Show me one pic of CONSOLE Crysis 2 that

Oh btw, play Crysis with 512 MB of RAM and tell me how good it looks. If you think Crytek is going to squeeze out even high-PC Crysis 1 graphics, you are out of your mind.Hahadouken

For starting you wont have to loose 600mb duo to Windows boot on consoles.Also you cant possibly compare console ram and PCs.Look at the most simple example,my old PC had 1gb or ram,6600gt and amd 3500+ and i ran San Andreas on high(1024x728,2xaa and i had 40fps with drops here and there) while ps2 had absolute sh** of gfx card,cpu was laughable outdated and 32 mb of ram,yes 32mb!And it still ran fine,yes low settings and all,but non the less it had 35 times less ram then my PC but it still ran it fine.

Now this consoles are much closer to PC in terms of power then they were in earlier gens.Both cpus will be able to do all the computing,physics a.i and such and cell will be left some for helping RSX.Both have 512 mb,while low for PCs it certainly will be enough for Crysis 2 if used correctly.Gpus are also good,xenos is good however you put it and RSX while Cevat said its low end compared to PC and 360 gpu it will get some help from Cell.

So again...you cant compare game on PC made for 10 billion hardware combinations and game optimized for fixed hardware.I can tell you that you could make better looking game then crysis on fixed hardware made of quad core,1gb of ram and 4850,no doubt about it.

Yes, Killzone 2 is an amazing looking game. I'd go as far as to say that it looks better than U2 and RE5, but it will not beat Crysis 2. Even the original Crysis is better looking than KZ2.

Yes, Killzone 2 is an amazing looking game. I'd go as far as to say that it looks better than U2 and RE5, but it will not beat Crysis 2. Even the original Crysis is better looking than KZ2.

brickdoctor

[QUOTE="brickdoctor"]

Yes, Killzone 2 is an amazing looking game. I'd go as far as to say that it looks better than U2 and RE5, but it will not beat Crysis 2. Even the original Crysis is better looking than KZ2.

GeneralShowzer

I dont see anything special that KZ2 is doing that Crysis 2 on consoles wont.

Deferred rendering(Crytek said up to 400 lightsources):checked

Better textures:checked

Real time global illumination(first on PC and consoles):checked

Bigger scale:checked

Procedular destruction:checked

we only have to wait if they gonna hit the art style,if they do,then its pretty much Crysis 2 consoles>KZ2 (as far as technicals go its already well known).

Maybe if you crank the texture down and exagerate the motion blur; cows would then be impressed?

Though I suppose nothing outside of a "PS3 exclusive" tag would make any visuals impressive to cows.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="brickdoctor"]

Yes, Killzone 2 is an amazing looking game. I'd go as far as to say that it looks better than U2 and RE5, but it will not beat Crysis 2. Even the original Crysis is better looking than KZ2.

Bus-A-Bus

I dont see anything special that KZ2 is doing that Crysis 2 on consoles wont.

Deferred rendering(Crytek said up to 400 lightsources):checked

Better textures:checked

Real time global illumination(first on PC and consoles):checked

Bigger scale:checked

Procedular destruction:checked

we only have to wait if they gonna hit the art style,if they do,then its pretty much Crysis 2 consoles>KZ2 (as far as technicals go its already well known).

Maybe if you crank the texture down and exagerate the motion blur; cows would then be impressed?

Though I suppose nothing outside of a "PS3 exclusive" tag would make any visuals impressive to cows.

AnnoyedDragon

You are absolutely on point.This is GG tech interview,you can see the stages of rendering and how game actually looks(textures,aa...)before adding motion blur and post processing.

Just look at 1:38.Before pp and motion blur its really nothing to brag about...

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tech-interview-killzone-2/43389

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] :D Crysis is the best looking game. You can't throw it in like that. And i believe this thread is whether console version Crysis 2 will look better than KZ2. We know about the PC version.GeneralShowzer

I dont see anything special that KZ2 is doing that Crysis 2 on consoles wont.

Deferred rendering(Crytek said up to 400 lightsources):checked

Better textures:checked

Real time global illumination(first on PC and consoles):checked

Bigger scale:checked

Procedular destruction:checked

we only have to wait if they gonna hit the art style,if they do,then its pretty much Crysis 2 consoles>KZ2 (as far as technicals go its already well known).

No,thats what they showed they are doing on consoles and what tech forums confirmed(b3d).All that i posted is on PC and consoles,if you think im wrong i would like to you to prove me wrong.

Edit.To save you the trouble,since im right and you cant prove me wrong,here it is :D

http://www.vis.uni-stuttgart.de/~dachsbcn/download/lpv.pdf

http://www.crytek.com/fileadmin/user_upload/inside/presentations/2009/Light_Propagation_Volumes.pdf (page 29,real time GI on consoles)

Straight from Crytek :P

*I cant post another pdf,gives me error,its about deferred lightning.

You are absolutely on point.This is GG tech interview,you can see the stages of rendering and how game actually looks(textures,aa...)before adding motion blur and post processing.

Just look at 1:38.Before pp and motion blur its really nothing to brag about...

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tech-interview-killzone-2/43389

Bus-A-Bus

I think a lot of games would look worse without their post processing, Killzone 2 just seems to rely on it to cover up the poor textures rather than to enhance the game.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

You are absolutely on point.This is GG tech interview,you can see the stages of rendering and how game actually looks(textures,aa...)before adding motion blur and post processing.

Just look at 1:38.Before pp and motion blur its really nothing to brag about...

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tech-interview-killzone-2/43389

AnnoyedDragon

I think a lot of games would look worse without their post processing, Killzone 2 just seems to rely on it to cover up the poor textures rather than to enhance the game.

Well thats what im saying,if Crysis or even UC2 was without pp it would look worse,but KZ2 heavily relies on it.

Actually TC i'd say Killzone 2 is the best looking PS3 game.racing1750

[QUOTE="Macutchi"]

[QUOTE="djsifer01"]There isnt any. Not only that, Crysis 2 wont touch Uncharted 2, KZ2 and GOW3 graphically. The PS3 will remain with the best looking console exclusives for the rest of this generation.Chutebox

/system wars

OT: You have the best avatar and second best sig on SW.

ta bro :D

like your sig too

that rocks looks very bad.funsohng

looks better than this. Please be honest when posting it. Keep in mind, this isn't even PS3s best looking game. Just thought I'd post this to everyone who swears up and down that the best looking console game won't be a PS3 exclusive. Remember folks, please be HONEST.

iKINGBOBi

God that looks bad. Is that really what console games look like ? How do you guys even say with a straight face that any console game beats a PC game. Just wow.

Silenthps

Crysis 2 is definitely looking good so far, but there are some pretty weird physics being displayed in those gifs. On a side note, the hate on KZ2 graphics are simply unwarranted, to this day I still rank it higher than UC2(or any other console game to date) on the visuals department.

[QUOTE="Shattered007"]This is what I expect even after Crysis 2 comes out and every major website's Preview/Review/Hands-on says it's the best looking console game(best looking game) when cows try and say "PS3 only does Best Graphics". It's sad really.vaderhater

So there will be no Uncharted 3 or Killzone 3? :P

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]

Crysis 2 isn't even finished yet man, isn't that a little unfair :(

iKINGBOBi

That doesn't stop posters here from saying it will be console graphics king, so I'm simply asking them to put their money where their mouth is.

Maybe if you crank the texture down and exagerate the motion blur; cows would then be impressed?

Though I suppose nothing outside of a "PS3 exclusive" tag would make any visuals impressive to cows.

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

[QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

you can do better than that right? where's the wow? cause I'm certainly not seeing it

chaplainDMK

Yes Killzone 2 is a fugly game.

Nice way of destroying your reputation here.

And Killzone 2 looks 10 times better in motion then in screens, because it has quite meh texture work but in motion they cover this up, and the motion blur, particle effects, animations, gun models and explosions are gorgeus.

But no way will it EVER beat PC Crysis, and there are a few other games on the PC that look better then KZ2.

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Is that surpose to be a rock or plastic bag in the bottom right corner, the texture is awful.

As far as i know there arent any Crysis 2 console screenshots is there? All the ones released are PC version? I may be wrong.

what about the rest of the pic:| no game has 100% graphical consistency

[QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Is that surpose to be a rock or plastic bag in the bottom right corner, the texture is awful.

As far as i know there arent any Crysis 2 console screenshots is there? All the ones released are PC version? I may be wrong.

clone01

what about the rest of the pic:| no game has 100% graphical consistency

there's a game that is unnamed that's better looking than anything on consoles by 10000000000 times

but i can't say the name or when it's coming out, you just gotta trust me

and it's exclusive to a platform, can't say which

...

now let the uberhype begin

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

what about the rest of the pic:| no game has 100% graphical consistency

88mphSlayer

there's a game that is unnamed that's better looking than anything on consoles by 10000000000 times

but i can't say the name or when it's coming out, you just gotta trust me

and it's exclusive to a platform, can't say which

...

now let the uberhype begin

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

welp, time to end this

/T

H

R

E

A

D

UncleLukex

indeed...

:D Oh snap

I consider myself a sane man so the only answer I can give is that KZ2 doesn't even come close.

[QUOTE="UncleLukex"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

welp, time to end this

/T

H

R

E

A

D

windsquid9000

indeed...

:D Oh snap

I consider myself a sane man so the only answer I can give is that KZ2 doesn't even come close.

I wish i knew how to locate gifs... :cry: Its beautiful...

also why is Crysis 2 on consoles more blury than KZ2 yet xbox360 fanboys and 360 fakeboys pretending to be hermetsare all over in Crysis 2 talking about how good it looks...the console versions that is?

Crysis 2 console...

Killzone 2 PS3

[QUOTE="UncleLukex"]

indeed...

:D Oh snap

I consider myself a sane man so the only answer I can give is that KZ2 doesn't even come close.

UncleLukex, not only that, but the Gif that your pasting is from 2007, meaning its a very old build of KZ2

also why is Crysis 2 on consoles more blury than KZ2

nope kz2 is the most technically impressive game ive seen on the ps3 it beats uncharted 2FILIPINOMAZTER

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I consider myself a sane man so the only answer I can give is that KZ2 doesn't even come close.

windsquid9000

[QUOTE="UncleLukex"]

also why is Crysis 2 on consoles more blury than KZ2

windsquid9000

Lol, I know what it's called...funny when xbox fanboys refereed to KZ2 it was just blur, now I guess you guys are educated on the matter since anther game you guys are hyping as graphics king is also using it...

[QUOTE="UncleLukex"]

also why is Crysis 2 on consoles more blury than KZ2 yet xbox360 fanboys and 360 fakeboys pretending to be hermetsare all over in Crysis 2 talking about how good it looks...the console versions that is?

Crysis 2 console...

Killzone 2 PS3

88mphSlayer

that Killzone 2 gif is actually from the 2007 pre-alpha build, which was before they spent a few years rebuilding the engine and re-doing a lot of the graphics

Killzone 2 definitely looks pretty decent in motion, mostly thanks to effects, but if people want to talk about graphics technology then you'd expect them to know better than to say Killzone 2 didn't take a lot of cheap ways out in order to achieve what it does (like exclusively using pre-baked lighting), or to diminish how capable Cryengine is... kinda failing graphics 101 if you ask me

Decent?! What is with this SW love for undervaluing KZ2's graphics!

The game is freaking astonishing. (I know, opinions, opinions blah blah blah!)

Also, were you saying KZ2 doesn't look as good as that gif?

I can't believe people are using off screen shots/gifs of an unfinished/unreleased game, let alone the game will probably look different from that on April 9th.

Off screen does not equal direct screen either.

Cryengine 3 gifs:

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] I don't see how you come to that conclusion from watching all those gifs, but whatev!Chutebox

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"] And I don't see how you could come to any other conclusion. C2 uses far superior tech (as demonstrated by the gifs) and has higher quality assets. Also, according to Crytek (I think it was Crytek), 3 screenshots have been released of the PS3 version- one of which I posted on the second page.windsquid9000

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="UncleLukex"]

also why is Crysis 2 on consoles more blury than KZ2

Lol, I know what it's called...funny when xbox fanboys refereed to KZ2 it was just blur, now I guess you guys are educated on the matter since anther game you guys are hyping as graphics king is also using it...