Sleeping Dogs: Xbox 360 takes another win aganist the PS3.

Lol at the lemmings fingering themselves because some flop multiplat has 1.5% higher resolution.

Face it lemmings that console is a dud

Pray_to_me

Someone's mad. :lol:

I just started playing this and it looks and runs great on PS3. People are absolute nutjobs if they think anything is wrong with this version of the game or the console versions in general. I just can't understand the trivial knit-picking over these multiplat games.

People play this game on consoles? Are they f*cked in the head? :|tagyhag

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]Resistance was 1280x702tormentos

I just started playing this and it looks and runs great on PS3. People are absolute nutjobs if they think anything is wrong with this version of the game or the console versions in general. I just can't understand the trivial knit-picking over these multiplat games.

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]People play this game on consoles? Are they f*cked in the head? :|Bigboi500

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Resistance: Fall of Man = 1280x720 (QAA) No it was 720P with QAA..platniumgamer

[QUOTE="platniumgamer"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] quit the bull**** is 1280X702 or 704? don't remember and thats because the crappy RSX works on 64x64 pixels tiles.

Tessellation

Honestly, I've never ever seen you saying something ordinary apart from speaking nonsense about the PS3.

You are officially labelled as an Xbox fanboy.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="platniumgamer"] get out of here tessey you are just ignorant to evry thing plane ignorant GamerwillzPS

Honestly, I've never ever seen you saying something ordinary apart from speaking nonsense about the PS3.

You are officially labelled as an Xbox fanboy.

People still play consoles? must be all the poor people lmao

I havent touched my ps3 since i played uncharted 3 in january, it has no games, and all the multiplats suck.

My only gripe is that nvidia has not released a SLI profile for the game yet, so only using my 1 GTX470, but even with one GTX470 i get 50-60fps on extreme settings, Normal AA, 1920x1080p

humpmasterflex

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="platniumgamer"] get out of here tessey you are just ignorant to evry thing plane ignorant GamerwillzPS

Honestly, I've never ever seen you saying something ordinary apart from speaking nonsense about the PS3.

You are officially labelled as an Xbox fanboy.

Fighting for second place again?

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="platniumgamer"] get out of here tessey you are just ignorant to evry thing plane ignorant platniumgamer

shut up butthurt baby aw baby going to cry now you just ignorant man just ignroent

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] i guess you're someone i made butthurt.Tessellation

Honestly, I've never ever seen you saying something ordinary apart from speaking nonsense about the PS3.

You are officially labelled as an Xbox fanboy.

You're a sad, sad person.

You've been calling people as 'basement dweller', and it looks like you're definitely the one.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Honestly, I've never ever seen you saying something ordinary apart from speaking nonsense about the PS3.

You are officially labelled as an Xbox fanboy.

GamerwillzPS

You're a sad, sad person.

You've been calling people as 'basement dweller', and it looks like you're definitely the one.

Fighting for second place again?

Jankarcop

Grow up, seriously :?

Really funny how 360 gets a couple of games that are slightly better than on PS3, and claim ownage.

Have fun with your slightly better multiplats that I get to play as well. While I play whatever I want and not worry about simple details.

Really funny how 360 gets a couple of games that are slightly better than on PS3, and claim ownage.

Have fun with your slightly better multiplats that I get to play as well. While I play whatever I want and not worry about simple details.

gotdangit

A couple is two.

Slimm compiles Eurogamer/IGN Insider/LoT and comes up with:

360:242

Tie: 145

PS3:80

Where, in God's name, is that a "couple"?

Link.

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Really funny how 360 gets a couple of games that are slightly better than on PS3, and claim ownage.

Have fun with your slightly better multiplats that I get to play as well. While I play whatever I want and not worry about simple details.

lundy86_4

A couple is two.

Slimm compiles Eurogamer/IGN Insider/LoT and comes up with:

360:242

Tie: 145

PS3:80

Where, in God's name, is that a "couple"?

Link.

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Tessellation"]Resistance was 1280x702Tessellation

Really funny how 360 gets a couple of games that are slightly better than on PS3, and claim ownage.

Have fun with your slightly better multiplats that I get to play as well. While I play whatever I want and not worry about simple details.

gotdangit

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Resistance: Fall of Man = 1280x720 (QAA) No it was 720P with QAA..tormentos

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

ShadowMoses900

What about those videos is in-depth enough to notice texture details and native resolution? You rely on these ridiculous Youtube videos, which lack the very definition needed for such an analysis. They need direct-feed to make these assertions.

