• 160 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for battalionwars13
battalionwars13

1264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#101 battalionwars13
Member since 2007 • 1264 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW
I truly hope not. Physical copy > Digital copy
Avatar image for Meowmixxvi
Meowmixxvi

2243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#102 Meowmixxvi
Member since 2008 • 2243 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW
sorry i prefer hard copies. i dont want to have to download my games after i reformat lol.
Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

Pixel-Pirate

It took DVD a long time to overcome VHS sales. DVD was introduced in 1995-96 yet didn't finally overtake VHS sales until 2003. Was VHS really better format than DVD?

It is still 5-10 years before DD starts taking off due to internet speeds and storage capacities become cheaper

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

Vasichko

You forgetting that over half of the US doesnt have highspeed internet. Disc format will be around for quite sometime.

Next generation, if games all use Blu-ray and intentionally fill up the disc to 25gb-50gb just because they can (like many PS3 exclusives do), the prospect of downloading the games digitally may not seem so appealing.

Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="Vasichko"][QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

SakusEnvoy

You forgetting that over half of the US doesnt have highspeed internet. Disc format will be around for quite sometime.

Next generation, if games all use Blu-ray and intentionally fill up the disc to 25gb-50gb just because they can (like many PS3 exclusives do), the prospect of downloading the games digitally may not seem so appealing.

compressing of the downloads and extracting/installing onto hdd will be the key
Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts

DVD9s are fine. At least on real gaming platforms...

Sony could have just put a nice hdd in the ps3 and have strait installs. It would have much fatser loading, and it would have made th2 ps3 200 bucks cheapr at launch.

Avatar image for Vasichko
Vasichko

2565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Vasichko
Member since 2004 • 2565 Posts
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

And yet DVD is still the leading media format.

Go fig.

II_Seraphim_II
In all fairness, when DVDs were introduced, they didn't become the leading platform in a single day. It took time for people get past VHS, and buy a DVD player. Same applies for Blu-Ray, in due time it will overrun DVD and everyone will have cheap BR-Drives and BR-Players.

Yeah DVD players over took VHS players in homes about 2-3 years ago. So it took about 10-12 years. Good luck with DD becoming the standard. Wont happen. Would suck to have something crash and you might not have it backed up and you have to re-DL everything again.
Avatar image for ihazfishsticks
ihazfishsticks

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 ihazfishsticks
Member since 2010 • 69 Posts
So why didn't they just use 2 discs? It's my understanding that when you pay MSFT for the rights to publish a title on their system, they allow you to put the game on 2-discs for no extra fee. It's only after the 2nd disc that they charge you more to release the title. Isn't that the reason iD said that Rage was going to be 2 discs? So I don't see what Capcom's problem is. Maybe they're just wanting to be lazy and not code the game in a way that it will only take 1 disc swap?
Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

I also have to disagree with the comment that Blu-ray discs will be replaced by a bigger, better physical disc format within the decade...

Blu-ray discs have the advantage of having an open-ended storage limit, and most Blu-Ray players on the market are upgradeable through firmware updates. Hitachi has claimed a 100GB Blu-ray disc which is readable on standard Blu-ray Disc drives; Pioneer created a 400 GB Blu-Ray disc which will be compatible with current players.

That's not to say that bigger discs than BR players are capable of reading won't exist, but there's little reason to doubt that Blu-ray may well be the last physical disc storage medium we need for a long, long time.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#110 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Look, I know what you're saying. You have a good point and all, but I'm still not sure what the bigger and better format would be since BluRay will go up to 200GBs. It is far more likely that the next-gen systems will all have BluRay drives in them or some derivative technology (like, I could totally see Nintendo going with that Chinese BluRay format or something along those lines).

The real point here is that BluRay is turning into an advantage for games during this generation. A lot of people said it would be completely unecessary but they are getting proven wrong time and again. Sony was clairvoyant in this regard. There's no denying that.

Fuhgeddabouditt

I believe a format is already being worked on that stores between 800 gb to 1 TB.

Bluray is nice but I don't feel it was worth it for sony. It's cost raised the PS3's cost which cost them alot of sales and took them from 1st place to 3rd in one generation all for the convenience of not having to switch a disc? I don't really see the big problem with switching a disc out, you know back in the PS1 era we sometimes had to switch between 4 discs! My God! 4! How we didn't strain our muscles and run out of breath having to swap a disc out is beyond me!

