[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"] Weak rebutal, I gave you the anology, hiding behind the "My PC cant run it" excuse is just as invalid as "I dont have a 360 therefore PS3 version is better" .
PC games only as good as your rig? Valid? Yes. poor excuse YES.
Nagidar
I never said the console versions were better. I said the PC version is "potentially" better. It all depends on your machine. See with the 360, the game will work the same for EVERY 360 owner. PS3 version will work the same for every PS3 owner. That can't be said for PCs. But I admitted that it could potentially be better on PC. No doubt.
Eevn if you run this game on medium it will more than likely look better than its console counterpart, not to mention the PC version has more content, you're really reaching here, your logic is "If I can't run it, its only got potential" with logic like that you should also believe, "Since I don't have a PS3, the PS3 version is only potentially better".
Wrong again. Even if I don't have the PS3 version, I can still see, read, watch, and play the PS3 version which is ALWAYS going to be the same on all PS3s. I can't say that about the PC version because all PCs are different. I'd have to see it being played on many different settings. So only the PC version earns the title of "Potentially better".
PS: There's your reply.. wasting my time with you.
Again, your arguement was if you don't have the hardware, its only potentially better, if thats the case, if you don't have a PS3, the PS3 version is only potentially better, its the same thing, you're really failing and grasping for straws here, give it up.
... But we KNOW what the PS3 hardware is. We KNOW what the 360 hardware is. We DON'T know what the PC hardware is because it varies from person to person. Is this so hard to understand really?
Log in to comment