please, Killzone 2's been long forgotten; stop bringing it up...(56Killz0wn3d)

Killzone 2 can have some fun online (depending on how well the player adjusts to the controls and sometimes 'nade rape)

but the SP was soooooooooooooooooo banal, the graphics were good sure, but graphics don't make a game and once you looked past the window dressing you realized how claustrophobic and badly designed all of it was, even more frustrating was how illusionary all the "big battles" were, the vehicle sections were simply scripted fights where enemies were scripted to goto the same spot everytime - there was no AI involved they're just moving turrets... then you had the gun turret section which was a nice break from dark corridors but again - super scripted and not even as fun as shooting asteroids in Dead Space, then you had all the big gun fights, many of which used the crappy technique of having infinitely respawning enemies until you crossed a certain point in the level, there were several big gunfights you could win by simply running forward and dodging bullets, which if you actually tried to fight normally you could sit all day killing enemies

it just seemed like a tiny game with lots of window dressing, it's not even like Crysis where if you strip away all the graphics from you still have a decently fun sandbox shooter (apart from the crappy ending)

but besides that, the online was fun for a little while heh, maybe even underrated

[QUOTE="gamewhat"]

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Metro 2033 will look better than Killzone 2. :)

Panosola

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Metro 2033 will look better than Killzone 2. :)

gamewhat

I'm not a lemming,

The 360 version of this game is going to look amazing, you wait and see, its a linear/corridor FPS.

Reach doesn't need to, it will still probably outperform Killzone 2 in the areas that matter (sales, critical acclaim, ongoing online popularity)Anjunaddict

Anyone else find this statement funny? 'The areas that matter' online popularity sure, but sales? critical acclaim? This matters more to you then how well the game looks on your tv? lol.

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]Reach doesn't need to, it will still probably outperform Killzone 2 in the areas that matter (sales, critical acclaim, ongoing online popularity)Domobomb

Anyone else find this statement funny? 'The areas that matter' online popularity sure, but sales? critical acclaim? This matters more to you then how well the game looks on your tv? lol.

? I'm sorry you confuse me with your contradictory title and post.

It's sad that the game needs to hide its laughable textures with so much motion blur and washed-out colors.

EndorphinMaster

and yet still look so sexy?

[QUOTE="gamewhat"]

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Metro 2033 will look better than Killzone 2. :)

Panosola

wow those gifs make me wana play killzone again lol =D crashndash

killzone 2 is a garbage of a game. no1 plays it. so who cares

Revolution316

I say Halo 3 is a garbage of a game because i hate it. Love killzone 2.

Look as those dark grey corridors, beautiful.SaltyMeatballs

Man you have the most fanboy remarks here in gamespot. Keep it to your self were tired of it already.

I was just playing it yesterday. I know I have a terrible memory, but still, I haven't forgotten yesterday... yet.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Look as those dark grey corridors, beautiful.telefanatic

Man you have the most fanboy remarks here in gamespot. Keep it to your self were tired of it already.

and you don't?...lol good one

Why are lems bringing up Crysis 2 when that game is also coming to the PS3? Sense, it makes none.

Why are lems bringing up Crysis 2 when that game is also coming to the PS3? Sense, it makes none.

Shewgenja

Will it look as good as the PC ver.......NO

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Why are lems bringing up Crysis 2 when that game is also coming to the PS3? Sense, it makes none.

BURSTIIIFIRE

Will it look as good as the PC ver.......NO

Most certainly not. I play FPS on my GeForce285GTX-box lol

That being said, KillZone 2 was a mighty hot game! First time I'd beaten a console FPS ever, actually.

Am I the only person who thinks this game looks ugly? The textures are poor and you are lucky if you can even see the graphics people are praising; because the game is coated in a extreme amount of motion blur. When I saw the demo at a friends all I saw was muddy textures and extremely short object popping distances.

I'd hate to play a game like this on PC, resolution would do nothing to enhance the games visual clarity.

I consider Uncharted 2 a far better example of PS3 capability, Killzone 2 is a muddy mess that tries to hide the ugly under many coats of post processing.

IMO of course, but if you have a problem with what I've said; by all means.

Am I the only person who thinks this game looks ugly? The textures are poor and you are lucky if you can even see the graphics people are praising; because the game is coated in a extreme amount of motion blur. When I saw the demo at a friends all I saw was muddy textures and extremely short object popping distances.

I'd hate to play a game like this on PC, resolution would do nothing to enhance the games visual clarity.

I consider Uncharted 2 a far better example of PS3 capability, Killzone 2 is a muddy mess that tries to hide the ugly under many coats of post processing.

IMO of course, but if you have a problem with what I've said; by all means.

AnnoyedDragon

.Lol: You really need to play it before making up that crap :lol: It's EASILY top 2 best looking console game ever, arguably the best. Unless your coming from the PC side your comment is really wtf. Cause on consoles it doesn't get any better.Eddie-Vedder

The textures are horendious; and don't tell me textures aren't important because they are the primary source of object detail after polygons.

