This topic is locked from further discussion.
To everyone who doubts its a 55" TV. Here you go :)
As you can see in the first picture by the large black marks, it's a little smaller than 5 feet. This makes the screen 55".
What's the point in having a thousand dollar TV if your console can't even display games at that resolution? Buwahahaha! Even worse, it displays games *below* that resolution at times. Tisk Tisk. Thank you, I love my new sig. Hahaha[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]
[QUOTE="lawlessx"]
teh burn!:P
nice sig btw
Xtasy26
Exactly! I never understood this. In fact the bigger the screen the more crappier 720P and sub-HD resolution in games like Crysis 2 looks. Why spend thousands of dollars on an HDTV that can do 1080P and not buy a gaming rig for like $400-$600 range that could easily to 1080P. It doesn't make sense.
uh....maybe because people use their tvs for more than just gaming. i know that probably blows your mind, but it's true.
To everyone who doubts its a 55" TV. Here you go :)
Omnisystem
This is a strange and funny thread to me.
Regardless of whether your powerful PC is hooked to your pitiful 16" TV or my glorious 1600" TV, what pray tell does that indicate that PC wins?
And do all PC's win whatever it is yours has won or can my PC win as well?
Oh, and by the way when console owners bring up the comfort involved in playing their consoles on a TV from their couch they are talking about an experience. An experience not to be replicated by sitting hovered over a keyboard and mouse at a desk a few feet away from a 55" screen, which is a liability in that case. You can indeed replicate that couch experience with a PC, but then you sacrifice the ability to be as productive as sitting at a desk allows hovered over your keyboard and mouse allows. You can switch back and forth between the two, but there goes that comfort level again.
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
To everyone who doubts its a 55" TV. Here you go :)
Seiki_sands
This is a strange and funny thread to me.
Regardless of whether your powerful PC is hooked to your pitiful 16" TV or my glorious 1600" TV, what pray tell does that indicate that PC wins?
And do all PC's win whatever it is yours has won or can my PC win as well?
Oh, and by the way when console owners bring up the comfort involved in playing their consoles on a TV from their couch they are talking about an experience. An experience not to be replicated by sitting hovered over a keyboard and mouse at a desk a few feet away from a 55" screen, which is a liability in that case. You can indeed replicate that couch experience with a PC, but then you sacrifice the ability to be as productive as sitting at a desk allows hovered over your keyboard and mouse allows. You can switch back and forth between the two, but there goes that comfort level again.
The fact that I can actually play at 1080p? Also, who is to say that sitting on a couch is more comfortable than sitting in a good computer chair? Remember how you have to spend hours leaning forward with your elbows on your knees while on a couch? I don't have to do that with my chair. I can sit back, reacht he keyboard and mouse, and play my games.
[QUOTE="Seiki_sands"]
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
To everyone who doubts its a 55" TV. Here you go :)
Omnisystem
This is a strange and funny thread to me.
Regardless of whether your powerful PC is hooked to your pitiful 16" TV or my glorious 1600" TV, what pray tell does that indicate that PC wins?
And do all PC's win whatever it is yours has won or can my PC win as well?
Oh, and by the way when console owners bring up the comfort involved in playing their consoles on a TV from their couch they are talking about an experience. An experience not to be replicated by sitting hovered over a keyboard and mouse at a desk a few feet away from a 55" screen, which is a liability in that case. You can indeed replicate that couch experience with a PC, but then you sacrifice the ability to be as productive as sitting at a desk allows hovered over your keyboard and mouse allows. You can switch back and forth between the two, but there goes that comfort level again.
The fact that I can actually play at 1080p? Also, who is to say that sitting on a couch is more comfortable than sitting in a good computer chair? Remember how you have to spend hours leaning forward with your elbows on your knees while on a couch? I don't have to do that with my chair. I can sit back, reacht he keyboard and mouse, and play my games.
Who's to say? The consolites that bring it up are to say, that's who. They are expressing a preference for a certain type of experience. You apparently think that can be disproved as if it is a scientific question answerable with proof and demonstrations. It is not.
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
[QUOTE="Seiki_sands"]
This is a strange and funny thread to me.
Regardless of whether your powerful PC is hooked to your pitiful 16" TV or my glorious 1600" TV, what pray tell does that indicate that PC wins?