CD was a big jump from cartridges because you can't really have a two cart game (I've never seen one) but you can have a 4 CD game.

wow, more useless crap to get consumers all giddy and happy. 800GB to 1TB, why would I want that knowing not even this or nex gen game will take full advantage of it, or if ever?

I often ask myself why I should want Bluray when my TV cannot take advantage of it.

I'm honestly still not convinced bluray will replace DVD anytime soon. Maybe in 3 to 5 years but within the year? I really doubt it.

Avatar image for JunkTrap
JunkTrap

2640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 JunkTrap
Member since 2006 • 2640 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW
Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

JunkTrap

Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:

cmon now, i think we can all realize the outcome of the psp go is a piss poor representation of DD only, on a game platform

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

[QUOTE="JunkTrap"][QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

kidcool189

Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:

cmon now, i think we can all realize the outcome of the psp go is a piss poor representation of DD only, on a game platform

No hes right, ppl dissing Blu Ray and claiming DD is better are just plain wrong about this matter, we aren't rdy for DD only on consoles yet, we need a physical media format and that's Blu Ray.
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#114 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

Why don't they just put it on 2 discs?

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#115 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"] and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

CajunShooter

It took DVD a long time to overcome VHS sales. DVD was introduced in 1995-96 yet didn't finally overtake VHS sales until 2003. Was VHS really better format than DVD?

It is still 5-10 years before DD starts taking off due to internet speeds and storage capacities become cheaper

I had never seen a DVD in stores or heard of one untill around 1999-2000. Shortly after I heard of it it seemed to quickly catch fire. I've known of bluray for several years now.

I personally won't go bluray until such time as I am forced to because DVD is no longer sold. Mainly because it doesn't seem worth it to me.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW

Hardcopies will never be replaced. THey will always be around no matter if its cd based or ssd..

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

[QUOTE="JunkTrap"][QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

kidcool189

Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:

cmon now, i think we can all realize the outcome of the psp go is a piss poor representation of DD only, on a game platform

I highly disagree. Having a discless/cartridgeless mobile gaming platform seems ideal.

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

They should sell games in a Solid-State Disk, like an SD card or something like that. Go into the shop, where they will have an work-station class SSD with the data on it. Buy the data, which is then transferred onto the SD. Off you go!

Probably will take a few years or so before that happens, but whatever....

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

And yet DVD is still the leading media format.

Go fig.

Pixel-Pirate

The lead format of failing gamers.

:roll:

DVD based games are still more widely used than bluray (I don't believe anyone uses it besides sony for the PS3) and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

And by the time that better format is out, it won't be as affordable or as wide spread as bluray.

Although I highly doubt we are going to launch very far beyond bluray.

Avatar image for CPM_basic
CPM_basic

4247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 CPM_basic
Member since 2002 • 4247 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW

lol so true!! Steam like services are the future... well it's not so high tech anymore since us PC users have been experiencing it for so long. Next gen console users will probably be experiencing something very similar to Steam. Hell on 360 right now you can purchase full games though digital download instead of buying them in store. Same thing goes with movies... except they will be streamed. Blue-ray is not the future.

They should sell games in a Solid-State Disk, like an SD card or something like that. Go into the shop, where they will have an work-station class SSD with the data on it. Buy the data, which is then transferred onto the SD. Off you go!


Probably will take a few years or so before that happens, but whatever....

siddhu33

This idea would work. It would be perfect for all the people with download caps. Not only that there will be no more "sold out" games. No more waiting in line for your favorite games. No more having to reserve copies. Buy games whenever you want/ whatever you want. It would just have to be HYPER secure to prevent privacy. I could see people being given a CD-key of sorts... also all next gen consoles should have a 3g connection or atleast a simple one so that they can authenticate your CD-key online even if you don't have internet in your area.

Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="kidcool189"]

[QUOTE="JunkTrap"] Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:Shewgenja

cmon now, i think we can all realize the outcome of the psp go is a piss poor representation of DD only, on a game platform

I highly disagree. Having a discless/cartridgeless mobile gaming platform seems ideal.

thats what i was implying i meant, you shouldnt judge a DD-only platform based off the psp go's lack of success
Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

:roll:

DVD based games are still more widely used than bluray (I don't believe anyone uses it besides sony for the PS3) and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

Shewgenja

Look, I know what you're saying. You have a good point and all, but I'm still not sure what the bigger and better format would be since BluRay will go up to 200GBs. It is far more likely that the next-gen systems will all have BluRay drives in them or some derivative technology (like, I could totally see Nintendo going with that Chinese BluRay format or something along those lines).

