Reviewer: Halo:ODST is Underwhelming

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
I can't really comment since I haven't seen much of the game, but I'm still surprised they are charging $60 for an expansion pack. The whole package just seems kind've weak. Short campaign and only 3 multiplayer maps. Really the highlight to me seems to be the "firefight" mode which sounds awesome, but still seems like it would be better at $29-39 tops. I'm interested to see what "real" reviewers think.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

I can't really comment since I haven't seen much of the game, but I'm still surprised they are charging $60 for an expansion pack. The whole package just seems kind've weak. Short campaign and only 3 multiplayer maps. Really the highlight to me seems to be the "firefight" mode which sounds awesome, but still seems like it would be better at $29-39 tops. I'm interested to see what "real" reviewers think.EmperorSupreme

well, it does include all the halo 3 DLC map-packs... so thats at least a $10-$15 value right there

Avatar image for Luigi_The_Pimp
Luigi_The_Pimp

310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Luigi_The_Pimp
Member since 2009 • 310 Posts
Who the hell gives Underwhelming games an 8 ? The review sounded like it was written by a 12 year old
Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

"but it's all built on an old engine (which looks pretty much untouched) and looks nowhere near as good as games such as Gears of War 2 or Killzone 2. It smacks of no effort and is a teensy bit cynical. Microsoft needed a big franchise title for this Christmas and presumably there wasn't enough time to build something new, so they gave us new missions on old, ageing technology that didn't really look that great first time round."

That's an unfair assumption because he doesn't consider the context. ODST has larger levels than Halo 3, large, open, non-linear enviorments with that same nice HDR lighting, the physics for both ragdolls and vehicles, and of course the engine supports many more characters onscreen at one time.

Mordred19

Look at the screens. Every single one looks awful.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#55 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

[QUOTE="WAIW"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

"This is Halo. HALO! One of the most recognisable and popular franchises the videogames world has ever seen. In terms of overall quality, it SHOULD be up there with Gears and Killzone, not limping along at 640p. Let's be clear, we say this as people who want Halo to be amazing, not 'fanboys' or 'haters', as backwards-cap-wearing American teens will no doubt accuse us of being. It doesn't matter if you're the biggest Halo and 360 Fan going - don't bury your head in the sand, demand better!"

Do thay not know that Halo 3 ran in the same resolution? This is really silly.

heretrix

What does it matter if they do or do not?

The quote acts as if ODST will be horrible running at sub 720p resolution when Halo 3 ran at sub 720p resolution and it was just fine. Like I said, it's a silly complaint.

"...regardless of what the gameplay is like, we reckon a 'triple A' franchise deserves 'triple A' technology."

As trivial as it may sound (and, I think, is) to some, it's a perfectly reasonable complaint. He wants one of the most popular series ever to take full advantage of modern hardware. Sure, why not.

Avatar image for charomid
charomid

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 charomid
Member since 2005 • 901 Posts

[QUOTE="charomid"]

[QUOTE="TheArmyGuy48"] you mean......Gran Turismo 5? the game in which the highest selling installment of halo has only matched the lowest selling GT game? and every first iteration each gen of gran turismo has outscored every halo game on gamerankings also. Lol, at getting personal with me...."Cow".....my e-feelings am hurt. I am a cow, lol, I didnt need you to point that out to me so what are you getting at? Lol, at how quickly lemmings get the claws out when someone talks about halo. Theres still lemmings that think halo is the best selling franchise ever.

EDIT: and LOL, at kotaku being COWS now, even though theyve been known for their 360 bias for years :roll:

I guess everyone who says something bad about 360 is a cow now

TheArmyGuy48

ummmmmm you gotta be kidding right? do u even know what the first halo scored? it got a 9.7/10!!!!! thats higher than any gran turismo game out there! even halo 3 scored a 9.5/10 which is higher than any gran turismo game out there as well. type it in on gamespot and you'll see what im talking about. even on your precious gamerankings, halo was given 95.45% while the highest gran turismo game was given 94.71%. next time find out the REAL answers before posting bs, because ppl will look to prove you wrong!