And do all PC's win whatever it is yours has won or can my PC win as well?
Oh, and by the way when console owners bring up the comfort involved in playing their consoles on a TV from their couch they are talking about an experience. An experience not to be replicated by sitting hovered over a keyboard and mouse at a desk a few feet away from a 55" screen, which is a liability in that case. You can indeed replicate that couch experience with a PC, but then you sacrifice the ability to be as productive as sitting at a desk allows hovered over your keyboard and mouse allows. You can switch back and forth between the two, but there goes that comfort level again.
Seiki_sands
The fact that I can actually play at 1080p? Also, who is to say that sitting on a couch is more comfortable than sitting in a good computer chair? Remember how you have to spend hours leaning forward with your elbows on your knees while on a couch? I don't have to do that with my chair. I can sit back, reacht he keyboard and mouse, and play my games.
Who's to say? The consolites that bring it up are to say, that's who. They are expressing a preference for a certain type of experience. You apparently think that can be disproved as if it is a scientific question answerable with proof and demonstrations. It is not.
Something as simple as sitting in a chair or couch while gaming and being being comfortable can certainly be scientifically looked at in a study. This isn't scientists trying to see whether god exists or not. I don't see why you would think its not testable.
[QUOTE="Seiki_sands"]
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
The fact that I can actually play at 1080p? Also, who is to say that sitting on a couch is more comfortable than sitting in a good computer chair? Remember how you have to spend hours leaning forward with your elbows on your knees while on a couch? I don't have to do that with my chair. I can sit back, reacht he keyboard and mouse, and play my games.
Omnisystem
Who's to say? The consolites that bring it up are to say, that's who. They are expressing a preference for a certain type of experience. You apparently think that can be disproved as if it is a scientific question answerable with proof and demonstrations. It is not.
Something as simple as sitting in a chair or couch while gaming and being being comfortable can certainly be scientifically looked at in a study. This isn't scientists trying to see whether god exists or not. I don't see why you would think its not testable.
A person's comfort level can be petitioned in a scientific survey, but you can't seriously believe science can tell you the circumstances under which you will be ideally comfortable playing a video game.
Science can tell you sleeping on a bed of nails is bad for your back, and sleeping on that NASA memory stuff is much better for you. However, if science attempted to say you'll be more comfortable on memory foam than a bed of nails, science clearly isn't taking the masochist into consideration and is full of crap. A level of comfort includes emotional responses to your surroundings and no, science cannot decide such things on your behalf.
PC doesnt do Split-screen, which is the only reason i care for having a big tv, so yeah.
quaappybla
Serious Sam and a slew of other games say hi.
He posted a TV the same size as mine but LED-lit (and 3D, which is nice but gives me a headache) and a PC somewhat faster than mine (i7 instead of i5, GTX 580 instead of 2 GTX 460s). What am I jealous of, exactly?[QUOTE="pelvist"]
You made a lot of consolites jelly in this thread TC.
lowe0
I never said you where... Why so defensive though? Waaaaah! :cry:
[QUOTE="lowe0"]
[QUOTE="pelvist"]
You made a lot of consolites jelly in this thread TC.
He posted a TV the same size as mine but LED-lit (and 3D, which is nice but gives me a headache) and a PC somewhat faster than mine (i7 instead of i5, GTX 580 instead of 2 GTX 460s). What am I jealous of, exactly?I never said you where... Why so defensive though? Waaaaah! :cry:
Nah, I just like it when you guys say things that are wrong. It's fun to point out.[QUOTE="pelvist"][QUOTE="lowe0"] He posted a TV the same size as mine but LED-lit (and 3D, which is nice but gives me a headache) and a PC somewhat faster than mine (i7 instead of i5, GTX 580 instead of 2 GTX 460s). What am I jealous of, exactly?
lowe0
I never said you where... Why so defensive though? Waaaaah! :cry:
Nah, I just like it when you guys say things that are wrong. It's fun to point out.Nice, one. Which "guys" said the wrong thing that amused you though?
Nah, I just like it when you guys say things that are wrong. It's fun to point out.[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="pelvist"]
I never said you where... Why so defensive though? Waaaaah! :cry:
pelvist
Nice, one. Which "guys" said the wrong thing that amused you though?
