Rein: PS3 *DOES NOT* have enough resources for all UT3 maps

[QUOTE="solidgamer"]lol why would i want to play ut3 on ps3 or 360Dreams-Visions

by suggesting "want", I presume you have the OPTION, meaning you have a PC capable of running UT3. In that case, there is no reason you would "want" to do such a thing.

But for those who do not have a PC that can run UT3, it's an issue of "need", not of "want". For all of those people, they will need to play on a 360 or PS3. If your PC can run it...well...it means you've sunk a good amount of money into your PC to play PC games...so it would be illogical for you to buy the console version of a game built for PC gaming.

Very nice, very nice indeed

Mark Rein is the worse douche bag ever, he is an idiot and should be fired, killed and teabaged all over. Said that, he's right the PS3 plain sucks.SER69

He needs to just keep his mouth shut or think before he speaks.

compairing the ps3 version with the pc version is bull...

the pc's hardware isn't limited as the ps3 is. no wonder that big maps can't be done on the ps3.

i don't think the 360 could have done it better.

bu..bu..but UT3 better on PS3 :cry:

bu..bu..but UT3 comes later on 360 :cry:

I told you this game will be downgraded on PS3.

Areola54

A few missing maps= downgrade?

And the 360 version will have even less maps due to dvd.

Once again Hermits can say "We told you so" ... is it getting tiring being wrong all the time?

This also confirms that a good majority of the PC mods wont even work on the PS3 :lol: ... unless they use a point system like Halo's Forge which limits objects .. whichI doubt.

[QUOTE="Areola54"]

bu..bu..but UT3 better on PS3 :cry:

bu..bu..but UT3 comes later on 360 :cry:

I told you this game will be downgraded on PS3.

trizzle_a

A few missing maps= downgrade?

And the 360 version will have even less maps due to dvd.

its not just about missing maps. the ps3s lack ram could effect all the maps, like seriously downgraded textures.

[QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="Areola54"]

bu..bu..but UT3 better on PS3 :cry:

bu..bu..but UT3 comes later on 360 :cry:

I told you this game will be downgraded on PS3.

marklarmer

A few missing maps= downgrade?

And the 360 version will have even less maps due to dvd.

its not about missing maps. the ps3s lack ram could effect all the maps, like downgraded textures.

This also has me thinking... what are mods going to be like on the PS3? With its hardware limitations you folks might not see everything that comes out the way you want to see it.smokeydabear076

Q: Another big thing about the Unreal franchise, for me, on the PC, as a fan, was the user-created content. The mods, the mutators, the levels, the skins, and models. Are PS3 owners going to have the tools to do those kind of things and upload them on PS3 or are they going to have to do it on PC.

Mark Rein: Obviously PlayStation 3 has a certain amount of memory compared to PC so you have to make sure that your mod fits in the PlayStation 3. But I mean, you see the game fits in the PlayStation 3, and it's pretty elaborate, so I think there's gonna be some pretty amazing stuff.

http://360.advancedmn.com/article.php?artid=10886

AMN

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]

[QUOTE="IGN"]Mark Rein said that they are shooting for a November release and did say that the PS3 version would have "most" of the content that would be found in its PC brother. He said that there would be a couple of maps that would be left out of the PS3 version simply because the system didn't have the resources to produce a smooth gameplay experience.Tamarind_Face

http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/821/821817p1.html

Let's see what happens to this thread...

You do know hes talking about those 32 or 64 player maps?

WAIT WHAT?! the ps3 has less resources than the computors?! surely you kid!! but what in the hell are lems doing in this thread? there is no 'ownage' for you here! shoo with you! if this article actually mention f'all about the 360 version you could all rub your groinswithdelight and shout "PAWNAGE" at the mountains, fanboy ****shivaskunk9mm

Well then why do the cows come to the Gears to PC threads? It doesn't concern cows, so why do they bother?

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.R-Dot-Yung

Because the console market is where the money is...theres very little piracy, and the industry is simple with the consoles compared to the PC...

Casuals dontbuy PC games anymore, they buy a Wii, or a slightly bigger casual will get a 360 or PS3....

PC gaming is having its last run as far as being all "EXCLUSIVE" with great games and such, games are now PC/360, and that sucks for hermits but thats the way its going to be

did you miss this?

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=p7pcq78sddbXfN0A-LjKWEA

looks like its the other way around.....

Okay...can i put an end to this?
UT3 is known to have meny mods ps3 gets the same mods as PC users,and their will be custom made maps


Do the math :|
Squall_Griver

the same issue will apply there as well....

the more demanding maps wont work properly.

