PC gaming is awful for so many reasons

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

Left 4 Dead and Orange Box PC > Left 4 Dead and Orange Box for consoles.

GTR2addict

Don't even get me started on TF2. There is no comparison between the PC version and the 360 version. I mean, on the 360, there are 16 players max. That means 8 players to a team. And there are 9 classes...

when on pc there are maps that escalate to 40 players...

Not to mention all the extra content that's in the PC version now? Granted, that'll be coming to the 360 soon, so that isn't much. PS3, on the other hand...

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]

[QUOTE="goatblah"] guess you didn't notice PC always gets the best versions. also you don't know your problems aren't everyone's problems. [QUOTE="Ryusuke_Akihiro"]In a game like Planescape, Fallout, Baldur's Gate, etc.?Ryusuke_Akihiro

*FACEPALM* a controller is USB, you can unplug it whenever the hell you want, even in game, what makes you think you have to use a controller for EVERYTHING? gotdammit i could post some really insulting stuff but i will hold myself from doing so.

All of you ****ers can kiss my god**** ***. I was just posting my ****ing opinion like the rest of you! GOD!!!!

*sigh* i appear to draw rage on people when i splash truth in their faces... i haven't been swearing because i've been moderated on account of it, i advise you to keep your mouth shut when you don't have anything good to say.
Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#153 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts
[QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"][QUOTE="GeoffZak"]

Why buy a game for the PC when you can get it for a console? Consoles > PCs because of simplicity. You put the game in, and it works. Bam!

The only decent PC exclusive is WoW.

HuusAsking
games on pc are cheaper than consoles, and why pay for DLC when you can get it free on pc? umm consoles has installs for patches and certain games too(MGS4).

And console games are simpler. You just put them in and go, for the most part. Once upon a time, you didn't need to install console games; indeed, installation was impossible because such things as hard drives didin't exist for them, and we were better off for it. You just put it in, turn it on and play. Turnkey simplicity; no PC game can achieve that universally (because PCs are too diverse), and people will pay for simplicity if it makes their lives easier. Not only that, since console games were unpatchable, games needed to get it right the first time; gaming companies risked their futures otherwise.

Yes and there were many games that had bug/errors that would never be fixed. If they did have HHDs and installs they could have been better, there's 2 sides to this argument. There is nothing wrong with a company being able to improve on something, in fact its a really good thing with the complexity of new games.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

[QUOTE="Ryusuke_Akihiro"]

The only thing I HATE about PC games is Mouse controls... Pointing a clicking to do things in GAME is just so annoying...

Ryusuke_Akihiro

Then use a controller.

In a game like Planescape, Fallout, Baldur's Gate, etc.?

Yeah, good luck using those clumsy thumbsticks to navigate a game like those. It'd take you a week just to achieve something you could do in a day with a mouse and keyboard.
Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#155 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] games on pc are cheaper than consoles, and why pay for DLC when you can get it free on pc? umm consoles has installs for patches and certain games too(MGS4). GTR2addict
And console games are simpler. You just put them in and go, for the most part. Once upon a time, you didn't need to install console games; indeed, installation was impossible because such things as hard drives didin't exist for them, and we were better off for it. You just put it in, turn it on and play. Turnkey simplicity; no PC game can achieve that universally (because PCs are too diverse), and people will pay for simplicity if it makes their lives easier. Not only that, since console games were unpatchable, games needed to get it right the first time; gaming companies risked their futures otherwise.

PC: 1. insert disk / DL game from steam 2. Install 3. Play you need zero knowledge to do any of these, explain to me in what way consoles being simpler makes it an advantage

you can completely skip step 2 if you use steam :o

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]And console games are simpler. You just put them in and go, for the most part. Once upon a time, you didn't need to install console games; indeed, installation was impossible because such things as hard drives didin't exist for them, and we were better off for it. You just put it in, turn it on and play. Turnkey simplicity; no PC game can achieve that universally (because PCs are too diverse), and people will pay for simplicity if it makes their lives easier. Not only that, since console games were unpatchable, games needed to get it right the first time; gaming companies risked their futures otherwise.swazidoughman

PC: 1. insert disk / DL game from steam 2. Install 3. Play you need zero knowledge to do any of these, explain to me in what way consoles being simpler makes it an advantage

you can completely skip step 2 if you use steam :o

Unless your PC isn't compatible with the game. At least with the console compatibility is guaranteed--otherwise, you can make a legal complaint. You can't with PCs because they're too diverse.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] games on pc are cheaper than consoles, and why pay for DLC when you can get it free on pc? umm consoles has installs for patches and certain games too(MGS4).

And console games are simpler. You just put them in and go, for the most part. Once upon a time, you didn't need to install console games; indeed, installation was impossible because such things as hard drives didin't exist for them, and we were better off for it. You just put it in, turn it on and play. Turnkey simplicity; no PC game can achieve that universally (because PCs are too diverse), and people will pay for simplicity if it makes their lives easier. Not only that, since console games were unpatchable, games needed to get it right the first time; gaming companies risked their futures otherwise.

Yes and there were many games that had bug/errors that would never be fixed. If they did have HHDs and installs they could have been better, there's 2 sides to this argument. There is nothing wrong with a company being able to improve on something, in fact its a really good thing with the complexity of new games.

Quality Assurance. It's the company's responsibility to make sure those bugs never make the final release. That speaks poorly of the company, so those that don't simply don't get my business, enough said.
Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts

Arguments i have seen in this thread;

1. I hate KB+M! :cry:

ok then use any of the numerous USB or wireless controlers. For games it's not suited to, why are you trying to play them in the first place? You 'Hate' the controls?KB+M has had games built arround it since... well since PC gaming was born. They nailed it in 1997 with quake and they still are. It just works, if you are not used to it then that's a different matter.

2. I can't make it work on my compooter! All PC games are teh broken!! :cry:

Man up, simple as.sometimes you will encouter issues, same can be said for on consoles. The PC is not some magic error machine, use your head, make usre your drivers are up to date and things will go ok. Remeber to do all the stuff you should do anyway if you own a PC like scans and updates. It's just plain everyday stuff. YES the PC does require techical know-how but if you have half a brain you can get trough the frankly very easy steps, only those who struggle with everyday use would find it 'too hard'


3. PC games are just graphics/ there are no good looking games exept Crysis/ Console versions are better.

These are conflicting arguments, you can't have you hate and eat it. The PC DOES get MANY better verisons of games (all VALVE games, most shooters and RPGs [just look at Mass Effect and Last rem]). The PC also has many deep exclusives. Graphics will be addressed later ;)

.




Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#159 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts
[QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"] PC: 1. insert disk / DL game from steam 2. Install 3. Play you need zero knowledge to do any of these, explain to me in what way consoles being simpler makes it an advantageHuusAsking

you can completely skip step 2 if you use steam :o

Unless your PC isn't compatible with the game. At least with the console compatibility is guaranteed--otherwise, you can make a legal complaint. You can't with PCs because they're too diverse.

Do you know how Rare that is with windows? You would have to have hardware form the dark ages, Even a 6150SE will run most modern games, trust me i've tried the only one i got issues with was STALKER because the sky would not load properly. Still playable. Yes folks, a 6150SE WILL run STALKER i'm as amazed as you.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

you can completely skip step 2 if you use steam :o

BoloTheGreat

Unless your PC isn't compatible with the game. At least with the console compatibility is guaranteed--otherwise, you can make a legal complaint. You can't with PCs because they're too diverse.

Do you know how Rare that is with windows? You would have to have hardware form the dark ages, Even a 6150SE will run most modern games, trust me i've tried the only one i got issues with was STALKER because the sky would not load properly. Still playable. Yes folks, a 6150SE WILL run STALKER i'm as amazed as you.

Tell that to a guy who got BSODs and unbreakable freezes trying to play PC games in the past (and yes, there was ample cooling installed). Sometimes, things just don't work, and I'm speaking from firsthand experience.

Avatar image for Addict187
Addict187

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 Addict187
Member since 2008 • 1128 Posts

1. So much hassle getting games to run at optimum levels 2. So many glitches, patches and general BS that goes along with it. 3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends. 4. Mouse and Keyboard were never an intended interface for gaming. 5. Buy a new rig, it's good for a couple years then it's dated for the latest games. 6. PC gaming is in such a dire state that devs don't even bother trying to push the envelope in terms of graphics anymore. Crysis was there last serious effort to pump alot of finances into 'teh graphics', but it flopped in sales, third parties saw this and decided not to attempt games like Crysis anymore, as a result a game that came out on the PC two years ago is still the best looking. airraido

I use to think like you but after getting a ATI 4890 and playing HalfLife 2 on the pc.OMFG is it ever better then the 360 version WOW WOW WOW ive been missing out and bioshok to then I got crysis and again OMFG is it great consoles can kiss the PC ass they dont compare not even close. I still have love for my 360

Avatar image for TreyoftheDead
TreyoftheDead

7982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#162 TreyoftheDead
Member since 2007 • 7982 Posts

Quality Assurance. It's the company's responsibility to make sure those bugs never make the final release. That speaks poorly of the company, so those that don't simply don't get my business, enough said.HuusAsking

Yes, but sometimes big companies push games out when they aren't ready. It isn't the fault of the developers, but the publishers. Killzone is a great example of this. The first game was rushed, forced out early by Sony in order to compete with Halo, and suffered from it once released. The game was riddled with bugs that made it a chore to play and the game scored poorly across the board because of this. However, Guerilla games was able to take their time with the second game and it wasn't released until it was ready to be released. The game sold well, scored well, and is considered one of the greatest games offered on the PS3.

Now, what does this have to with your post? Simply that devs are not always in control with when they are able to release a game. Sure, it would be nice if all games were held back for quality assurance, but since we live in reality and not an ideal world, we can only choose to play those games or not. Personally, I'd rather have it so that the developers are able to patch a rushed game after release. Why? Because if it is a good game, with only a few bugs hampering the experience, I'd rather get it fixed later than not at all.

In the end the experience matters the most, it doesn't matter how it gives you that. People are too caught up on what the devs do and how a game isn't worth their time if the devs don't get it right. This is silly. I'll take an almost good game that is made great by mods or patches over one that stays mediocre.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#163 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Tell that to a guy who got BSODs and unbreakable freezes trying to play PC games in the past (and yes, there was ample cooling installed). Sometimes, things just don't work, and I'm speaking from experienceHuusAsking
I've had far more problems with my 360 than my PC lately. My THIRD 360 just died. This time, it isn't RROD either, so the three year warranty doesn't cover it. Microsoft is asking me to pay a hundred bucks because of their shoddy design flaws. This is the THIRD TIME my 360 has screwed up. THIRD TIME.
Avatar image for _Verm
_Verm

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 _Verm
Member since 2009 • 488 Posts
Pc gaming's current state is dead, i think it personally died '99-[early]07. some great games though.
Avatar image for TreyoftheDead
TreyoftheDead

7982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#165 TreyoftheDead
Member since 2007 • 7982 Posts

Pc gaming's current state is dead, i think it personally died '99-[early]07. some great games though._Verm

Got any evidence to support that?

Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#166 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts

because you suck at them and own a dell? what

Avatar image for o0squishy0o
o0squishy0o

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#167 o0squishy0o
Member since 2007 • 2802 Posts

well pc needs its exclusives back as in NEW QUAKE, NEW BETTER UT, NEW SUPCOM, etc the real PC games although its likely consolisation will ruin the games ='[

Avatar image for _Verm
_Verm

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 _Verm
Member since 2009 • 488 Posts

Got any evidence to support that?

TreyoftheDead

Sales decline, game quality decline, the only thing that seems to have increased is the cost to upgrade....

Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]Unless your PC isn't compatible with the game. At least with the console compatibility is guaranteed--otherwise, you can make a legal complaint. You can't with PCs because they're too diverse.HuusAsking

Do you know how Rare that is with windows? You would have to have hardware form the dark ages, Even a 6150SE will run most modern games, trust me i've tried the only one i got issues with was STALKER because the sky would not load properly. Still playable. Yes folks, a 6150SE WILL run STALKER i'm as amazed as you.