You, on the topic of jealousy. If you have specific posters in mind, let's see some irrefutable evidence. Otherwise, stick to arguments based on solid facts instead of ridiculous aspersions.Don't worry, the 360 wins because it can be hooked up to a monitor.PC wins because you can hook it up to a TV?
Yeah, sure thing.
Silverbond
Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
[QUOTE="Seiki_sands"]
Who's to say? The consolites that bring it up are to say, that's who. They are expressing a preference for a certain type of experience. You apparently think that can be disproved as if it is a scientific question answerable with proof and demonstrations. It is not.
Seiki_sands
Something as simple as sitting in a chair or couch while gaming and being being comfortable can certainly be scientifically looked at in a study. This isn't scientists trying to see whether god exists or not. I don't see why you would think its not testable.
A person's comfort level can be petitioned in a scientific survey, but you can't seriously believe science can tell you the circumstances under which you will be ideally comfortable playing a video game.
Science can tell you sleeping on a bed of nails is bad for your back, and sleeping on that NASA memory stuff is much better for you. However, if science attempted to say you'll be more comfortable on memory foam than a bed of nails, science clearly isn't taking the masochist into consideration and is full of crap. A level of comfort includes emotional responses to your surroundings and no, science cannot decide such things on your behalf.
So you're saying it's a preference. Why don't we just exclude the comfort level thing then(obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.) So that leaves the objective points. Better graphics, ability to use whatever controls you'd like, and mods.Why do you need a couple of gaming PC's? Wouldn't you only play in 1 area(the area you prefer)? If you wanted to play in your office, wouldn't you also have a 360 in there too? or a PS3?Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
gamecubepad
To be honest, this is part of the reason why I'm not attracted to the idea of PC gaming. That case looks absolutely massive (in comparison to a fat PS3 too). Couple that with me coming home from uni every other weekend and lugging that around (compared to a PS3 slim which fits in a laptop bag and can be taken on the bus)....Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
gamecubepad
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]Why do you need a couple of gaming PC's? Wouldn't you only play in 1 area(the area you prefer)? If you wanted to play in your office, wouldn't you also have a 360 in there too? or a PS3?Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
DragonfireXZ95
No. My PC is also heavily used for everyday computing and various artistic endeavours. That's why I said you'd need 2 PCs. Also, playing RTS or competitive online FPS on a HDTV from a couch with a KB/M isn't exactly functional. I'm not gonna settle for the Phantom lapboard either. That's why I play at the desk when I'm on my desktop PC.
I thought about going for a HTPC, but the micro-atx/itx cases only support low-pro cards, not to mention what sort of psu those things have. So, there's where the 360 comes into play. I get many of my PC/360 multiplats, and I can leave a hdmi cable hooked into the TV and a 360 vga cable hooked into my monitor and easily carry the tiny 360 around when I want to play in a different area of the house.
The only reason I ever wanted to hook up a PC to a TV was to play games on programs that can't be discussed here, but the Wii VC or XBLA largely accomplishes that in a more convenient manner, albeit more expensive.;)
(obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.)DragonfireXZ95LOL no. As I said, perhaps when Steam finishes a UI that's designed to be used with a controller - and even then, you still have to get into Steam, which means dealing with the mouse-centric Windows interface. If I have to pick up a mouse or keyboard at any point, for any reason, at any time in the machine's life, it's just not good enough.
Why do you need a couple of gaming PC's? Wouldn't you only play in 1 area(the area you prefer)? If you wanted to play in your office, wouldn't you also have a 360 in there too? or a PS3?[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]
Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
gamecubepad
No. My PC is also heavily used for everyday computing and various artistic endeavours. That's why I said you'd need 2 PCs. Also, playing RTS or competitive online FPS on a HDTV from a couch with a KB/M isn't exactly functional. I'm not gonna settle for the Phantom lapboard either. That's why I play at the desk when I'm on my desktop PC.
I thought about going for a HTPC, but the micro-atx/itx cases only support low-pro cards, not to mention what sort of psu those things have. So, there's where the 360 comes into play. I get many of my PC/360 multiplats, and I can leave a hdmi cable hooked into the TV and a 360 vga cable hooked into my monitor and easily carry the tiny 360 around when I want to play in a different area of the house.