The real point here is that BluRay is turning into an advantage for games during this generation. A lot of people said it would be completely unecessary but they are getting proven wrong time and again. Sony was clairvoyant in this regard. There's no denying that.

Installs will outstrip disc based games, simple fact its faster to load and access! All games should be full installs ^^
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Fuhgeddabouditt"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

I believe a format is already being worked on that stores between 800 gb to 1 TB.

Bluray is nice but I don't feel it was worth it for sony. It's cost raised the PS3's cost which cost them alot of sales and took them from 1st place to 3rd in one generation all for the convenience of not having to switch a disc? I don't really see the big problem with switching a disc out, you know back in the PS1 era we sometimes had to switch between 4 discs! My God! 4! How we didn't strain our muscles and run out of breath having to swap a disc out is beyond me!

CD was a big jump from cartridges because you can't really have a two cart game (I've never seen one) but you can have a 4 CD game.

Pixel-Pirate

wow, more useless crap to get consumers all giddy and happy. 800GB to 1TB, why would I want that knowing not even this or nex gen game will take full advantage of it, or if ever?

I often ask myself why I should want Bluray when my TV cannot take advantage of it.

I'm honestly still not convinced bluray will replace DVD anytime soon. Maybe in 3 to 5 years but within the year? I really doubt it.

How about an entire TV series (perhaps even multiple seasons) on one disc? They'd still be in SD format (since the TV shows are in that format), but you'd be able to hold a lot more of them.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

:roll:

DVD based games are still more widely used than bluray (I don't believe anyone uses it besides sony for the PS3) and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

toxicmog

Look, I know what you're saying. You have a good point and all, but I'm still not sure what the bigger and better format would be since BluRay will go up to 200GBs. It is far more likely that the next-gen systems will all have BluRay drives in them or some derivative technology (like, I could totally see Nintendo going with that Chinese BluRay format or something along those lines).

The real point here is that BluRay is turning into an advantage for games during this generation. A lot of people said it would be completely unecessary but they are getting proven wrong time and again. Sony was clairvoyant in this regard. There's no denying that.

Installs will outstrip disc based games, simple fact its faster to load and access! All games should be full installs ^^

Until the games themselves take up multiple GB of data. Install a bunch of them and you soon realize your hard drive space is beginning to dwindle (take this from a Steam user). And those downloads took time; furthermore, don't expect the console makers to endorse external backups just yet (blame their piracy paranoia). Not to mention a lot of people aren't even on the net (some don't even have dialup; think about that). Why alienate the non-connected audience?
Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="kidcool189"]

[QUOTE="JunkTrap"] Yea because PSP Go! is such a success :roll:Eddie-Vedder

cmon now, i think we can all realize the outcome of the psp go is a piss poor representation of DD only, on a game platform

No hes right, ppl dissing Blu Ray and claiming DD is better are just plain wrong about this matter, we aren't rdy for DD only on consoles yet, we need a physical media format and that's Blu Ray.

DD will fail on consoles anyways because it'll reveal the harsh truth about the closed console style of business: console companies rape consumers' wallets

currently having physical medium that they can't control after it's sold at retail masks this

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

Owning a physical copy is power. Consumers should never let that be taken away from them.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

:roll:

DVD based games are still more widely used than bluray (I don't believe anyone uses it besides sony for the PS3) and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

Pixel-Pirate

Look, I know what you're saying. You have a good point and all, but I'm still not sure what the bigger and better format would be since BluRay will go up to 200GBs. It is far more likely that the next-gen systems will all have BluRay drives in them or some derivative technology (like, I could totally see Nintendo going with that Chinese BluRay format or something along those lines).

The real point here is that BluRay is turning into an advantage for games during this generation. A lot of people said it would be completely unecessary but they are getting proven wrong time and again. Sony was clairvoyant in this regard. There's no denying that.

I believe a format is already being worked on that stores between 800 gb to 1 TB.

Bluray is nice but I don't feel it was worth it for sony. It's cost raised the PS3's cost which cost them alot of sales and took them from 1st place to 3rd in one generation all for the convenience of not having to switch a disc? I don't really see the big problem with switching a disc out, you know back in the PS1 era we sometimes had to switch between 4 discs! My God! 4! How we didn't strain our muscles and run out of breath having to swap a disc out is beyond me!

CD was a big jump from cartridges because you can't really have a two cart game (I've never seen one) but you can have a 4 CD game.