Seriously, stop being as thick as pig sh*t.

Lol I can't imagine being a ps3 fan and getting crappy ports all gen. Must suck really bad.Miketheman83

I'm a PS3 fan and I'll admit that the PS3 has been crap with multiplats. That's one big disadvantage I feel towards the PS3. But it doesn't matter anymore since I have a gaming PC which I buy all multiplats on.

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

ShadowMoses900

Those websites aren't for fanboys, they just offer a much more in-depth insight into the comparison of two versions. When I want to see the difference, I go to these "fanboy" websites you speak of.

The main difference I usually look for is the framerate and performance as these are very important otherwise it may be game-breaking.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

lundy86_4

What about those videos is in-depth enough to notice texture details and native resolution? You rely on these ridiculous Youtube videos, which lack the very definition needed for such an analysis. They need direct-feed to make these assertions.

Seriously, stop being as thick as pig sh*t.

Youtube is accurate as long as they are in HD. Fanboys just try to downplay it and make it look less credible because it defeates their argument completely.

Devs release game play videos on youtube all the time, they have no issue with it because there is no issue with it.

even resistance 3 was sub HD Tessellation

Yeah yeah yeah yeah, whatever.

What matters is the library of games. Nobody cares about visuals as much. Even 360 exclusives looks that bad.

even resistance 3 was sub HD Tessellation

Fake. Here is what it really looks like.

Resistance 3: Boat Level Gameplay Footage

Same level you showed, but in the real quality. Sub HD PS3 games are just a myth.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

ShadowMoses900

What about those videos is in-depth enough to notice texture details and native resolution? You rely on these ridiculous Youtube videos, which lack the very definition needed for such an analysis. They need direct-feed to make these assertions.

Seriously, stop being as thick as pig sh*t.

Youtube is accurate as long as they are in HD. Fanboys just try to downplay it and make it look less credible because it defeates their argument completely.

Devs release game play videos on youtube all the time, they have no issue with it because there is no issue with it.

Fake. Here is what it really looks like.

Resistance 3: Boat Level Gameplay Footage

Same level you showed, but in the real quality. Sub HD PS3 games are just a myth.

ShadowMoses900

Youtube is accurate as long as they are in HD. Fanboys just try to downplay it and make it look less credible because it defeates their argument completely.

Devs release game play videos on youtube all the time, they have no issue with it because there is no issue with it.

ShadowMoses900

No. The analysis sites use far more in-depth tools than the human eye. Furthermore, even the Youtube videos have noteable compression on even 1080p videos.

You are relying on the individual's eyes, rather than any in-depth scientific analysis. Please try to discredit any scientific analysis because you can't see a difference. You can't see cancerous cells... Do they not exist?

Devs release gameplay videos. They are uploaded to youtube because it accesses a massive audience. Understand marketing you absolute, f*cking idiot. Seriously, you don't have a basic grasp of even a single subject.

Yeah yeah yeah yeah, whatever.

What matters is the library of games. Nobody cares about visuals as much. Even 360 exclusives looks that bad.

GamerwillzPS

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

GamerwillzPS

Those websites aren't for fanboys, they just offer a much more in-depth insight into the comparison of two versions. When I want to see the difference, I go to these "fanboy" websites you speak of.

The main difference I usually look for is the framerate and performance as these are very important otherwise it may be game-breaking.

Yes they are, they are made to help people who are unhappy with their system feel less insecure about their purchase.

No one can tell a difference between the two versions except in rare cases, so how do you know DF and LOT just arn't making it up? How do you know their "findings" are even accurate? What about variables like TV difference or gamma differences? HDMI cables? Correct option settings? Camera used?

See there are far too many variables. If you want to see accurate ones you should use IGN, they have good in depth comparisons. They usually give it a draw because you cannot see a difference, this is because the differences are made up. They capture diret game play too, best way to determine quality.

Aside from a few rare exceptions, it's just a myth that PS3 has inferior multiplats.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Yeah yeah yeah yeah, whatever.

What matters is the library of games. Nobody cares about visuals as much. Even 360 exclusives looks that bad.

Tessellation

Grow up.

All you are saying is words like 'butthurt, cry more, fanboy, delicious tears, basement dweller, PS3 sucks, X360 is the best system', blah, blah, blah. In your every goddamn post, is that all you are saying? Jesus Christ, you have a lot of growing up to do.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Yeah yeah yeah yeah, whatever.

What matters is the library of games. Nobody cares about visuals as much. Even 360 exclusives looks that bad.

GamerwillzPS

Grow up.

All you are saying is words like 'butthurt, cry more, fanboy, delicious tears, basement dweller, PS3 sucks, X360 is the best system', blah, blah, blah. In your every goddamn post, is that all you are saying? Jesus Christ, you have a lot of growing up to do.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This thread just shows how desperate lems are. Both versions look and play identical, I will prove it once again.

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying. If you need to go to a fanboy website to tell you there are differences even though no sane person in real life can see them, then you have buyers remorse.

Lems have no ammo, they lost. Hermits are next.

ShadowMoses900

Those websites aren't for fanboys, they just offer a much more in-depth insight into the comparison of two versions. When I want to see the difference, I go to these "fanboy" websites you speak of.

The main difference I usually look for is the framerate and performance as these are very important otherwise it may be game-breaking.

Yes they are, they are made to help people who are unhappy with their system feel less insecure about their purchase.

No one can tell a difference between the two versions except in rare cases, so how do you know DF and LOT just arn't making it up? How do you know their "findings" are even accurate? What about variables like TV difference or gamma differences? HDMI cables? Correct option settings? Camera used?

See there are far too many variables. If you want to see accurate ones you should use IGN, they have good in depth comparisons. They usually give it a draw because you cannot see a difference, this is because the differences are made up. They capture diret game play too, best way to determine quality.

Aside from a few rare exceptions, it's just a myth that PS3 has inferior multiplats.

Well, I own both consoles (X360 is returned in its box, it's crap, lol) and from my experience those "fanboy" websites' findings were actually true. I bought a few same games on both and I noticed that X360 versions are better, and those "fanboy" websites said and showed exactly the same thing. They aren't made up.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Those websites aren't for fanboys, they just offer a much more in-depth insight into the comparison of two versions. When I want to see the difference, I go to these "fanboy" websites you speak of.

The main difference I usually look for is the framerate and performance as these are very important otherwise it may be game-breaking.

GamerwillzPS

Yes they are, they are made to help people who are unhappy with their system feel less insecure about their purchase.

No one can tell a difference between the two versions except in rare cases, so how do you know DF and LOT just arn't making it up? How do you know their "findings" are even accurate? What about variables like TV difference or gamma differences? HDMI cables? Correct option settings? Camera used?

See there are far too many variables. If you want to see accurate ones you should use IGN, they have good in depth comparisons. They usually give it a draw because you cannot see a difference, this is because the differences are made up. They capture diret game play too, best way to determine quality.

Aside from a few rare exceptions, it's just a myth that PS3 has inferior multiplats.

Well, I own both consoles (X360 is returned in its box, it's crap, lol) and from my experience those "fanboy" websites' findings were actually true. I bought a few same games on both and I noticed that X360 versions are better, and those "fanboy" websites said and showed exactly the same thing. They aren't made up.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

What about those videos is in-depth enough to notice texture details and native resolution? You rely on these ridiculous Youtube videos, which lack the very definition needed for such an analysis. They need direct-feed to make these assertions.

Seriously, stop being as thick as pig sh*t.

Tessellation

Youtube is accurate as long as they are in HD. Fanboys just try to downplay it and make it look less credible because it defeates their argument completely.

Devs release game play videos on youtube all the time, they have no issue with it because there is no issue with it.

Nope, they are HD. You can see the resolution right there. You and Lundys are just fanboys.

360 won nothing with sleeping dogs, 360 has lost in graphics, it has lost in multiplats, it has lost in online, it has lost in reliable hardware, it has lost in exclusives, it has lost in every thing.

360 owners have nothing to brag about except for "better multiplatz because fanboy websites say 360 winz even though we don't see a difference but are going to pretend to" and "last place", which you guys care more about than we PS3 guys do.

PS3 has won. It is the future. Don't get mad because you bought the wrong system.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Those websites aren't for fanboys, they just offer a much more in-depth insight into the comparison of two versions. When I want to see the difference, I go to these "fanboy" websites you speak of.

The main difference I usually look for is the framerate and performance as these are very important otherwise it may be game-breaking.