The only reason I ever wanted to hook up a PC to a TV was to play games on programs that can't be discussed here, but the Wii VC or XBLA largely accomplishes that in a more convenient manner, albeit more expensive.;)
You mean that's why you'd need 2 computers. I only need 1 and I'm sure most people only need 1. :P You actually carry your 360 around to play in different rooms? That's very strange.[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"](obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.)lowe0LOL no. As I said, perhaps when Steam finishes a UI that's designed to be used with a controller - and even then, you still have to get into Steam, which means dealing with the mouse-centric Windows interface. If I have to pick up a mouse or keyboard at any point, for any reason, at any time in the machine's life, it's just not good enough. Perhaps when the consoles finally allow mouse and keyboards to be used with all the games, they'd be really worth it. Anytime I have to use a controller to control a first person game, it's just not good enough. :P
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Why do you need a couple of gaming PC's? Wouldn't you only play in 1 area(the area you prefer)? If you wanted to play in your office, wouldn't you also have a 360 in there too? or a PS3?DragonfireXZ95
No. My PC is also heavily used for everyday computing and various artistic endeavours. That's why I said you'd need 2 PCs. Also, playing RTS or competitive online FPS on a HDTV from a couch with a KB/M isn't exactly functional. I'm not gonna settle for the Phantom lapboard either. That's why I play at the desk when I'm on my desktop PC.
I thought about going for a HTPC, but the micro-atx/itx cases only support low-pro cards, not to mention what sort of psu those things have. So, there's where the 360 comes into play. I get many of my PC/360 multiplats, and I can leave a hdmi cable hooked into the TV and a 360 vga cable hooked into my monitor and easily carry the tiny 360 around when I want to play in a different area of the house.
The only reason I ever wanted to hook up a PC to a TV was to play games on programs that can't be discussed here, but the Wii VC or XBLA largely accomplishes that in a more convenient manner, albeit more expensive.;)
You mean that's why you'd need 2 computers. I only need 1 and I'm sure most people only need 1. :P You actually carry your 360 around to play in different rooms? That's very strange. Just because we can move our consoles around without hiring a forklift doesn't mean it's strange... :P[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="gamecubepad"]You mean that's why you'd need 2 computers. I only need 1 and I'm sure most people only need 1. :P You actually carry your 360 around to play in different rooms? That's very strange. Just because we can move our consoles around without hiring a forklift doesn't mean it's strange... :P If you need a forklift, I think you need to hit the gym. 50 pounds is pretty light, but then again, I've been in the gym for 11 years of my life so far.No. My PC is also heavily used for everyday computing and various artistic endeavours. That's why I said you'd need 2 PCs. Also, playing RTS or competitive online FPS on a HDTV from a couch with a KB/M isn't exactly functional. I'm not gonna settle for the Phantom lapboard either. That's why I play at the desk when I'm on my desktop PC.
I thought about going for a HTPC, but the micro-atx/itx cases only support low-pro cards, not to mention what sort of psu those things have. So, there's where the 360 comes into play. I get many of my PC/360 multiplats, and I can leave a hdmi cable hooked into the TV and a 360 vga cable hooked into my monitor and easily carry the tiny 360 around when I want to play in a different area of the house.
The only reason I ever wanted to hook up a PC to a TV was to play games on programs that can't be discussed here, but the Wii VC or XBLA largely accomplishes that in a more convenient manner, albeit more expensive.;)
Ravensmash
You mean that's why you'd need 2 computers. I only need 1 and I'm sure most people only need 1. :P You actually carry your 360 around to play in different rooms? That's very strange.DragonfireXZ95
:lol:
Yeah, I do. Not only that, I have 2 360s and I still find myself having to move 1 to my desk to get some playtime without having my kids crawl all over me while my wife tells me not to curse and nags me to do something other than play C2 or COD4. We use the 360s for Netflix and as media/dvd players, then when I have free time I like to fool around with XNA/XBLIG, so I move the 360's around a lot. Trust me, it's a lot easier to move a 360, a controller, and a psu/power cable than a desktop PC.
So yeah, that's why I'd need 2 powerful gaming rigs to bother leaving 1 hooked into the TV all the time. If you live in a dorm or a studio apartment, then I could see where that wouldn't be an issue.
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"](obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.)DragonfireXZ95LOL no. As I said, perhaps when Steam finishes a UI that's designed to be used with a controller - and even then, you still have to get into Steam, which means dealing with the mouse-centric Windows interface. If I have to pick up a mouse or keyboard at any point, for any reason, at any time in the machine's life, it's just not good enough. Perhaps when the consoles finally allow mouse and keyboards to be used with all the games, they'd be really worth it. Anytime I have to use a controller to control a first person game, it's just not good enough. :P Gee, two different platforms fail to meet two very different people's needs. What a ****in' surprise.
You can hook a pc up to multiple displays at once by cloning them I have my PC in my room at my desk wth a 32" wall mounted lcd and have it connected to the 60" t.v and onkyo sound system in the living room so when I'm in my living room no noise at all can be heard from my pc while gaming and no "Ugly" case next to me t.v although disagree on this point. I can very easily switch between the to depending on what I'm in the mode for only thing i have to change is which sound system to output audio to Its hardly inconvenient at all.Here's the problem I always run into. Any uber-powerful PC will usually have a large case. I find that inconvenient and unsightly to have a giant PC sitting out in the open next to your HDTV with a mouse and keyboard lying around. Then there's the fact that I only have 1 decent PC for gaming, and that PC is at my work desk in a different room. Are you supposed to have 1 TV gaming PC and 1 monitor gaming PC, or carry it around, or what?
And yes, I'm fully aware of wireless KB/M, glovepie, and htpc cases. Still can be quite inconvenient unless you own a couple powerful PCs.
gamecubepad
My desk setup and living room setup below all connected to one PC and plan to add a 50-55" plasma wall mounted infront of my bed when i get the money to do so.
Hate to break to you all but its all baseed on opinion and prefernce.
Not everyone has time to invest research into pc components plus consoles provide larger communities
EdenProxy
better graphics and choice of controls is not an opinion.
Also, larger communities for maybe 2 games. Halo and CoD? Yeah, I think so.
It depends on the game in question as to which offer the larger community and past a certian point any additional people playing become redundant.plus consoles provide larger communities
EdenProxy
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"][QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] Exactly :Pmrmusicman247
That is a 55" compare it to the keyboard ont he desk or the PS3, the Case is a 800D Corsair FULL Case, its HUGE, which in turn makes you think of the puny cases you've seen making you compare it to the case and thinking its small.
Even so, It still doesn't look 55" to me.it is 55". the case is HUGE. also the surround sound speaker looks tiny compared tot he tv.
Even so, It still doesn't look 55" to me.[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="Omnisystem"]
That is a 55" compare it to the keyboard ont he desk or the PS3, the Case is a 800D Corsair FULL Case, its HUGE, which in turn makes you think of the puny cases you've seen making you compare it to the case and thinking its small.
pc-ps360
it is 55". the case is HUGE. also the surround sound speaker looks tiny compared tot he tv.
Yeah just look how small the ps3 is next to it lol pics always make t.vs look smaller then they are in person[QUOTE="pelvist"][QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah, I just like it when you guys say things that are wrong. It's fun to point out.lowe0
Nice, one. Which "guys" said the wrong thing that amused you though?
You, on the topic of jealousy. If you have specific posters in mind, let's see some irrefutable evidence. Otherwise, stick to arguments based on solid facts instead of ridiculous aspersions.Oh ok, Since your playing the old fact game now where are your facts that there arent any jealous consolites then? Lets see those facts then clever clogs, instead of getting all defensive and posting fail comments in reply to something that "apparently" doesnt include you... :roll
You, on the topic of jealousy. If you have specific posters in mind, let's see some irrefutable evidence. Otherwise, stick to arguments based on solid facts instead of ridiculous aspersions.[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="pelvist"]
Nice, one. Which "guys" said the wrong thing that amused you though?
pelvist
Oh ok, Since your playing the old fact game now where are your facts that there arent any jealous consolites then? Lets see those facts then clever clogs, instead of getting all defensive and posting fail comments in reply to something that "apparently" doesnt include you... :roll
You're the one who made the assertion that we're jealous. I'm simply asking for some proof, or in its absence, that you try arguing about the platform instead of the people gaming on it. Is that too much to ask?So you're saying it's a preference. Why don't we just exclude the comfort level thing then(obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.) So that leaves the objective points. Better graphics, ability to use whatever controls you'd like, and mods.DragonfireXZ95
And the strongest argument to those things would be preference for the games not available for PCs, including both a couple hundred exclusives between the three consoles consoles and the couple hundred multi-platform games that are excluded from the PC every generation.