Gamerankings, GT outscored every halo. my bad, for not stating gamerankings and metacritic, which is the magority consensus.

your still WRONG! gamerankings, halo still scored higher than GT. halo scored 95.45% and GT scored 94.71%. whatever site you check, halo still scored higher than any GT game.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

all they're pretty much talking about is the graphics... what about the actual gameplay?

ogvampire

Please gameplay is not important for games. Graphics is where it is at now.:D

(that was joke fyi;), they can be hard to getacross the interweb)

[QUOTE="Cicatraz_ESP"]

Reviews from a no name journalist FTW? lol.

Leejjohno

Doesn't make his opinion worth any less that any other reviewer. He would be one of the first that doesn't seem to hype everything to the high heavens. If he was saying "one word: awesome" instead everybody in the thread would be saying "OMG AAA am confirmed".

But he is litterally a no name journalist., can you find any name in that story? Anything that is from an unnamed source should raise red flags.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]

"but it's all built on an old engine (which looks pretty much untouched) and looks nowhere near as good as games such as Gears of War 2 or Killzone 2. It smacks of no effort and is a teensy bit cynical. Microsoft needed a big franchise title for this Christmas and presumably there wasn't enough time to build something new, so they gave us new missions on old, ageing technology that didn't really look that great first time round."

That's an unfair assumption because he doesn't consider the context. ODST has larger levels than Halo 3, large, open, non-linear enviorments with that same nice HDR lighting, the physics for both ragdolls and vehicles, and of course the engine supports many more characters onscreen at one time.

Brownesque

Look at the screens. Every single one looks awful.

Look at what I posted. I'm not talking about textures or polygons.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#59 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

Well, it was supposed to be an expansion with a shorter length and all, so I imagine upgrading it to real game status might have made people expect more. Still, I was never expecting anything too new anyways, but I'll still play it. Jeez, its not lke Halo is a deep shooter or anything, its just arcadey fun is all.

Avatar image for diecasualdie
diecasualdie

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 diecasualdie
Member since 2009 • 39 Posts
HALO! One of the most recognisable and popular franchises the videogames world has ever seen. In terms of overall quality, it SHOULD be up there with Gears and Killzone2, not limping along at 640p /thread ^ halo odst=suck
Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

This guy can't even spell correctly. :lol: What a professional journalist.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Leejjohno"]

Doesn't make his opinion worth any less that any other reviewer.

Leejjohno

Yes it does.He hasn't proven to anyone that he's trustworthy at all.

Why would he sacrifice his integrity just for the sake of being a fanboy?

Maybe because he had none to begin with. That's why trust is important. You don't know.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

yeah, those pics look pretty terrible.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#64 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="WAIW"] What does it matter if they do or do not?WAIW

The quote acts as if ODST will be horrible running at sub 720p resolution when Halo 3 ran at sub 720p resolution and it was just fine. Like I said, it's a silly complaint.

"...regardless of what the gameplay is like, we reckon a 'triple A' franchise deserves 'triple A' technology."

As trivial as it may sound (and, I think, is) to some, it's a perfectly reasonable complaint. He wants one of the most popular series ever to take full advantage of modern hardware. Sure, why not.

It's a silly complaint because as a so called journalist he would know that the game is being made using the Halo 3 engine. Why would you expect something that shouldn't be there? ODST is basically a modified expansion to Halo 3. That's like expecting a Gears of War expansion using the Unreal engine to look like Crysis because the game is popular.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
Here is a pic.
Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

Did you write that article?

heretrix

LMAO. That's quite likely.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

I don't trust this at all, but seriously, I thought the graphics looked really good from the screens, and much improved over Halo 3. Anyways I don't use HD past 420p so I'm all good with that.

Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

Here is a pic. killzowned24

Does posting bad ODST screenshots make you feel better?

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

Article about a fake interview is what I find underwhelming.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Here is a pic. EndorphinMaster

Does posting bad ODST screenshots make you feel better?

Considering they're all bad, yes.
Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

Article about a fake interview is what I find underwhelming.

vaderhater

This reminds me so much of how PSU faked the interview with Valve.

Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#72 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
No comment until a journalist or game website that I know of says it.
Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Here is a pic. killzowned24

Does posting bad ODST screenshots make you feel better?

Considering they're all bad, yes.

These screens mean nothing. Everything looks better in motion, always. I mean, I look at this screen and say "Yuck!", but when actually playing Halo, it looks great. Gamepsot needs embed videos...
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Here is a pic. Brownesque

Does posting bad ODST screenshots make you feel better?

