Sleeping Dogs: Xbox 360 takes another win aganist the PS3.

Of course it looks better on the 360.

Anyone saying they look identical are just fanboys trying to justify their purchase.

The good ol console wars still going on.

And PC rapes em both.

and like 99.9% of multiplatforms, the differences are so small that you need a website to tell you that there is any. Yet, you see idiots using it as a superioty complexe and other idiots taking offense to it.

You have such a raging hard on for AMD.

Also looking at benchmark results the 7970 was behind the GTX 680 at 1080P and not many gamers game at 2560x1600.

I like how that graph is also very misleading but Nvidia does the same thing and I find it very stupid.

Heck here is a benchamrk from a GTX 570 at 1080P.

Keep an eye on the High AA version.

http://www.abload.de/img/sleep11ns6o.jpg

And here is a 7970 with high AA.

RyviusARC

My Radeon HD 7950 "Ghz Edition" from Sapphire R7950 900 Mhz Edition. VRAM still at default speed.

Voltage is at 1.1 V (from V1.07) and it's less than AMD's official BIOS 7950 Boost Edition (7950 BE) i.e. 1.2V

Everything is maxed (including world density set to extreme) except for AA.

Intel Core i5-2500K still set to normal.

NVIDIA Geforce GTX 670's scores. Note the SSAO is set to normal, it's unknown if the world detail is set to extreme.

Both versions look and play identical. Digital Foundry is just a site made for fanboys to help them feel less insecure about their system purchase.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] Gears 3 is on Par and does better things and vise versa.loosingENDS

Gears 3 destroys Uncharted 3 visually, especially in image quality, scale, action on screen, detail, motion blur effect etc etc

There is not even a comparisson there really, Uncharted 3 looks a generation behind Gears 3 (and two behind Halo 4)

and like 99.9% of multiplatforms, the differences are so small that you need a website to tell you that there is any. Yet, you see idiots using it as a superioty complexe and other idiots taking offense to it.

da_illest101

This is system wars afterall...

At least that multiplat slight superiority is something objective. Far more ineresting is how cows use their subjective opinion on how their banana look better than our orange, as ownage!

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Better image quality- Uncharted Physics- Uncharted Animation -Uncharted Better shadowing- Uncharted AA uncharted gears has non. Elements effect,water,fire,sand simulation-Uncharted Characters detail- Uncharted by a long shot characters will even get their hair wet. Textures very close Uncharted. Lighting very close Gears i concede. Particle effects Gears. tormentos

Gears 3 destroys Uncharted 3 visually, especially in image quality, scale, action on screen, detail, motion blur effect etc etc

There is not even a comparisson there really, Uncharted 3 looks a generation behind Gears 3 (and two behind Halo 4)

Yes, he is a fanboy. Remembers me a lem version of you, shadowmoses and others.

Cross game chat>Home, also, why bring up Vita when it's 360 vs PS3, might as well throw the 3DS in there.mitu123

Yes, he is a fanboy. Remembers me a lem version of you, shadowmoses and others.PAL360

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Better image quality- Uncharted Physics- Uncharted Animation -Uncharted Better shadowing- Uncharted AA uncharted gears has non. Elements effect,water,fire,sand simulation-Uncharted Characters detail- Uncharted by a long shot characters will even get their hair wet. Textures very close Uncharted. Lighting very close Gears i concede. Particle effects Gears. tormentos

Gears 3 destroys Uncharted 3 visually, especially in image quality, scale, action on screen, detail, motion blur effect etc etc

There is not even a comparisson there really, Uncharted 3 looks a generation behind Gears 3 (and two behind Halo 4)

This is system wars afterall...

At least that multiplat slight superiority is something objective. Far more ineresting is how cows use their subjective opinion on how their banana look better than our orange, as ownage!PAL360

[QUOTE="da_illest101"]

and like 99.9% of multiplatforms, the differences are so small that you need a website to tell you that there is any. Yet, you see idiots using it as a superioty complexe and other idiots taking offense to it.

PAL360

This is system wars afterall...