Some people would also not find some of the features you bring up overly compelling. Modding for instance, doesn't necessarily appeal to people who tend to play a game and move on, or to people who don't like to proactively seek out and sort through large amounts of content on the internet. If you only have a hour or two to play games after a long day of work and other responsibilities you may not want to spend it in forums pouring over endless reskins and relatively uncompelling material.
Also, using a PC for gaming among the uninitiated can be a considerable investment of time and resources. I maintain PC gaming is a more expensive hobby than console gaming even accounting for cheaper games. On the time front, a long time PC gamer will run into problems that will require google searches to fix at the very least, and they will need to learn to map controller preferences for games that don't natively support their chosen controller. Unless they buy PCs off the shelf, which would be very expensive over time they will need to learn about their hardware in a way console users do not. As they upgrade graphics cards, they may well need to upgrade power supplies, and the first sign of that need for many will likely come in the form of lock-ups, restarts, or blue screens that will send them to the internet. They'll seek out driver solutions and have to learn how to use the device manager. They'll need to learn what a driver is and know to uninstall them before installing new hardware. When they start diving into the large PC back-catalog they'll run into compatibility issues, not all of which will be solved by simple right-click, check box solutions. Repairing hardware is both a huge pro and also sometimes a con compared to consoles. Its nice, quicker in terms of game downtime, and sometimes cheaper (depending on the warranty situation for the individual component) to be able to fix your own problems, but at the same time it once again comes at the cost of an effort of time. There are undoubtedly people, believe it or not, who would be more content upon breakage to send their system off to be repaired and watch movies for a couple weeks rather than spend even a hour or two fixing a machine, so precious is their relaxation time to them, and so onerous the idea of using it to fix anything.
The real reason not to bring up these things though, or to discount the whole comfort thing is it was the basis of this thread. This thread was made by someone that mistook console users bringing up their TV as an advantage as being literally an end to itself, and not reflective of a broader experience, which I have no doubt that it was, as I've seen it brought up many times and always in that context.
Many PC fans seem to struggle with the idea that many people prefer consoles for their simplicity, believing that people believe such things only out of ignorance. I think PC users often forget just how much was learned over time and just how much time they truly spent not gaming over the entire course of an average PC gamers experience with PCs. They don't consider that people truly have no desire to spend even a single solitary minute of their leisure time learning something new just to have a higher resolution for their games. PC fans would do better to argue the merits of the RTS genre, or MMOs, or Simulation games, or P&C Adventure titles, or other areas involving games that console owners just aren't getting. Or perhaps extolling the virtues of the independent game scene or mentioning the many freeware titles, at least those would be more compelling to me if I didn't already game on a PC. What would attract me to PC gaming wouldn't be graphics, it would be the promise of rewarding games I couldn't get elsewhere. I suspect anyone that would be swayed by tech would be people inclined to be PC gamers in the first place.
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]So you're saying it's a preference. Why don't we just exclude the comfort level thing then(obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.) So that leaves the objective points. Better graphics, ability to use whatever controls you'd like, and mods.Seiki_sands
And the strongest argument to those things would be preference for the games not available for PCs, including both a couple hundred exclusives between the three consoles consoles and the couple hundred multi-platform games that are excluded from the PC every generation.
Some people would also not find some of the features you bring up overly compelling. Modding for instance, doesn't necessarily appeal to people who tend to play a game and move on, or to people who don't like to proactively seek out and sort through large amounts of content on the internet. If you only have a hour or two to play games after a long day of work and other responsibilities you may not want to spend it in forums pouring over endless reskins and relatively uncompelling material.
