Bu Bu Bu it is very fun game :( told you guys, this is the same exact sitution like the wii dumbed down gameplayGiancar
It's ok when the 360 does it .. not ok when the Wii does it. At least the wii doesn't try to dumb down PC games.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well it sounds like they reviewed it by PC RTS standards, which is unfair to say the least. So called gaming journalism is a joke.comeonthehoopsJust like how they review BiA on the DS by the standards of the Xbox game. Gamespot's reviews are a joke.
[QUOTE="bez2083"] [QUOTE="PBSnipes"]
I'd like to congratulate GS on setting a new standard for piss-poor reviews (and this is coming from a life-long PC RTS fan). Lets go through this cluster****, shall we?:
"Covenant not playable in campaign mode, Flood not playable at all"
Just like how their wasn't a German campaign in Company of Heores, PC GOTY 2006? Also, thank's for the spoiler, champ.
"Small unit counts and map limit the scale of battles"
That's the whole goddamn point of the game, to focus on small-scale battles. This isn't C&C. God help this guy if he gets his hands on DoW 2.
"In terms of churning out an army, you need to actually click on a building to access its build menu."
Just like oh, I don't know, the vast majority of RTS games!?!?
"Although you can set up global and base-specific rally points, you can't create them for different unit types."
See above.
"Halo Wars is desperately lacking more factions to choose from"
Again, see PC GOTY 2006 Company of Heroes. Both feature 2 factions with 3 specialized sub-sets each.
Wow. Just wow.
XturnalS
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g51/bez2083/umad-1.jpg
I think it was the post that gave it away.
You sir win the MFing Internets with that post. God couldn't of asked for a better pic. Gotta love that Killa Cam line.
Im glad im not the only one that got that pic :lol: Hilarious[QUOTE="Giancar"]Bu Bu Bu it is very fun game :( told you guys, this is the same exact sitution like the wii dumbed down gameplayEspada12
It's ok when the 360 does it .. not ok when the Wii does it. At least the wii doesn't try to dumb down PC games.
Yep, they dumb down console games instead. ...wait, thats worse.[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"]} Get a PS3I personally only buy games above a 7...........most of my games are 8.5 and above...........
WTF DO I DO NOW!???!!!!!!!
Keep-the-Faith
i gotta go........gotta relax and process this. i am not joking when i say i feel light headed........i had such high hopes for this.
............ what? are you serious?The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.DaBrainzGames that do it well (Company of Heroes) offer layers upon layers of different strategy upon those two factions. Halo Wars simply doesnt.
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"]} Get a PS3I personally only buy games above a 7...........most of my games are 8.5 and above...........
WTF DO I DO NOW!???!!!!!!!
Keep-the-Faith
i gotta go........gotta relax and process this. i am not joking when i say i feel light headed........i had such high hopes for this.
buy it, simply as that...why would you care for a score, if you have fun...get itThe fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.DaBrainzWarcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi".
[QUOTE="angelkimne"]It's not just IGN that rated the game AA/AAA if that's what you're implying...BigGimp77http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/halowars I see GameInformer (Always over rates games) and 2 xbox realted reveiews... And one site i've never heard of lol.Metacritic don't update fast enough... http://www.n4g.com/Xbox360/games/g-21480/tt/metareviews.aspx
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.M337INGGames that do it well (Company of Heroes) offer layers upon layers of different strategy upon those two factions. Halo Wars simply doesnt. I think Age of Mythology is the only Ensemble game to have more then 2 factions. I mean AoE had multiple civilizations but they were basically all the same units with slightly altered benefits.
How can it get 6.5 here and 8.4 from ign us. 8.2 from ign uk. 9 from ign Australia?Why do we get these inconsistent reviews? Gamespot's still trying to prove they give the harshest reviewes, but with zero credibility under their belt they look even more of a laughing stock.
Franky-the-bat
Exactly, hence why it should be highly discouraged to only use GameSpot. :|
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.Skittles_McGeeWarcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi". Those games still had more depth and they are like what over 10 years old or something?
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.Skittles_McGeeWarcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi".
Warcraft 1 and 2 came out in 1994 and 1995,we are in 2009. Compare it to WC3 which was 2002 and lol!
[QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] } Get a PS3Giancar
i gotta go........gotta relax and process this. i am not joking when i say i feel light headed........i had such high hopes for this.
buy it, simply as that...why would you care for a score, if you have fun...get itoffcourse ill buy it. Ill play it and ill love it...........like any faithful lemming would. Any mother would unconditionally love an ugly baby........
but still........a halo fan getting a sub A Halo game.......this was very world shattering.
It's unfair that it was compared to other RTSs?
I think it's perfectly fair, after all the Lemmings were cheering after Ensemble said that this controlled better than any RTS on the PC.
Sucks that this is Ensemble's last project, hopefully Robot will take up arms and make an AoE2 or an AoM again.
[QUOTE="BigGimp77"][QUOTE="angelkimne"]It's not just IGN that rated the game AA/AAA if that's what you're implying...angelkimnehttp://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/halowars I see GameInformer (Always over rates games) and 2 xbox realted reveiews... And one site i've never heard of lol.Metacritic don't update fast enough... http://www.n4g.com/Xbox360/games/g-21480/tt/metareviews.aspxAll the 8's and 10's there heh
[QUOTE="Franky-the-bat"] How can it get 6.5 here and 8.4 from ign us. 8.2 from ign uk. 9 from ign Australia?Why do we get these inconsistent reviews? Gamespot's still trying to prove they give the harshest reviewes, but with zero credibility under their belt they look even more of a laughing stock.
leadernator
Same case always...
Fanboy doesn't agree with GS review, fanboy questions GS's credibility.
What makes me a fanboy? The fact I own consoles from all brands?
It's no secret GS been terrible for some time now, I bet you hide under a rock and pretend everything is hunky-dory. How can they give a garbage score for a game that's got great score average across the board?
For someone like me that heavily rely on reviews, this is ridicules, how is this making me a fanboy?
Warcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi".[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.Espada12
Warcraft 1 and 2 came out in 1994 and 1995,we are in 200. Compare it to WC3 which was 2002 and lol!
That doesn't change the point that they were highly praised RTS games with only two factions :| Fine, want a more recent one? Pick a Command and Conquer game that has two factions. There's been some recently, like Red Alert 2.[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]The best is the Halo wars will expand the RTS genre oneDo Not Post In Linked Threads.
Halo Wars AA
Halo Wars will expand the RTS genre
Holy Cow! Halo Wars demo dowloaded over 2 milllion times!!!!!!
The above illustrates the hype for the game, what lemmings think the game will do and how lemmings love to play "great" games.
Animal-Mother
I agree. That one was hilarious. :D
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"]buy it, simply as that...why would you care for a score, if you have fun...get iti gotta go........gotta relax and process this. i am not joking when i say i feel light headed........i had such high hopes for this.
Keep-the-Faith
offcourse ill buy it. Ill play it and ill love it...........like any faithful lemming would. Any mother would unconditionally love an ugly baby........
but still........a halo fan getting a sub A Halo game.......this was very world shattering.
:lol:
But honestly, play the games you want to play.
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"]buy it, simply as that...why would you care for a score, if you have fun...get iti gotta go........gotta relax and process this. i am not joking when i say i feel light headed........i had such high hopes for this.
Keep-the-Faith
offcourse ill buy it. Ill play it and ill love it...........like any faithful lemming would. Any mother would unconditionally love an ugly baby........
but still........a halo fan getting a sub A Halo game.......this was very world shattering.
why do you care, what a site gives to the game I use gs scores only for ownage purposes... But i trust more ign and gt moreI doubt they would be able to... Do they own the right to the AoE series or is it microsofts?It's unfair that it was compared to other RTSs?
I think it's perfectly fair, after all the Lemmings were cheering after Ensemble said that this controlled better than any RTS on the PC.
Sucks that this is Ensemble's last project, hopefully Robot will take up arms and make an AoE2 or an AoM again.
TenP
[QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"][QUOTE="Giancar"] buy it, simply as that...why would you care for a score, if you have fun...get itcarlisledavid79
offcourse ill buy it. Ill play it and ill love it...........like any faithful lemming would. Any mother would unconditionally love an ugly baby........
but still........a halo fan getting a sub A Halo game.......this was very world shattering.
/ the internet I agree im a huge halo fanboy and when I saw that score in some other thread I thought it was a joke post :(*waits for carlisledavid to say im hiding behind halo now* :P
Agreed. You cant complain that its judged by other standards when you judge it by the same standards before a review.It's unfair that it was compared to other RTSs?
