PS3 version of AC: Revalation include original game. 2 games with 1 price

too bad the ps3 version of ac sucks, it hardly makes it superior multiplat, the AC gams allways come out better on 360 then ps3tastetheacidmil

I haven't played the series on the 360, but they seemed fine on the PS3 to me.

[QUOTE="tastetheacidmil"]too bad the ps3 version of ac sucks, it hardly makes it superior multiplat, the AC gams allways come out better on 360 then ps3UnrealLegend

I haven't played the series on the 360, but they seemed fine on the PS3 to me.

[QUOTE="rumbalumba"]

AC1 was horrible. how it got a 9.0 is beyond me. well, the guy who gave it a 9 (Kevin V) even sports an AC tattoo. like, seriously.

he'll probably give Revelations an 11.

BrunoBRS

uhh...it was horrible (it still is). not fun at all.

if you've played the introductory chapter, you've basically palyed the whole game.

this is how AC1 was gamepaly-wise:

1) go to a town

2) find the assassin bureau

3) pickpocket, interrogate, eavesdrop

4) go back to assassin bureau

5) assassinate

6) escape

7) go to a different town, find the assassin bureau

you do that for the next 8-10 hours. exactly that. you get upgrades along the way, but the upgrades are pretty much useless and crappy anyways. they're not even really an upgrade or an addition they're more like an extra thing that you won't even bother with. also, the intro chapter had you equipped with everything you will obtain by the final level, so you basically lose all those and one by one you regain everything. but...uh...you've already seen and even played with it, so there's no 'fresh feeling' to the supposed upgrades. i mean, there's no element of suprise and discovery either. it's one of the crappiest 'new weapon/new move/new animation/new item' system i have ever seen in games.

i just had to quit after chapter 4 because i said **** this im not going to do the same things over and over for another 5 chapters. it's literally playing the same thing over and over. im not kidding.

AC2 was not even great. it was mediocre. they all say the jump from AC1 to AC2 is like UC1 to UC2 but that's totally wrong. UC1 was a good game and UC2 was great. meanwhile, AC1 was garbage and AC2 was okay. big difference.

No, The better deal would have been if AC: Revalation had 2 and Brotherhood.

You know the full Ezio Trilogy?

No, The better deal would have been if AC: Revalation had 2 and Brotherhood.

You know the full Ezio Trilogy?

LegatoSkyheart

Yes, that would have been better, but it's fairly unreasonable to expect Ubisoft to do this. They'd lose a ridiculoua amount of money.

The price of 1 that will be 60 dollars at launch. I'm happy with my Revelations pre order on PC for 34 dollars.

Hell yeah!! I skipped 1 cuz I knew I would get it "free" someday. My prayers have been answered

wait that makes no sense. if you haven't already played AC why are you playing the 4th game in the series????mems_1224

They don't really go in sequence...

That extra game is poison.

Too bad the first AC is an awful game.ActionRemix

[QUOTE="UnrealLegend"]

[QUOTE="tastetheacidmil"]too bad the ps3 version of ac sucks, it hardly makes it superior multiplat, the AC gams allways come out better on 360 then ps3soulitane

I haven't played the series on the 360, but they seemed fine on the PS3 to me.

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Should have put in AC2, AC1 was pretty bad

finalstar2007

Really? i never played it so i look forward to it as well as Bioshock 1 coming with Bioshock infinit since i never played Bio 1

Why would people be complaining about getting something more for your money? If you use it, then great, If you don't, then nothing lost or gained. ...but where is the downside?rawsavon

Brotherhood performed like garbage on the PS3. The choppy framerates when free-running through the city compared to the 360 version was horrid. I had to return it. Hopefully Revelations is better. Also, I don't get the hate for AC1. Sure, it's short, but it's not nearly as bad as most posters make it out to be. I finished it with no problem.

Merex760

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]wait that makes no sense. if you haven't already played AC why are you playing the 4th game in the series????GameShtopper

They don't really go in sequence...

[QUOTE="Merex760"]

Brotherhood performed like garbage on the PS3. The choppy framerates when free-running through the city compared to the 360 version was horrid. I had to return it. Hopefully Revelations is better. Also, I don't get the hate for AC1. Sure, it's short, but it's not nearly as bad as most posters make it out to be. I finished it with no problem.

Drakan11

"Quincunx and gamma aside, the two games are effectively a match, but this is nothing new, as the differentiating factor with the AC titles has always been the performance. In the original Assassin's Creed, performance wasn't spectacular on 360 but was positively woeful on PS3. The sequel showed little to no improvement on the Microsoft platform, but a lot of work had clearly been carried out on the PS3 engine – 360 still commanded the overall advantage, but in several places the Sony console outperformed it.

Similar to ACII, in like-for-like scenes we see an overall trend favouring the Xbox 360 version with slightly higher frame-rates on average and lower levels of tearing, with both versions capped at 30FPS in line with Brotherhood's predecessor. The PS3 game appears to have a specific weakness in rendering environments with lots of draw distance - here we see dropped frames a-plenty and lots of tearing whereas 360 is more solid.