Considering they're all bad, yes.

They're not bad at all. I suppose one could make the case for average, but in all honesty those pictures are fine.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#75 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Here is a pic.killzowned24
Why are you posting screnshots where there has already been better looking video shown? Hell, the off screen stuff at E3 looks better than that.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Here is a pic.heretrix

Why are you posting screnshots where there has already been better looking video shown? Hell, the off screen stuff at E3 looks better than that.

Because according to the website hosting those screens, they're direct grabs. Meaning that should be the only objective look at how the game is short of a 720p gameplay video.
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

Article about a fake interview is what I find underwhelming.

EndorphinMaster

This reminds me so much of how PSU faked the interview with Valve.

Why is it that a major site felt the need to lie for the PS3?

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Here is a pic.Brownesque

Why are you posting screnshots where there has already been better looking video shown? Hell, the off screen stuff at E3 looks better than that.

Because according to the website hosting those screens, they're direct grabs. Meaning that should be the only objective look at how the game is short of a 720p gameplay video.

How does that change anything? The videos I've seen look better than that.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="heretrix"]Why are you posting screnshots where there has already been better looking video shown? Hell, the off screen stuff at E3 looks better than that.

heretrix

Because according to the website hosting those screens, they're direct grabs. Meaning that should be the only objective look at how the game is short of a 720p gameplay video.

How does that change anything? The videos I've seen look better than that.

You just said you saw an off-screen video. Have you seen 720p direct feed gameplay footage?
Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

Article about a fake interview is what I find underwhelming.

vaderhater

This reminds me so much of how PSU faked the interview with Valve.

Why is it that a major site felt the need to lie for the PS3?

No idea. It's terribly sad really. I can only imagine how wildly some fanboys would go with the conspiracy theory if an Xbox site does that. :P

Avatar image for mohfrontline
mohfrontline

5678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#81 mohfrontline
Member since 2007 • 5678 Posts
the game doesn't look that good if you ask me. Game looks like a cartoon, everything has an outline on it. Other than that, it's Halo 3 all over again. I'll pass
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

all i know is that the 22nd ill be going to gamestops midnight release geting my copy and my code for SGT johnson, and going home and playing it coop 4 players with 3 of my friends from meijer.

All i know is i will have more fun with this game then any ps3 game i've played.

Avatar image for blank33
blank33

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 blank33
Member since 2005 • 1896 Posts

Well, Half-Life 2 has dated graphics, but I play it all the time. I wouldn't care if Episode 3 looked exactly the same.

Considering I don't know what this guy is talking about, other than graphics, I won't let it bother me.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#84 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Brownesque"] Because according to the website hosting those screens, they're direct grabs. Meaning that should be the only objective look at how the game is short of a 720p gameplay video.Brownesque

How does that change anything? The videos I've seen look better than that.

You just said you saw an off-screen video. Have you seen 720p direct feed gameplay footage?

Yes. There have been viddocs available for quite awhile.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="heretrix"]How does that change anything? The videos I've seen look better than that.

heretrix

You just said you saw an off-screen video. Have you seen 720p direct feed gameplay footage?

Yes. There have been viddocs available for quite awhile.

Can you show me?
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts
the game doesn't look that good if you ask me. Game looks like a cartoon, everything has an outline on it. Other than that, it's Halo 3 all over again. I'll passmohfrontline
If by "Halo 3 all over again" then I'm definately NOT going to pass.
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

I like how cows are flocking to this review calling it gospel. Sort of like when Game Critics game Halo 3 a 7.0. It's like if something Halo related scores high it's called "teh biased" or "they were payed by M$". But when someone gives it a low score it's "teh honesty".:roll:

Avatar image for bronxxbombers
bronxxbombers

2840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 bronxxbombers
Member since 2009 • 2840 Posts
LOL. It's sad when the only thing a reviewer can find wrong about the game is graphics. Then he has to say the games terrible because of it.
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

Here is a pic.  killzowned24

Ewwww....that looks really bad. If I was a massive Halo fan, I'd be quite frustrated. But Halo fans can always wait for Halo Reach. Just wait...

