Something still baffles me when fans speak of PS3 exclusives...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#151 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts

If they U3 was more popular than Gears 3 it would have sold more. But it didn't, so it must not be.meetroid8
Don't waste your time with the fakeboy, meetroid. :P

Once ye' spot a new account fakeboy, add a filter to adblock and move on!

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] Possible, but highly unlikely. Do you think the average PS3 user has $500 every year to spend on all the exclusives? Think.

If they U3 was more popular than Gears 3 it would have sold more. But it didn't, so it must not be.

If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.

How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] If they U3 was more popular than Gears 3 it would have sold more. But it didn't, so it must not be.

If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.

How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.

How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#155 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts
I'd never thought I'd stick up for cows like this but those charts (except the last one from 2009) are combined sales of Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, and/or PC, for the given title, so of course multiplatform titles will lead. I miss old charts though that would separate the ports, except for when they counted Wii Play on those charts as it's basically a controller with shovelware, if that counts then every PC sold that comes with Windows should list a top 10 tie for Solitare, Spider Solitare, Hearts, Minesweap, etc...
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.

How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just because there are no exclusives doesn't mean that there are no games. 360 has all of the same multiplats as PS3, many of which actually sold better on the 360. Not as many people bought U3 because not as many people are fans of the series, if they spent their money knowing that they wouldn't have the money to buy U3 then they must not care all that much about it.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol

Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.

How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just how expensive are these ps3 exclusives ...360 DOMINATES software sales all around...are we to believe that ps3 exclusives are so expensive that ps3 fans can only afford a few
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.meetroid8
I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just because there are no exclusives doesn't mean that there are no games. 360 has all of the same multiplats as PS3, many of which actually sold better on the 360. Not as many people bought U3 because not as many people are fans of the series, if they spent their money knowing that they wouldn't have the money to buy U3 then they must not care all that much about it.

Dude.. just stop..

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

Casual garbage games that are 99.9% cut scenes and 0% gameplay dont sell anything

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just because there are no exclusives doesn't mean that there are no games. 360 has all of the same multiplats as PS3, many of which actually sold better on the 360. Not as many people bought U3 because not as many people are fans of the series, if they spent their money knowing that they wouldn't have the money to buy U3 then they must not care all that much about it.

Yup, and the ps3 has all the multiplats the 360 had AND the exclusives. My point still stands. Well, I just hope the "fans" are still fans after playing that garbage they call a game with an average user score of 7.5.
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol

Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.

You're on gamespot numbnuts...gears of war 9.5...deal with it
Avatar image for killa4lyfe
killa4lyfe

3849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#163 killa4lyfe
Member since 2008 • 3849 Posts
PS3 exclusives DO tend to sell worse than 360/Wii counter parts. Only a handful few have sold amazingly well (5million +) However, they still do pretty well, i.e. Heavy Rain sold over 2 million, not to mention it is a niche title. Additionally, why would FANS care about how much something sells?! I don't work for Sony and or own any Stocks of Sony, so why would sales affect me at all, being a ps3/pc fan?! :? When we talk about exclusives in SW, we talk about having certain exclusives which the general consensus (critic consensus) says is a good game. Yeah, this is flawed for many reasons, but this is SW. :P In that respect though, the 360 has been lacking for the past 2 or so years. However, you still get all the great multiplats, so it's all good I think :) "360 has no games" argument is ridiculous...
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just how expensive are these ps3 exclusives ...360 DOMINATES software sales all around...are we to believe that ps3 exclusives are so expensive that ps3 fans can only afford a few

Wrong, dumbass. http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/09/07/sony-xbox-360-has-more-units-but-software-sells-on-ps3.aspx And the more units is probably because of the RROD fiasco.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol

Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.

You're on gamespot numbnuts...gears of war 9.5...deal with it

AHAHAHAHAHA... Yup, the xbot insults that ps3 fanboys use does make a lot of sense. You need a biased game rater to tell you what games you can enjoy? LOL... You're a joke man. I bet you also think P2P is better than dedicated servers because microsoft told you so, huh? Good thing there are still some 360 owners with sense and gave the mediocre game gears the score it deserves: a 7.5.
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol

Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.

All that user score proves is how bitter PS3 fans are, that they go and vote down 360 games.
Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#167 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

The only place sales matter and whether or not a game is exclusive is here on SW. Other than that it's meaningless.

Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.

Just how expensive are these ps3 exclusives ...360 DOMINATES software sales all around...are we to believe that ps3 exclusives are so expensive that ps3 fans can only afford a few

Wrong, dumbass. http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/09/07/sony-xbox-360-has-more-units-but-software-sells-on-ps3.aspx And the more units is probably because of the RROD fiasco.

Wrong again numbnuts.... www.gamasutra/view/news/33485.....google it...if you know how
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts

The only place sales matter and whether or not a game is exclusive is here on SW. Other than that it's meaningless.

turtlethetaffer
Actually, sales are all that matters elsewhere. And exclusive games are still very important to the manufacturers.
Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts

[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.OhSnapitz

Just because there are no exclusives doesn't mean that there are no games. 360 has all of the same multiplats as PS3, many of which actually sold better on the 360. Not as many people bought U3 because not as many people are fans of the series, if they spent their money knowing that they wouldn't have the money to buy U3 then they must not care all that much about it.

Dude.. just stop..

that was a pretty funny pic until i read your comments under it
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol

Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.

All that user score proves is how bitter PS3 fans are, that they go and vote down 360 games.

That's funny, because I read some of the reviews and they seemed to give good reasons why the game was terrible. I suggest you read them before dismissing it as some PS3 fanboy conspiracy. Also, check with a psychiatrist afterwards.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"] Just how expensive are these ps3 exclusives ...360 DOMINATES software sales all around...are we to believe that ps3 exclusives are so expensive that ps3 fans can only afford a few

Wrong, dumbass. http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/09/07/sony-xbox-360-has-more-units-but-software-sells-on-ps3.aspx And the more units is probably because of the RROD fiasco.

Wrong again numbnuts.... www.gamasutra/view/news/33485.....google it...if you know how

Rofl... Did you just google that without reading the title? Analysis: U.S. Software Attach Rates For Xbox 360, PS3 Reveal HD Console Trends U.S. U.S. U.S.
Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#173 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Thread proves that 360 and Wii are for casuals and brogamers.. Just sayin'

PAL360

Well, 360 seems to be the best console for casuals and core gamers. It gets all core games like Skyrim, Dark Souls, Mass Effects, The Witcher 2 (according to some, the most hardcore game on consoles), etc; and Kinect, which already has many A and AA exclusive games available.

Elder Scrolls is a PC series, essentially. Dark Souls is the sequel to a PS3 exclusive, lol @ Mass Effect (read my previous post in this thread as to why, and add extra lolsauce when 3 becomes the "fastest selling title in the franchise") and the Witcher is also a PC-based title. I mean seriously, don't tout the 360 as the champion of the core gamer just because it can have everyone elses leftovers, or at least come up with better examples. Convinced, I am not.

The truth is that what sells big in the US market and the 360 as well as wii is casual garbage and brogamer dreck. Hell, the CoD crowd infiltrated PS3 Nirvana when Sony cut out functionality of the console to get the price in line to the mass market. All of gaming is suffering for it... Well, except on PC.

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Thread proves that 360 and Wii are for casuals and brogamers.. Just sayin'

Shewgenja

Well, 360 seems to be the best console for casuals and core gamers. It gets all core games like Skyrim, Dark Souls, Mass Effects, The Witcher 2 (according to some, the most hardcore game on consoles), etc; and Kinect, which already has many A and AA exclusive games available.

Elder Scrolls is a PC series, essentially. Dark Souls is the sequel to a PS3 exclusive, lol @ Mass Effect (read my previous post in this thread as to why, and add extra lolsauce when 3 becomes the "fastest selling title in the franchise") and the Witcher is also a PC-based title. I mean seriously, don't tout the 360 as the champion of the core gamer just because it can have everyone elses leftovers, or at least come up with better examples. Convinced, I am not.

