"The PC"

  • 149 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like? Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCs arent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are ,they're basically an embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpu releases,computers can use them unlike consoles. Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become more powerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
What laptop do you have?
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#3 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

this isn't a very interesting PC trolling thread :?

tips for next time:

less text, UC 2 is graphics king, more nonsense statements.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like?Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCsarent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are,they're basicallyan embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpureleases,computers can use them unlike consoles.Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become morepowerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

1Stark1

You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx

When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

What laptop do you have?tagyhag

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee

That one, but in white.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

this isn't a very interesting PC trolling thread :?

tips for next time:

less text, UC 2 is graphics king, more nonsense statements.

Dead-Memories

No, I'm not trolling whatsoever. I just find it crazythat PC fans act above everyone else when their platform is basically a computer that can use current techology while consoles are static:|

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]What laptop do you have?1Stark1

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee

That one, but in white.

The link won't let me see it but it already has 500GB and 6GB RAM, that's a wee bit more than consoles don't you think?
Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
So... because there are PCs that are weak, we should be unable to talk about those that can whip the console's asses into next week?
Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like?Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCsarent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are,they're basicallyan embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpureleases,computers can use them unlike consoles.Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become morepowerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

Mystic-G

You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx

When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.

Well of course, computers can use the newest tech. I just find it funny that Hermit act as if they're doing something by saying PC is more powerful. I mean computers can use any new tech that releases, consoles can't. A computer isn't a unique gaming platform, thats the only point I'm trying to make. So when Hermits say things like "Consoles will never surpass PC" I just want them to see the error in that comparison.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

I know what you're saying. Don't let it get to you. This place in general doesn't make any sense. Especially sentences that contain "PC". The majority of time spent on the PC isn't for gaming. And this hurts people. hehe humans

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx

When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.

Mystic-G

If he were trying to spend the money really wisely, he should just build his own, and avoid alienware.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

So... because there are PCs that are weak, we should be unable to talk about those that can whip the console's asses into next week?Head_of_games

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like?Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCsarent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are,they're basicallyan embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpureleases,computers can use them unlike consoles.Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become morepowerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

1Stark1

You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx

When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.

Well of course, computers can use the newest tech. I just find it funny that Hermit act as if they're doing something by saying PC is more powerful. I mean computers can use any new tech that releases, consoles can't. A computer isn't a unique gaming platform, thats the only point I'm trying to make. So when Hermits say things like "Consoles will never surpass PC" I just want them to see the error in that comparison.

Ummm... ok? Like I said, its all in reference to gaming computers. You act like you speak on something no one's noticed. You think console gamers or PC gamers are somehow unaware that there are computers in the world that don't compare to consoles? We all know this and accepted it, maybe you should to.

Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"]So... because there are PCs that are weak, we should be unable to talk about those that can whip the console's asses into next week?1Stark1

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?
Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]What laptop do you have?tagyhag

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee

That one, but in white.

The link won't let me see it but it already has 500GB and 6GB RAM, that's a wee bit more than consoles don't you think?

Unfortunately, its CPU and GPU SUCK. You can tell it just isn't designed for gaming at all. Maybe it's... I really can't tell what it would be designed for. Maybe they designed it so people who don't know a whole lot about computers would get frustrated and upgrade at some unnessesarily early point.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Well, if it'll comfort you any......

Consoles already had 3D-acceleration for games back in 1995 while PCs had to wait until near the end of 1996. It actually didn't take off on the Pc until early 1997. But when 3D acceleration finally did take off on the PC, it was a firestorm.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I guess people talk like that for pc because it a complicated topic. Eg: lets just say someones show a link of pc sales, pc sales what? Pc sales hardware, good but thats not enough because pc hardware is divided into gaming pc and just hardware which are not good enough to play games well. Also half of those sales come from pirates. So pc platform in sales is divided in 3 categories Pcs with high hardware to play games. Pcs from pirates that dont contribute in pc sales and fanbase Pcs with lesser hardware that either dont play games or play weaker indie games that still count as pc fanbase So in the end "the pc" is a complicated platform. A good gaming pc can vary in price depending on the games you wanna play. Some games may play well on a 700 bucks pc and some might need a 1000+ to play well.
Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"]So... because there are PCs that are weak, we should be unable to talk about those that can whip the console's asses into next week?Head_of_games

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphics cards and proceessor updates that keep computers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything would be at the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"][QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

1Stark1

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphicscards and proceessor updates that keepcomputers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything wouldat the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

PC doesn't win but current technology wins? And what do you think makes use of this current technology or what this current technology is developed for? The Gameboy Advance?
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]What laptop do you have?1Stark1

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee

That one, but in white.

Will $1000 you could build a pc that destroys consoles, hell I've seen builds for $300 that destroy consoles.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"][QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

1Stark1

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphics cards and proceessor updates that keep computers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything would be at the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

If consoles were upgradeable there would be no purpose in buying one.
Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"][QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

1Stark1

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphicscards and proceessor updates that keepcomputers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything wouldat the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

Hang on, what makes a console a console and a PC a PC?

