This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

-Torchlight 1 8.3

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/torchlight

-Couldn't find titans quest on meta.

-Diablo 3 isn't released yet. Diablo 2 was AA so I am presuming 3 will be AA too.

-Grim Dawn wasn't on meta critic either.

-Heroes of Might and Magic V wasnt an rpg

-The witcher 8.1

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-witcher

-Kings Bounty not on meta

-The dark eye: drakensang 7.5

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-dark-eye-drakensang

-A Farewell to Dragons not on meta

-Gothic 3 6.3

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/gothic-3

-Neverwinter Nights 2 8.2

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/neverwinter-nights-2

badtaker

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/kings-bounty-armored-princess

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/kings-bounty-the-legend

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/titan-quest-immortal-throne

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/titan-quest

and notice the user scores are all much, much higher than the metacritic scores? 7.9 for Kings Bounty? what a disgrace...
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

Thats funny because the 360 was only around for a couple of years. Nice way to filter out information so that it is in the pc's favour. If what you said was true I would be playing my pc more often =) So you are telling me I have to play decade old games to play good shooters on the pc? Your logic.

roflcopter317

I'm not 'filtering out' information. To quote myself "The gamespot 'exclusive' list is vindictative of this" To source this: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=3 As you hopefully know this only counts since the Xbox 360 was released. and if you want to play a 10 year old quality shooter. Go for it. If you want to play a new release quality shooter, you can do that to.

Do you realise that gamespot isn't the correct way to compare scores of games? A little website called METACRITIC. According to meta critic, Crysis was the pc's only AAA fps game in years.

You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system.

Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter?

They still exist and are relevant as ever.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

This argument about rpg's is stupid. The majority of them are bad on each system.

roflcopter317
Have you played them? Do you play them?
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

This argument about rpg's is stupid. The majority of them are bad on each system.

coreybg

You saw you're losing the argument and suddenly it's stupid. Just... LOL

Actualy I seen the scores for both exclusive rpg games and I thought "Jesus those games are medicore". PC fanboys always try there hardest to pick at everything I say... *Sigh*

Avatar image for DFL274
DFL274

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#155 DFL274
Member since 2010 • 34 Posts
Geesh this debate comes up over and over. I really don't think either gets the crown here. The arguements for PCs and Consoles should have little footnotes attached to them. PCs have better graphics, are more customizable and a wider arrange of games and better controls and can do other things besides gaming. Better Graphics. Well thats not totally true. PCs potentially have better graphics, but you have to pay considerably more for the PC to get those better graphics. For a cheaper PC the graphics aren't all that better than a console. But PCs can have much better graphics, if you're willing to pay. Customizing is really reserved for computer geeks. For me, I don't want to have to go spending hours trolling mod sites and backing up .ini files just to add a mod. Just pop the game in and play it. End of story. But you have that option on PCs, where with consoles you don't. I just think most people won't really bother so I don't think this is valid. PCs do have more games, but most of them are out-of-date games. There are virtually no exclusives outside of MMOs that are PC only when it comes to new releases. PCs do have much more online games available but if you aren't into online games then there is no difference at all between a PC and a console here. Better controls, well frankly I find a controller easier to use then a keyboard and mouse but that could be because I'm left handed and before I even start a game I have to reconfigure all the keyboard shortcuts and it gets on my nerves. I think the controller is a lot more comfortable. But PCs can have a controller to if you want to buy one so I think PCs win here. You have more options. Can do "other" things. Well really this is a pointless arguement because if you are doing "other" things on your PC you aren't gaming. And this debate is about gaming not surfing the web. Really I think PCs and Consoles are evenly matched. But I do think PCs are dying and consoles are just starting their way up. PCs are dying because people just don't need or want these expensive high-powered rigs anymore. People are buying notebooks and smartphones now. So I think though the PC is far from dead right now, its on its way out. Consoles are the way of the future for gaming whether you like it or not.
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

This argument about rpg's is stupid. The majority of them are bad on each system.

coreybg

You saw you're losing the argument and suddenly it's stupid. Just... LOL

well if you consider multiplats not available on PC and xbox live offerings (since alot of the PC games didnt seem like retail offerings)... i dont think the PC would come out on top.

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]I'm not 'filtering out' information. To quote myself "The gamespot 'exclusive' list is vindictative of this" To source this: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=3 As you hopefully know this only counts since the Xbox 360 was released. and if you want to play a 10 year old quality shooter. Go for it. If you want to play a new release quality shooter, you can do that to.skrat_01

Do you realise that gamespot isn't the correct way to compare scores of games? A little website called METACRITIC. According to meta critic, Crysis was the pc's only AAA fps game in years.

You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system.

Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter?

They still exist and are relevant as ever.

I never heard of game rankings. But pc also fails on there too.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Consoles are the way of the future for gaming whether you like it or not.DFL274
With rising development costs and the advent of widespread cloud computing on every platform, it actually seems to be the opposite. Maybe in the mid 2000s the idea of consoles eclipsing will be true.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

Do you realise that gamespot isn't the correct way to compare scores of games? A little website called METACRITIC. According to meta critic, Crysis was the pc's only AAA fps game in years.

roflcopter317

You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system.

Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter?

They still exist and are relevant as ever.

I never heard of game rankings.

I'm not surprised.
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts
[QUOTE="badtaker"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

-Torchlight 1 8.3

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/torchlight

-Couldn't find titans quest on meta.

-Diablo 3 isn't released yet. Diablo 2 was AA so I am presuming 3 will be AA too.

-Grim Dawn wasn't on meta critic either.

-Heroes of Might and Magic V wasnt an rpg

-The witcher 8.1

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-witcher

-Kings Bounty not on meta

-The dark eye: drakensang 7.5

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-dark-eye-drakensang

-A Farewell to Dragons not on meta

-Gothic 3 6.3

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/gothic-3

-Neverwinter Nights 2 8.2

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/neverwinter-nights-2

FGMPR

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/kings-bounty-armored-princess

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/kings-bounty-the-legend

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/titan-quest-immortal-throne

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/titan-quest

and notice the user scores are all much, much higher than the metacritic scores? 7.9 for Kings Bounty? what a disgrace...

It got low scores because of dated graphics (i may be wrong) They don't take into consideration that a small team has made the game.(idiots reviewers)
Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="DFL274"]Geesh this debate comes up over and over. I really don't think either gets the crown here. The arguements for PCs and Consoles should have little footnotes attached to them. PCs have better graphics, are more customizable and a wider arrange of games and better controls and can do other things besides gaming. Better Graphics. Well thats not totally true. PCs potentially have better graphics, but you have to pay considerably more for the PC to get those better graphics. For a cheaper PC the graphics aren't all that better than a console. But PCs can have much better graphics, if you're willing to pay. Customizing is really reserved for computer geeks. For me, I don't want to have to go spending hours trolling mod sites and backing up .ini files just to add a mod. Just pop the game in and play it. End of story. But you have that option on PCs, where with consoles you don't. I just think most people won't really bother so I don't think this is valid. PCs do have more games, but most of them are out-of-date games. There are virtually no exclusives outside of MMOs that are PC only when it comes to new releases. PCs do have much more online games available but if you aren't into online games then there is no difference at all between a PC and a console here. Better controls, well frankly I find a controller easier to use then a keyboard and mouse but that could be because I'm left handed and before I even start a game I have to reconfigure all the keyboard shortcuts and it gets on my nerves. I think the controller is a lot more comfortable. But PCs can have a controller to if you want to buy one so I think PCs win here. You have more options. Can do "other" things. Well really this is a pointless arguement because if you are doing "other" things on your PC you aren't gaming. And this debate is about gaming not surfing the web. Really I think PCs and Consoles are evenly matched. But I do think PCs are dying and consoles are just starting their way up. PCs are dying because people just don't need or want these expensive high-powered rigs anymore. People are buying notebooks and smartphones now. So I think though the PC is far from dead right now, its on its way out. Consoles are the way of the future for gaming whether you like it or not.