The truth is that what sells big in the US market and the 360 as well as wii is casual garbage and brogamer dreck. Hell, the CoD crowd infiltrated PS3 Nirvana when Sony cut out functionality of the console to get the price in line to the mass market. All of gaming is suffering for it... Well, except on PC.

..or devs & publishers found logic in releasing said titles to multiple platforms.. That doesn't take away from their "core-ness"..

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#175 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Well, 360 seems to be the best console for casuals and core gamers. It gets all core games like Skyrim, Dark Souls, Mass Effects, The Witcher 2 (according to some, the most hardcore game on consoles), etc; and Kinect, which already has many A and AA exclusive games available.

OhSnapitz

Elder Scrolls is a PC series, essentially. Dark Souls is the sequel to a PS3 exclusive, lol @ Mass Effect (read my previous post in this thread as to why, and add extra lolsauce when 3 becomes the "fastest selling title in the franchise") and the Witcher is also a PC-based title. I mean seriously, don't tout the 360 as the champion of the core gamer just because it can have everyone elses leftovers, or at least come up with better examples. Convinced, I am not.

The truth is that what sells big in the US market and the 360 as well as wii is casual garbage and brogamer dreck. Hell, the CoD crowd infiltrated PS3 Nirvana when Sony cut out functionality of the console to get the price in line to the mass market. All of gaming is suffering for it... Well, except on PC.

..or devs & publishers found logic in releasing said titles to multiple platforms.. That doesn't take away from their "core-ness"..

No, but what I *am* saying is that those franchises were more or less started on other platforms that *do* cater to the core gamer before being brought over to 360-ville. The lone exception to the rule in that list being Mass Effect.. Which even it's own fanbase is chomping at the bit at for becoming too casual and having a linear ending. See also my previous post with Youtube video URL.

You guys are notoriously conservative in your tastes. It's part of the reason why people are capping on it so much nowadays. Hooray sales, I'll give you that. However, quality has gone out the window.

Avatar image for Devil-Itachi
Devil-Itachi

4387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Devil-Itachi
Member since 2005 • 4387 Posts
Those lists are kind of weird and seem fairly random. They are certainly not lists of top selling games of a given year. Look like they may of been taken from random months.
Avatar image for JLF1MarkII
JLF1MarkII

1416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 JLF1MarkII
Member since 2012 • 1416 Posts

Oh, just another thread from an idiot who thinks sales = quality.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"] Elder Scrolls is a PC series, essentially. Dark Souls is the sequel to a PS3 exclusive, lol @ Mass Effect (read my previous post in this thread as to why, and add extra lolsauce when 3 becomes the "fastest selling title in the franchise") and the Witcher is also a PC-based title. I mean seriously, don't tout the 360 as the champion of the core gamer just because it can have everyone elses leftovers, or at least come up with better examples. Convinced, I am not.

The truth is that what sells big in the US market and the 360 as well as wii is casual garbage and brogamer dreck. Hell, the CoD crowd infiltrated PS3 Nirvana when Sony cut out functionality of the console to get the price in line to the mass market. All of gaming is suffering for it... Well, except on PC.

Shewgenja

..or devs & publishers found logic in releasing said titles to multiple platforms.. That doesn't take away from their "core-ness"..

No, but what I *am* saying is that those franchises were more or less started on other platforms that *do* cater to the core gamer before being brought over to 360-ville. The lone exception to the rule in that list being Mass Effect.. Which even it's own fanbase is chomping at the bit at for becoming too casual and having a linear ending. See also my previous post with Youtube video URL.

You guys are notoriously conservative in your tastes. It's part of the reason why people are capping on it so much nowadays. Hooray sales, I'll give you that. However, quality has gone out the window.

I don't think we need to address that 360 quality is gone. The fanboys might be in denial, but a large amount of people are aware and are not blinded by rating sites that suck microsoft's schlong. That's why they gave Halo:Reach a 7.6 and Gears of War 3 a 7.5. And honestly, both those scores are what those 2 mediocre games deserved. Heck, LittleBigPlanet got a 95 on metacritic, beating out every exclusive that the 360 has had, yet I think that game is garbage, even worse than halo and gears. Metacritic users gave it a 6.8 or 6.9, which I think is what the game deserves.
Avatar image for JLF1MarkII
JLF1MarkII

1416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 JLF1MarkII
Member since 2012 • 1416 Posts

[QUOTE="VikingStoner"]

[QUOTE="exiledsnake"]Since this is NPD you should also take into consideration how many 360s and ps3s are out there in america. 360 exclusives sell better in america because the install base is far larger.delta3074

Perhaps but as for 360 exclusives selling better overall? Its a myth that people continue to keep alive.

Why do all people talk about 360 exclusives like everyone of them is Halo? GT5 sold more than all 3 Gears of Wars games. Halo isn't the only 360 exclusive. Kameo, Saints Row, Dead Rising and other former exclusive franchises didn't sell nearly the amount Halo games did. Fable & Alan Wake didn't either. Uncharted 2 sold more than both those games. Really its no different than PS3. Not all PS3 exclusives sold like GT5 and not all 360 exclusives sell like Halo

GT5 Sales=7.5 million as of december 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gran_Turismo_5 Gears franchise sales Gears of war=5.88 million as of november 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gears_of_War Gears of war 2=over 5 million units as of may 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gears_of_War_2 Gears of war 3=6 million units as of january 2012 Total=17 million units, 9,5 million units more than Gt5 Saying Gt5 outsold all 3 gears games=Stupid:)



All Just Dance games have outsold the Gears franchise though :)

Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

..or devs & publishers found logic in releasing said titles to multiple platforms.. That doesn't take away from their "core-ness"..

BattlefieldFan1

No, but what I *am* saying is that those franchises were more or less started on other platforms that *do* cater to the core gamer before being brought over to 360-ville. The lone exception to the rule in that list being Mass Effect.. Which even it's own fanbase is chomping at the bit at for becoming too casual and having a linear ending. See also my previous post with Youtube video URL.

You guys are notoriously conservative in your tastes. It's part of the reason why people are capping on it so much nowadays. Hooray sales, I'll give you that. However, quality has gone out the window.

I don't think we need to address that 360 quality is gone. The fanboys might be in denial, but a large amount of people are aware and are not blinded by rating sites that suck microsoft's schlong. That's why they gave Halo:Reach a 7.6 and Gears of War 3 a 7.5. And honestly, both those scores are what those 2 mediocre games deserved. Heck, LittleBigPlanet got a 95 on metacritic, beating out every exclusive that the 360 has had, yet I think that game is garbage, even worse than halo and gears. Metacritic users gave it a 6.8 or 6.9, which I think is what the game deserves.

Listen...i understand your frustration..being last sucks...but it will develop your character, and what doesn't kill you makes you stronger...pin your dreams on that and forget about the good ole days of sony ruling ....all things must pass...peace be with you
Avatar image for wewantdoom4now
wewantdoom4now

1792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 wewantdoom4now
Member since 2012 • 1792 Posts

Yea xbox doesnt need halo pfft it was one of the only decent launch titles.

EXCLUSIVES PFFT who needs em? CONSOLES

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Shewgenja"] No, but what I *am* saying is that those franchises were more or less started on other platforms that *do* cater to the core gamer before being brought over to 360-ville. The lone exception to the rule in that list being Mass Effect.. Which even it's own fanbase is chomping at the bit at for becoming too casual and having a linear ending. See also my previous post with Youtube video URL.You guys are notoriously conservative in your tastes. It's part of the reason why people are capping on it so much nowadays. Hooray sales, I'll give you that. However, quality has gone out the window.spiderluck
I don't think we need to address that 360 quality is gone. The fanboys might be in denial, but a large amount of people are aware and are not blinded by rating sites that suck microsoft's schlong. That's why they gave Halo:Reach a 7.6 and Gears of War 3 a 7.5. And honestly, both those scores are what those 2 mediocre games deserved. Heck, LittleBigPlanet got a 95 on metacritic, beating out every exclusive that the 360 has had, yet I think that game is garbage, even worse than halo and gears. Metacritic users gave it a 6.8 or 6.9, which I think is what the game deserves.

