themajormayor

It's probably the blurriest game in existence.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] 10% and not blurred > 25% and horrible blurred Crysis 2 on Xbox 360 still looks like a 720p game,the ps3 version doesn't at all Xbox 360 Ps3 Tessellation

Well if it's bluryness you want to point out then C2 is horrible blurred compared to KZ3 and every other standard resolution game that has realsed this gen. At the end of the day you are still trying to hype the resolution of a sub-HD game...

KZ3 vs Crysis 2 (on 360)...so you won't have to ask these are native res shots from Lense of Truth

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] it doesn't look blurred,just don't be butthurt at it.Tessellation

It's probably the blurriest game in existence.

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

It's probably the blurriest game in existence.

themajormayor

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] No it isn't,my friend has the game ,i played with him and for a sub HD game that has 10% hit on its resolution still looks like a native 720p..probably you played the ps3 version which looks blurred according to Digital Foundry ( cows enemies because they always prove them wrong)Tessellation

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

The AF is far superior.

No screen tear.

More stable framerate.

And clearly more jaggies on the 360 version. Which is almost paradoxal considering Crysis 2 on PS3 is the jaggiest game I have ever played.

You can see it's much harder to detect jaggies in the PS3 version. For example on the front of the truck. Or that yellow rectangular thingy in the middle.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

themajormayor

The AF is far superior.

No screen tear.

More stable framerate.

And clearly more jaggies on the 360 version. Which is almost paradoxal considering Crysis 2 on PS3 is the jaggiest game I have ever played.

You can see it's much harder to detect jaggies in the PS3 version. For example on the front of the truck. Or that yellow rectangular thingy in the middle.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

themajormayor

The AF is far superior.

No screen tear.

More stable framerate.

And clearly more jaggies on the 360 version. Which is almost paradoxal considering Crysis 2 on PS3 is the jaggiest game I have ever played.

You can see it's much harder to detect jaggies in the PS3 version. For example on the front of the truck. Or that yellow rectangular thingy in the middle.

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] lol you love to be in denial or come from a parallel world,the game looks and runs better on xbox 360,the AA is also better on xbox 360,the only slightly better is the AF on ps3 and it dies there.Tessellation

The AF is far superior.

No screen tear.

More stable framerate.

And clearly more jaggies on the 360 version. Which is almost paradoxal considering Crysis 2 on PS3 is the jaggiest game I have ever played.

You can see it's much harder to detect jaggies in the PS3 version. For example on the front of the truck. Or that yellow rectangular thingy in the middle.

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] No it isn't,my friend has the game ,i played with him and for a sub HD game that has 10% hit on its resolution still looks like a native 720p..probably you played the ps3 version which looks blurred according to Digital Foundry ( cows enemies because they always prove them wrong)Tessellation

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

The game actually ran worse on the 360 in alot of areas. The PS3 had more frame drosp but the 360 had the worst framedrops even going as low as 10 fps. DF and LOT said they virtually looked the same and even DF said the PS3 had better AF. Lemmings act like theres this massive diffrence between the two and the fact is you could see them side by side and barely see any diffrence at all. At the end of the day Crysis 2 ran like crap on both consoles and far worse then the PS3's best looking games.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Good God, I've been banned for 4 years and a member here for 10, and Cows are as rabid as ever. Since when did Crysis 2-Xbox 360 stop being the best looking console game, ever? Don't make me pull out the evidence.kalipekona

Since it lost most best graphic awards last year to UC3 and since its in sub HD and consistently dips below 10 to 15 fps. Stop calling out rabid fanboys , how about you own both consoles and play for yourself. Crysis 2 on the 360 ran emberasingly bad and for that it aint the best looking game not even close its not even the best looking game on the 360 much less consoles.

Maybe so, but it's doing about 3 times the graphical processing as God of War 3.