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

well, personally trust kotaku more than a "source" who stated the game was underwhelming.

http://kotaku.com/5356366/halo-3-odst-campaign-impressions-the-tension-bungie-built

Avatar image for Metalscarz
Metalscarz

1019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Metalscarz
Member since 2004 • 1019 Posts

[QUOTE="charomid"]

[QUOTE="TheArmyGuy48"] you mean......Gran Turismo 5? the game in which the highest selling installment of halo has only matched the lowest selling GT game? and every first iteration each gen of gran turismo has outscored every halo game on gamerankings also. Lol, at getting personal with me...."Cow".....my e-feelings am hurt. I am a cow, lol, I didnt need you to point that out to me so what are you getting at? Lol, at how quickly lemmings get the claws out when someone talks about halo. Theres still lemmings that think halo is the best selling franchise ever.

EDIT: and LOL, at kotaku being COWS now, even though theyve been known for their 360 bias for years :roll:

I guess everyone who says something bad about 360 is a cow now

TheArmyGuy48

ummmmmm you gotta be kidding right? do u even know what the first halo scored? it got a 9.7/10!!!!! thats higher than any gran turismo game out there! even halo 3 scored a 9.5/10 which is higher than any gran turismo game out there as well. type it in on gamespot and you'll see what im talking about. even on your precious gamerankings, halo was given 95.45% while the highest gran turismo game was given 94.71%. next time find out the REAL answers before posting bs, because ppl will look to prove you wrong!

Gamerankings, GT outscored every halo. my bad, for not stating gamerankings and metacritic, which is the magority consensus.

WTF? On game rankigs Halo CE: has a score of 95.45 with 82 ****ing reviews. GT 1 the first GT on the list has a 94.71 with only 21 reviews. Metacritic has the best reviews Gran Turismo the first one with a 96. Halo :CE on Xbox has a 97. Strike 2. 1) You're wrong. 2) You try way to hard to spin for Sony. Hope they give you a check.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#92 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Brownesque"] You just said you saw an off-screen video. Have you seen 720p direct feed gameplay footage?Brownesque

Yes. There have been viddocs available for quite awhile.

Can you show me?

No. I'm sure you know how to use the internet.

Avatar image for whatisazerg
whatisazerg

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 whatisazerg
Member since 2009 • 2371 Posts

I read the 1st paragraph and came to the realization that this "guy" is not a fan of Halo, and a total graphics whore. He just keeps complaining about the game looking the same as Halo3, its on the same engine.... WAH WAH WAH!

Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
I could start a blog, and "review" KZ2, completely trash it, and it'll have the same effect as this so-called, "review".
Avatar image for Tht1Guy7780
Tht1Guy7780

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Tht1Guy7780
Member since 2009 • 1277 Posts

If this "reviewer" gets paid, then I really think he needs to get the boot. He's among one of the worst I've heard and has some personal issues with Halo in general. He didn't go in as an open reviewer, thus he wasn't doing his job, if this is a real, paid, reviewer.

BioShockOwnz

Jim Sterling of Destructoid is still worse. I love Destructoid by I can inly take so much of his stupid caption jokes, weird headline pictures, and perverse nature.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

all they're pretty much talking about is the graphics... what about the actual gameplay?

ogvampire

I was thinking the same thing, sounded pretty biased imo.

Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts
Looks like an average game for an average system.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts

He is a Cow like you, that explains it, sorry Kotaku is saying its going to be a great game. It sure will outsell anything on the PS3 thats for sure...

PrimusGears
Selling well dosent make it a good game, it will be a low quality rehash of Halo 3. Whats really bad is Bungie can keep putting this low quality crap and people make it a success by buying it.
Avatar image for Tht1Guy7780
Tht1Guy7780

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Tht1Guy7780
Member since 2009 • 1277 Posts

[QUOTE="PrimusGears"]

He is a Cow like you, that explains it, sorry Kotaku is saying its going to be a great game. It sure will outsell anything on the PS3 thats for sure...

djsifer01

Selling well dosent make it a good game, it will be a low quality rehash of Halo 3.

You played it???

How was it??

Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

[QUOTE="PrimusGears"]

He is a Cow like you, that explains it, sorry Kotaku is saying its going to be a great game. It sure will outsell anything on the PS3 thats for sure...

djsifer01

Selling well dosent make it a good game, it will be a low quality rehash of Halo 3.

I'm sure you'll feel better if you keep telling yourself that.