At least that multiplat slight superiority is something objective. Far more ineresting is how cows use their subjective opinion on how their banana look better than our orange, as ownage!

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Better image quality- Uncharted Physics- Uncharted Animation -Uncharted Better shadowing- Uncharted AA uncharted gears has non. Elements effect,water,fire,sand simulation-Uncharted Characters detail- Uncharted by a long shot characters will even get their hair wet. Textures very close Uncharted. Lighting very close Gears i concede. Particle effects Gears. Gue1

Except for the textures and AA the rest is pretty spot on. Best textures are from Rage and best AA is MLAA on GOWIII.

edit: oh crap, I forgot you're that idiot from that thread! X(

oh look you still butthurt since that day..man what getting owned does to people..amazing indeed..,keep it butthurt brah :cool:

For the fanboys:

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (PS3)

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay (360)

Anyone who says they see a difference between the two versions is lying.

Here is the PC version also:

Sleeping Dogs Gameplay [PC]

I think I rest my case. But people are going to believe whatever makes them feel better. If one version truly was better you would be able to see it clear as day, you wouldn't need a website to tell you it. Besides if you cared about graphics that much you would just get a PS3.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="PAL360"]This is system wars afterall...

At least that multiplat slight superiority is something objective. Far more ineresting is how cows use their subjective opinion on how their banana look better than our orange, as ownage!tormentos

[QUOTE="PAL360"]Yes, he is a fanboy. Remembers me a lem version of you, shadowmoses and others.tormentos

Well, the 'worst' thing about PS3 that comes to my mind, is that its a capable console. As capable as the 360, and both very impressive considering their age.

Of course, for a fanboy like you and LoosingEnds, that would be an insult, since your investment must be 10.000 times better than the competition. For a gamer, on the other hand, those are great news :)

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="PAL360"]Yes, he is a fanboy. Remembers me a lem version of you, shadowmoses and others.PAL360

Well, the 'worst' thing about PS3 that comes to my mind, is that its a capable console. As capable as the 360, and both very impressive considering their age.

Of course, for a fanboy like you and LoosingEnds, that would be an insult, since your investment must be 10.000 times better than the competition. For a gamer, on the other hand, those are great news :)

Agreed, although the 360 is my weapon of choice both consoles are awesome in there own right, i just prefer what the 360 has to offer because it has more WRPG's and to me Halo is the best shooter out there (i love Sci-Fi), i can even concede that Ps3 exclusives have marginally better graphics sometimes, to UC3 is on Par with gears 3 but UC3 has a slight edge in graphical fidelity due to having better (not perfect) Anti aliasing, cows are angry because they intitially paid a lot more for a console that turned out only to be marginally more powerful than the 360 due to having a Gimped GPU.delta3074

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Agreed, although the 360 is my weapon of choice both consoles are awesome in there own right, i just prefer what the 360 has to offer because it has more WRPG's and to me Halo is the best shooter out there (i love Sci-Fi), i can even concede that Ps3 exclusives have marginally better graphics sometimes, to UC3 is on Par with gears 3 but UC3 has a slight edge in graphical fidelity due to having better (not perfect) Anti aliasing, cows are angry because they intitially paid a lot more for a console that turned out only to be marginally more powerful than the 360 due to having a Gimped GPU.tormentos

Non fanboys Sony supporters are probably hidden because of arrogant brainwashed ones like you, who make the whole comunity look bad. Isnt it sad?

The world say: Both consoles are great and equally capable.

Sony fanboys say: PS3 is infinitely better because Sony told me it would be.