However, Ezio's mad dash on horseback through his besieged town throws up some interesting points where the PS3 version is clearly outperforming the Xbox 360 game, so perhaps other game modules (physics, for example) are optimised in favour of the Sony console? "

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-assassins-creed-brotherhood-face-off

They should actually take points out of Revelations for including the first AC.IronBass

Yes. Take away points for adding an AAA game for extra content. Drakan11

What a fantastic value for PS3 owners. It seems Sony just goes out of their way to give gamers more games for the money and that is nice in these tough economic days. Thank you Sony. Heil68

It's not that big of a deal. It's for day one copies only.

Why would people be complaining about getting something more for your money? If you use it, then great, If you don't, then nothing lost or gained. ...but where is the downside?rawsavon

[QUOTE="Heil68"]What a fantastic value for PS3 owners. It seems Sony just goes out of their way to give gamers more games for the money and that is nice in these tough economic days. Thank you Sony. sts106mat

yeah, here you are, have a free game you should have played 4 years ago, there are two other games in the same series we could fit on this disc, but we reckon they might still sell at a decent price in the shops, so go there instead.

yeah btw, isn't it ubisoft that is giving the game away not sony. crikey.

[QUOTE="Heil68"]What a fantastic value for PS3 owners. It seems Sony just goes out of their way to give gamers more games for the money and that is nice in these tough economic days. Thank you Sony. sts106mat

yeah, here you are, have a free game you should have played 4 years ago, there are two other games in the same series we could fit on this disc, but we reckon they might still sell at a decent price in the shops, so go there instead.

yeah btw, isn't it ubisoft that is giving the game away not sony. crikey.

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]What a fantastic value for PS3 owners. It seems Sony just goes out of their way to give gamers more games for the money and that is nice in these tough economic days. Thank you Sony. Drakan11

yeah, here you are, have a free game you should have played 4 years ago, there are two other games in the same series we could fit on this disc, but we reckon they might still sell at a decent price in the shops, so go there instead.

yeah btw, isn't it ubisoft that is giving the game away not sony. crikey.

It makes more sense to put in AC1, since you are revisiting that area in Revelations and you are involved with Altair. And Walt, is it really only day 1 copies? That sucks. Although, something similar was said about Dead Space 2, but that limited edition with the extra game is still available I think.

Drakan11

According to the gaming media it is. So it's probably not on the disc, but a PSN code.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Should have put in AC2, AC1 was pretty bad

rumbalumba

Really? i never played it so i look forward to it as well as Bioshock 1 coming with Bioshock infinit since i never played Bio 1

AC1 was horrible. how it got a 9.0 is beyond me. well, the guy who gave it a 9 (Kevin V) even sports an AC tattoo. like, seriously.

he'll probably give Revelations an 11.

Too bad they didn't actually talk about it. It was just the video comparison, which clearly shows the PS3 outperforming the 360. I apologize in advance if that upsets you. Drakan11

[QUOTE="Merex760"]

Brotherhood performed like garbage on the PS3. The choppy framerates when free-running through the city compared to the 360 version was horrid. I had to return it. Hopefully Revelations is better. Also, I don't get the hate for AC1. Sure, it's short, but it's not nearly as bad as most posters make it out to be. I finished it with no problem.

Drakan11

[QUOTE="Heil68"]What a fantastic value for PS3 owners. It seems Sony just goes out of their way to give gamers more games for the money and that is nice in these tough economic days. Thank you Sony. sts106mat

yeah, here you are, have a free game you should have played 4 years ago, there are two other games in the same series we could fit on this disc, but we reckon they might still sell at a decent price in the shops, so go there instead.

yeah btw, isn't it ubisoft that is giving the game away not sony. crikey.

Sounds like nothing more than to spite MS on their new policy. Sort of like "Oh look MS got a new policy, let's see just how brave they are to not allow AC: R on their console!". Anyway i don't care i have it and had nothing but trouble with corrupted gamesaves, gave up on it.

[QUOTE="Drakan11"]

[QUOTE="Merex760"]

Brotherhood performed like garbage on the PS3. The choppy framerates when free-running through the city compared to the 360 version was horrid. I had to return it. Hopefully Revelations is better. Also, I don't get the hate for AC1. Sure, it's short, but it's not nearly as bad as most posters make it out to be. I finished it with no problem.

MFDOOM1983

I thought the 1st AC was overrated, is what so-so in my opinion. I liked the story and setting and all, but the mission variety and gameplay was very flawed. Too repetitive and too easy, just stand there and press counter button and you will always win.

Glad too see that they are including both games though, that's like getting one for free. But I don't like how 360 owners don't get this, it's not fair to them. I mean it may not be that big of a deal, but I always have a problem with people not getting what someone else does for the same price. But that is MS fault and not the 360 owners themselves, if MS was more open and friendly to devs like Sony was then MS would get more support. But unfortunately MS seems more concerned with Kinect and whatnot right now than their fans.

Also be ready to have a good laugh at lems who post stupid Lens of Noobs comparisons and claim they have the "superior" version because they have an invisble difference :lol: