So Red Dead Redemption looks just as good as Uncharted 2?!?!(new video)

Every game looks better than uncharted 2 among thieves.

nhh18

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Ok, as long as you realize that's not how it looks when played then I have no beef. And yes, screw pictures. Seriously, videos or nothing!

Chutebox

No i dont have to realize,i played it and i think its best looking game on consoles,i just thought its better to post capture card shoots(even if they are not representative of game when you play it from sofa) then ultra doctored shoots.

http://i41.tinypic.com/bf5o3d.jpg

This one still looks better then 99% of bullshots from other games out there,plus bit of blur postprocessing and sofa,TADANNN :D

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Ok, as long as you realize that's not how it looks when played then I have no beef. And yes, screw pictures. Seriously, videos or nothing!

Chutebox

No i dont have to realize,i played it and i think its best looking game on consoles,i just thought its better to post capture card shoots(even if they are not representative of game when you play it from sofa) then ultra doctored shoots.

http://i41.tinypic.com/bf5o3d.jpg

This one still looks better then 99% of bullshots from other games out there,plus bit of blur postprocessing and sofa,TADANNN :D

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

This is what people post like ownage for even Crysis...

And this is what is taken with capture card...

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

No i dont have to realize,i played it and i think its best looking game on consoles,i just thought its better to post capture card shoots(even if they are not representative of game when you play it from sofa) then ultra doctored shoots.

http://i41.tinypic.com/bf5o3d.jpg

This one still looks better then 99% of bullshots from other games out there,plus bit of blur postprocessing and sofa,TADANNN :D

G-O-M-J

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

No i dont have to realize,i played it and i think its best looking game on consoles,i just thought its better to post capture card shoots(even if they are not representative of game when you play it from sofa) then ultra doctored shoots.

http://i41.tinypic.com/bf5o3d.jpg

This one still looks better then 99% of bullshots from other games out there,plus bit of blur postprocessing and sofa,TADANNN :D

Bus-A-Bus

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

This is what people post like ownage for even Crysis...

And this is what is taken with capture card...

I never said they look bad, just saying not true to the retail product.

I cant believe how good this game looks,amazing.IMO just as good as UC2,vistas look even better,animations are top notch and the game is just MASSIVE.:shock:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-life-red-dead/63987?type=flv

Though they have to polish frame rate a bit...

Bus-A-Bus

I am really hyped for RDR but the graphics aren't quite at UC2 levels.

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] No it's not better, it's just as bad. If it's not representative of what I'm playing, which none of theses images are, then the people posting the shots are just lying to themselves.SaltyMeatballs

I'm never serious here. Ever lol.

Just trying to get a point across (and it's not working).

And about AW, not getting into that!

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]dude why do you care so much jeez its not as if its important were here for fun, everyone in this thread needs to chill the **** out

Chutebox

I'm never serious here. Ever lol.

Just trying to get a point across (and it's not working).

And about AW, not getting into that!

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] No it's not better, it's just as bad. If it's not representative of what I'm playing, which none of theses images are, then the people posting the shots are just lying to themselves.Chutebox

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

This is what people post like ownage for even Crysis...

And this is what is taken with capture card...

I never said they look bad, just saying not true to the retail product.

No they are not,neither of those two.Neither is this...Obvious bullshots are obvious...never did Gears 2 look like that,never...

Dataleak

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

Bus-A-Bus

Regarding the bolded... it's been pointed out that GoW3 has no jaggies in reviews, yet it's running at 720p and doesn't have 16xAA. Your theory is moot.

If we're talking about jaggies you can't actually see, then wtf are we talking about?

What's with this rigidity to the formula "if its not 1080p it MUST have jaggies!!!!" Dude, jaggies don't need a jaggy detector. Simply look at the game.

nope its not a ps3 exclusive so thats impossibe

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

windsquid9000

I agree. And most of those trees in the background are almost certainly 2D sprites. I couldn't find a fair comparison so this one had to do. :P

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

This is what people post like ownage for even Crysis...

And this is what is taken with capture card...

Bus-A-Bus

I never said they look bad, just saying not true to the retail product.

No they are not,neither of those two.Neither is this...Obvious bullshots are obvious...never did Gears 2 look like that,never...

It looked like this :P (likes like you took this screen)

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

How is it just as bad?It MUST have aliasing,it is not 1080p neither is 16xaa.Then people should not post any pictures,just videos.But you people will call me fanboy because i post direct card taken shoots.Same like Forza 3,they downsampled shoots and post it for real,people belived then when demo came DF took pics with capture card,2xaa,jaggies alot but i dont see them when i play on my tv,maybe a bit...

AGAIN,i say people should just post videos because bullshots are not how game looks when i play it...

Hahadouken

Regarding the bolded... it's been pointed out that GoW3 has no jaggies in reviews, yet it's running at 720p and doesn't have 16xAA. Your theory is moot.

If we're talking about jaggies you can't actually see, then wtf are we talking about?

What's with this rigidity to the formula "if its not 1080p it MUST have jaggies!!!!" Dude, jaggies don't need a jaggy detector. Simply look at the game.

I already said GOW III uses MLAA...im not saying that,you can see last page,one press shoot and one from capture card,then while you at it look at the bottom at press picture of Gears 2.BULLSHOTS.Look how they added blur,depth of field,32xaa,IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE THAT.People post bullshots everywere here on SW...should only post video...

I would argue that this shoot of Gears 2 looks almost as good as Crysis,but when you actually see that all that effects it has on this bullshot are not in game you realize that it cant compete.Same like UC2,i hate when people use freakin bullshots to prove one game is looking better then other,post some video.

And i dont understand why are you still trying to mark me as fanboy,I already said to me its best looking console game,GOW III close second but that wont change my opinion on bullshots on this forum.

It's a good looking game for sure. They've made the people look better since GTA IV, Niko Bellic looks wierd in comparison now.Parasomniac

He was from Balkans,he couldnt be made good looking even if they were payed for it :lol: /jk

[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]It's a good looking game for sure. They've made the people look better since GTA IV, Niko Bellic looks wierd in comparison now.Bus-A-Bus

He was from Balkans,he couldnt be made good looking even if they were payed for it :lol: /jk

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]It's a good looking game for sure. They've made the people look better since GTA IV, Niko Bellic looks wierd in comparison now.SaltyMeatballs

He was from Balkans,he couldnt be made good looking even if they were payed for it :lol: /jk

Sorry if i offended you,im from balkans so i said it :)

Woooow, the game looks great, not sure if it can match U2 especially when it comes to details ........... need some reviews.

2mrw

Of course it can!!! Uncharted 2 looks like poop,even Haze is on par with it!

[spoiler] Was this a good trolling attempt?:oops: [/spoiler]

[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]It's a good looking game for sure. They've made the people look better since GTA IV, Niko Bellic looks wierd in comparison now.Bus-A-Bus

He was from Balkans,he couldnt be made good looking even if they were payed for it :lol: /jk

Dude, stop. :lol:

Remember how awesome GTA4 looked before it came out... it was meh. Im looking forward to this game though.

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

Woooow, the game looks great, not sure if it can match U2 especially when it comes to details ........... need some reviews.

Arach666

Of course it can!!! Uncharted 2 looks like poop,even Haze is on par with it!

I usually dislike open world games like this.

Yet Red Dead Redemption looks so appealing. :P

Thanks for the vid.

eveileb-ekam

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

Woooow, the game looks great, not sure if it can match U2 especially when it comes to details ........... need some reviews.

Animal-Mother

Of course it can!!! Uncharted 2 looks like poop,even Haze is on par with it!

Damn,me no good at this:cry:

It definitely looks good but not as good as Uncharted 2. Well, we won't know for sure until it's out. Gameplay-wise, Red Dead Redemption is looking awesome. I actually haven't seen much of this game and that really impressed me. Looks like I'm going to be poor for the summer.

I'd say it looks even better.Devourtosurvive

Bus-A-Bus, U2 uses a very advanced form of motion blur, and uses a very advanced form of depth of field...Also, your HD card must be mediocre, since the images that you post are rather low quality, blurry, and faded...

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"] U2's hit detection is specific to where you hit enemies, they just didn't institute animations for specific body parts like limping. Goldeneye did though, it's not like it's new technology. Perhaps it's an aesthetic choice?Hahadouken

Its not like its a bad thing, I can tell when I've shot someone in a specific area in U2 and he stutters a bit, plus I understand that having a guy limping and bleeding profusely to death would no have made it into a Teen game like UC2. Still, its pretty ignorant to say I haven't played the game, I was just pointing out the visceral differences when you shoot someone.

Not you, the other guy. Hamzah, he keeps saying that people haven't played it just because they say good things about RDR.

I cannot wait for this game...

and the graphics seem to have that cell shady-ness that Bad company 2 uses...LOOKS great*

Oh man its rated M. Never gonna be able to convince me mom to let me get it. :(. I was really hyping this game too. (My mom sees anything violent and freaks. Especially GTA style games. Oh, and she'll do research if I ask her and find out that it was made by the same company as GTA. Maybe I'll be able to get it on XBLM eventully.tehsystemwarior