PS3 has the most diverse library with highest quality exclusives

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Translation: Sites that give it the score I want are credible, sites that give it the score I didn't want do not matter and are obviously trolling. :lol:MuayThaiFTW
Basically, I already disected his argument anyway. I won this easily. Stevo can we battle again? I remember when I first joined this site I use to but heads with you all the time. Then you went soft on us :P

Lol you didn't disect anything. I tore your flimsy argument apart. I wouldn't be too excited that stevo the gamer agreed and came to your defense though...suprise he's a lemming at heart....of course he will....and We've already had our arguments as well

Yes because in my 3 years here stevo has learned that I can't fight my own battles :lol:

you didn't tear apart any argument. You simply keep spouting that we should ignore a 4 in a sea of 10s. I'm saying we should just look at everything, the multiple 10s and the 4 since the aggregate includes it. Who sounds more ignorant with that logic?

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Basically, I already disected his argument anyway. I won this easily. Stevo can we battle again? I remember when I first joined this site I use to but heads with you all the time. Then you went soft on us :P

Stevo_the_gamer

The Wii hate mantra died long ago, friend. Probably because I bought one and realized it wasn't a plastic devil in disguise and was actually quite good--RE4 being amazing on the Wii might have helped too.

Man I wish they would port RE:R to the Wii too. I would play the hell outta that. I told you the Wii was good though (just the worse of the 4)

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#203 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] Yeah, because the only legitimate score that Uncharted received was a 4....*rollys eyes* Only the 4 counts and not the 10's Lol get the F out of here you troll. Go on ! shooooo! Lol

None of the scores are "legitimate" reflections on the game--they're all arbitrary. Pointless. Stupid summation of an article that holds no value whats so ever. The true meat is in the review itself, and that my fellow delusional cow, is where legitimacy is made or broken. You are whining about troll reviews and simply call reviews "trolls" merely because they gave it a score you didn't like. A hilarious idiotic, and hypocritical aspect that I find e-hilarious. Uncharted 3 does have better reviews, which explains why it has a 1% higher metacritic score. But you're really making an argument over a 1% difference? That's sad. :lol:
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#204 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

Man I wish they would port RE:R to the Wii too. I would play the hell outta that. I told you the Wii was good though (just the worse of the 4)

ActicEdge

Likewise, I still wish I had my Wii--but it's back in California right now. :[

Avatar image for glimpus
glimpus

2306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#205 glimpus
Member since 2004 • 2306 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

I'm not saying it. It's just the way the metagame works. Anything above AAE is considered a quality exclusive and counts toward it's system.

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

PS3 won 2008, PS3 was second (after PC, ahead of WIi in 2009) and Wii won 2010.

Mozelleple112

Nope.avi. Your opinion is irrelevant, 360 and PC both had more high exclusives than PS3 and thus beat it.

But MGS4 was AAAA :x and is worth all of those high quality exclusives combined :x :x :x

Something tells me you REALLY like MGS4. Can't quite put my finger on it..

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Man I wish they would port RE:R to the Wii too. I would play the hell outta that. I told you the Wii was good though (just the worse of the 4)

Stevo_the_gamer

Likewise, I still wish I had my Wii--but it's back in California right now. :[

:(

Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :P

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#207 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Man I wish they would port RE:R to the Wii too. I would play the hell outta that. I told you the Wii was good though (just the worse of the 4)

ActicEdge

Likewise, I still wish I had my Wii--but it's back in California right now. :[

:(

Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :P

There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.
Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"] Likewise, I still wish I had my Wii--but it's back in California right now. :[

Stevo_the_gamer

:(

Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :P

There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.

Boring games.


What you really want are games like Little King's Story, Zack & Wiki, and LostWinds

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

:(

Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :P

SW__Troll

There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.

Boring games.


What you really want are games like Little King's Story, Zack & Wiki, and LostWinds

Awesome games not boring. I have played all those games except Little Kings Story. In terms of quality SMG2>Zack and Wki>NSMBWii>Lost Winds (I adore Lost Winds though, its just short and has some design error in it. The sequel greatly improves on this some of it though)

Avatar image for TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
TH1Sx1SxSPARTA

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Member since 2011 • 1852 Posts
so many hardcore cows and lemmings in here lol
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]Basically, I already disected his argument anyway. I won this easily. Stevo can we battle again? I remember when I first joined this site I use to but heads with you all the time. Then you went soft on us :PActicEdge

Lol you didn't disect anything. I tore your flimsy argument apart. I wouldn't be too excited that stevo the gamer agreed and came to your defense though...suprise he's a lemming at heart....of course he will....and We've already had our arguments as well

Yes because in my 3 years here stevo has learned that I can't fight my own battles :lol:

you didn't tear apart any argument. You simply keep spouting that we should ignore a 4 in a sea of 10s. I'm saying we should just look at everything, the multiple 10s and the 4 since the aggregate includes it. Who sounds more ignorant with that logic?

For some reason you cant seem to , or refuse to , not only look at the nunbers but also look at proper context. When we look at the 50 or so sites that reviewed both games, Uncharted scored higher on many more web sites, then vice versa. And earned a significant amount of more 10s then Gears ever did Who cares about the over all sore. We were never talking about that. Its about taking a deeper look at the numbers and viewing them in context and in what it means. I mean cmon And another thing. When reviewers unanimously praise and score Uncharted highly and then one obscure site scores it SIGNIFICANTLY below the average don't you think that that is a little suspicious? Why would we only regard that score?
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#212 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

:(

Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :P

SW__Troll

There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.

Boring games.


What you really want are games like Little King's Story, Zack & Wiki, and LostWinds

Those three games look especially unappealing to me. I would rather play Endless Ocean than those... :P

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#213 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

don't you think that that is a little suspicious?MuayThaiFTW
Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]:(Well there isn't much coming out anymore for it anyway :PSW__Troll
There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.

Boring games.What you really want are games like Little King's Story, Zack & Wiki, and LostWinds

Zelda is a fun game. What are you talking about?
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] Lol you didn't disect anything. I tore your flimsy argument apart. I wouldn't be too excited that stevo the gamer agreed and came to your defense though...suprise he's a lemming at heart....of course he will....and We've already had our arguments as wellMuayThaiFTW

Yes because in my 3 years here stevo has learned that I can't fight my own battles :lol:

you didn't tear apart any argument. You simply keep spouting that we should ignore a 4 in a sea of 10s. I'm saying we should just look at everything, the multiple 10s and the 4 since the aggregate includes it. Who sounds more ignorant with that logic?

For some reason you cant seem to , or refuse to , not only look at the nunbers but also look at proper context. When we look at the 50 or so sites that reviewed both games, Uncharted scored higher on many more web sites, then vice versa. And earned a significant amount of more 10s then Gears ever did Who cares about the over all sore. We were never talking about that. Its about taking a deeper look at the numbers and viewing them in context and in what it means. I mean cmon And another thing. When reviewers unanimously praise and score Uncharted highly and then one obscure site scores it SIGNIFICANTLY below the average don't you think that that is a little suspicious? Why would we only regard that score?

The proper context for a score would be to read the review, not disregard the low number. Of course you wouldn't know anything about the concept of reading the review would you?

I care about the overall score, that's the best way to compare generally quality, obviously gears 3 garned high praise from other sources to boost its score up higher if it was so inferior to U3 to begin with (which of course it isn't). The context you are using is that U3 is way better than because it got better reviews from sites than Gears 3. It's fine to say U3 is better than Gears 3 from reviews, I have no problem with that. But you said it got "way" better reviews. Obviously not when the averages are so close. And a single 4 in a sea of 9s and 10s will not significantly drag down an average as much as you want to believe it would.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Exactly. It's been 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and now 2011, Xbox 360 has BEAT the PS3 for all those years by having a better games library. The fanboys just won't accept it. They try and pick and choose what games "count", they try to use GS/IGN/Metacritic, they try to go by amount of GOTY awards, etc. At the end of the day, all that BS aside, 360 simply has more good games then PS3. 360 won this console gen in overall games, Wii won in sales and exclusives, PS3 won nothing, except best Blu Ray player :P

I agree. The 360 has had the better gaming library for a while, but recently the PS3 has made a huge comeback, anow I would say it's pretty close. I still the the 360 gets the edge. It does for me anyways. I play it about 75% of the time, while my PS3 gets about 25% playtime.

That's absolutely false. The PS3 already started "catching up" to the 360 beginning in 2007. Now in 2011 its not even a contest. The PS3 has the better and higher rated exclusives by far And its important to note that old PS2 ports, old 2005 and 2006 versions of sports games from early this gen, that no one cares about PAD the 360's exclusive library significantly As well as XBL titles. And that exclusive titles from early in this gen like Mass Effect and Bio Shock and Lost Planet and Dead Rising ALL either had their sequels released on the PS3 or had their originals re released for the PS3 Yet a lot of those games still are only counted towards the 360's library. Take out all the padding and filler and the PS3 absolutely CRUSHES the 360 in having more exclusives and better exclusives Also, I play my PS3 about 90% of the time, while my 360 gets about 10% playtime from me, so who cares

Exactly. Start crying that 360 was out longer. Start crying that loads of awesome 360 games "don't count". Start crying about exclusives. Start crying about sequels and your years old ports, and inferior multiplats. Anything to ignore the FACT that the 360's game library is bigger and higher rated. But it's ok, as long as your happy playing the second best console :D
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"]don't you think that that is a little suspicious?Stevo_the_gamer

Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#218 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"]don't you think that that is a little suspicious?MuayThaiFTW

Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score

It is backwards logic to not take everything you read at face value, and actually step back and judge the inherent quality of the totality of the review itself? Or does your brain capacity simply not allow you to reach to that end... which, actually explains why you're so keenly and stubborn focused on the meaningless numerical values. Not surprisingly to see a console peasant argue in that regard.I did not say they are worse--merely, I will remain skeptical none the less and suspicious of the same. Again, your reading compehension is clearly lacking, console peasant.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"]don't you think that that is a little suspicious?MuayThaiFTW

Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score

Its more like because IGN is a trash site that exaggerates everything and has no objectivity at all. GTA4, MGS4, SMG2, Zelda: SS, U3 all got 10s there and all of those revews were drenched in obnoxious generalizations, clear blemish overlooking and extreme hyperbole. Its a terrible site and there are a lot of sites just as bad about that for games on every system in every genre. His logic isn't backwards, its just hurt because people like the look of multiple 10s more than objective and fair reviewing.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#220 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

ActicEdge

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score

Its more like because IGN is a trash site that exaggerates everything and has no objectivity at all. GTA4, MGS4, SMG2, Zelda: SS, U3 all got 10s there and all of those revews were drenched in obnoxious generalizations, clear blemish overlooking and extreme hyperbole. Its a terrible site and there are a lot of sites just as bad about that for games on every system in every genre. His logic isn't backwards, its just hurt because people like the look of multiple 10s more than objective and fair reviewing.

I won't lie though, tis' amusing to see the reviewer hyperbole though. IGN is notorious for that garbage, but they still oddly manage to consistently make me laugh--even when they can be predictable.
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

Stevo_the_gamer

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score

It is backwards logic to not take everything you read at face value, and actually step back and judge the inherent quality of the totality of the review itself?

Exactly. And vice versa , that's what we should do with the obscure sites that reviewed Uncharted , and maybe you should think to yourself, hmmmm I wonder what benefit it could bring to their obscure site to rate Uncharted significantly below the average. Would it be to drive its hits up? Naw, cant be lol Just read the actual review and you'll see why gamers disregard those sites even more so
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#222 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

Exactly. That's what you should do with the obscure troll sites that reviewed Uncharted , and maybe you should think to yourself, hmmmm I wonder what benefit it could bring to their obscure site to rate Uncharted significantly below the average. Would it be drive its hits up? Naw, cant be lol Just read the actual review and you'll see why gamers disregard those sites even moreMuayThaiFTW
Who says I don't? I've already hit on that review anyways; in fact... I do remember commenting on that review here back when it first released. 0.o

Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts

[QUOTE="SW__Troll"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]There's Zelda... :P And all that backlog that I still never got a chance to try out. Haha. Heck, I never even got to fully play NSMB or SMG2. I missed out on a lot.ActicEdge

Boring games.


What you really want are games like Little King's Story, Zack & Wiki, and LostWinds

Awesome games not boring. I have played all those games except Little Kings Story. In terms of quality SMG2>Zack and Wki>NSMBWii>Lost Winds (I adore Lost Winds though, its just short and has some design error in it. The sequel greatly improves on this some of it though)

I feel Mario games have taken on a more 'cutesy' image in recent years, and I don't like it. The games don't give me the same, good vibes as the older titles, and I can't bring myself to beat them.

I stick to other Mario titles now like the Mario & Luigi series.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#224 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

This thread turned out rather well...

Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Sure, but I'm skeptical about the 10s that hold no complaints just as well--especially when reviewer hyperbole comes into play (IGN is notorious for that garbage).

ActicEdge

Backwards logic. Also, IGN was 1 of many ...many ..many sites that Uncharted 3 earned a perfect 10 from. But no, in your head they're worse then the obscure troll site that scored Uncharted significantly below the average with a 4 And you say I'm bad? Take a look at yourself bro. Maybe you have that backwards train of thought because I don't know...you are a lemming...and only agree with it being thrashed by a low score

Its more like because IGN is a trash site that exaggerates everything and has no objectivity at all. GTA4, MGS4, SMG2, Zelda: SS, U3 all got 10s there and all of those revews were drenched in obnoxious generalizations, clear blemish overlooking and extreme hyperbole. Its a terrible site and there are a lot of sites just as bad about that for games on every system in every genre. His logic isn't backwards, its just hurt because people like the look of multiple 10s more than objective and fair reviewing.

I've all ready made all my point clear. You ignore a lot of what i have stated and are just rambling. I've destroyed your arguments lol and that's that. I don't need to keep deabting you any further. Its like I'm talking to a brick wall. Its funny how IGN is thrash yet those other sites arent and are the only legitimate sites that you want to consider. Oh and by the way, Uncharted 3 was the first game to earn a 10 from IGN in years. So that says a lot despite the insane image you have concocted of IGN in your little deluded head. Bottom line Uncharted >>> Gears critically and commercially
Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

... I honestly clicked on this thread thinking it would be a joke thread. :|

Avatar image for redikan
redikan

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#227 redikan
Member since 2004 • 144 Posts

[QUOTE="Spartan070"]

[QUOTE="gregbmil"]

Yes it does. Just about everything on 360 is on PS3. Then PS3 has tons of exclusives. Anyone who disagrees needs to look at the facts and stop kidding themselfs

arbitor365

...except whats most important, the Halo series.

unless *gasp* people dont think halo is that good

sounds Legit...
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#228 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]So why does the Xbox 360 crush the PS3 in software sales AND have more higher rated games?MuayThaiFTW
Lol when games like Perfect Dark Zero, Crackdown, and Halo ODST are considered its "high scoring" games then you know its b.s.

bs why? Because you don't like those games? What makes your opinion the right one? All those high scores you keep touting for uncharted are from game reviewers. The scores for odst and other 360 games are from.........games reviewers! So basically when a reviewer scores a ps3 game well it all good and truthful, but 360 game its not? Because you say so? Dude you gotta let go of this blind love for a company. We all have a favorite but telling us uncharted 3 was victimized by troll sites but gears 3 wasn't? Wake up, bro, Sony, MS, Nintendo don't care about us.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#229 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

yet clear obscure troll sites are the only legitimate sites that you and Steve o want to consider.MuayThaiFTW
Andddd we're back to square one.

Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"]Exactly. That's what you should do with the obscure troll sites that reviewed Uncharted , and maybe you should think to yourself, hmmmm I wonder what benefit it could bring to their obscure site to rate Uncharted significantly below the average. Would it be drive its hits up? Naw, cant be lol Just read the actual review and you'll see why gamers disregard those sites even moreStevo_the_gamer

Who says I don't? I've already hit on that review anyways; in fact... I do remember commenting on that review here back when it first released. 0.o

Ok. By the way, what games do you like? Let's talk about games. Too much arguing lol
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#231 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Exactly. It's been 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and now 2011, Xbox 360 has BEAT the PS3 for all those years by having a better games library. The fanboys just won't accept it. They try and pick and choose what games "count", they try to use GS/IGN/Metacritic, they try to go by amount of GOTY awards, etc. At the end of the day, all that BS aside, 360 simply has more good games then PS3. 360 won this console gen in overall games, Wii won in sales and exclusives, PS3 won nothing, except best Blu Ray player :P

I agree. The 360 has had the better gaming library for a while, but recently the PS3 has made a huge comeback, anow I would say it's pretty close. I still the the 360 gets the edge. It does for me anyways. I play it about 75% of the time, while my PS3 gets about 25% playtime.

