Sleeping Dogs: Xbox 360 takes another win aganist the PS3.

Xbox 360:

Resolution: 1200x720

AA Method: FXAA

Anisotropic Filtering: Unknown Level but Higher than PS3.

Load Times: Slower than PS3 [Without Install]. Faster than PS3 [With Install]

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Some drops to 25 and some rare cases to low 20's.

Other: Textures appear to be higher in rez on the Xbox 360.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PS3:

Resolution: 1152x640

AA Method: FXAA + Edge Detect

Anisotropic Filtering: Unknown Level but much lower than Xbox 360.

Mandatory Install: 4.2 GBs.

Load Times: Slower than Xbox 360 when 360 version is installed. Faster than Xbox 360 without 360 version installed.

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Drops to low 20's happen. Frames are less stable than the Xbox 360.

Other: Textures seem to be lower rezed. Use of Depth of Field is used higher to mask this occurance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC:

Resolution: Whatever you want.

AA Method: Whatever you want.

Anisotropic Filtering: Whatever you want.

Load Times: FAST

Frame Rate: Whatever you want.

Other: Whatever you want.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-sleeping-dogs-face-off


Conclusion:PC >>>>>>>> Xbox 360 >> PS3

ShadowDeathX

Xbox 360's texture advantage is most likely due to AMD's 3DC+ texture compression hardware. AMD's 3DC+ IP was included in MS DirectX10.

Like Dirt Showdown, Sleeping Dogs is an AMD "Gaming Evolved" title. http://blogs.amd.com/play/2012/08/16/sleeping-dogs-gaming-evolved-and-you/

AMD's "Gaming Evolved" is a reliation against NVIDIA's "The Way It's Meant to be Played".

Expect more "Gaming Evolved" for next-gen consoles.

On the smartphone front, Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro's Adreno 320 GPU also uses Xenos IP.

AMD contributed BC6 and BC7 texture compression into MS DirectX11.

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

ShadowMoses900

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="needweed"]who cares the game flopped. needweed

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

lundy86_4

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

DarkLink77

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

All saved in a neat and tidy Word document... That's the life.

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

lundy86_4

All saved in a neat and tidy Word document... That's the life.

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

lundy86_4

All saved in a neat and tidy Word document... That's the life.

lol. Consoles are in sub-HD.Stevo_the_gamer

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Skyrim is one of those rare exceptions. Which got fixed to the same level as 360.

Most PS3 multiplats look and play the same as 360. You can name just about any multiplat and you can't tell a difference between them.

Funny if you claim you can see these differences in multiplats, then you should be able to see the obvious jarring differences with PS3 exclusives, they look miles better than anything on 360.

360 having better multiplats is just a myth. Only a few games are better on 360, the rest are all equal. The PS3 makes up for this with having the best graphics in town.

ShadowMoses900

Says the guy who claimed PS3 exclusives looked better than the Star Wars 1313 gameplay, you don't even believe half the stuff you write, you just write it for the sake of it.

BTW Sony aren't listening and won't give you anything for keeping up this front.

Many PS3 exclusives do look better than 1313 PC game play. Like this here:

The Last of Us Gameplay [HD]

Star Wars 1313 Gamescom Gameplay [HD]

The Last of Us is clearly the better looking game. There are many PS3 games that rival PC games like I said. Maybe you can't accept it because maybe you are the fanboy. No offense of course. I don't insult people on here. I'm nice person.

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

Xbox 360:

Resolution: 1200x720

AA Method: FXAA

Anisotropic Filtering: Unknown Level but Higher than PS3.

Load Times: Slower than PS3 [Without Install]. Faster than PS3 [With Install]

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Some drops to 25 and some rare cases to low 20's.

Other: Textures appear to be higher in rez on the Xbox 360.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PS3:

Resolution: 1152x640

AA Method: FXAA + Edge Detect

Anisotropic Filtering: Unknown Level but much lower than Xbox 360.