I love random facts , GOW 3 has better textures , better lighting more enemies on screen at a time , higher res , better AF and AA and runs at 30 to 45fps compared to Crysis2 10 to 30 fps. I own both games GOW 3 was more impressive.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

.... since its in sub HD and consistently dips below 10 to 15 fps.T-razor1

Digital Foundry:

"Put simply, on certain stages, frame-rate varies rather drastically to the point where the game can feel almost unplayable. Thankfully these areas don't account for the majority of the gameplay by any stretch of the imagination"

Keep the lies and exaggeration coming cows. You're definitely good at it. Also the sub-hd argument is weak. If a game looks great it looks great. It's as simple as that. Ooooh it's 1152x720. Big loss there. Oh and **cough** Metal **cough** Gear **cough**Solid 4 **cough** 1024x768 **cough**

It doesnt average 10 fps but it does it quite often . The part when you have to fight all those guys in the bridge after the bridge is destroyed was nearly UNPLAYABLE. Its not an exagerration its just a fact. This was like a 30 minuite segment in the game , you never see that on games like GOW3 , KZ3 or GeoW 3 . Sorry but lemmings are utterly delusional at this point . MGS4 was sub HD yea we get it but MGS4 was a great looking game back in 2008 nobody has claimed it was the best looking game on consoles in years.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Good God, I've been banned for 4 years and a member here for 10, and Cows are as rabid as ever. Since when did Crysis 2-Xbox 360 stop being the best looking console game, ever? Don't make me pull out the evidence.super600

Since it lost most best graphic awards last year to UC3 and since its in sub HD and consistently dips below 10 to 15 fps. Stop calling out rabid fanboys , how about you own both consoles and play for yourself. Crysis 2 on the 360 ran emberasingly bad and for that it aint the best looking game not even close its not even the best looking game on the 360 much less consoles.

UC3's graphics were a slight downgrade in areas compared to UC2 from what I seen from pics.

LMAO and this is the problem right here , more people discussing the topics that havent played the games. UC3 looked as good if not better then UC2 in every way. It wasnt a massive upgrade but overall it was a better looking game. If you played both you wouldnt question it.

I've never thought GOW3 looked as good as some PS3 fans claimed. I've played through it and have the trophies to prove it. It is a pretty nice looking console game, but definitely not the best looking...on either console. It's fixed perspective and mediocre textures just don't look that impressive. The chains on Kratos's arms look pathetically bad. Not even close to the detail seen in Geralt's character model in The Witcher 2.

kalipekona

GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

Since it lost most best graphic awards last year to UC3 and since its in sub HD and consistently dips below 10 to 15 fps. Stop calling out rabid fanboys , how about you own both consoles and play for yourself. Crysis 2 on the 360 ran emberasingly bad and for that it aint the best looking game not even close its not even the best looking game on the 360 much less consoles.

AM-Gamer

Maybe so, but it's doing about 3 times the graphical processing as God of War 3.

I love random facts , GOW 3 has better textures , better lighting more enemies on screen at a time , higher res , better AF and AA and runs at 30 to 45fps compared to Crysis2 10 to 30 fps. I own both games GOW 3 was more impressive.

10fps.... 0_0 i've never played C2 on console, only ever had it on PC but it can't really drop to that can it 0_0

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

Maybe so, but it's doing about 3 times the graphical processing as God of War 3.

ugoo18

I love random facts , GOW 3 has better textures , better lighting more enemies on screen at a time , higher res , better AF and AA and runs at 30 to 45fps compared to Crysis2 10 to 30 fps. I own both games GOW 3 was more impressive.

10fps.... 0_0 i've never played C2 on console, only ever had it on PC but it can't really drop to that can it 0_0

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"] "We're on Gamespot forums, so only Gamespot scores/merits count"..or do you guys still flip flop when the advantage is your favor?(@SW as a whole) Gears of War 3 won best technical graphics on Gamespot and Alice won best artistic. Also, what does frame rate have to do with how a game looks? Battlefield 3-PC on Ultra settings chugging away at 20fps looks markedly better than BLOPS on consoles running 60fps... Framerate =/= graphics, :P

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Good God, I've been banned for 4 years and a member here for 10, and Cows are as rabid as ever. Since when did Crysis 2-Xbox 360 stop being the best looking console game, ever? Don't make me pull out the evidence.Pro_wrestler

Gamespot never said crysis 2 was graphcics king on consoles thats why when they nomiinated Crysis 2 you saw a big fat version of the pc box next to it. Obviously a high end pc running Crysis 2 on DX 11 would probably be the graphics king , but that doesnt mean the 360 version looks better then anything on consoles and Gamespot never claimed it did.

