@monstersfa said:
@HalcyonScarlet said:
@monstersfa said:
First off a youtube video cannot convey the difference in resolution. Last gen is all low settings. Next gen is mix of medium and high settings. Next gen is 60fps with 64 player mp while last gen is 24 players and 30 fps.
My point was that this is not good enough to warrant early adopting a current gen platform.
It's 2015
Gamer A bought the xbone for $400 and has bought BF 4, AC Black Flag, DA Inquisition, Shadow of Mordor, Far Cry 4.
Gamer B has bought BF 4, AC Black Flag, DA Inquisition, Shadow of Mordor, Far Cry 4 for the 360 and just bought the xbone for $400.
Both gamers spent same amount of money but the early adopter got to play superior versions of all those games.
Well since the X1 keeps dropping in price, that just backs up my point.
Listen it's simple, if current gen consoles get great unique games to them [X1 and PS4], they then they become of value. I own an X1 and even I realised I got one at the wrong time and I was very foolish, because right now, the current gen is full of crap. If you really want to buy a brand new console just for questionably better multiplats then fine.
But I think it's smarter to wait and see what happens and decide when the actual next gen games start coming.
We shouldn't be defending cross gen multiplats and ports. The only people benefiting is the publishers making money off last gen systems while holding back current gen console to achieve this. On the one side you could argue that 'great, they're still supporting last gen systems', but imo it's a slap in the face to us current gen owners. It's like, they encouraged us to buy these fucking contraptions and now they're feeding us shit.
I don't want better versions of those games, I want games those last gen consoles couldn't run if you cut them in half. I want true current gen games.
Log in to comment