Mandatory Install: 4.2 GBs.

Load Times: Slower than Xbox 360 when 360 version is installed. Faster than Xbox 360 without 360 version installed.

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Drops to low 20's happen. Frames are less stable than the Xbox 360.

Other: Textures seem to be lower rezed. Use of Depth of Field is used higher to mask this occurance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC:

Resolution: Whatever you want.

AA Method: Whatever you want.

Anisotropic Filtering: Whatever you want.

Load Times: FAST

Frame Rate: Whatever you want.

Other: Whatever you want.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-sleeping-dogs-face-off


Conclusion:PC >>>>>>>> Xbox 360 >> PS3

ronvalencia

Xbox 360's texture advantage is most likely due to AMD's 3DC+ texture compression hardware. AMD's 3DC+ IP was included in MS DirectX10.

Like Dirt Showdown, Sleeping Dogs is an AMD "Gaming Evolved" title. http://blogs.amd.com/play/2012/08/16/sleeping-dogs-gaming-evolved-and-you/

AMD's "Gaming Evolved" is a reliation against NVIDIA's "The Way It's Meant to be Played".

Expect more "Gaming Evolved" for next-gen consoles.

On the smartphone front, Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro's Adreno 320 GPU also uses Xenos IP.

AMD contributed BC6 and BC7 texture compression into MS DirectX11.

You have such a raging hard on for AMD.

Also looking at benchmark results the 7970 was behind the GTX 680 at 1080P and not many gamers game at 2560x1600.

I like how that graph is also very misleading but Nvidia does the same thing and I find it very stupid.

Heck here is a benchamrk from a GTX 570 at 1080P.

Keep an eye on the High AA version.

And here is a 7970 with high AA.

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Teh powah of teh CELL! ;)

tormentos

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Na is the mediocrity of some developers.tormentos

We've been hearing that excuse all generation. I think it's time to put it out to pasture and accept that the PS3 isn't quite as amazing as you guys seem to think it is.

Who the hell plays multiplats on a console anyways?

The hell are you talking about? I play my PS3 on the same HDTV I play my 360 on and I'm actually playing Uncharted 3 right now, smart guy.

Sure, I'll concede that Uncharted had better animations and possibly better physics but Gears of War 3 has superior lighting, better particle effects and was more consistent in its visual quality between single player and multiplayer.

The_Game21x

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

We've been hearing that excuse all generation. I think it's time to put it out to pasture and accept that the PS3 isn't quite as amazing as you guys seem to think it is.

Tessellation

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

DarkLink77

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

You have such a raging hard on for AMD.

RyviusARC

LOL,

Also looking at benchmark results the 7970 was behind the GTX 680 at 1080P and not many gamers game at 2560x1600.

I like how that graph is also very misleading but Nvidia does the same thing and I find it very stupid.

Heck here is a benchamrk from a GTX 570 at 1080P.

Keep an eye on the High AA version.

And here is a 7970 with high AA.

RyviusARC

Note that

1. Benchmarks must run with the same CPU and V-Sync turned off.

2. Limiting to "high" settings would hide GPU's reserve horizontal performance.

3. SSAA renders at a higher resolution before it displays to the user's screen resolution settings e.g. 1920x1080p.

Note that AMD Radeon HD 6800 matches your posted 570 benchmarks.

With V-Sync switched off for Radeon HD 7970.

Reference

http://forums.sleepingdogs.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1188&start=15

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

lawlessx

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Teh powah of teh CELL! ;)

PAL360

This is the kind of damage control i remember reading in 2007. Or was it 2006? 2008??

To the AMD fanboys, were those results made before or after the drivers crashed the system?

And on the same note, I could care less for buying a video card that costs as much as an entire system.

I also get it for free on other systems...

How's that cross game chat coming along on the PS3?>.>

mitu123

[QUOTE="inb4uall"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Lol I can't imagine being a ps3 fan and getting crappy ports all gen. Must suck really bad.CanYouDiglt

That's sooo true.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

:lol:

Shadow never disappoints.

DarkLink77

All saved in a neat and tidy Word document... That's the life.

Dude!! Where have you been? You haven't posted in SW in ages :o

ShadowMoses900's blog....:lol: Are you serious?

4Dec 11

Why I am leaving SW.....

You may have noticed that I haven't been posting topics lately, I'll explain why. System Wars has always been a pretty dumb place by it'self, mostly just fanboys trying to one up other fanboys, wether it be 360/PS3/Nintendo/PC it's all pretty stupid. The main reason why I gotinto SW in the first place was because no one really hangs out in General Game Discussions, I would like to simply talk to other gamers but SW is the only place where the activity is. Some times I find the content in SW to be hilarious, and sometimes I would make joke topics about systems because I thought it would be funny, to put it in other words I was trolling. It wasn't serious though and it was pretty obvious that I wasn't to be taken seriously, but lately I notice now with the new change of rules on here (I like it better but it has it's downsides) that many of these posters in SW are really angry and rude fanboys. Now I'm not sensitive or anything like that so I just try to ignore them, but there are so many of them on here now that I find it hard to just ignore them, and when I start trying to respond to them I get in a "fanboy mood" because they are kind of rubbing off on me. I'm not angry at anyone, just that they way they act has some kind of influence on everyone here. And many of these people are not joke trolls, they are serious.

One thing that makes me shake my head and annoys me are all the constant "Skyrim sucks on PS3 because some site says so" threads that popping up. Now I know from my own personal experince with the game on PS3 that it's fine, I have an 11MB save file with over 40 hours in it, I did have a main quest bug (as I mentioned in an older blog post) but the recent update fixed it. I never had any massive framerate drops or anything of the sort, so what get's me annoyed is when alot of these people (mostly 360 fanboys in this case) go on about how it's "unplayable" or it's "a mess" or a "disaster" because a site like Digital Foundry (a 360 bias site) says so. I always try to defend the PS3 version because I know that the problems that this site is mentioning are either made up or over exaggerated, take for instance they recently got caught falsley accusing the PS3 udpadte of Skyrim that it made the graphics worse, it turned out to be BS and they later pulled it. The PS3 version did have some issues no doubt just like the other versions I'm sure, but the site DF only chooses to point out the PS3 and over exaggerate them greatly because it pleases their audience..... BLAH BLAH BLAH....AND SO ON AND SO ON!!!!

Take care!

Man you are a trip.

deu5ka175

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] Gears 3 is on Par and does better things and vise versa.Tessellation

Except for the textures and AA the rest is pretty spot on. Best textures are from Rage and best AA is MLAA on GOWIII.

edit: oh crap, I forgot you're that idiot from that thread! X(

Damn,what an awesome thread!

Too bad I overslept the best parts! :cry:

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Yes some else opinion which may or may not be as biased as your or mine,but that cumulative actually does show a tendency... The facts are there as soon as you turn on Uncharted 3 and compare it with anything on 360. tormentos

Gears 3 destroys Uncharted 3 visually, especially in image quality, scale, action on screen, detail, motion blur effect etc etc

There is not even a comparisson there really, Uncharted 3 looks a generation behind Gears 3 (and two behind Halo 4)

Xbox 360:

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Some drops to 25 and some rare cases to low 20's.

PS3:

Frame Rate: 30fps locked. Drops to low 20's happen. Frames are less stable than the Xbox 360.

ShadowDeathX

:? even at low res the game still drops below 30 fps. Meanwhile I'm playing it on PC at 1080p and the fps never goes below 60 fps.

It's about time for next gen consoles to be announced.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]I also get it for free on other systems...

How's that cross game chat coming along on the PS3?>.>

tormentos

To the AMD fanboys, were those results made before or after the drivers crashed the system?

And on the same note, I could care less for buying a video card that costs as much as an entire system.

dxmcat

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127664