I think it's perfectly fair, after all the Lemmings were cheering after Ensemble said that this controlled better than any RTS on the PC.
Sucks that this is Ensemble's last project, hopefully Robot will take up arms and make an AoE2 or an AoM again.
TenP
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]I feel bad for the people whose first RTS will be Halo Wars. :(
FragTycoon
best post so far. :lol:
Has this really changed anyones minds if they planed to pick it up?
Thanks! And I would assume so! After all, "hardcore gamers" are not buying the Wii because it lacks a sufficient amount of highly rated games. If they care so much about highly rated games, then they shouldn't be buying this.
Warcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi".[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]The fact that the game only has only 2 factions and a short single player campaign is why I think this score is valid. I mean how much replay can you get with only 2 factions? That severely limits the amount of strategies you can use.Espada12
Warcraft 1 and 2 came out in 1994 and 1995,we are in 2009. Compare it to WC3 which was 2002 and lol!
Someone else said it before I had to. Maybe if HaloWars came out 15 years ago it would of scored higher too, but then it still wouldn't of been as good as WCII because of teh controls anyway.
So wait, Red Alert 3 on the xbox 360 gets a better score? And i thought Halo Wars will expand the rts genre. :Dgamedude00it will also be better than SC2. :roll:
One of the negative points on the game was that the Flood arn't playable at all? I don't recall Dawn of War being shunned because the Imperial Guard weren't playable. But anyway, I respect the guys opinion. I just disagree with it.Doom_HellKnight
The score doesn't bother me since I was never really interested in this game but if they talk about the covenant not being playable in the campaign then I would also like to see in the reviews for Dawn of War II and Starcraft II that other races were not playable in the campaign aswell. Halo Wars campaign is pretty much exactly like those two games with only one playable race during the campaign, if those games get the pass while Halo Wars does not, I will then start damaging controlling more :P
[QUOTE="TenP"]Agreed. You cant complain that its judged by other standards when you judge it by the same standards before a review. I agree. Lets start judging handheld games by console and PC standards.It's unfair that it was compared to other RTSs?
I think it's perfectly fair, after all the Lemmings were cheering after Ensemble said that this controlled better than any RTS on the PC.
Sucks that this is Ensemble's last project, hopefully Robot will take up arms and make an AoE2 or an AoM again.
carlisledavid79
To the people comparing CoH to HW, just stop please. CoH is a 2006 game that is already a clasic. HW is a 2009 game that is as casual as Wii shovelware. Just stop please.I agree, you can't compare the two. Halo Wars has balance, CoH... well its made by Relic :| Oh yeah, I went there.
glez13
[QUOTE="Espada12"][QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] Warcraft 1 and 2 would like to say "hi".Skittles_McGee
Warcraft 1 and 2 came out in 1994 and 1995,we are in 200. Compare it to WC3 which was 2002 and lol!
That doesn't change the point that they were highly praised RTS games with only two factions :| Fine, want a more recent one? Pick a Command and Conquer game that has two factions. There's been some recently, like Red Alert 2.Your really missing the point...War Craft 1 and 2 came out nearly 15 years ago...back when the standards for RTS's were very differently...back than all the races tended to be very similar to one another, and thus there wasnt a lot of point to doing multiple campaigns....
It wasnt until starcraft that had 3 very distinct races that doing multiple campaigns became standard for RTS's.
[QUOTE="FragTycoon"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]I feel bad for the people whose first RTS will be Halo Wars. :(
Hexagon_777
best post so far. :lol:
Has this really changed anyones minds if they planed to pick it up?
Thanks! And I would assume so! After all, "hardcore gamers" are not buying the Wii because it lacks a sufficient amount of highly rated games. If they care so much about highly rated games, then they shouldn't be buying this.
I still say the reason Halo was so adored because it was people's first FPS too.[QUOTE="TenP"]I doubt they would be able to... Do they own the right to the AoE series or is it microsofts?It's unfair that it was compared to other RTSs?
I think it's perfectly fair, after all the Lemmings were cheering after Ensemble said that this controlled better than any RTS on the PC.
Sucks that this is Ensemble's last project, hopefully Robot will take up arms and make an AoE2 or an AoM again.
BigGimp77
I'm pretty sure the rights will transfer over to Robot... or I hope they will anyway. I don't want an AoE not made by Ensemble. :[
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment