[QUOTE="lild1425"]
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]The thing is, what consumers want is a little bit more important than what developers and publishers want. Consumers are the ones buying the games and putting money into the hands of the people making and selling the games. Publishers needs consumers way more than consumers need publishers. Games aren't my job, they aren't what's putting food on my table, I have the luxury of just not buying them if I feel like my wants aren't being met. Shinobi120
Agree with bold statement #2. Consumers are the ones that buy the product. It's the wonderful thing of capitalism. Basically the game companies/publishers should be kissing our asses. It's our money that keeps them going and even creates the business market to begin with. I think sometimes companies forget that and that's when they see their profits hit the tank. If the public doesn't like what they're putting out, the publishers go bye bye.
However, I do feel bad for some devs. Some decent devs like Superbot and THQ have gone bankrupt/been sold. But $60 a game is asinine. I wait until they drop to $20 or less.
I also agree with both of you.
Plus anyone like Cranler who seriously thinks that the average consumer (or average gamer) is going to praise or buy a console that doesn't allow trading or borrowing games are as dumb as mud.
Where did i say consoles should block used games? I simply think Gamestop should either give a cut to the pub or sell used games for less.
Anyone who thinks consumers are going to buy a console that charges to play online are dumb as mud.
Log in to comment