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Agreed, although the 360 is my weapon of choice both consoles are awesome in there own right, i just prefer what the 360 has to offer because it has more WRPG's and to me Halo is the best shooter out there (i love Sci-Fi), i can even concede that Ps3 exclusives have marginally better graphics sometimes, to UC3 is on Par with gears 3 but UC3 has a slight edge in graphical fidelity due to having better (not perfect) Anti aliasing, cows are angry because they intitially paid a lot more for a console that turned out only to be marginally more powerful than the 360 due to having a Gimped GPU.tormentos

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Agreed, although the 360 is my weapon of choice both consoles are awesome in there own right, i just prefer what the 360 has to offer because it has more WRPG's and to me Halo is the best shooter out there (i love Sci-Fi), i can even concede that Ps3 exclusives have marginally better graphics sometimes, to UC3 is on Par with gears 3 but UC3 has a slight edge in graphical fidelity due to having better (not perfect) Anti aliasing, cows are angry because they intitially paid a lot more for a console that turned out only to be marginally more powerful than the 360 due to having a Gimped GPU.tormentos

you are an idiot, when talking about how a game performs on the technical level free online doesn't come into the equation, it has nothing to do with the games actual performance at the technical level, and yes, when comparing games at a technical level the evidence is objective, it's something that can be measured whereas how a game actually looks is a subjective opinion, you can measure FPS performance=objective, you can measure screen tearing=Objective and you can measure load times=Objective, you obviously hve no clue what the word objective actually means, the Fact that you would rather have Free online over an extra 2 FPS is purely your SUBJECTIVE opinion.delta3074

Console fanboys are bad on here.

But gears 3 beats UC3 in particle physics, the lighting is just as good because it uses Unreal lightmass global illumination and it has destructible enviroments (something gamers take for granted these days), also, don't try that stupid price argument with me, i bought a 360 WITH A HDD for 280 quid when it released the Ps3 was 425 quid, My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable and stop adding Non -essentials to the cost of the 360, wi-fi is not necessary, the HD-DVD add on is not neccessary and i use batterys so i didn't buy a Plug and play charge kit, it makes the controller heavier and i can get 20 batterys for under a quid and try replacing the Rechargeable battery in the Ps3 controller, ALL batterys lose ther charge eventually, even li-ion batterys ,don't try and say otherwise cos you will just look stupiddelta3074

My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable delta3074

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

[QUOTE="delta3074"]My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable jun_aka_pekto

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

[QUOTE="delta3074"]My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable jun_aka_pekto

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable Phazevariance

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

MS seems to have taken them out. I'm checking brand new XBox 360s online. Perhaps retailers are including HD cables but not MS itself.

No HD cables. All have composite.

Edit: All from newegg.com since they tend to buy boxed hardware from the manufacturer as is.

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

jun_aka_pekto

MS seems to have taken them out. I'm checking brand new XBox 360s online. Perhaps retailers are including HD cables but not MS itself.

No HD cables. All have composite.

Edit: All from newegg.com since they tend to buy boxed hardware from the manufacturer as is.

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]My 360 was HD out of the box because the composite cable is HD, the Ps3 you have to buy a HDMI cable delta3074

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

they have not actually supplied HD component cables in the 360 since the release of the new 250 gb S versions, a moot point as we where discussing initial launch pricesdelta3074

That clears it up.

It's a weird decision because when the 360 first came out, HDTVs weren't commonplace. Now that they are, MS decide to yank out the HD cable? Hmmm.:lol:

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

I've been checking new 360 and PS3 gaming systems online. Both include composite cables. Composite cables are inherently sub-HD. HD cables are either HDMI or RGB component (the red, green, blue ones).

tormentos

[QUOTE="delta3074"]they have not actually supplied HD component cables in the 360 since the release of the new 250 gb S versions, a moot point as we where discussing initial launch pricesjun_aka_pekto

That clears it up.

It's a weird decision because when the 360 first came out, HDTVs weren't commonplace. Now that they are, MS decide to yank out the HD cable? Hmmm.:lol:

they have not actually supplied HD component cables in the 360 since the release of the new 250 gb S versions, a moot point as we where discussing initial launch pricesdelta3074

[QUOTE="delta3074"] they have not actually supplied HD component cables in the 360 since the release of the new 250 gb S versions, a moot point as we where discussing initial launch pricestormentos

Console fanboys are bad on here.

ultimate-k

I've been playing this game all weekend on PC, and guess what? Both console versions look like crap compared to the master race PC version. If you are looking for good graphics and you're playing on a console, you're doing it wrong.

Meh, whatever. Console differences appear to be pretty minimal. And I haven't read anything that has suggested either one was definitively worse than the other.