Many many console games have done cleaner looking textures than this game.

Am I the only person who thinks this game looks ugly? The textures are poor and you are lucky if you can even see the graphics people are praising; because the game is coated in a extreme amount of motion blur. When I saw the demo at a friends all I saw was muddy textures and extremely short object popping distances.

I'd hate to play a game like this on PC, resolution would do nothing to enhance the games visual clarity.

I consider Uncharted 2 a far better example of PS3 capability, Killzone 2 is a muddy mess that tries to hide the ugly under many coats of post processing.

IMO of course, but if you have a problem with what I've said; by all means.

AnnoyedDragon

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"].Lol: You really need to play it before making up that crap :lol: It's EASILY top 2 best looking console game ever, arguably the best. Unless your coming from the PC side your comment is really wtf. Cause on consoles it doesn't get any better.AnnoyedDragon

The textures are horendious; and don't tell me textures aren't important because they are the primary source of object detail after polygons.

Many many console games have done cleaner looking textures than this game.

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"].Lol: You really need to play it before making up that crap :lol: It's EASILY top 2 best looking console game ever, arguably the best. Unless your coming from the PC side your comment is really wtf. Cause on consoles it doesn't get any better.AnnoyedDragon

The textures are horendious; and don't tell me textures aren't important because they are the primary source of object detail after polygons.

Many many console games have done cleaner looking textures than this game.

You haven't played the game, you don't know what your talking about.Eddie-Vedder

I have seen it in action when my friend played the demo. On a PC monitor at that, so it was a lot clearer than what a TV screen has to offer.

Every screenshot I look at shows terrible image quality. Of course if you are playing the game that constant blur filter would prevent you from seeing that.

You could argue being a PC gamer that my definition of muddy textures is different, but I know consoles can do better.

Again, I ask myself and others whenever I see these type of threads

Why do the graphics have to match or exceed it?

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]You haven't played the game, you don't know what your talking about.AnnoyedDragon

I have seen it in action when my friend played the demo. On a PC monitor at that, so it was a lot clearer than what a TV screen has to offer.

Every screenshot I look at shows terrible image quality. Of course if you are playing the game that constant blur filter would prevent you from seeing that.

You could argue being a PC gamer that my definition of muddy textures is different, but I know consoles can do better.

[QUOTE="Revolution316"]

killzone 2 is a garbage of a game. no1 plays it. so who cares

supersaiyen

Using gifs to showcase graphics? :? Anyways, in terms of multiplayer, it sure ain't all that popular. Tis' a pity, since it's pretty fun. It's a good looking game that's for sure, but from what we've seen of Reach in Alpha and Pre-Alpha stage, it's shaping up to be a good looking game as well.Stevo_the_gamer

Again, I ask myself and others whenever I see these type of threads

Why do the graphics have to match or exceed it?

[QUOTE="supersaiyen"]

[QUOTE="Revolution316"]

killzone 2 is a garbage of a game. no1 plays it. so who cares

SAGE_OF_FIRE

Cows are still telling themselves that Killzone 2 looks better than Reach. :lol: Reach is 360 exclusive...hurts doesn't it?

[QUOTE="Revolution316"]

killzone 2 is a garbage of a game. no1 plays it. so who cares

Cows are still telling themselves that Killzone 2 looks better than Reach. :lol: Reach is 360 exclusive...hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="supersaiyen"]You lemmings are pathetic really you're just angry because you have nothing that even comes close to killzone 2 and alot of people play online you would know if you ever even touched it and i'm talking about now.

peaceoutmedusa

It is a piece of crap to him and that's ok. He's not stating it as fact or anything.

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Cows are still telling themselves that Killzone 2 looks better than Reach. :lol: Reach is 360 exclusive...hurts doesn't it?

powerman91

Cows are still telling themselves that Killzone 2 looks better than Reach. :lol: Reach is 360 exclusive...hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

[QUOTE="powerman91"]

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Cows are still telling themselves that Killzone 2 looks better than Reach. :lol: Reach is 360 exclusive...hurts doesn't it?

Chutebox

Using gifs to showcase graphics? :? Anyways, in terms of multiplayer, it sure ain't all that popular. Tis' a pity, since it's pretty fun. It's a good looking game that's for sure, but from what we've seen of Reach in Alpha and Pre-Alpha stage, it's shaping up to be a good looking game as well.Stevo_the_gamer

I will admit KZ2 looks good, but not as good as most cows claim. its textures arent very good. Most of them are low res. Im still confused though as to how people compare it to Crysis though. i dont think KZ2 can beat this

i would also like to see Killzone 2 do this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzGYqnVW9x8&fmt=22

and here is a 46 megapixel image shrunk down. real link here http://download.vam-online.com/test/04/ScreenShot0097-res-10000.jpg 20mb download