Tell that to a guy who got BSODs and unbreakable freezes trying to play PC games in the past (and yes, there was ample cooling installed). Sometimes, things just don't work, and I'm speaking from firsthand experience.

Well then you are VERY unlucky, things just don't work for no reason on the PC, you obviously have some broken or poorly OC hardware running. Its not the games companies fault you own a busted PC. Oh and it's not like RROD doesn't exist either.
Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#170 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts

1: no hassle at all, settings exist for a reason

2: console games have the same problems now. and console devs intentionally release broken games so they can sell the fixes

3: i can play my pc on a big screen if i want to.

4: then why did the very first games use kb/m?

5: nope, just flat out wrong

6: PC gaming still is the largest market share, larger than any single console.

Avatar image for TreyoftheDead
TreyoftheDead

7982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#171 TreyoftheDead
Member since 2007 • 7982 Posts

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

Got any evidence to support that?

_Verm

Sales decline, game quality decline, the only thing that seems to have increased is the cost to upgrade....

Game quality decline? The PC has had 12 AAA-AA titles in the past 6 months. This includes games like Empire: Total War, Dawn of War II, Cryostasis, and The Sims 3. 8 of those games are exclusive to the PC. I just built a brand new gaming machine from scratch, on that can play any game available, for 500 bucks. And where is the proof that sales have decreased? You are bringing up this accusation, the burden of proof is on you. :)

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#172 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

Got any evidence to support that?

_Verm

game quality decline

PC has 12 AAAEs...

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#173 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
Unless your PC isn't compatible with the game. At least with the console compatibility is guaranteed--otherwise, you can make a legal complaint. You can't with PCs because they're too diverse.HuusAsking
WHAT? all games are compatible with ALL PC's you hear that boy?

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

Got any evidence to support that?

_Verm

Sales decline, game quality decline, the only thing that seems to have increased is the cost to upgrade....

game quality has always been rising, sales are higher than ever, the costs to upgrade keep going down, and the 11 billion dollars worth of computer hardware sold in 2008 (that's more than all 3 consoles combined) say hi. try harder next time.
Avatar image for XxChicagoTedXx
XxChicagoTedXx

407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 XxChicagoTedXx
Member since 2009 • 407 Posts
1. So much hassle getting games to run at optimum levels I have had the same PC for over 2 years now and still play new games great. 2. So many glitches, patches and general BS that goes along with it. I only experience this when playing games from the 90's like Grim Fandango but this is fixable by the click of the mouse. 3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends. Or you could hook up with your friends online and play 2 games at once on a huge flatscreen monitor. 4. Mouse and Keyboard were never an intended interface for gaming. Well seeing as the first video games in history were on PC's I disagree. 5. Buy a new rig, it's good for a couple years then it's dated for the latest games. Like I said I could boot up my old windows ME and make it run most games out there. 6. PC gaming is in such a dire state that devs don't even bother trying to push the envelope in terms of graphics anymore. Crysis was there last serious effort to pump alot of finances into 'teh graphics', but it flopped in sales, third parties saw this and decided not to attempt games like Crysis anymore, as a result a game that came out on the PC two years ago is still the best looking. The reason they dont touch graphics right now is because Crysis was way over the top. I could barely run it on my computer. That is the reason nobody bought it: nobody could run it. You need to wait until the high end becomes mainstream before you could put out a game like that. Also, the graphics on a PC or even Mac will always surpass a console. Give me any game you have that is also availible for PC. My loads will be slower and it will look better, plus I could do several other things while the games is running.
Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#175 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

...meh, i think you took enough verbal beating's today..i'll leave u alone....

Avatar image for goatblah
goatblah

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 goatblah
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

1) agreed, Ive had so many problems with games recently. Fifa09 on pc is just a mess.2) Watchmen didn't work on PC on release so I agree again as well as having numours problems this year with games

3) get a DVI to HDMI lead. This leads connects your pc to you TV I realise this may be over your level of comprehension4) yes they were and try and play Vs a person with KB/m on an fps and see what happens to you5) less true these days as intel have slowed down updated6) I agree that PC is the last format of choice for developers, Ive noticed now how games come out on PC way later then their console counterparts. Where fight night 4 and UFC????