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="super600"]

He's talking about the scale of the two places.The uncharted3 pic is barely showing anything besides drake and a bunch of houses while the crysis2 pic is showing a whole city.Which will be more taxing to a console's hardware.

mitu123

dude I sit about 5 feet away from a 40 inch HDTV , UC3 did not have that manny jaggies. You can pick them out if you want but the game looked pretty clean.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

I played the PS3 version yes. Which has the far superior AF to compensate. In any case I doubt they used a different motion blur for each version. Also the AA is the worst I have seen. And judging by your pics it's even worse on the 360

AM-Gamer

The game actually ran worse on the 360 in alot of areas. The PS3 had more frame drosp but the 360 had the worst framedrops even going as low as 10 fps. DF and LOT said they virtually looked the same and even DF said the PS3 had better AF. Lemmings act like theres this massive diffrence between the two and the fact is you could see them side by side and barely see any diffrence at all. At the end of the day Crysis 2 ran like crap on both consoles and far worse then the PS3's best looking games.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] lol you love to be in denial or come from a parallel world,the game looks and runs better on xbox 360,the AA is also better on xbox 360,the only slightly better is the AF on ps3 and it dies there.Tessellation

The game actually ran worse on the 360 in alot of areas. The PS3 had more frame drosp but the 360 had the worst framedrops even going as low as 10 fps. DF and LOT said they virtually looked the same and even DF said the PS3 had better AF. Lemmings act like theres this massive diffrence between the two and the fact is you could see them side by side and barely see any diffrence at all. At the end of the day Crysis 2 ran like crap on both consoles and far worse then the PS3's best looking games.

GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.AM-Gamer

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.Stevo_the_gamer

800 post though?

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

omg the majority of the game is playable. Graphics king for sure.

Too bad it looks like pure garbage. And you're not doing yourself any favours by comparing it to MGS4 which also looks pretty bad. Not as bad as Crysis 2 though obviously.

casharmy

This looks like "pure crap"?(Crysis X360):


UC3:

Crysis is no doubt the more impressive here... One is rendering a few adobe structures in an otherwise barren dessert while the other a destroyed city-scape.

Maybe we're not playing the same games!

:lol: comapiring a high end PC shot agianst PS3 in an effort to hype graphics for 360? I've never seen this before...

Classic lem move. I remember 360 fans did the same thing for Alan Wake, RAGE, and Splinter Cell . How come nobody pointed this out? I have already posted direct feed shots of what C2 looks like on both PS3 and 360. lol, hey kid if you want C2 to look like that you will need a high end gaming PC...you must be confused because the argument is revolving around Crysis 2 on xbox360.

Emm, my Radeon HD 5730M**/6570M** series (a.k.a. 5570** on desktop PC) plays C2 better than Xbox 360/PS3.

**650Mhz, 400 stream processors, 8 ROPs, 26 watts (mobile), ~35 watts (desktop).

800 post though?

Mario1331

Over 800 posts of Lems and Sheep butthurt.....lol

And yet no prove for any XBOX360 game that look better than GoW3 on PS3.:cool:

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

800 post though?

AtariKidX

Over 800 posts of Lems and Sheep butthurt.....lol

And yet no prove for any XBOX360 game that look better than GoW3 on PS3.:cool:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqs9DYisSsg

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

800 post though?

