[QUOTE="Mark36111"]Add $100 for an OS and you're up to the full price of a PS3. At this point, you have to ask yourself whether you'd rather spend your money on a PC that can't even play today's games at the settings they're meant to be, and certainly won't be able to in the future, or would you rather buy a console that should remain relevant for the next 3-4 years at least, and won't require any additional hardware costs for this duration. Given this choice, I'd take the PS3. The better option might be to spend a couple hundred more on parts, and build a pc that isn't already completely obsolete.DAZZER7
It will meet all the recommended requirements of todays pc games
It will play games at settings much higher than what the ps3 can
It will continue to play new pc games for the next 4 perhaps even 5 years without upgrading
As time goes by ps3 will struggle more and more with pc multiplat games
...please define how this pc is nearly obsolete? Do you know anything about pc gaming. Something is only obsolete when it can no longer be used or is no longer supported NOT when a newer version simply comes out.
Why do many of you consolites act as if you can only game on a pc if you're hitting max settings and as soon as you don't you have to upgrade? There is a difference to being a pc gamer and being an enthusiast!
Maybe you're content with playing games at low settings. I'm not. If I'm going to play something, I'd like to have the best experience possible, or at least come relatively close. The rig in question is not capable of providing this. And please shove it with your "consolite" slurs. I'm building a new i7 system in the next few weeks, and actually just sold my PS3 on ebay to help fund it. Just because I don't toss away rationality and act as if a $400 computer outclasses all consoles doesn't mean I'm biased.
The original poster was simply wrong when he said that the 9500 gt could play Crysis at high resolution and high details. Posted below are benchmarks that show it cannot achieve playable framerates on high at even 1024x768 (if you want to run it at something like 1080p, forget it). Scroll down the following link and you'll see that it isn't capable of 30 fps on medium either at better resolutions (http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-9500-gt-review/8). Thus, on a decent monitor, you're forced to turn details down to low, at which point you lose any graphical advantage over console games.
And you seriously think this is going to be a capable gaming machine five years from now? Get out of here. You can't even say that for new high-end systems, much less this turd.
![](http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/video_cards/Foxconn_GeForce_9500-GT/Crysis_1024x768.jpg)
Log in to comment