Listen...i understand your frustration..being last sucks...but it will develop your character, and what doesn't kill you makes you stronger...pin your dreams on that and forget about the good ole days of sony ruling ....all things must pass...peace be with you

I'm sorry that you lack any quality games and that your last chance to show us PS3 users that you have any noteworthy games to make us jealous has failed. Heck, they failed so much that even with all the fanboys giving it a 10, they only managed a pathetic 7.5 and 7.6. Both those games must have been a phenomenal disaster that even 360 fanboys had to say they were only mediocre. Don't worry, it's not too late. next gen, pick the company that doesn't rip off their costumers by charging you to play on a laggy P2P network.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#183 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62022 Posts

Why do you equate a System Wars mentality with US/worldwide sales?

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

Why do you equate a System Wars mentality with US/worldwide sales?

lundy86_4
It's the only argument lems have. Heck, even a lot of the lems admit their exclusives lack quality. Just check the user scores on metacritic. Also, what are they going to brag about? Oh wow, they had the RROD fiasco, so the only reason why they're leading by 2-3 mill units is because of replacements due to hardware failure? Doesn't sound very good. Not to mention the $60 fee to play on a P2P network. There's absolutely nothing to brag about and a lot of things to be ashamed about.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#185 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

How did DC Universe Online make it into the top 10 retail of 2010?!

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"] Elder Scrolls is a PC series, essentially. Dark Souls is the sequel to a PS3 exclusive, lol @ Mass Effect (read my previous post in this thread as to why, and add extra lolsauce when 3 becomes the "fastest selling title in the franchise") and the Witcher is also a PC-based title. I mean seriously, don't tout the 360 as the champion of the core gamer just because it can have everyone elses leftovers, or at least come up with better examples. Convinced, I am not.

The truth is that what sells big in the US market and the 360 as well as wii is casual garbage and brogamer dreck. Hell, the CoD crowd infiltrated PS3 Nirvana when Sony cut out functionality of the console to get the price in line to the mass market. All of gaming is suffering for it... Well, except on PC.

Shewgenja

..or devs & publishers found logic in releasing said titles to multiple platforms.. That doesn't take away from their "core-ness"..

No, but what I *am* saying is that those franchises were more or less started on other platforms that *do* cater to the core gamer before being brought over to 360-ville. The lone exception to the rule in that list being Mass Effect.. Which even it's own fanbase is chomping at the bit at for becoming too casual and having a linear ending. See also my previous post with Youtube video URL.

You guys are notoriously conservative in your tastes. It's part of the reason why people are capping on it so much nowadays. Hooray sales, I'll give you that. However, quality has gone out the window.

..sounds like sour grapes.. :?
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I don't think we need to address that 360 quality is gone. The fanboys might be in denial, but a large amount of people are aware and are not blinded by rating sites that suck microsoft's schlong. That's why they gave Halo:Reach a 7.6 and Gears of War 3 a 7.5. And honestly, both those scores are what those 2 mediocre games deserved. Heck, LittleBigPlanet got a 95 on metacritic, beating out every exclusive that the 360 has had, yet I think that game is garbage, even worse than halo and gears. Metacritic users gave it a 6.8 or 6.9, which I think is what the game deserves.

Listen...i understand your frustration..being last sucks...but it will develop your character, and what doesn't kill you makes you stronger...pin your dreams on that and forget about the good ole days of sony ruling ....all things must pass...peace be with you

I'm sorry that you lack any quality games and that your last chance to show us PS3 users that you have any noteworthy games to make us jealous has failed. Heck, they failed so much that even with all the fanboys giving it a 10, they only managed a pathetic 7.5 and 7.6. Both those games must have been a phenomenal disaster that even 360 fanboys had to say they were only mediocre. Don't worry, it's not too late. next gen, pick the company that doesn't rip off their costumers by charging you to play on a laggy P2P network.

You mean the company that's on the verge of bankruptcy because of inept management...misplaced bravado in the strength of it's brand name ...lacklustre and security issues laden online service...the purveyor of the 4th dimension....no thanks
Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

I know, it sucks. I literally can't enjoy a game unless it sells 20 million copies. I have so many games that I bought just laying around. I refuse to even take the plastic wrap off of them before they sell at least 15 million.