[QUOTE="Squall_Griver"]Okay...can i put an end to this?
UT3 is known to have meny mods ps3 gets the same mods as PC users,and their will be custom made maps


Do the math :|
cobrax25

the same issue will apply there as well....

the more demanding maps wont work properly.

Or not at all.

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Squall_Griver"]Okay...can i put an end to this?
UT3 is known to have meny mods ps3 gets the same mods as PC users,and their will be custom made maps


Do the math :|
Marka1700

the same issue will apply there as well....

the more demanding maps wont work properly.

Or not at all.

thats pretty much my points...most user maps will not work properly....

the ones that will...will need to be created for the PS3 version specificlly....

but if you can run the Unreal Editor well unough to make maps....why get the PS3 vesrion in the first place.

bu..bu..but UT3 better on PS3 :cry:

bu..bu..but UT3 comes later on 360 :cry:

I told you this game will be downgraded on PS3.

Areola54

It will look and run better then the 360 version.

man i don't even know how people play a shooter on the playstations with that shooter unfriendly controllerkrunkfu2

Oh no, the joystick used for strafing is in a slightly different place than on Xbox 360! It must suck for shooters! :o

/sarcasm

Just imagine how dumbed down the 360 version will be...Timstuff

thats pretty weak and obvious damage control

Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.foxhound_fox

PSM saw the game running right next to a pc with a 8800gtx and said the PS3 version looked almsot identical. So what the hell are you talking about? Just because it wont support as many players (64 player maps) doesnt mean its going to be gimped hell you rarely ever get a 64 player game going on. Heck I cant even get a 32 player game on for games that support that most the time.

[QUOTE="krunkfu2"]man i don't even know how people play a shooter on the playstations with that shooter unfriendly controllerTimstuff

Oh no, the joystick used for strafing is in a slightly different place than on Xbox 360! It must suck for shooters! :o

/sarcasm

i tried playing killzone and man it just don't work for me the xbox's joysticks have litle bumps in them that hold you thumbs in place the Ps joysticks are like a mushroom and your thumbs slide off easier and the triggers on xbox make it easier i hate shooting with a button doesn't feel like you're shooting y'know and you gotta pay extra for rumble

That means that the 360 can'y have those maps either :?meetroid8

where does it say that?

ps3 version- won't have all the maps, one disc

xbox 360- all maps, prob multiple discs

ill take the 360 version thank u

[QUOTE="Nedemis"]Hmmmm.....lack of RAM much? :lol:
Dreams-Visions

Well...I wouldn't expect it to be lack of CPU power. Ram is probably a likely candidate. I wonder what will happen to the 360 version? :?

LAck of CPU power? I wonder what CPU is gonna be listed for teh PC version's minimum specs, RAM? I doubt. I just don't see ram requirements in various levels be so grossly different to each other

That means that the 360 can'y have those maps either :?meetroid8

you never know epic already has experience with the 360's layout

ps3 version- won't have all the maps, one disc

xbox 360- all maps, prob multiple discs

ill take the 360 version thank u

crusher2002000

Selfowned. 360 version is confirmed to have less maps than both PS3 and PC versions.

UT2004 was 5GB and that was a last gen game.

[QUOTE="crusher2002000"]

ps3 version- won't have all the maps, one disc

xbox 360- all maps, prob multiple discs

ill take the 360 version thank u

trizzle_a

Selfowned. 360 version is confirmed to have less maps than both PS3 and PC versions.

UT2004 was 5GB and that was a last gen game.

since when?

link plz

ps3 version- won't have all the maps, one disc

xbox 360- all maps, prob multiple discs

ill take the 360 version thank u

crusher2002000

BD 25 gb

DVD9 = 8.5gb

that theory doesn't add up

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.Polaris_choice

PSM saw the game running right next to a pc with a 8800gtx and said the PS3 version looked almsot identical. So what the hell are you talking about? Just because it wont support as many players (64 player maps) doesnt mean its going to be gimped hell you rarely ever get a 64 player game going on. Heck I cant even get a 32 player game on for games that support that most the time.

what are you talking about....there are plenty 64 man servers for UT04.....and the game is already getting pretty old....

see....PC games use dedicaded servers....you can come back the next day...and the exact still server will still be up...

You've never heard of the Heavenly Sword theory?

[QUOTE="trizzle_a"][QUOTE="crusher2002000"]

ps3 version- won't have all the maps, one disc

xbox 360- all maps, prob multiple discs

ill take the 360 version thank u

crusher2002000

Selfowned. 360 version is confirmed to have less maps than both PS3 and PC versions.

UT2004 was 5GB and that was a last gen game.

since when?

link plz

Here buddy:)

guys, remember that the 360 version has cut maps too. So pc still wins, againlettuceman44

i meant a real link not a fanboy site. give me a link from ign, gamepsot, unreal site, 1up u know a official link not a rumor

[QUOTE="Areola54"]

bu..bu..but UT3 better on PS3 :cry:

bu..bu..but UT3 comes later on 360 :cry:

I told you this game will be downgraded on PS3.

Polaris_choice

It will look and run better then the 360 version.

Agreed. it always is.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]

[QUOTE="Nedemis"]Hmmmm.....lack of RAM much? :lol:
Blinblingthing

Well...I wouldn't expect it to be lack of CPU power. Ram is probably a likely candidate. I wonder what will happen to the 360 version? :?

LAck of CPU power? I wonder what CPU is gonna be listed for teh PC version's minimum specs, RAM? I doubt. I just don't see ram requirements in various levels be so grossly different to each other

Yea...it's kinda wierd. You'd think a map is a map (more or less).

i meant a real link not a fanboy site. give me a link from ign, gamepsot, unreal site, 1up u know a official link not a rumor

crusher2002000

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.Polaris_choice

PSM saw the game running right next to a pc with a 8800gtx and said the PS3 version looked almsot identical. So what the hell are you talking about? Just because it wont support as many players (64 player maps) doesnt mean its going to be gimped hell you rarely ever get a 64 player game going on. Heck I cant even get a 32 player game on for games that support that most the time.

Again, where is the presumption that these are the 64-player maps that are the issue? It's just as possible that it's a normal sized map doing a ton of crazy things in the environment, given the lack of details about which maps he's referring to. Until the game launches on both platforms, we may never know what maps they're talking about. generally speaking, I doubt it's because a map is large. It would be more likely because the maps in question are pushing hella effects at the same time.

[QUOTE="crusher2002000"]

i meant a real link not a fanboy site. give me a link from ign, gamepsot, unreal site, 1up u know a official link not a rumor

smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.Dreams-Visions

PSM saw the game running right next to a pc with a 8800gtx and said the PS3 version looked almsot identical. So what the hell are you talking about? Just because it wont support as many players (64 player maps) doesnt mean its going to be gimped hell you rarely ever get a 64 player game going on. Heck I cant even get a 32 player game on for games that support that most the time.

Again, where is the presumption that these are the 64-player maps that are the issue? It's just as possible that it's a normal sized map doing a ton of crazy things in the environment, given the lack of details about which maps he's referring to. Until the game launches on both platforms, we may never know what maps they're talking about. generally speaking, I doubt it's because a map is large. It would be more likely because the maps in question are pushing hella effects at the same time.

back when I was making maps before I heard that it generally went like this....the more textures and meshes you have in a map the more CPU dependent the game becomes (UE2.5 was very CPU dependent for some reason, and could run decently on onboard graphics) but the more variety you had in terms of textures and meshes, the more RAM dependent the map would become.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Yet again consoles prove they don't work as PC's. I don't even know why developers waste time porting PC games to consoles anyways.cobrax25

PSM saw the game running right next to a pc with a 8800gtx and said the PS3 version looked almsot identical. So what the hell are you talking about? Just because it wont support as many players (64 player maps) doesnt mean its going to be gimped hell you rarely ever get a 64 player game going on. Heck I cant even get a 32 player game on for games that support that most the time.

Again, where is the presumption that these are the 64-player maps that are the issue? It's just as possible that it's a normal sized map doing a ton of crazy things in the environment, given the lack of details about which maps he's referring to. Until the game launches on both platforms, we may never know what maps they're talking about. generally speaking, I doubt it's because a map is large. It would be more likely because the maps in question are pushing hella effects at the same time.

back when I was making maps before I heard that it generally went like this....the more textures and meshes you have in a map the more CPU dependent the game becomes (UE2.5 was very CPU dependent for some reason, and could run decently on onboard graphics) but the more variety you had in terms of textures and meshes, the more RAM dependent the map would become.

The reason why I mention players is because it is the most resonable explanation. We really dont know all the details but consdering the entire single player campaighn is being put in the PS3 version( and the single player mode always looks as good if not better then the online mode) would it not be safe to assume that the effects and features will remain intact? Have you not seen pictures of the PS3 version? Visually they look amazing the only logical explanation would be the amount of players during the online mode considering no conosle game has supported 64 players online.