GamerwillzPS

Yes they are, they are made to help people who are unhappy with their system feel less insecure about their purchase.

No one can tell a difference between the two versions except in rare cases, so how do you know DF and LOT just arn't making it up? How do you know their "findings" are even accurate? What about variables like TV difference or gamma differences? HDMI cables? Correct option settings? Camera used?

See there are far too many variables. If you want to see accurate ones you should use IGN, they have good in depth comparisons. They usually give it a draw because you cannot see a difference, this is because the differences are made up. They capture diret game play too, best way to determine quality.

Aside from a few rare exceptions, it's just a myth that PS3 has inferior multiplats.

Well, I own both consoles (X360 is returned in its box, it's crap, lol) and from my experience those "fanboy" websites' findings were actually true. I bought a few same games on both and I noticed that X360 versions are better, and those "fanboy" websites said and showed exactly the same thing. They aren't made up.

I own both systems, these sites have been wrong on everything except for a few like Skyrim, Bayonetta ect....but you didn't need them to tell you that, it was obvious (they are fine now after updates of course).

Those sites just make everything up, there is zero evidence for them being credible or relibale. IGN is far better. IGN is a house hold name. And IGN almost always says both versions are the same. I find them to be much more accurate.

You and Lundys are just fanboys.

ShadowMoses900

:lol:

Youtube videos, even at thei "HD" resolutions, are marred by compression artifacts.

This is a 1080p video of ACIII in full-screen mode (i.e. what you would be playing it at in a rendered resolution):

Is that the image quality of consoles, even up-rezzed to 1080p? Lolno.

Youtube is a poor comparison. Images are downsized to fit their relatively small video player. Now, actual sites such as Eurogamer, uses analysis software to assess the rendering of direct-feed images/videos.

Hell, you didn't even know the difference between a "native resolution" and "upscaled resolution" in the other thread. Can you say "f*cking owned"?

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

You and Lundys are just fanboys.

lundy86_4

:lol:

Youtube videos, even at thei "HD" resolutions, are marred by compression artifacts.

This is a 1080p video of ACIII in full-screen mode (i.e. what you would be playing it at in a rendered resolution):

Is that the image quality of consoles, even up-rezzed to 1080p? Lolno.

Youtube is a poor comparison. Images are downsized to fit their relatively small video player. Now, actual sites such as Eurogamer, uses analysis software to assess the rendering of direct-feed images/videos.

Hell, you didn't even know the difference between a "native resolution" and "upscaled resolution" in the other thread. Can you say "f*cking owned"?

Fake. Just more fake docotred images or low res ones, you are not fooling anyone with them. Rocker (the king of the fanboys) tried to fool people with the same thing for TLOU, but I showed people the truth.

Here is what it REALLY looks like in game play: Assassin's Creed 3 E3 Frontier Gameplay Demo-HD

Looks WAY better than what you posted, that's because what you posted was fake or low res captured. Your not fooling anyone.

Fake. Just more fake docotred images or low res ones, you are not fooling anyone with them. Rocker (the king of the fanboys) tried to fool people with the same thing for TLOU, but I showed people the truth.

Here is what it REALLY looks like in game play: Assassin's Creed 3 E3 Frontier Gameplay Demo-HD

Looks WAY better than what you posted, that's because what you posted was fake or low res captured. Your not fooling anyone.

ShadowMoses900

I pressed 1080p in Youtube's resolution section, and clicked full-screen. Copied and saved the image, as it wa. Uploaded to imageshack, without resizing. How did I doctor it?

Shot taken from your video:

You f*cking idiot. Get an education beyond "f*cking mouthbreather". You're playing in the big leagues here... Don't wet yourself.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Youtube is accurate as long as they are in HD. Fanboys just try to downplay it and make it look less credible because it defeates their argument completely.

Devs release game play videos on youtube all the time, they have no issue with it because there is no issue with it.

ShadowMoses900

Nope, they are HD. You can see the resolution right there. You and Lundys are just fanboys.

360 won nothing with sleeping dogs, 360 has lost in graphics, it has lost in multiplats, it has lost in online, it has lost in reliable hardware, it has lost in exclusives, it has lost in every thing.

360 owners have nothing to brag about except for "better multiplatz because fanboy websites say 360 winz even though we don't see a difference but are going to pretend to" and "last place", which you guys care more about than we PS3 guys do.

PS3 has won. It is the future. Don't get mad because you bought the wrong system.