Tessellation

Over 800 posts of Lems and Sheep butthurt.....lol

And yet no prove for any XBOX360 game that look better than GoW3 on PS3.:cool:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqs9DYisSsg

Nothing better than a butthurt lem........lolol

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.Stevo_the_gamer

Was that user banned before the new TOu was created.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

Over 800 posts of Lems and Sheep butthurt.....lol

And yet no prove for any XBOX360 game that look better than GoW3 on PS3.:cool:

AtariKidX

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqs9DYisSsg

Nothing better than a butthurt lem........lolol

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

I've never thought GOW3 looked as good as some PS3 fans claimed. I've played through it and have the trophies to prove it. It is a pretty nice looking console game, but definitely not the best looking...on either console. It's fixed perspective and mediocre textures just don't look that impressive. The chains on Kratos's arms look pathetically bad. Not even close to the detail seen in Geralt's character model in The Witcher 2.

AM-Gamer

GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.

Your lying.I noticed no slowdowns or sub 30fps in the game at all.And the game environements were kinda big at times and non-linear.

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

800 post though?

Sun_Universe

Over 800 posts of Lems and Sheep butthurt.....lol

And yet no prove for any XBOX360 game that look better than GoW3 on PS3.:cool:

Is that a new joke.....??lol

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]GOW3 troucned Wticher 2 all day , i have the 360 version and the trophys to prove it as well gamertag TheSTerls. Witcher 2 was also sub HD and barely hit 30 fps. The char model on Kratos was also better then geralts not to mention far more enemies on screen at a time.super600

Was that user banned before the new TOu was created.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Welcome back to you too.Tessellation

Was that user banned before the new TOu was created.

The mods are letting back all pre new TOU bandodgers and users.They probably won;t ban someone that broke certain now removed parts of the TOU.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="super600"]

Was that user banned before the new TOu was created.

super600

The mods are letting back all pre new TOU bandodgers and users.They probably won;t ban someone that broke certain now removed parts of the TOU.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] you can still report them anyways.Tessellation

The mods are letting back all pre new TOU bandodgers and users.They probably won;t ban someone that broke certain now removed parts of the TOU.

Never knew that.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

The mods are letting back all pre new TOU bandodgers and users.They probably won;t ban someone that broke certain now removed parts of the TOU.

super600

Never knew that.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] they just don't let anyone back that easy..they will check your posting history and contributions...if it happens to be an account that contributed nothing but trolling is not coming back,they just want you to still report those accounts that still banned n the same person is braking the rules with a new account.

Tessellation

Never knew that.

Then let's talk ot the mods about it.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] lol you love to be in denial or come from a parallel world,the game looks and runs better on xbox 360,the AA is also better on xbox 360,the only slightly better is the AF on ps3 and it dies there.Tessellation

The game actually ran worse on the 360 in alot of areas. The PS3 had more frame drosp but the 360 had the worst framedrops even going as low as 10 fps. DF and LOT said they virtually looked the same and even DF said the PS3 had better AF. Lemmings act like theres this massive diffrence between the two and the fact is you could see them side by side and barely see any diffrence at all. At the end of the day Crysis 2 ran like crap on both consoles and far worse then the PS3's best looking games.

LOL you are a funny troll , but I dont have a basement I own a house while you cant even afford a PS3 . Regardless it drops to 10 fps and has sub HD . So rave over your slightly better looking multiplat while the PS3 continues to play the far superior exclusives that dont dip to 10 fps.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="super600"]

Never knew that.

super600

Then let's talk ot the mods about it.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] its something to do more with the reputation you had before getting banned.. so far i've seen high level accounts back n mostly from well known users.Tessellation

Then let's talk ot the mods about it.

I have one account troll, my last account was banned over a year ago by CaseyWegner who is no longer a mod because if you said even the slighest negative thing about pc he would run into the thread with drool coming out of this mouth and slap the ban hammer on you while he would allow the hermits to throw personal insults with no penalty.

LOL you are a funny troll , but I dont have a basement I own a house while you cant even afford a PS3AM-Gamer

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]LOL you are a funny troll , but I dont have a basement I own a house while you cant even afford a PS3Tessellation

Is that your roomates PS3 that you are not allowed to touch? What is your gamertag on PSN and XBL ? So we can even see if you own the games you are talking about , feel free to check my trophys including my crysis 2 ones on Xbox.