That's absolutely false. The PS3 already started "catching up" to the 360 beginning in 2007. Now in 2011 its not even a contest. The PS3 has the better and higher rated exclusives by far And its important to note that old PS2 ports, old 2005 and 2006 versions of sports games from early this gen, that no one cares about PAD the 360's exclusive library significantly As well as XBL titles. And that exclusive titles from early in this gen like Mass Effect and Bio Shock and Lost Planet and Dead Rising ALL either had their sequels released on the PS3 or had their originals re released for the PS3 Yet a lot of those games still are only counted towards the 360's library. Take out all the padding and filler and the PS3 absolutely CRUSHES the 360 in having more exclusives and better exclusives Also, I play my PS3 about 90% of the time, while my 360 gets about 10% playtime from me, so who cares

Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#232 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50158 Posts

Ok. By the way, what games do you like? Let's talk about games. Too much arguing lolMuayThaiFTW

The console peasant wishes to stop arguing after he is served with a delicious dish of ownage? Predictable.

Avatar image for heeeeeeeeeweeee
heeeeeeeeeweeee

2083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 heeeeeeeeeweeee
Member since 2011 • 2083 Posts

Dont think im missing out lol with my two gaming computers, ps3 and xbox360.

Avatar image for Kolev_Plus
Kolev_Plus

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 Kolev_Plus
Member since 2011 • 157 Posts

Dont think im missing out lol with my two gaming computers, ps3 and xbox360.

heeeeeeeeeweeee

That's some sh*t flooring.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#235 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts

[QUOTE="heeeeeeeeeweeee"]

Dont think im missing out lol with my two gaming computers, ps3 and xbox360.

Kolev_Plus

That's some sh*t flooring.

with his systems, when does he have time to notice it?
Avatar image for heeeeeeeeeweeee
heeeeeeeeeweeee

2083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 heeeeeeeeeweeee
Member since 2011 • 2083 Posts

[QUOTE="heeeeeeeeeweeee"]

Dont think im missing out lol with my two gaming computers, ps3 and xbox360.

Kolev_Plus

That's some sh*t flooring.

yea the floors **** up when we bought the house people who lived here before us put tape under the rug to hold it in place and like 20 years later ripping the rug up it ruined the finish of the floor when i pulled it up so goddamn sticky.

Avatar image for Kolev_Plus
Kolev_Plus

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 Kolev_Plus
Member since 2011 • 157 Posts

[QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"]

[QUOTE="heeeeeeeeeweeee"]

Dont think im missing out lol with my two gaming computers, ps3 and xbox360.

heeeeeeeeeweeee

That's some sh*t flooring.

yea the floors **** up when we bought the house people who lived here before us put tape under the rug to hold it in place and like 20 years ripping the rug up it's ruined the finish of the floor when i pulled it up so goddamn sticky.

Damn man! That must suck hard :lol:
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] Ok. By the way, what games do you like? Let's talk about games. Too much arguing lolStevo_the_gamer
The console peasant wishes to stop arguing after he is served with a delicious dish of ownage? Predictable.

Haha no hard feelings but what a douche lol. Hey i was owning you and edge so hard that I was actually getting tired of owning you two, and wanted to bring up a light topic to talk about. But fine we can go back to me owning you some more lol;) Lol
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"] I agree. The 360 has had the better gaming library for a while, but recently the PS3 has made a huge comeback, anow I would say it's pretty close. I still the the 360 gets the edge. It does for me anyways. I play it about 75% of the time, while my PS3 gets about 25% playtime.

That's absolutely false. The PS3 already started "catching up" to the 360 beginning in 2007. Now in 2011 its not even a contest. The PS3 has the better and higher rated exclusives by far And its important to note that old PS2 ports, old 2005 and 2006 versions of sports games from early this gen, that no one cares about PAD the 360's exclusive library significantly As well as XBL titles. And that exclusive titles from early in this gen like Mass Effect and Bio Shock and Lost Planet and Dead Rising ALL either had their sequels released on the PS3 or had their originals re released for the PS3 Yet a lot of those games still are only counted towards the 360's library. Take out all the padding and filler and the PS3 absolutely CRUSHES the 360 in having more exclusives and better exclusives Also, I play my PS3 about 90% of the time, while my 360 gets about 10% playtime from me, so who cares

Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?

True. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game Oh and there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" drivel was/is one of the biggest forum myths ever In reality it came out late in 2006 and by the next year alone you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming in and being released steadily
Avatar image for Kolev_Plus
Kolev_Plus

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 Kolev_Plus
Member since 2011 • 157 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] That's absolutely false. The PS3 already started "catching up" to the 360 beginning in 2007. Now in 2011 its not even a contest. The PS3 has the better and higher rated exclusives by far And its important to note that old PS2 ports, old 2005 and 2006 versions of sports games from early this gen, that no one cares about PAD the 360's exclusive library significantly As well as XBL titles. And that exclusive titles from early in this gen like Mass Effect and Bio Shock and Lost Planet and Dead Rising ALL either had their sequels released on the PS3 or had their originals re released for the PS3 Yet a lot of those games still are only counted towards the 360's library. Take out all the padding and filler and the PS3 absolutely CRUSHES the 360 in having more exclusives and better exclusives Also, I play my PS3 about 90% of the time, while my 360 gets about 10% playtime from me, so who cares

Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?

That's true. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game P.s there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" is one of the biggest forum myths ever lol. Or at least its often greatly exaggerated It came out late in 2006 and by the next year you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming

Heavenly Sword, uncharted 1, and RaC:aCiT were not good games lol. I'll give you Warhawk though.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#241 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts
@MuayThaiFTW- do you really consider yourself impartial? Look at the stuff you post? You suck Sony's d***, dude. After the patch lair was not considered a good game. If you liked it, cool. To each their own. I like quite a few dogs, but stating your preferences like they are cold hard facts is all I see you do. In this thread, I get it. You don't like gears and love uncharted. But saying it crushed gears critically when there is a one point metacritic difference is absurdly fanboyish. Then playing the victim of troll review sites that gears wasn't. Crying victim is such a fanboy defense. Why do you feel the need to prove what you like is the best as if it will make others suddenly say, "I don't know why I like the other game/console more. I need to be like MuayThaiFTW. He is right. My tastes are wrong, blah blah". Everyone has different preferences, NOBODY'S ARE RIGHT OR WRONG.
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"] Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?

That's true. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game P.s there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" is one of the biggest forum myths ever lol. Or at least its often greatly exaggerated It came out late in 2006 and by the next year you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming

Heavenly Sword, uncharted 1, and RaC:aCiT were not good games lol. I'll give you Warhawk though.

Lol speak for yourself forum trollio lol All of those games were good games and were a big blast to play! In fact, Uncharted 1 and Ratchet and Clank are even criminally under rated games. Even today they are still fun to play.
Avatar image for Kolev_Plus
Kolev_Plus

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 Kolev_Plus
Member since 2011 • 157 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] That's true. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game P.s there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" is one of the biggest forum myths ever lol. Or at least its often greatly exaggerated It came out late in 2006 and by the next year you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming

Heavenly Sword, uncharted 1, and RaC:aCiT were not good games lol. I'll give you Warhawk though.

Lol speak for yourself forum trollio lol All of those games were good games and were a big blast to play! In fact, Uncharted 1 and Ratchet and Clank are even criminally under rated games. Even today they are still fun to play.

Warhawk was the only good PS3 Exclusive in 2007. For 360 it was Crackdown and Mass Effect. Calm your nips bro.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#244 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts
@Kolev_Plus- what was wrong with uncharted and heavenly sword? If you didn't like them that's cool. Just curious what you disliked. I liked both of them.
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"] Heavenly Sword, uncharted 1, and RaC:aCiT were not good games lol. I'll give you Warhawk though.

Lol speak for yourself forum trollio lol All of those games were good games and were a big blast to play! In fact, Uncharted 1 and Ratchet and Clank are even criminally under rated games. Even today they are still fun to play.

Warhawk was the only good PS3 Exclusive in 2007. For 360 it was Crackdown and Mass Effect. Calm your nips bro.

Never played Crackdown and do not plan to ever. Never was interested nor will i ever be interested lol Also Mass Effect is no longer exclusive and all its sequels have come out on the PS3
Avatar image for Kolev_Plus
Kolev_Plus

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 Kolev_Plus
Member since 2011 • 157 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="Kolev_Plus"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] Warhawk was the only good PS3 Exclusive in 2007. For 360 it was Crackdown and Mass Effect. Calm your nips bro.

Never played Crackdown and do not plan to ever. Never was interested nor will i ever be interested lol Also Mass Effect is no longer exclusive and all its sequels have come out on the PS3

@Kolev_Plus- what was wrong with uncharted and heavenly sword? If you didn't like them that's cool. Just curious what you disliked. I liked both of them.cainetao11
I'm just having fun with Muay Thai. I actually liked Heavenly Sword and There's too many reasons of my dislike towards Uncharted 1.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#247 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"] That's absolutely false. The PS3 already started "catching up" to the 360 beginning in 2007. Now in 2011 its not even a contest. The PS3 has the better and higher rated exclusives by far And its important to note that old PS2 ports, old 2005 and 2006 versions of sports games from early this gen, that no one cares about PAD the 360's exclusive library significantly As well as XBL titles. And that exclusive titles from early in this gen like Mass Effect and Bio Shock and Lost Planet and Dead Rising ALL either had their sequels released on the PS3 or had their originals re released for the PS3 Yet a lot of those games still are only counted towards the 360's library. Take out all the padding and filler and the PS3 absolutely CRUSHES the 360 in having more exclusives and better exclusives Also, I play my PS3 about 90% of the time, while my 360 gets about 10% playtime from me, so who cares

Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?

True. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game Oh and there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" drivel was/is one of the biggest forum myths ever In reality it came out late in 2006 and by the next year alone you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming in and being released steadily

Those were some good games, although if you already had a 360 like I did, it was hard to justify the purchase of a additional console with it's hefty price tag, at the time anyways. I waited until GOW3, KZ2, and MGS4 were released before I ended up getting mine. I think when those titles came out is when the PS3 started gaining momentum. That and the fact that it also dropped it price a bit.
Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#248 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

i agree completely except for resistance which is really bad. 360 started strong with exclusives but after kinect came out, all i did was hang my head in shame, out of the all the exclusives this year gears of war 3 was maybe the only worthwhile exclusive

Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts
[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="MuayThaiFTW"][QUOTE="godzillavskong"] Well, it's all about preferences.I don't seem to remember the PS3 getting any big name exclusives until 2009 and then they started pouring them on.I may be wrong, so if you are aware of those titles, or big name exclusives that launched in 2007 could you list them?

True. Anyway, in 2007 alone there were big titles like Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, and the first game to the epic series Uncharted lol There was also Lair, which I cant remember if it was released in 2006 or 2007, but it wasn't that good a game. I mean it looked beautiful and seemed interesting, but the controls were just so frustrating. After the patch came out to allow you to play with analog sticks and buttons it became a much better game Oh and there was also Ratchet and Clank: Tools of destruction in 2007, which was and is a criminally under rated game. The whole "PS3 had no games for the first several years" drivel was/is one of the biggest forum myths ever In reality it came out late in 2006 and by the next year alone you had a steady supply of said great exclusives coming in and being released steadily

Those were some good games, although if you already had a 360 like I did, it was hard to justify the purchase of a additional console with it's hefty price tag, at the time anyways. I waited until GOW3, KZ2, and MGS4 were released before I ended up getting mine. I think when those titles came out is when the PS3 started gaining momentum. That and the fact that it also dropped it price a bit.

I agree. Good post Also, MGS4 in 2008 was one of its first true system sellers. I dont know, but to me( from 2007 on) it almost seemed like every other month a quailty PS3 exclusive was being released. I always had games to play and I had lots of fun. The good old days lol From 2007 on the PS3 was already displaying its dominance in regards to exclusives Then when the first price cut happened, along with more marketing + the new kevin butler commercials lol, that's when the PS3 started picking up crazy momentum and making a furious comeback. Now the PS3 is neck and neck in sales with the 360. The PS3 has many more exclusives and many more higher scoring exclusives to go along with all the good multi plats. + the free online and blue ray player does it for me too . What I do like about the 360 are the faster download speeds and instals
Avatar image for MuayThaiFTW
MuayThaiFTW

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 MuayThaiFTW
Member since 2011 • 701 Posts

Fuel for the fire.

Results of meta-analysis:

  • Number of equivalent publications sampled: 42
  • Average score (U3): 93.86
  • Average score (G3): 91.07
  • Number of publications scoring U3 higher: 21
  • Number of publications scoring both equally: 16
  • Number of publications scoring G3 higher: 5

Averages didn't end up very far off the metacritic interestingly.

shinrabanshou