Why did you write all of this when your knowledge of PC gaming is minimal? do you really hope to converse and debate with those who obviously know so much more than you do about the subject? -No PC do not cost significantly more to get console performance, and no, graphics are not up for debate. -Modding not a valid advantage? Yeah OK... -Out of date games? what does that even mean? PC still get's a significantly larger amount of exclusives than consoles. Go check the spreadsheet if it doesn't make you feel like too much of a "geek".
Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

@roflcopter316, PC has had more exclusives compared to the 360, than your God can even count. And that's a fact, if you do your research. You're the definition of a butt-hurt fanboy that's gelous at the PC.

And that's the only thing you proved trough out all your trollish posts here. Keep going, and provide laughter.

Now get mad.

roflcopter317

Do you realise I own a pc, and that all of the majority of those games are around decades old?

I only included games from 2005 onwards. If you really want to compare the PCs RPGs to the Xbox 360 from before then, then Baldurs Gate, Deus Ex, Fallout, Planescape: Torment all say hi.

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system.

Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter?

They still exist and are relevant as ever.

skrat_01

I never heard of game rankings.

I'm not surprised.

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

I never heard of game rankings.

roflcopter317

I'm not surprised.

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

And all Xbox 360 has is Halo 3.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

Avatar image for DFL274
DFL274

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#166 DFL274
Member since 2010 • 34 Posts

Why did you write all of this when your knowledge of PC gaming is minimal? do you really hope to converse and debate with those who obviously know so much more than you do about the subject? -No PC do not cost significantly more to get console performance, and no, graphics are not up for debate. -Modding not a valid advantage? Yeah OK... -Out of date games? what does that even mean? PC still get's a significantly larger amount of exclusives than consoles. Go check the spreadsheet if it doesn't make you feel like too much of a "geek".

Apparently you don't know how to read. I said better graphics not equal graphics. Modding is not a valid advantage because most people don't bother. Out of date means out of date. I don't have an english to english translator for you.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#167 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62057 Posts

PCs have better graphics, are more customizable and a wider arrange of games and better controls and can do other things besides gaming. Better Graphics. Well thats not totally true. PCs potentially have better graphics, but you have to pay considerably more for the PC to get those better graphics. For a cheaper PC the graphics aren't all that better than a console. But PCs can have much better graphics, if you're willing to pay.

DFL274

Actually, there are quite a few budget rigs, priced around $500 that can game at 1080p and sometimes above. I wouldn't call that paying "considerably more".

Customizing is really reserved for computer geeks. For me, I don't want to have to go spending hours trolling mod sites and backing up .ini files just to add a mod. Just pop the game in and play it. End of story. But you have that option on PCs, where with consoles you don't. I just think most people won't really bother so I don't think this is valid.

DFL274

Many people won't use Move/Kinect, does that make them valid? More and more mods are coming with self-installers (especially larger ones) and most developers make adding mods simple. In The Witcher you simply put an "Override" folder in the main directory and copy the files there.

PCs do have more games, but most of them are out-of-date games. There are virtually no exclusives outside of MMOs that are PC only when it comes to new releases. PCs do have much more online games available but if you aren't into online games then there is no difference at all between a PC and a console here.

DFL274

Out-of-date? Every exclusive we count comes from this generation and it still has vastly more than consoles. There are also a plethora of Sims, Adventures, Strategy (sub-genres included). The last few exclusives we've had were Starcraft II (not an MMO), Napopleon: Total War (not an MMO), Dawn of War II: Chaos (not an MMO), The Sims 3: Ambitions (not an MMO), Tropico 3: Absolute Poewer (not an MMO), Stalker: CoP (not an MMO), and those are from 2010.

But I do think PCs are dying and consoles are just starting their way up. PCs are dying because people just don't need or want these expensive high-powered rigs anymore. People are buying notebooks and smartphones now. So I think though the PC is far from dead right now, its on its way out. Consoles are the way of the future for gaming whether you like it or not.DFL274

I've shown that you don't need expensive rigs, and many people are going with budget gaming. Plus considering the PC gaming market grew in 2009 over 2008, it's hard to say that it's "dying".