I tried playing games before when they didn't sell 15 million plus, and I thought I was having fun, but I went to look at the sales charts and it reminded me that I was in fact not having fun, because the game I was playing didn't sell a certain amount.

Unfortunately, I probably won't ever end up playing a lot of the games I own, because unless they sell 15 million or more, they're just not going to be fun games.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#189 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

I know, it sucks. I literally can't enjoy a game unless it sells 20 million copies. I have so many games that I bought just laying around. I refuse to even take the plastic wrap off of them before they sell at least 15 million.

I tried playing games before when they didn't sell 15 million plus, and I thought I was having fun, but I went to look at the sales charts and it reminded me that I was in fact not having fun, because the game I was playing didn't sell a certain amount.

Unfortunately, I probably won't ever end up playing a lot of the games I own, because unless they sell 15 million or more, they're just not going to be fun games.

arkephonic
Yeah I know what you mean, when i saw that Resistance 3 didn't sell well at all it suddenly didn't have great gameplay or atmosphere and the weapons instantly became boring because i knew that not many people were enjoying them and how could they after seeing the sales, I don't blame them. The only fun games are CoD, Halo and GTA these days and even then it takes a few days for them to become fun and exciting.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"] Listen...i understand your frustration..being last sucks...but it will develop your character, and what doesn't kill you makes you stronger...pin your dreams on that and forget about the good ole days of sony ruling ....all things must pass...peace be with you

I'm sorry that you lack any quality games and that your last chance to show us PS3 users that you have any noteworthy games to make us jealous has failed. Heck, they failed so much that even with all the fanboys giving it a 10, they only managed a pathetic 7.5 and 7.6. Both those games must have been a phenomenal disaster that even 360 fanboys had to say they were only mediocre. Don't worry, it's not too late. next gen, pick the company that doesn't rip off their costumers by charging you to play on a laggy P2P network.

You mean the company that's on the verge of bankruptcy because of inept management...misplaced bravado in the strength of it's brand name ...lacklustre and security issues laden online service...the purveyor of the 4th dimension....no thanks

The playstation department is still profitable, so the health of other SONY branches won't matter that much in the console industry. Nice try. So you'll stick with the company that rams their dick down their consumer's throat? A company that charges $60 to play on a laggy P2P network? Microsoft, who has been hacked more times than SONY has been? http://www.pcworld.com/article/249868/the_byte_microsoft_hacked_apple_wants_inspections_white_house_cto_resigns.html 2001 2001- Microsoft becomes the prominent victim of a new type of hack that attacks the domain name server. In these denial-of-service attacks, the DNS paths that take users to Microsoft's Web sites are corrupted. 2004 - http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/03q2/ms-hack-image.html 2010 - http://techrights.org/2010/01/20/microsoft-pharma-hotmail-abandonment/ Not really a hacking, but would you really trust a company so careless? http://thehackernews.com/2012/03/microsoft-hacking-code-leaked-from.html And you have the gall to call SONY's security lackluster. The same group that hacked SONY could have easily hacked LIVE. They targeted SONY because of SONY's stance on game piracy. It's astonishing, yet sad at the same time. You pick a company based on how profitable they are? Do you have MSFT stocks? If you don't, I don't know why you're even stickign with them. You had no games this gen with any quality. You got ripped off by paying that bullcrap live fee. Then you had the RROD fiasco. Yet, after all this, you're still sticking with MSFT because SONY sold 2 mill less consoles so far? You're as inane as any other 360 fanboy. Or, it could be that you know you lost the debate, but are trying to be so damn illogical to appear as a troll to save face. Honestly, I don't know, but in either case, you should grow up.
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] I'm sorry that you lack any quality games and that your last chance to show us PS3 users that you have any noteworthy games to make us jealous has failed. Heck, they failed so much that even with all the fanboys giving it a 10, they only managed a pathetic 7.5 and 7.6. Both those games must have been a phenomenal disaster that even 360 fanboys had to say they were only mediocre. Don't worry, it's not too late. next gen, pick the company that doesn't rip off their costumers by charging you to play on a laggy P2P network.