Thats business, you WILL! lose money and spend money to make money. Sony did take a hit on the PS3, but it's working forSony now. Sony thought ahead, Microsoft didnt. All I'm saying is you have to spend money to make money.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

Owning a physical copy is power. Consumers should never let that be taken away from them.

hakanakumono

That's wuz up!!! I'm 100% for physical copies, but the way you put it is like, dayum!!!

Avatar image for ItsBriskBaby
ItsBriskBaby

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 ItsBriskBaby
Member since 2007 • 1748 Posts

Wanna hear something funny? I don't even use my dvd drive in my PC, because all my games are digital, that is the future, not blu-ray

DoomZaW

You know how stupid that sounds! Anything that is stored on a Disc or downloaded is digital. They use the 1's and 0's method to store and send data.

Avatar image for ChiChiMonKilla
ChiChiMonKilla

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 ChiChiMonKilla
Member since 2007 • 2339 Posts

DVD is dying but it's not dead it would have been better if the 360 used hd-dvd or blu-ray but the 360 came out 1 year before the ps3.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#131 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I won't argue that HDD for gaming > all, I though you were saying DVD > Blu Ray like some other poster was which is just lol worthy, Blu Ray is just the next logical step in disc media format. I'm not sure if will ever see full install on consoles tho, that sounds like a pirates dream, I honestly think Blu Ray and then whatever media disk format comes next will be the future on consoles. PC is a diferent beast, all it's games are fully installed, there really is no need to move over to Blu Ray right now, but that's not the case on consoles, consoles run the games off the disc so it makes a lot more sense evolve that aging dvd format. And Dev's are having more and more probs with the limitations of the DVD format, Blu Ray is getting better and better, in the begining EVERY game had an install, now hardly any of them do, and even if they do who cares, if it makes the game run better...

Eddie-Vedder


HDD's are going to be standard next generation, as is most likely full-blown HDD installation, just like the PC (the benefits of installation are incredible over media streaming). You'll still need the disc to run it (or be logged into the account it was activated on for DD games) but as far as distribution goes, DVD will remain cheaper and easier than Blu-ray. I'm not arguing that DVD is a better physical format than Blu-ray, you are strawmaning my argument, I am saying that as a format FOR GAMING, Blu-ray has little worth. Which is true, except to those who deny it.

Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#132 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

That's just Capcom.

The same Capcom that released overpriced DLC on nearly every game they've released this gen. I find it hard to believe that LP2 couldn't fit on a single disc when games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and ToV came on a single disc and had campaigns that were over 30 hours.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#133 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

[...] games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and ToV came on a single disc and had campaigns that were over 30 hours.

SpinoRaptor24


Campaigns and total content nearing 100 hours in the case of Oblivion. Not to mention full voice acting.

Avatar image for TheDogout
TheDogout

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 TheDogout
Member since 2010 • 807 Posts

Jeez, so what if a game has more than 1 disc. Gamers are getting so lazy. You want a laser beam that can scratch your a* from space too?

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"][...] games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and ToV came on a single disc and had campaigns that were over 30 hours.

foxhound_fox


Campaigns and total content nearing 100 hours in the case of Oblivion. Not to mention full voice acting.

But to be fair, you can counter with the fact that the environments aren't that unique when you travel from place to place (this is true with ES4 and with FO3). It's likely that if each region of the game map required a significantly different architectural design, not only would the development costs (in time and money) go up but so also would the necessary space since there are more unique resources.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] I won't argue that HDD for gaming > all, I though you were saying DVD > Blu Ray like some other poster was which is just lol worthy, Blu Ray is just the next logical step in disc media format. I'm not sure if will ever see full install on consoles tho, that sounds like a pirates dream, I honestly think Blu Ray and then whatever media disk format comes next will be the future on consoles. PC is a diferent beast, all it's games are fully installed, there really is no need to move over to Blu Ray right now, but that's not the case on consoles, consoles run the games off the disc so it makes a lot more sense evolve that aging dvd format. And Dev's are having more and more probs with the limitations of the DVD format, Blu Ray is getting better and better, in the begining EVERY game had an install, now hardly any of them do, and even if they do who cares, if it makes the game run better...

foxhound_fox


HDD's are going to be standard next generation, as is most likely full-blown HDD installation, just like the PC (the benefits of installation are incredible over media streaming). You'll still need the disc to run it (or be logged into the account it was activated on for DD games) but as far as distribution goes, DVD will remain cheaper and easier than Blu-ray. I'm not arguing that DVD is a better physical format than Blu-ray, you are strawmaning my argument, I am saying that as a format FOR GAMING, Blu-ray has little worth. Which is true, except to those who deny it.

If games get bigger next gen, then even hard drives won't be able to keep up. I filled up half my hard drive on Steam installs, and I consider my library only of medium size (close to 30 games)--not all of which are big hulking beasts like Witcher. I can certainly see installations still available as an option, like it is on the 360, but the norm? Unlikely since people complain now about their hard drives not being big enough. Trust me--hard drives are never big enough.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#137 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

well for games dvd may be dead but movies, i just dont see that possible oh and wii , practically because of focus on hd the other systems need more space , thus why nintendo waited ,, and will probably use bigger disc next gen at half the price, lol while ms is still lacking behind

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#138 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

If games get bigger next gen, then even hard drives won't be able to keep up. I filled up half my hard drive on Steam installs, and I consider my library only of medium size (close to 30 games)--not all of which are big hulking beasts like Witcher. I can certainly see installations still available as an option, like it is on the 360, but the norm? Unlikely since people complain now about their hard drives not being big enough. Trust me--hard drives are never big enough.

HuusAsking


You can buy 2TB (terabyte) portable HDD's for $150 now. I don't see how HDD storage space is "expensive." I think you haven't looked at the price of HDD's recently... their manufacturing costs have dwindled quite rapidly. They are actually more affordable storage per megabyte than physical media now.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]If games get bigger next gen, then even hard drives won't be able to keep up. I filled up half my hard drive on Steam installs, and I consider my library only of medium size (close to 30 games)--not all of which are big hulking beasts like Witcher. I can certainly see installations still available as an option, like it is on the 360, but the norm? Unlikely since people complain now about their hard drives not being big enough. Trust me--hard drives are never big enough.

foxhound_fox


You can buy 2TB (terabyte) portable HDD's for $150 now. I don't see how HDD storage space is "expensive." I think you haven't looked at the price of HDD's recently... their manufacturing costs have dwindled quite rapidly. They are actually more affordable storage per megabyte than physical media now.

My current hard drive is a 1TB, and like I said, my library isn't what one would consider very large. Then there's the matter of reliability. At least with optical drives, the drives may break but the discs generally maintain their integrity--replace the drive and you're back in business. There generally isn't a practical way to back up 2TB of hard drive data apart from another hard drive. You wanna be on the other end of a caller whose TB or so of downloads just went kaput?

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

:roll:

DVD based games are still more widely used than bluray (I don't believe anyone uses it besides sony for the PS3) and I'm pretty sure DVD movies still outsell Bluray.

Bluray is taking an awful long time to become the media standard it wants to think it is. By the time it makes it, a new larger and better format will be out.

Shewgenja

Look, I know what you're saying. You have a good point and all, but I'm still not sure what the bigger and better format would be since BluRay will go up to 200GBs. It is far more likely that the next-gen systems will all have BluRay drives in them or some derivative technology (like, I could totally see Nintendo going with that Chinese BluRay format or something along those lines).

The real point here is that BluRay is turning into an advantage for games during this generation. A lot of people said it would be completely unecessary but they are getting proven wrong time and again. Sony was clairvoyant in this regard. There's no denying that.

nope. We aren't anywhere close to the 14 or so floppy discs some PCs used. Woah, 4 DVD discs? Sounds like when the PS1 had to use 3-4 CDs for some of its games.

5 is pushing it, and an Xbox 360 exclusive did 4, FFXIII only made it to 3 and NOTHING stopped Capcom from using 2, because common sense wasn't around that day.

Blu-Ray can hit 400 Gb BTW, but thanks for half-assing your research. it fits with the rest of your argument.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"][...] games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and ToV came on a single disc and had campaigns that were over 30 hours.

foxhound_fox


Campaigns and total content nearing 100 hours in the case of Oblivion. Not to mention full voice acting.

+GTA IV which barely broke 3/4 of a disc.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"][...] games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and ToV came on a single disc and had campaigns that were over 30 hours.

HavocV3


Campaigns and total content nearing 100 hours in the case of Oblivion. Not to mention full voice acting.

+GTA IV which barely broke 3/4 of a disc.

And yet had a few things missing that kept it from being a mostly-authentic facsimile of New York. For one thing, where was the analogue to Staten Island? It kinda makes you ask why it was left out.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"] my PC probably outbenches yours by a mile delta3074
so, my dads bigger than your dad,lol your PC being more powerful than verge's doesn't make you less of a fanboy, may as well compare **** sizes at an IQ contest,lol

lmao, now browsing this thread really became worthwhile. the laugh was at least.

RIP TC.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Mass Effect 2 is one of the biggest, best-looking, most technically impressive, most complete and varied games ever, and it needs (teh horror) two DVDs. As long as most games fit in one, and games like ME2 needs only two, DVDs are far, far away from "dead".
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
If they had that much extra content, they could have easily put it on a second disc. They know what they were dealing with from the start, and here they're acting suprised. Do they really expect us to believe they didn't know how big their game was? This is just an excuse for them to milk gamers...Nothing more.
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"]If they had that much extra content, they could have easily put it on a second disc. They know what they were dealing with from the start, and here they're acting suprised. Do they really expect us to believe they didn't know how big their game was? This is just an excuse for them to milk gamers...Nothing more.

Do you work for Capcom? How can you be so sure your theory is right?
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"]If they had that much extra content, they could have easily put it on a second disc. They know what they were dealing with from the start, and here they're acting suprised. Do they really expect us to believe they didn't know how big their game was? This is just an excuse for them to milk gamers...Nothing more.TintedEyes
Do you work for Capcom? How can you be so sure your theory is right?

Logic, dude... Simple logic. If you were making a game, you'd know how big it was, right? You wouldn't act surprised if it didn't fit on a DVD, because you'd always know how big the files were. So, you'd see this, and plan for a second disc. It costs Capcom nothing to put the game on a second disc. MS charges royalties after the second disc. So, why would they not put it on a second disc? Or rather, why would they when they can make even more money off of it? Simple, really.
Avatar image for 210189677155857843583653671808
210189677155857843583653671808

748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 210189677155857843583653671808
Member since 2006 • 748 Posts

If this is really the case - the real question should be; will all the DLC that cannot fit on DVD9 be on the PS3 version of the game as standard.

I think Capcom and its big mouth will cause its self a lot of problems with this revelation.

They have no real excuse not to include the DLC fro FREE as standard for PS3 users and it would be unfair to charge 360 owners for it. I mean if the DLC was originally part of the game, the DLC is already technically paid for it you decide to buy the game.

If they don't include it on a blu-ray and charge PS3 users for the DLC they will lose credibility and be accused of just milking gamers.

If the content is not released as standard on the PS3 it will also bring back the argument that the 360 is holding back development of the PS3 .

Changing discs was not a problem back when I had a PS1, I doubt it will be much of a problem now. This is the kind of topic that should bring system wars together, because in this case if the 360 suffers the PS3 suffers also.

Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="anthonydwyer"]

If this is really the case - the real question should be; will all the DLC that cannot fit on DVD9 be on the PS3 version of the game as standard.

I think Capcom and its big mouth will cause its self a lot of problems with this revelation.

They have no real excuse not to include the DLC fro FREE as standard for PS3 users and it would be unfair to charge 360 owners for it. I mean if the DLC was originally part of the game, the DLC is already technically paid for it you decide to buy the game.

If they don't include it on a blu-ray and charge PS3 users for the DLC they will lose credibility and be accused of just milking gamers.

If the content is not released as standard on the PS3 it will also bring back the argument that the 360 is holding back development of the PS3 .

Changing discs was not a problem back when I had a PS1, I doubt it will be much of a problem now. This is the kind of topic that should bring system wars together, because in this case if the 360 suffers the PS3 suffers also.

How is the 360 holding back the PS3 when they could easily put the cut content on a second disc? It is painfully obvious this is out of greed, not limitation.
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="anthonydwyer"]

If this is really the case - the real question should be; will all the DLC that cannot fit on DVD9 be on the PS3 version of the game as standard.

I think Capcom and its big mouth will cause its self a lot of problems with this revelation.

They have no real excuse not to include the DLC fro FREE as standard for PS3 users and it would be unfair to charge 360 owners for it. I mean if the DLC was originally part of the game, the DLC is already technically paid for it you decide to buy the game.

If they don't include it on a blu-ray and charge PS3 users for the DLC they will lose credibility and be accused of just milking gamers.

If the content is not released as standard on the PS3 it will also bring back the argument that the 360 is holding back development of the PS3 .

Changing discs was not a problem back when I had a PS1, I doubt it will be much of a problem now. This is the kind of topic that should bring system wars together, because in this case if the 360 suffers the PS3 suffers also.

How is the 360 holding back the PS3 when they could easily put the cut content on a second disc? It is painfully obvious this is out of greed, not limitation.

Apparently it costs money to put it on a second disc.