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"] So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?Mystic-G

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphicscards and proceessor updates that keepcomputers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything wouldat the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

PC doesn't win but current technology wins? And what do you think makes use of this current technology or what this current technology is developed for? The Gameboy Advance?

Look at the logic at this statements and hopefully, you'll see where I'm coming from. "The Wii will never surpass PC, PC has a much more powerful processor and the gpu runs circles around the Wii. I can't wait to buy PC" "I can't wait to have a PC launch party with my friends" "PC has a launch date of XXXX" If these don't sound right, you get where I'm coming from. I'm just saying that posters here act as if PC is a unique platform. I mean Sony, Acer, Alienware,HP, Toshiba, and Samsung all make them. They're general purpose computers that mold with current technology:| yet everyone act like its doing something when it beats out 5 year technology. Thats why I don't get why posters are boasting about PC advantages.:|

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"][QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Well its a computer:| Its upgradeable:| Its not even a unique gaming platform:| I mean when did the PC even launch? See what I mean, computers arent to be compared to consoles. You act as if PC is a unique gaming system or something:roll: The current consoles are 4-5 years old, big whoop if something that can upgrade can beat consoles.

1Stark1

So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphics cards and proceessor updates that keep computers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything would be at the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

How are consoles unique gaming systems? I don't think you are using these terms correctly here.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"] So... we're agreed that PC is a much better gaming machine than any of the consoles? And you think it's so good it should be excluded from system wars because it's simply undebatable that the PC wins?Blade8Aus

Its all up to preference, its subjective. No, the PC doesn't win. Current technology wins, its the graphicscards and proceessor updates that keepcomputers where its at. If consoles were upgradable,everything wouldat the same level and then you would see how generic computers are.I don't think you're getting my point that computers are generic machines. I don't mean anything derogatory when i say generic, I just mean its not a unique gaming system.

Hang on, what makes a console a console and a PC a PC?

What makes a console- Having an exact launch date, not being upgradeable with current technology, not being general purpose, having an exact controller, having a name that isn't as generic as Personal Computer

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

1Stark1

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

Vaasman

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Does it really matter, the argument has no point and is pretty stupid.

Avatar image for alexandros1313
alexandros1313

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 alexandros1313
Member since 2006 • 268 Posts

I see that even basic concepts such as "platform" are too hard to grasp for some people. Ok, I suppose it's logical, if you're playing on consoles you're bound to not 'get' a lot of things about the PC. So, my dear TC, pay attention to the following:

- The PC (Personal Computer) is a gaming platform. But what does that mean, you ask? Well, you can play games on it. Yes, it's true. Games made for PC cannot be played on any other machine, therefore it is a distinct and unique platform.

- "But it changes all the time!" I hear you cry out in despair. Yes. You see, the PC, in contrast to consoles, is an open platform. That means that you can change the software and hardware at will.

[intermission, to give our friend a little time to absord all that knowledge]

...

-"But, but when was it launched?" According to Wikipedia, the PC platform was launched on August 12, 1981 (link). I really don't know the launch games since it was almost 30 years ago, but the PC platform has accumulated thousands upon thousands of games since then, with no sign of stopping.

- "But how can you compare the PC to 360 and PS3??". Here's how. You can play games on 360 and PS3. Poorly, but you can. You can also play games on PC. Shocking, isn't it?

- "But I paid 1000$ for a laptop and it sucks at gaming!". Tough luck. At some point the average consumer is going to have to come to terms with the fact that it's a bad idea to buy stuff because they are shiny and new. You could have paid a lot less money and bought a system that would offer better performance than any console, if you had only taken the time to do a little research or go to the PC hardware forum here on Gamespot and ask. So, I sympathize with the fact that you bought a lame laptop and now you're stuck with the consoles' poor performance, but it's really your own fault. Deal with it.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

Vaasman

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

SAGE_OF_FIRE

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Does it really matter, the argument has no point and is pretty stupid.

Yea but I want to see what nonsense comes out next for teh lulz.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

1Stark1

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

But it's one of the many advantages of pc gaming.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

1Stark1

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

What do you mean a computer isn't a "unique gaming platform"? That makes no sense. Do you mean a computer isn't specifically a gaming platform?

Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh

1Stark1

Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

Well I just had an argument to counter all of your previous gibberish. But now that you have it summarised, this will be so much easier and more meaningful.

In that case, consoles aren't considered a standard platform and consolites shouldn't "act as if they're doing something" when each console available at for purchase uses ancient and out-dated technology.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Why don't you sum it up neatly then, to get your point across. As it stands right now, I can't decide what you are trying to argue.

Vaasman

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

What do you mean a computer isn't a "unique gaming platform"? That makes no sense. Do you mean a computer isn't specifically a gaming platform?

Thats another way of putting it. Yes yes, I know PS3 and 360 have Bluray and DVD, that the excuse that a lot of PC fans would flock to. But computers go beyond what consoles can do in terms of general purpose use.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

1Stark1

What do you mean a computer isn't a "unique gaming platform"? That makes no sense. Do you mean a computer isn't specifically a gaming platform?

Thats another way of putting it. Yes yes, I know PS3 and 360 have Bluray and DVD, that the excuse that a lot of PC fans would flock to. But computers go beyond what consoles can do in terms of general purpose use.

And....?
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Basically that a computer isn't a unique gaming platform and that Hermits shouldn't act as if they're doing something when a computer( that can accept current graphics card and processors) beats out static 5 year old technology.

1Stark1

What do you mean a computer isn't a "unique gaming platform"? That makes no sense. Do you mean a computer isn't specifically a gaming platform?

Thats another way of putting it. Yes yes, I know PS3 and 360 have Bluray and DVD, that the excuse that a lot of PC fans would flock to. But computers go beyond what consoles can do in terms of general purpose use.

Would you like us to say "gaming PC" instead of "PC" then, since it removes the generality of the machine and defines it's specific purpose?

Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]What do you mean a computer isn't a "unique gaming platform"? That makes no sense. Do you mean a computer isn't specifically a gaming platform?

Vaasman

Thats another way of putting it. Yes yes, I know PS3 and 360 have Bluray and DVD, that the excuse that a lot of PC fans would flock to. But computers go beyond what consoles can do in terms of general purpose use.

Would you like us to say "gaming PC" instead of "PC" then, since it removes the generality of the machine and defines it's specific purpose?

He wants a specific build with a name to it. Pointless really...

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

The PC is nothing without the hardware that powers it. You could see it this way: every now a new piece of hardware gets released and games are made for it. It's constant evolution just that you aren't hardware limited like on the consoles. This is both good and bad. The good side is that you can see amazing progress and that everyone can make games for the PC. The bad side is that hardware gets outdated quickly (if you aren't exactly undemanding) and that it's hard to "max out" the hardware. That's why many publishers now focus more on consoles. They're cheaper to develop and bring more cash (except in the case of some PC specific genres).

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62036 Posts

PC generations in SW are limited to the release of the first "next-gen" console until the end of that same generation. Thus all games released in that time frame are current generation. In terms of hardware we generally go off what the most powerful PC is capable of.

PC is compared here because it is not the be all and end all, and least of all a perfect system, thus it is still debateable on which is "best" in some aspects or to individuals.

Avatar image for Cronik959
Cronik959

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Cronik959
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]

this isn't a very interesting PC trolling thread :?

tips for next time:

less text, UC 2 is graphics king, more nonsense statements.

1Stark1

No, I'm not trolling whatsoever. I just find it crazythat PC fans act above everyone else when their platform is basically a computer that can use current techology while consoles are static:|

and you just said exactly why PC is above console. PC uses current tech while console is stagnant.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Now I'm not here to bash PC [...]

1Stark1


Of course you are. Why else would you start a thread about the PC and then go on to list why you think consoles are "better"?

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#45 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

BTW TC:

Your laptop isn't a gaming machine per say, but that doesn't mean it won't play games. You could easily set yourself up with a gog.com account and a steam account and have access to a HUGE load of kick-ass games that will play just fine on your (non-gaming) laptop.

PC isn't defined by generations. It's a continual spectrum of pure gaming heaven.

Some stuff you might want to look into:

Check outhttp://www.gog.com/en/frontpage/You should easily be able to play ANY of those great old games on the PC.

There's also nothing stopping you from playing plants vs zombies and peggle and Sim City 4, and braid, and machinarium, and Trine, or any number of modern games that are easy on system requirements. Sins of a solar empire is just another example of an epic game that will run just fine on your system, so is Galactic Civ II, and the older Total War games.

I looked up your video card, it seems that will run Half-Life 2 at 49 FPS on medium settings. That's almost 20 FPS faster than the consoles. Pretty good for a non-gaming latptop, wouldn't you say?

There you go, even your non-so gaming friendly laptop can play a huge library of great PC games. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised, if the library that your low end, non gaming laptop can play is larger than the current library of Xbox 360 games.

Maybe now, you'll have a glimpse as to why we love the platform so damn much.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts
So you got a crap laptop is that why you made a troll thread?
Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

You wasted $1,000 on something that would have cost way less if you built it yourself. Just saying.

Avatar image for AiurProtoss
AiurProtoss

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 AiurProtoss
Member since 2010 • 1080 Posts

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like? Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCs arent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are ,they're basically an embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpu releases,computers can use them unlike consoles. Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become more powerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

1Stark1

you do realise a gamind PC from 2005 can still play games at higher resolutions than consoles right?? and when we get into the 2006 and 2007 years they completely destroy them.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#49 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like?Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCsarent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are,they're basicallyan embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpureleases,computers can use them unlike consoles.Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become morepowerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.

Mystic-G

You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx

When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.

Spending money on an Alienware anything isn't wise either.

Avatar image for Heyhuub
Heyhuub

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Heyhuub
Member since 2010 • 317 Posts

My Radeon HD4890 is my gaming console. It was released in 2009 and was just over half the price of a Xbox 360. It can run any current game in 1920x1080, or 1080p if you want. Sadly like a console it can't be upgraded, but i can overclock it or replace it. Just like you can replace your PS2 for a PS3. Just had to place it in a computer just like you have to connect a console to a TV.