You mean the company that's on the verge of bankruptcy because of inept management...misplaced bravado in the strength of it's brand name ...lacklustre and security issues laden online service...the purveyor of the 4th dimension....no thanks

The playstation department is still profitable, so the health of other SONY branches won't matter that much in the console industry. Nice try. So you'll stick with the company that rams their dick down their consumer's throat? A company that charges $60 to play on a laggy P2P network? Microsoft, who has been hacked more times than SONY has been? http://www.pcworld.com/article/249868/the_byte_microsoft_hacked_apple_wants_inspections_white_house_cto_resigns.html 2001 2001- Microsoft becomes the prominent victim of a new type of hack that attacks the domain name server. In these denial-of-service attacks, the DNS paths that take users to Microsoft's Web sites are corrupted. 2004 - http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/03q2/ms-hack-image.html 2010 - http://techrights.org/2010/01/20/microsoft-pharma-hotmail-abandonment/ Not really a hacking, but would you really trust a company so careless? http://thehackernews.com/2012/03/microsoft-hacking-code-leaked-from.html It's astonishing, yet sad at the same time. You pick a company based on how profitable they are? Do you have MSFT stocks? If you don't, I don't know why you're even stickign with them. You had no games this gen with any quality. You got ripped off by paying that bullcrap live fee. Then you had the RROD fiasco. Yet, after all this, you're still sticking with MSFT because SONY sold 2 mill less consoles so far? You're as inane as any other 360 fanboy. Or, it could be that you know you lost the debate, but are trying to be so damn illogical to appear as a troll to save face. Honestly, I don't know, but in either case, you should grow up.

Hang on tight...you really cant fall lower than last
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"] You mean the company that's on the verge of bankruptcy because of inept management...misplaced bravado in the strength of it's brand name ...lacklustre and security issues laden online service...the purveyor of the 4th dimension....no thanks

The playstation department is still profitable, so the health of other SONY branches won't matter that much in the console industry. Nice try. So you'll stick with the company that rams their dick down their consumer's throat? A company that charges $60 to play on a laggy P2P network? Microsoft, who has been hacked more times than SONY has been? http://www.pcworld.com/article/249868/the_byte_microsoft_hacked_apple_wants_inspections_white_house_cto_resigns.html 2001 2001- Microsoft becomes the prominent victim of a new type of hack that attacks the domain name server. In these denial-of-service attacks, the DNS paths that take users to Microsoft's Web sites are corrupted. 2004 - http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/03q2/ms-hack-image.html 2010 - http://techrights.org/2010/01/20/microsoft-pharma-hotmail-abandonment/ Not really a hacking, but would you really trust a company so careless? http://thehackernews.com/2012/03/microsoft-hacking-code-leaked-from.html It's astonishing, yet sad at the same time. You pick a company based on how profitable they are? Do you have MSFT stocks? If you don't, I don't know why you're even stickign with them. You had no games this gen with any quality. You got ripped off by paying that bullcrap live fee. Then you had the RROD fiasco. Yet, after all this, you're still sticking with MSFT because SONY sold 2 mill less consoles so far? You're as inane as any other 360 fanboy. Or, it could be that you know you lost the debate, but are trying to be so damn illogical to appear as a troll to save face. Honestly, I don't know, but in either case, you should grow up.

Hang on tight...you really cant fall lower than last

Nope you can't, but it seems MSFT will be last. They're selling less consoles than SONY.
Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

I know, it sucks. I literally can't enjoy a game unless it sells 20 million copies. I have so many games that I bought just laying around. I refuse to even take the plastic wrap off of them before they sell at least 15 million.

I tried playing games before when they didn't sell 15 million plus, and I thought I was having fun, but I went to look at the sales charts and it reminded me that I was in fact not having fun, because the game I was playing didn't sell a certain amount.

Unfortunately, I probably won't ever end up playing a lot of the games I own, because unless they sell 15 million or more, they're just not going to be fun games.

Yeah I know what you mean, when i saw that Resistance 3 didn't sell well at all it suddenly didn't have great gameplay or atmosphere and the weapons instantly became boring because i knew that not many people were enjoying them and how could they after seeing the sales, I don't blame them. The only fun games are CoD, Halo and GTA these days and even then it takes a few days for them to become fun and exciting.

Resistance 2 was awesome, cant wait to get R3. The weapons in that game man.....so creative
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] The playstation department is still profitable, so the health of other SONY branches won't matter that much in the console industry. Nice try. So you'll stick with the company that rams their dick down their consumer's throat? A company that charges $60 to play on a laggy P2P network? Microsoft, who has been hacked more times than SONY has been? http://www.pcworld.com/article/249868/the_byte_microsoft_hacked_apple_wants_inspections_white_house_cto_resigns.html 2001 2001- Microsoft becomes the prominent victim of a new type of hack that attacks the domain name server. In these denial-of-service attacks, the DNS paths that take users to Microsoft's Web sites are corrupted. 2004 - http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/03q2/ms-hack-image.html 2010 - http://techrights.org/2010/01/20/microsoft-pharma-hotmail-abandonment/ Not really a hacking, but would you really trust a company so careless? http://thehackernews.com/2012/03/microsoft-hacking-code-leaked-from.html It's astonishing, yet sad at the same time. You pick a company based on how profitable they are? Do you have MSFT stocks? If you don't, I don't know why you're even stickign with them. You had no games this gen with any quality. You got ripped off by paying that bullcrap live fee. Then you had the RROD fiasco. Yet, after all this, you're still sticking with MSFT because SONY sold 2 mill less consoles so far? You're as inane as any other 360 fanboy. Or, it could be that you know you lost the debate, but are trying to be so damn illogical to appear as a troll to save face. Honestly, I don't know, but in either case, you should grow up.

Hang on tight...you really cant fall lower than last

Nope you can't, but it seems MSFT will be last. They're selling less consoles than SONY.

Only in your dream universe
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"] Hang on tight...you really cant fall lower than last

Nope you can't, but it seems MSFT will be last. They're selling less consoles than SONY.

Only in your dream universe

Didn't I tell you to go see a psychiatrist? Did seeing all your 360 sheep trashtalking halo and gears break your heart?
Avatar image for spiderluck
spiderluck

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 spiderluck
Member since 2012 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"] Nope you can't, but it seems MSFT will be last. They're selling less consoles than SONY.

Only in your dream universe

Didn't I tell you to go see a psychiatrist? Did seeing all your 360 sheep trashtalking halo and gears break your heart?

OOOhhh you so clever....
Avatar image for Assassin_87
Assassin_87

2349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#197 Assassin_87
Member since 2004 • 2349 Posts

Well, I can't speak for all PS3 fans obviously, but I own/have owned UC1 and 2, Killzone 3, Demon's Souls, MGS4, Infamous, Valkyria Chronicles, LBP, and all three Resistance games. I plan on picking up GT5 XL Edition and UC3 also.

I mean, if you're going to own a PS3, at least use it correctly...

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="spiderluck"] Only in your dream universe

Didn't I tell you to go see a psychiatrist? Did seeing all your 360 sheep trashtalking halo and gears break your heart?

OOOhhh you so clever....

Baah, baahh bahhh. Oh, did you hear that? That much be all your 360 sheep friends falling off the cliff. Go on, little sheep. Go follow them.
Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

Well, I can't speak for all PS3 fans obviously, but I own/have owned UC1 and 2, Killzone 3, Demon's Souls, MGS4, Infamous, Valkyria Chronicles, LBP, and all three Resistance games. I plan on picking up GT5 XL Edition and UC3 also.

I mean, if you're going to own a PS3, at least use it correctly...

Assassin_87
The 360 dominates in the USA because of patriotism. Of course the console with more units in the USA will have more software sales.
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

The 360 dominates in the USA because of patriotism. Of course the console with more units in the USA will have more software sales.BattlefieldFan1

U-S-A U-S-AU-S-A U-S-AU-S-A U-S-AU-S-A U-S-AU-S-A U-S-AU-S-A U-S-A