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]I'm not surprised.WhenCicadasCry

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

And all Xbox 360 has is Halo 3.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

Wait I havn't stopped there.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

Gears of war 1 and 2.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

PC=nothing.

Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

I never heard of game rankings.

roflcopter317

I'm not surprised.

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

And yet 90% of PC gamers wouldn't swap STALKER for Halo, even without overblown ratings based on hype. You know why? because you have the same type of game, over and over again with console FPS's. The only place you will find innovation is on the PC, and it's the only place where you will find FPS's that don't hold your hand, give you endless regenerating health and a gigantic arrow that removes any sense of exploration. STALKER and Cryostasis are better games than any Halo or Cod.
Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

DFL274
Why did you write all of this when your knowledge of PC gaming is minimal? do you really hope to converse and debate with those who obviously know so much more than you do about the subject? -No PC do not cost significantly more to get console performance, and no, graphics are not up for debate. -Modding not a valid advantage? Yeah OK... -Out of date games? what does that even mean? PC still get's a significantly larger amount of exclusives than consoles. Go check the spreadsheet if it doesn't make you feel like too much of a "geek".

Apparently you don't know how to read. I said better graphics not equal graphics. Modding is not a valid advantage because most people don't bother. Out of date means out of date. I don't have an english to english translator for you.

http://news.filefront.com/modding/ :?

Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

roflcopter317

And all Xbox 360 has is Halo 3.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

Wait I havn't stopped there.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

Gears of war 1 and 2.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

PC=nothing.

Since when was Gears an FPS? :|

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]I'm not surprised.FGMPR

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

And yet 90% of PC gamers wouldn't swap STALKER for Halo, even without overblown ratings based on hype. You know why? because you have the same type of game, over and over again with console FPS's. The only place you will find innovation is on the PC, and it's the only place where you will find FPS's that don't hold your hand, give you endless regenerating health and a gigantic arrow that removes any sense of exploration. STALKER and Cryostasis are better games than any Halo or Cod.

Do you realise regenerating health doesn't 'hold your hand', it actualy make the combat faster by not having to go pick up a med pack after every fight.

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

And all Xbox 360 has is Halo 3.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

WhenCicadasCry

Wait I havn't stopped there.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

Gears of war 1 and 2.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

PC=nothing.

Since when was Gears an FPS? :|

It is a shooter. Plus don't forget halo reach is comming out in about 4 days.

Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts

@DFL274

Modding is valid, developers released mod tools for their game.Modding is IMP in PC gaming it increases the sales and developers know that.

Mass Effect and BC2 are not modded because developers have not release the mod tools

Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts
DFL274
Why did you write all of this when your knowledge of PC gaming is minimal? do you really hope to converse and debate with those who obviously know so much more than you do about the subject? -No PC do not cost significantly more to get console performance, and no, graphics are not up for debate. -Modding not a valid advantage? Yeah OK... -Out of date games? what does that even mean? PC still get's a significantly larger amount of exclusives than consoles. Go check the spreadsheet if it doesn't make you feel like too much of a "geek".

Apparently you don't know how to read. I said better graphics not equal graphics. Modding is not a valid advantage because most people don't bother. Out of date means out of date. I don't have an english to english translator for you.

Modding isn't an advantage because most don't bother? are you serious? how is the option to customize your game to the nth degree, new levels, improved graphics etc not an advantage to people thinking of getting into PC gaming? It doesn't matter if most don't take advantage of it (though I can guarantee you, that modding is HUGE with PC gaming), it's a clear win and an option that you will never have as a console gamer. ...and I still don't know what out of date means? why don't you explain it to me, because PC is still getting more, higher rated exclusive than any console. That is fact, backed up by both numbers and common sense.
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]I'm not surprised.FGMPR

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

And yet 90% of PC gamers wouldn't swap STALKER for Halo, even without overblown ratings based on hype. You know why? because you have the same type of game, over and over again with console FPS's. The only place you will find innovation is on the PC, and it's the only place where you will find FPS's that don't hold your hand, give you endless regenerating health and a gigantic arrow that removes any sense of exploration. STALKER and Cryostasis are better games than any Halo or Cod.

Opinion. Also, right there I just proved 360 has more shooters.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

roflcopter317
Won what argument? You actually went ahead and proved my point. " You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system. Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter? " Not sharp chief.
Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="FGMPR"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

roflcopter317

And yet 90% of PC gamers wouldn't swap STALKER for Halo, even without overblown ratings based on hype. You know why? because you have the same type of game, over and over again with console FPS's. The only place you will find innovation is on the PC, and it's the only place where you will find FPS's that don't hold your hand, give you endless regenerating health and a gigantic arrow that removes any sense of exploration. STALKER and Cryostasis are better games than any Halo or Cod.

Do you realise regenerating health doesn't 'hold your hand', it actualy make the combat faster by not having to go pick up a med pack after every fight.

It removes requiring you to strategically move throughout the level so you don't bust through your health. It turns every FPS winnable by using one universal strategy... hide when you're taking damage. Not having health regenerate is infinitely more challenging that having your health recharge. It's about stripping yet another layer of strategy from FPS games in order to appease to the lowest common denominator.
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

It looks like I just won this argument about exclusives.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS.

roflcopter317

And all Xbox 360 has is Halo 3.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=79&year=0&numrev=0&sort=0&letter=&search=

Wait I havn't stopped there.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

Gears of war 1 and 2.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=pc&cat=80&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

PC=nothing.

Gears of war 1 = Exclusive ?
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#181 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62057 Posts

Gears of war 1 = Exclusive ?badtaker

Or an FPS, which the poster specified by saying:

"EXCLUSIVE AAA FPS GAMES FROM 2004 TO 2010 = UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 AND CRYSIS."

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]skrat_01

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="FGMPR"] And yet 90% of PC gamers wouldn't swap STALKER for Halo, even without overblown ratings based on hype. You know why? because you have the same type of game, over and over again with console FPS's. The only place you will find innovation is on the PC, and it's the only place where you will find FPS's that don't hold your hand, give you endless regenerating health and a gigantic arrow that removes any sense of exploration. STALKER and Cryostasis are better games than any Halo or Cod. FGMPR

Do you realise regenerating health doesn't 'hold your hand', it actualy make the combat faster by not having to go pick up a med pack after every fight.

It removes requiring you to strategically move throughout the level so you don't bust through your health. It turns every FPS winnable by using one universal strategy... hide when you're taking damage. Not having health regenerate is infinitely more challenging that having your health recharge. It's about stripping yet another layer of strategy from FPS games in order to appease to the lowest common denominator.

And do you realise there are med packs in halo reach?

Avatar image for FGMPR
FGMPR

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 FGMPR
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="FGMPR"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

Do you realise regenerating health doesn't 'hold your hand', it actualy make the combat faster by not having to go pick up a med pack after every fight.

roflcopter317

It removes requiring you to strategically move throughout the level so you don't bust through your health. It turns every FPS winnable by using one universal strategy... hide when you're taking damage. Not having health regenerate is infinitely more challenging that having your health recharge. It's about stripping yet another layer of strategy from FPS games in order to appease to the lowest common denominator.

And do you realise there are med packs in halo reach?

Nope, I didn't. That's a good thing, I hope more dev's take that route and FPS's for all system relegate regenerating health to history.
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="FGMPR"] It removes requiring you to strategically move throughout the level so you don't bust through your health. It turns every FPS winnable by using one universal strategy... hide when you're taking damage. Not having health regenerate is infinitely more challenging that having your health recharge. It's about stripping yet another layer of strategy from FPS games in order to appease to the lowest common denominator.FGMPR

And do you realise there are med packs in halo reach?

Nope, I didn't. That's a good thing, I hope more dev's take that route and FPS's for all system relegate regenerating health to history.


I played the reach beta and I didn't like the med pack idea. It makes it alot more enjoyable to just get shot and have your health regenerate then having to find med packs when you are hurt. Sigh.

Avatar image for DFL274
DFL274

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#187 DFL274
Member since 2010 • 34 Posts
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="DFL274"]

Actually, there are quite a few budget rigs, priced around $500 that can game at 1080p and sometimes above. I wouldn't call that paying "considerably more".

[QUOTE="DFL274"]

Many people won't use Move/Kinect, does that make them valid? More and more mods are coming with self-installers (especially larger ones) and most developers make adding mods simple. In The Witcher you simply put an "Override" folder in the main directory and copy the files there.

[QUOTE="DFL274"]

PCs do have more games, but most of them are out-of-date games. There are virtually no exclusives outside of MMOs that are PC only when it comes to new releases. PCs do have much more online games available but if you aren't into online games then there is no difference at all between a PC and a console here.

Out-of-date? Every exclusive we count comes from this generation and it still has vastly more than consoles. There are also a plethora of Sims, Adventures, Strategy (sub-genres included). The last few exclusives we've had were Starcraft II (not an MMO), Napopleon: Total War (not an MMO), Dawn of War II: Chaos (not an MMO), The Sims 3: Ambitions (not an MMO), Tropico 3: Absolute Poewer (not an MMO), Stalker: CoP (not an MMO), and those are from 2010.

[QUOTE="DFL274"]

But I do think PCs are dying and consoles are just starting their way up. PCs are dying because people just don't need or want these expensive high-powered rigs anymore. People are buying notebooks and smartphones now. So I think though the PC is far from dead right now, its on its way out. Consoles are the way of the future for gaming whether you like it or not.

I've shown that you don't need expensive rigs, and many people are going with budget gaming. Plus considering the PC gaming market grew in 2009 over 2008, it's hard to say that it's "dying".

I'm curious if in those PC gaming market stats they are including mobile games like iPhone and Android. The way the PC is evolving just seems like its moving away from gaming. Portability seems to be the way everything is going.
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

Why pay 600 bucks for a pc (mine cost WAYYY more then that) when you can just buy a 360 arcade and have the 360's exclusives and most of the pc's major games for 150? It is also true that the pc has only got 2 exclusive shooters within 6 years. The only 'new' games on the pc ARE MMO's.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#189 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23859 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]roflcopter317

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Lol, you couldnt be more wrong. What about FEAR, STALKER, HL2 EP 1 and 2, and other fps's that were out only for Pc first . Then the fact that most of the fps's on 360 is also on Pc and nine times out of ten the Pc has the best version.
Avatar image for DFL274
DFL274

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#190 DFL274
Member since 2010 • 34 Posts
[QUOTE="FGMPR"] Modding isn't an advantage because most don't bother? are you serious? how is the option to customize your game to the nth degree, new levels, improved graphics etc not an advantage to people thinking of getting into PC gaming? It doesn't matter if most don't take advantage of it (though I can guarantee you, that modding is HUGE with PC gaming), it's a clear win and an option that you will never have as a console gamer. ...and I still don't know what out of date means? why don't you explain it to me, because PC is still getting more, higher rated exclusive than any console. That is fact, backed up by both numbers and common sense.

Like I said I still don't think modding is a big concern to most people. Its like an added extra bonus, not a reason for buying a game. I don't know anyone who wouldn't buy a game just because they couldn't mod it. Most people I game with don't bother to mod the game. Once they are done with it they move on to the next game.
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]04dcarraher

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Lol, you couldnt be more wrong. What about FEAR, STALKER, HL2 EP 1 and 2, and other fps's that were out only for Pc first . Then the fact that most of the fps's on 360 is also on Pc and nine times out of ten the Pc has the best version.

Fear=on 360

Orange box= HL2, ep1, and 2, portal and all.

Stalker clear sky= Single A game

Typical from someone with a Crysis avatar.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]roflcopter317

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Again you're proving my point. Quoting myself again. "Won what argument? You actually went ahead and proved my point. " You could have mentioned Game Rankings as well, but your rather obnoxious point seemed to miss that. As everyone knows, meta scores are inherently flawed; every site calculates their result alternatively to a scaling system. Which is why it's only ever spouted here in posts like yours. Either way, doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of amazing shooters on the PC, let alone exclusive ones. But hey, you don't play them, what does it matter? " Not sharp chief. " You're not even trying to read anything are you?
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]roflcopter317

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Looky here, I just proved the 360 has more and better shooters. I agree the pc has some good shooters BTW.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#194 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62057 Posts

I'm curious if in those PC gaming market stats they are including mobile games like iPhone and Android. The way the PC is evolving just seems like its moving away from gaming. Portability seems to be the way everything is going.DFL274

It's hard to determine considering we aren't allowed full access to the reports (you have to be a paying member of the PCGA). The PC gaming revenue grew 3% to 13.1 billion in 2009 over 2008. I believe (IIRC) over 1 billion of it wasd brought in via MMO's such as WoW. Link

Portability is definately an increasing trend, but it's not surprising considering the way hardware advancement has far surpassed software advancement currently -- when was the last time we got a properly demanding PC game?

Either way, if the PC gaming market is actually growing in size, I wouldn't call it dying.

Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]roflcopter317

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Looky here, I just proved the 360 has more and better shooters.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=0 The PC has a more high scoring exclusives, and more games then the Xbox 360. End of discussion.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#196 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62057 Posts

Looky here, I just proved the 360 has more and better shooters. I agree the pc has some good shooters BTW.

roflcopter317

Now prove it has more and better exclusives. How'd you guys get onto shooters specifically anyway?

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

WhenCicadasCry

Looky here, I just proved the 360 has more and better shooters.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=0 The PC has a more high scoring exclusives, and more games then the Xbox 360. End of discussion.

That is gamespot. Plus you are meant to compare individualy according to genre.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#198 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23859 Posts
[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

360 wins in the shooter department. From 2005 to 2010 AAA.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=xbox360&cat=55&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=

360= Halo: 3, Halo: Reach (comming soon), Gears 2, Gears 3 (upcomming).

PC= Crysis.

Lol, you couldnt be more wrong. What about FEAR, STALKER, HL2 EP 1 and 2, and other fps's that were out only for Pc first . Then the fact that most of the fps's on 360 is also on Pc and nine times out of ten the Pc has the best version.

Fear=on 360

Orange box= HL2, ep1, and 2, portal and all.

Stalker clear sky= Single A game

"Shakes Head"........ FEAR was created and produced for Pc first then was ported to console same thing for the Orange Box and STALKER being an A game lol, proves my point , the Ranking system for consoles shouldnt be applied to Pc games because the fact that that sysytem is based on console ideals. Where hype, bought / fixed reviews and consolers blind rush buying of games and then resale afterward make a game a certain "rank" is dumb.
Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

Looky here, I just proved the 360 has more and better shooters.

roflcopter317

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=0 The PC has a more high scoring exclusives, and more games then the Xbox 360. End of discussion.

That is gamespot.

Care to compile a Metacritic spreadsheet that features every PC exclusive vs every 360 exclusive? Be my guest.

Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#200 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

[QUOTE="FGMPR"] Modding isn't an advantage because most don't bother? are you serious? how is the option to customize your game to the nth degree, new levels, improved graphics etc not an advantage to people thinking of getting into PC gaming? It doesn't matter if most don't take advantage of it (though I can guarantee you, that modding is HUGE with PC gaming), it's a clear win and an option that you will never have as a console gamer. ...and I still don't know what out of date means? why don't you explain it to me, because PC is still getting more, higher rated exclusive than any console. That is fact, backed up by both numbers and common sense. DFL274
Like I said I still don't think modding is a big concern to most people. Its like an added extra bonus, not a reason for buying a game. I don't know anyone who wouldn't buy a game just because they couldn't mod it. Most people I game with don't bother to mod the game. Once they are done with it they move on to the next game.

The modding communities on the PC are incomprehensibly huge though. A extra bonus? There are countless mods that can make any game into a completely new one, from the graphics to the story, and so extending the duration of a game's lifespan far beyond its normal one.

Example, Duke Nukem 3D looks like a 2007 game, graphic wise, thanks to its mods. And i guarantee you, its modding communities are huge.