[QUOTE="Ryusuke_Akihiro"]

guess you didn't notice PC always gets the best versions. also you don't know your problems aren't everyone's problems. goatblah

Erm no its the majority of people with these problems so get your facts right bubaloo

Fifa09

http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/fifa-09-pc/355009-do-you-get-lag-stuttering-fifa-09-offline.html

Watchmen

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=13633370

Terminator

http://play.tm/news/24706/launch-issues-impact-terminator-salvation-on-pc/

Wanted: weapons of fate failed to install on any of the 6 PC's I tried it on, there are multiple people that experience the same thing

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Guess what.....you can do all that on a PC. Big Screen, Couch, controllers, etc. And you act like sitting in a chair is extremely uncomfortable and bad for your back.CBR600-RR
Guess what, there aint many games to play on PC with friends. What about Warhawk, The Warriors, Champions, Kung Fu Fists Of Plastic? And many more. And I'd rather slouch on a bean bag rather than sit on a pc chair.

Not many games to play with friends? L4D, TF2, CS + CS:S, Warcraft 3, Diablo 2, Starcraft, COD4 + COD 5 (especially Nazi Zombies), SFIV, Supreme Commander, Sins of a Solar Empire, Crysis Wars, any Command and Conquer ect ect. And guess what? They can also be played on this hypothetical bean bag chair in front of a TV, most with a 360 controller.
Avatar image for goatblah
goatblah

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 goatblah
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

[QUOTE="CBR600-RR"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Guess what.....you can do all that on a PC. Big Screen, Couch, controllers, etc. And you act like sitting in a chair is extremely uncomfortable and bad for your back.General_X
Guess what, there aint many games to play on PC with friends. What about Warhawk, The Warriors, Champions, Kung Fu Fists Of Plastic? And many more. And I'd rather slouch on a bean bag rather than sit on a pc chair.

Not many games to play with friends? L4D, TF2, CS + CS:S, Warcraft 3, Diablo 2, Starcraft, COD4 + COD 5 (especially Nazi Zombies), SFIV, Supreme Commander, Sins of a Solar Empire, Crysis Wars, any Command and Conquer ect ect. And guess what? They can also be played on this hypothetical bean bag chair in front of a TV, most with a 360 controller.

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="CBR600-RR"]Guess what, there aint many games to play on PC with friends. What about Warhawk, The Warriors, Champions, Kung Fu Fists Of Plastic? And many more. And I'd rather slouch on a bean bag rather than sit on a pc chair.goatblah

Not many games to play with friends? L4D, TF2, CS + CS:S, Warcraft 3, Diablo 2, Starcraft, COD4 + COD 5 (especially Nazi Zombies), SFIV, Supreme Commander, Sins of a Solar Empire, Crysis Wars, any Command and Conquer ect ect. And guess what? They can also be played on this hypothetical bean bag chair in front of a TV, most with a 360 controller.

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.
Avatar image for goatblah
goatblah

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 goatblah
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

[QUOTE="goatblah"]

[QUOTE="General_X"]Not many games to play with friends? L4D, TF2, CS + CS:S, Warcraft 3, Diablo 2, Starcraft, COD4 + COD 5 (especially Nazi Zombies), SFIV, Supreme Commander, Sins of a Solar Empire, Crysis Wars, any Command and Conquer ect ect. And guess what? They can also be played on this hypothetical bean bag chair in front of a TV, most with a 360 controller.General_X

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.

yer obviously that is loads better but the consolities will say you need $1,000,000 for that rig just to play with friends

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

1. So much hassle getting games to run at optimum levels 2. So many glitches, patches and general BS that goes along with it. 3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends. 4. Mouse and Keyboard were never an intended interface for gaming. 5. Buy a new rig, it's good for a couple years then it's dated for the latest games. 6. PC gaming is in such a dire state that devs don't even bother trying to push the envelope in terms of graphics anymore. Crysis was there last serious effort to pump alot of finances into 'teh graphics', but it flopped in sales, third parties saw this and decided not to attempt games like Crysis anymore, as a result a game that came out on the PC two years ago is still the best looking. airraido
1. Opinion

2. Learning curve

3. Interior Design Flaw

4. True. People got used to it so they think it is the best and only way.

5. Same with all gaming devices

6. True. Is why Crysis is going else where.

Good job making people upset. I don't know why they are so emotional. Your list is mostly opinions.

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="goatblah"]

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

goatblah

Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.

yer obviously that is loads better but the consolities will say you need $1,000,000 for that rig just to play with friends

Which is the automatic response from them, all while I just built a rig for my friend for $530 that can run Crysis on high.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="goatblah"]

[QUOTE="General_X"]Not many games to play with friends? L4D, TF2, CS + CS:S, Warcraft 3, Diablo 2, Starcraft, COD4 + COD 5 (especially Nazi Zombies), SFIV, Supreme Commander, Sins of a Solar Empire, Crysis Wars, any Command and Conquer ect ect. And guess what? They can also be played on this hypothetical bean bag chair in front of a TV, most with a 360 controller.General_X

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.

What about games that don't need to split the screen, such as Brawl and sports titles?
Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#184 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

PC gaming is great now . Tons of console games like Devil May Cry, Fall Out 3, GRID, COD4, Bioshock, Mass Effect, Left for Dead, Street Fighter 4, and a whole slew of new ones coming soon,: Dirt 2, Assassins Creed 2, Bioshock 2, Splinter Cell Conviction, etc. On the right rig, these games can look quite a bit better than the console versions, and you can play most of them with a xbox 360 controller. I run mine to a 54in plasma hdtv and i can directly compare pc gamess to pse3 and 360 games. My pc is like a super duper console, which is fine with me.

Avatar image for Kicker_of_Cans
Kicker_of_Cans

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Kicker_of_Cans
Member since 2009 • 444 Posts
I don't enjoy PC gaming as much as I used to. Then again, I just don't enjoy gaming in general as much as I used to. But I still consider PC to be the ultimate gaming platform, and the criticisms shown in the OP have been used to death and have been debunked to death. What happened SW? People used to know what they were talking about a few years ago.
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
[QUOTE="General_X"]

[QUOTE="goatblah"]

I think he meant face to face split screen man :)

HuusAsking
Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.

What about games that don't need to split the screen, such as Brawl and sports titles?

Which is a very short list (if you lump the sports games together, I'm personally not a huge fan). Outside of brawl/melee and a couple of hack and slash RPGs, there aren't many set up like that.
Avatar image for GodofEmpires
GodofEmpires

611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 GodofEmpires
Member since 2009 • 611 Posts

1. I haven't had any hassles running games for a year and a half.

2. And consoles dont freeze up and need servicing?

3. Playing Wii music and Virtua BS Tennis can't compare to being able to surf the net, check mail, instant msging, word processing and the alike.

4. You're right!! They couldn't get VR working well before consoles so they just had to settle for K+M. It was never intended.

5. What do you think happens with consoles? Buy one, its out dated in a few years. You can replace PC parts, cheaper too.

6. PC Gaming has been on top for the last 3 weeks mate. Check the charts in Australia. Sims 3 - 1.4million copies in a week.

biggest_loser
3, 5, 6 are wrong. 3 is wrong because seriously, who would want to play wii music? When I play with friends, I play good fps(halo, killzone, etc.), rockband/guitar hero, and other great multi-player games unlike your examples. 5 is somewhat wrong because my ps2 lasted 9 years, 9 years and I'm still using it. If I had a PC 9 years ago, it wouldn't do any good. 6 is wrong because look at those other games for consoles. GeoW 2 sold 2.4 million 1st day. GTA4 sold 2-3 million consoles first day. Anyways, what's the highest-selling pc video game? Probably selling about 10 million at most. Don't get me wrong, I still like PC's, but I don't use them for anything less than MMO's and rts.
Avatar image for AdoringFan_
AdoringFan_

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 AdoringFan_
Member since 2009 • 1890 Posts

So much fail in this thread. PC gaming will always be the best TC ;)

PC Gaming>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Consoles. FACT!

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts
Its not awful for RTS or Online games.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#190 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

I've had games crash on consoles. Just the other day dead space froze after I finished a chapter.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] It wasn't really the language that bothered me, it was the unsubstantiated opinions and contradictions in your post. I just thought it was unfortunate the first game you referenced you misspelt badly. For example, you claimed Crysis failed in its sales performance, and was only good for its graphics, when in reality, it sold in the millions (a financial success) and was almost universally praised for its gameplay, including by GameSpot who awarded it shooter of the year over Halo 3 and Call of Duty 4. Another example, you claim PC exclusives are usually low budget Russian games. Can you give me examples?DragonfireXZ95
from wikepedia i learned that crysis sodl 1.5 million some till some months ago, now if the article changed or you got another source thats ok.. but i didnt know that. Russuan low budget games? 1 exodus from the earth 2 isntict 3 dusk 12 4 necrovision 5 cryostasis well even stalker since the budget was much inferior compared to similar games also cod 4 sold 16 millions, since gta iv sold 4 millions, i guess thats 4 millons on ps3 and 4-5 on x360, as you see the pc version sold about 7 millions...am just saying it didnt go too well as cod 4, id stick with cod4 for game of the year. But seriously now buddy, forget stalker forget crysis and forget all of this and anwer me do the new games resemble the old ones in any way? Eg they are going to release a deus ex 3 which i doubt it will be similar to the first game.... Ohh and i have too many issues latelly in games, i mean i bought a ps3 and i play oldschool fps like resistance that remind me of the old pc games, and the game runs just fine no probems or crashes eg like the pc version of gta iv and far cry 2, hell even stalker and crysis have bugs, so its not multiplatform thing, its just that the developers dont polish much the pc versions, do we atleast agree on that?

I've experienced no crashes or bugs in the PC versions of Far Cry 2 and GTA IV. The bugs/glitches are usually in the minority for people with wonky PC's or people that use no cd cracks with the pirated games, etc.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#191 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

As a fellow pc gamer the only reason that pc gaming sucks is because of lag if it didn't have that it would be gaming king.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="General_X"]Meh I've always preffered a LAN with my friends over split screen, even big TV's only give you about an 9"-20" screen if you have more than 2 people. You have to squint to see whats going on and the FOV is awful.General_X
What about games that don't need to split the screen, such as Brawl and sports titles?

Which is a very short list (if you lump the sports games together, I'm personally not a huge fan). Outside of brawl/melee and a couple of hack and slash RPGs, there aren't many set up like that.

But that short list is a powerful one. Sports games are perennial sellers, and Brawl shows that interest in Super Smash Bros. remains high. Shows there's still a need for offline multiplayer, particularly of the kind that doesn't involve splitting the screen. I mean, there's nothing like ribbing your buddy next to you after a particularly nasty play.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"] WHAT? all games are compatible with ALL PC's you hear that boy? [QUOTE="_Verm"]

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]

Got any evidence to support that?

GTR2addict

Sales decline, game quality decline, the only thing that seems to have increased is the cost to upgrade....

game quality has always been rising, sales are higher than ever, the costs to upgrade keep going down, and the 11 billion dollars worth of computer hardware sold in 2008 (that's more than all 3 consoles combined) say hi. try harder next time.

I don't have the link with me, but I'm pretty sure those 11 billion dollars account for game sales exclusively, not hardware. If you include hardware that figure skyrockets. So basically PC game sales in 2008 were bigger than the 360+PS3 combined.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#194 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]Tell that to a guy who got BSODs and unbreakable freezes trying to play PC games in the past (and yes, there was ample cooling installed). Sometimes, things just don't work, and I'm speaking from experienceVandalvideo
I've had far more problems with my 360 than my PC lately. My THIRD 360 just died. This time, it isn't RROD either, so the three year warranty doesn't cover it. Microsoft is asking me to pay a hundred bucks because of their shoddy design flaws. This is the THIRD TIME my 360 has screwed up. THIRD TIME.

If your Xbox 360 is outside warranty, you could try oven bake the mainboard trick. http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=606658
Avatar image for SeventhWonder
SeventhWonder

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 SeventhWonder
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends.airraido

One of the reasons I can't stand to game on my 42" plasma is that it feels absolutely puny when viewed from my sofa compared to when I sit in front of my 24" monitor. Most people sit at least 2 meters from their TV and usually more than that. Unless you have a really friggin' large TV or sit unusually close to it, it's not going to be perceived to be as large as a 22-24" computer monitor sitting a typical 60-70 cm from your face.

And "hunched over in front of a monitor"? So, PC gaming is bad because you can't be bothered to get a good chair? I have a nice office chair that is fully adjustable and I actually prefer gaming in that compared to the sofa. If I want to be hunched over, I can. If I want to sit back, I can.

EDIT: And just as an FYI: My gaming "career" started at an early age, with consoles. Since then, I've owned several consoles. The most recent one was a 360, but owning that made me realize that I just couldn't be bothered with console gaming anymore. The few times I have time to game these days, I simply want the premium experience, not the watered down, low-res, low-performance one. I can understand why some people prefer console gaming, but it's definitely not for me anymore. Sure, PC gaming is a bit more expensive, but some of us just don't care. On the grand scale of things, it's not really very expensive either and I think the higher price is well worth it.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

PC gaming is awful because it caters to everyone. Which is why a gamer on a PC shouldn't be called a hermit.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#197 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] If your Xbox 360 is outside warranty, you could try oven bake the mainboard trick. http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=606658

' I don't think fraud is something I want to have on my resume.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#198 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
I have a simple challenge for anyone who thinks PC gaming is, in any way, inferior to console gaming. Simply answer the following questions: 1. How many retail games do you own for the console of your choice? Please provide photographic evidence if the answer is more than twenty-five. 2. How large is your screen? Again, provide photographic evidence if the answer is more than 50" 3. What pro / social gaming do you participate in? Again, photographic evidence please for tournament wins, clan memberships, etc.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="airraido"]3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends.SeventhWonder

One of the reasons I can't stand to game on my 42" plasma is that it feels absolutely puny when viewed from my sofa compared to when I sit in front of my 24" monitor. Most people sit at least 2 meters from their TV and usually more than that. Unless you have a really friggin' large TV or sit unusually close to it, it's not going to be perceived to be as large as a 22-24" computer monitor sitting a typical 60-70 cm from your face.

And "hunched over in front of a monitor"? So, PC gaming is bad because you can't be bothered to get a good chair? I have a nice office chair that is fully adjustable and I actually prefer gaming in that compared to the sofa. If I want to be hunched over, I can. If I want to sit back, I can.

EDIT: And just as an FYI: My gaming "career" started at an early age, with consoles. Since then, I've owned several consoles. The most recent one was a 360, but owning that made me realize that I just couldn't be bothered with console gaming anymore. The few times I have time to game these days, I simply want the premium experience, not the watered down, low-res, low-performance one. I can understand why some people prefer console gaming, but it's definitely not for me anymore. Sure, PC gaming is a bit more expensive, but some of us just don't care. On the grand scale of things, it's not really very expensive either and I think the higher price is well worth it.

Then again, there are some game types you simply don't see on PC. JRPGs, for one (my main reason for getting a 360).

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#200 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="airraido"] 3. Sitting alone, hunched over infront of a monitor can never compare to relaxing on your sofa and enjoying a game on your bigscreen plasma with friends. 4. Mouse and Keyboard were never an intended interface for gaming.

They don't make a consumer-available plasma screen large enough to replace my monitor. I have an 80" screen - my network is also set up to output to several personal displays located around my dedicated media room. I can switch on any console I'd like - Wii, 360, PS3 - via my PC setup. - If the mouse & keyboard wasn't intended for gaming, why are console manufacturers trying so hard to replicate them? The Wiimote is just a wireless mouse that sense horizontally, rather than vertically.