@mems_1224 said:
i mean, if you considering "winning" as selling the most but having no games then i guess. you're basically saying the ps4 is the wii without the great exclusives.
So how should we view selling less and having even less games.?
@navyguy21 said:
Yep, game over.
Just like PS3, Xbox One will never catch up...
The PS3 did catch up,but unlike the PS3 the xbox one has not market period,the PS3 had Japan and mainland EU on lock even when it was $600 dollars,MS could never get deep on those markets so the PS3 was able to catch up.
To make a hardware number disadvantage you need to 2 things.
1-Having a big enough market for make the gap from.
2-Ousell the competition world wide even if by a little.
@trugs26 said:
Of all fanboys, Sony fanboys should know that they shouldn't judge the sales so early on, given how the PS3 caught the 360 at the end of the gen.
Completely different scenario,if the PS3 would have come on 2005 it would lead the xbox 360 now by 8 or 10 million units,the PS3 had markets to fall back on the xbox one doesn't.
@navyguy21 said:
lol, wtf?
You proved my point for me...
Xbox was more expensive and the lead of the PS4 is currently about the same (about 5-6million).
Not seeing the ownage.
1yr lead is irrelevant given how the PS3 and Wii caught up.
Dude the wii sold 20 million units in 13 months,it beat the xbox 360 lead like it was nothing,it took an entire gen for the PS3 to catch up,and unlike now where MS is losing in all markets,the PS3 outsold the xbox 360 since it arrived in Mainland EU and Japan even at higher price.
This isn't the case here at all,not only that the advantage the xbox 360 had was because of a year head start as soon as the PS3 came out started eating away from the xbox 360 advantage,the advantage the PS4 has is won on the spot both units release at the same time and the PS4 just walked all over the xbox one outselling it by double numbers.
Is not even close to be the same scenario.
@navyguy21 said:
That just seems like an extremely simplified way of looking at it. Going by that logic, we could never compare gens unless all of the parameters were the same. Of course HOW the xbox catches up matters according to WHY it is behind and WHAT Sony does with the PS4. Also depends on economic conditions and the way the market goes in the next few years.
You cant really account for many of the variables. The bottom line that im arguing (because its really the only thing that matters) is that the Xbox is behind. It is possible to catch up, sure. Anything is possible. HOW it gets there is another argument altogether.
I really dont understand why you (and a few others) keep trying to argue that the variables arent the same. It really doesnt matter.
The PS3 was behind for a ton of reasons and caught up for a ton of reasons. At the end of the day, it was behind and took a specific patch to catch up.
The PS2 was also behind the dreamcast.
Fact is the market the xbox 360 won it still hold them,US and UK the xbox 360 won there and it didn't change with the years,MS just couldn't win in Japan and EU which make dent of the 360 armor,buy a nice sofa so you can seat to wait.
@mems_1224 said:
And the PC still has more than the PS4. Whats your point? Unless you think 2nd place=winning. Your little league lied to you, participation doesn't count. Must suck to suck bro.
And you are a lemming not a hermit which make your argument null,hiding on PC doesn't make you a hermit.
And the PC market and console market are 2 different markets period they have been for years and basically one doesn't eat from the other.
So Yeah PC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS4 >>>> XBO...lol'
Log in to comment