[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Incredibly nice job.. Since when Sony is responsible for 3rd parties short comings.. Is very hard to find a sony ip that is sud HD,while MS from the start has sub HD games. tormentos
He said "PS3 has more Sub HD games than the xbox 360,so who cares"
You, knowing you couldn't refute that argument, redirected to Sony games.
So like I said, good job moving the goal posts. :)
Regardless, compared to the claims Sony has failed to deliver on this generation (4D 1080p 60fps), Microsoft failing to reach the 720p and 4X AA mark is negligible.
No dude i have make this argument several times already,is based on the fact that Multiplatforms are not a good way to measure power period. Developers all they care is for a playable version,which is the reason why games like COD keep been sub HD in both consoles,with all the money Activision make on the games and re using the same engines is about time those games were deliver on 720p,on COD the case was so blatantly odious that they patch the PS3 version,of black ops,and the patch actually read no party chat allowed,since when the PS3 has party chat.? WTF so by your crappy argument 720p 4XAA is more difficult to reach than 4D,1080p 60 FPS.? Wow man stop been such a blind lemming,measure games for exclusives not for mutliplatforms games which don't take advantage of the hardware in question,what more evident Gears of war has been consistently 720p,while games that don't look even close on 360 are sub HD... Keep riding the PS3 hate,the fact is there since launch 360 games had been sub HD,i don't know which has more sub HD games,but i am sure there is a ton also on 360. Okay. So Microsoft's own exclusives have missed the 720p and 4X AA mark since launch. Where did I deny this?
Now show me a single exclusive on the PS3 that runs 1080p native at 120FPS (I forgot that they claimed 120 fps and not 60) and in 4D.
Don't worry, I'll wait.
Log in to comment