Also, using a PC for gaming among the uninitiated can be a considerable investment of time and resources. I maintain PC gaming is a more expensive hobby than console gaming even accounting for cheaper games. On the time front, a long time PC gamer will run into problems that will require google searches to fix at the very least, and they will need to learn to map controller preferences for games that don't natively support their chosen controller. Unless they buy PCs off the shelf, which would be very expensive over time they will need to learn about their hardware in a way console users do not. As they upgrade graphics cards, they may well need to upgrade power supplies, and the first sign of that need for many will likely come in the form of lock-ups, restarts, or blue screens that will send them to the internet. They'll seek out driver solutions and have to learn how to use the device manager. They'll need to learn what a driver is and know to uninstall them before installing new hardware. When they start diving into the large PC back-catalog they'll run into compatibility issues, not all of which will be solved by simple right-click, check box solutions. Repairing hardware is both a huge pro and also sometimes a con compared to consoles. Its nice, quicker in terms of game downtime, and sometimes cheaper (depending on the warranty situation for the individual component) to be able to fix your own problems, but at the same time it once again comes at the cost of an effort of time. There are undoubtedly people, believe it or not, who would be more content upon breakage to send their system off to be repaired and watch movies for a couple weeks rather than spend even a hour or two fixing a machine, so precious is their relaxation time to them, and so onerous the idea of using it to fix anything.
The real reason not to bring up these things though, or to discount the whole comfort thing is it was the basis of this thread. This thread was made by someone that mistook console users bringing up their TV as an advantage as being literally an end to itself, and not reflective of a broader experience, which I have no doubt that it was, as I've seen it brought up many times and always in that context.
Many PC fans seem to struggle with the idea that many people prefer consoles for their simplicity, believing that people believe such things only out of ignorance. I think PC users often forget just how much was learned over time and just how much time they truly spent not gaming over the entire course of an average PC gamers experience with PCs. They don't consider that people truly have no desire to spend even a single solitary minute of their leisure time learning something new just to have a higher resolution for their games. PC fans would do better to argue the merits of the RTS genre, or MMOs, or Simulation games, or P&C Adventure titles, or other areas involving games that console owners just aren't getting. Or perhaps extolling the virtues of the independent game scene or mentioning the many freeware titles, at least those would be more compelling to me if I didn't already game on a PC. What would attract me to PC gaming wouldn't be graphics, it would be the promise of rewarding games I couldn't get elsewhere. I suspect anyone that would be swayed by tech would be people inclined to be PC gamers in the first place.
You can post this huge wall of text if you want, but when you bring up such specific instances(people without that much time, etc.), you're pretty much grasping at straws to try to rule out the options which exist in the first place.
The fact that better graphics, mods and control customization exist cannot be negated. They are there for people to use or not to use. However on a console, I can't do anything, I HAVE to use a proprietary controller either provided by the parent company or a crappier 3rd party controller from Madcatz(or other companies).
Many console fans fail to realize that many people prefer to get out more of what they put into it, whether it be time or money, and PC gaming is one of those fields that definitely is better with the more time and money you put into it.
PC:
i7 920 @ 4.2GHz
GTX 580
3-WAY SLI x58 MB
1000W PSU
6GB Dominator GT RAM
G19 KB / x8 Sidewinder Mouse
PS: I can't wait for Witcher 2!
Omnisystem
why do you need 3 way sli?
the strongest argument to those things would be preference for the games not available for PCs, including both a couple hundred exclusives between the three consoles consolesSeiki_sands
That argument is not strong at all, in fact it's not even valid because there are four platforms, not two.
If I decide to game on the PC I get StarCraft II, but miss out on Gears of War, Uncharted and Zelda. If I decide to game on the 360 I'm swapping StarCraft II for Gears of War but I'm still missing out on Uncharted and Zelda.
No matter which one of the four platforms you choose you're inevitably missing out on the exclusives of the other three--and if you're going to argue that I should own two or more consoles then the price difference of a gaming PC becomes significantly more competitive.
[QUOTE="Seiki_sands"]
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]So you're saying it's a preference. Why don't we just exclude the comfort level thing then(obviously if a controller can be hooked up to a PC then the PC is just fine with a couch.) So that leaves the objective points. Better graphics, ability to use whatever controls you'd like, and mods.DragonfireXZ95
And the strongest argument to those things would be preference for the games not available for PCs, including both a couple hundred exclusives between the three consoles consoles and the couple hundred multi-platform games that are excluded from the PC every generation.
Some people would also not find some of the features you bring up overly compelling. Modding for instance, doesn't necessarily appeal to people who tend to play a game and move on, or to people who don't like to proactively seek out and sort through large amounts of content on the internet. If you only have a hour or two to play games after a long day of work and other responsibilities you may not want to spend it in forums pouring over endless reskins and relatively uncompelling material.
Also, using a PC for gaming among the uninitiated can be a considerable investment of time and resources. I maintain PC gaming is a more expensive hobby than console gaming even accounting for cheaper games. On the time front, a long time PC gamer will run into problems that will require google searches to fix at the very least, and they will need to learn to map controller preferences for games that don't natively support their chosen controller. Unless they buy PCs off the shelf, which would be very expensive over time they will need to learn about their hardware in a way console users do not. As they upgrade graphics cards, they may well need to upgrade power supplies, and the first sign of that need for many will likely come in the form of lock-ups, restarts, or blue screens that will send them to the internet. They'll seek out driver solutions and have to learn how to use the device manager. They'll need to learn what a driver is and know to uninstall them before installing new hardware. When they start diving into the large PC back-catalog they'll run into compatibility issues, not all of which will be solved by simple right-click, check box solutions. Repairing hardware is both a huge pro and also sometimes a con compared to consoles. Its nice, quicker in terms of game downtime, and sometimes cheaper (depending on the warranty situation for the individual component) to be able to fix your own problems, but at the same time it once again comes at the cost of an effort of time. There are undoubtedly people, believe it or not, who would be more content upon breakage to send their system off to be repaired and watch movies for a couple weeks rather than spend even a hour or two fixing a machine, so precious is their relaxation time to them, and so onerous the idea of using it to fix anything.
The real reason not to bring up these things though, or to discount the whole comfort thing is it was the basis of this thread. This thread was made by someone that mistook console users bringing up their TV as an advantage as being literally an end to itself, and not reflective of a broader experience, which I have no doubt that it was, as I've seen it brought up many times and always in that context.
Many PC fans seem to struggle with the idea that many people prefer consoles for their simplicity, believing that people believe such things only out of ignorance. I think PC users often forget just how much was learned over time and just how much time they truly spent not gaming over the entire course of an average PC gamers experience with PCs. They don't consider that people truly have no desire to spend even a single solitary minute of their leisure time learning something new just to have a higher resolution for their games. PC fans would do better to argue the merits of the RTS genre, or MMOs, or Simulation games, or P&C Adventure titles, or other areas involving games that console owners just aren't getting. Or perhaps extolling the virtues of the independent game scene or mentioning the many freeware titles, at least those would be more compelling to me if I didn't already game on a PC. What would attract me to PC gaming wouldn't be graphics, it would be the promise of rewarding games I couldn't get elsewhere. I suspect anyone that would be swayed by tech would be people inclined to be PC gamers in the first place.
You can post this huge wall of text if you want, but when you bring up such specific instances(people without that much time, etc.), you're pretty much grasping at straws to try to rule out the options which exist in the first place.
The fact that better graphics, mods and control customization exist cannot be negated. They are there for people to use or not to use. However on a console, I can't do anything, I HAVE to use a proprietary controller either provided by the parent company or a crappier 3rd party controller from Madcatz(or other companies).
Many console fans fail to realize that many people prefer to get out more of what they put into it, whether it be time or money, and PC gaming is one of those fields that definitely is better with the more time and money you put into it.
I'm someone with plenty of time and as a contract devloper, i choose to game on a console, away from my workstation/gaming machine just for these reasons, secondly I do like using a controller, and when you play a game on a PC that doesn't support a specific controller then the buttons loose all context in the game, press [button-16], WTF i have only letters on my buttons... good job at blatently dismissing these arguments when theres quite a bit of truth to it. And because of this a lot of the times people don't get a more rewarding experience out of PC then they do with consoles, I consider those small Google searches a waste of time,Edit: I think mostly PC gamers don't get, PC gaming generally simulate a work enviroment thats just more rewarding then work, mmos are basically the daily grind and you get to pay for them, city builers where you have to manage an economy, strategy games...
Thats not 55 inch TV , here is my setup and i have a 46" Bravia and the rig is a Full Tower XCLIO case. This is from my first apartment, it looks different now and i got it hooked up to a monitor now anyways with a nice desk, i just couldnt play on a coffe table anymore almost always using the 360 controller and chilling on the couch most of the time. But now with a nice LED monitor and pretty sick desk i love it even more. Been PC gamer since 1996.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment