Sony set to dissapoint again with no backward compatibilty on PS4 !!!

  • 166 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]lol, you never owned a PS3 fool sit down. 

lol @ desperate lems trying to make a bid deal out of this..

For old PS3 owners they can just keep their old consoles for now players who never owned a Trey they have Gakai which could possibly host the entire Playstation library through every generation.  

Obviously_Right

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

No it isn't.

Unless you're a dullard that buys a current gen console to play last gen games.

Some people trade in their old console to pay for part of the new console. Their game collection is going to be worthless to them now. Yeah I think BC is somewhat important to people. If Microsoft is going to have the Next Xbox not have BC either I'll be mad at them too. 

Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

xhawk27

No it isn't.

Unless you're a dullard that buys a current gen console to play last gen games.

Some people trade in their old console to pay for part of the new console. Their game collection is going to be worthless to them now. Yeah I think BC is somewhat important to people. If Microsoft is going to have the Next Xbox not have BC either I'll be mad at them too. 

Then those people need to be patient and save up longer.

Now that PS4 has no BC you can bet your a$$ that M$ won't use it either. Why would they? It would like make the console more expensive than PS4.

Pointless.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#103 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45464 Posts
Well it was pretty obvious it wouldn't have BC years ago. Don't act shocked, many of us weren't, just admit your naivety.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

Buying the old PS3 games all over again this time streaming them. Thank You Sony, Day Fing 1!

xhawk27

lol, you never owned a PS3 fool sit down. 

lol @ desperate lems trying to make a bid deal out of this..

For old PS3 owners they can just keep their old consoles for now players who never owned a Trey they have Gakai which could possibly host the entire Playstation library through every generation.  

I do have a PS3. My gamertag is Hawk_X29  

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.
Avatar image for 06
06

998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 06
Member since 2003 • 998 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]lol, you never owned a PS3 fool sit down. 

lol @ desperate lems trying to make a bid deal out of this..

For old PS3 owners they can just keep their old consoles for now players who never owned a Trey they have Gakai which could possibly host the entire Playstation library through every generation.  

casharmy

I do have a PS3. My gamertag is Hawk_X29  

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

then why are you talking about buying games all over again, did your PS3 stop working or something?  all your game disks break?  seriously now.

Thank you, pleas keep educateing the people. Not having BC is not a big deal. You just can't win with people, they add BC, "Oh no price is too high!" They take away BC to lower the price, "Oh noooo, how will I ever play my PS3 games!" Common people, it's not hard to use that thing inside your skull.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]lol, you never owned a PS3 fool sit down. 

lol @ desperate lems trying to make a bid deal out of this..

For old PS3 owners they can just keep their old consoles for now players who never owned a Trey they have Gakai which could possibly host the entire Playstation library through every generation.  

Murderstyle75

I do have a PS3. My gamertag is Hawk_X29  

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Avatar image for 06
06

998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 06
Member since 2003 • 998 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

xhawk27

No it isn't.

Unless you're a dullard that buys a current gen console to play last gen games.

Some people trade in their old console to pay for part of the new console. Their game collection is going to be worthless to them now. Yeah I think BC is somewhat important to people. If Microsoft is going to have the Next Xbox not have BC either I'll be mad at them too. 

Trade in... That whole $50 GameStop will give you for your old console, will that really stop someone from buying a new console?
Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="xhawk27"]

I do have a PS3. My gamertag is Hawk_X29  

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

sSubZerOo

Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Yes PC is the perfect platform for BC. Good luck getting older games not on GOG to run.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.whiskeystrike

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Yes PC is the perfect platform for BC. Good luck getting older games not on GOG to run.

   Uh most games have easy to get patch's.. And those are the troublesome ones that won't launch when in compatability mode.. Which I have really only come across one that gave me problems.. That being Homeworld Cataclysm.. 

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="xhawk27"]

I do have a PS3. My gamertag is Hawk_X29  

Not having BC is kind of a big deal. 

sSubZerOo

Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Then perhaps you should just stay in the PS3 generation and forget about a PS4. Once PS4 games are in full swing, are you really going to have time for PS3 games? The only way I would be able to would be to quit my job and abandon my family. You also have to think about it this way. What happened the last time Sony released an expensive Sku? Not only did we hear about it from Xbox fanboys who ignored the fact that there was a 500.00 sku that far exceeded the value of a 400.00 Xbox 360 and was only 30.00 more after a 1 year Live subscription and a play & charge to power the controller but the industry critics did the exact same thing. The last thing Sony needs is kind of criticism they would receive by releasing a 700.00 sku that plays last gen games. They would get flamed just as bad as they did with their 600.00 sku and the propaganda would again overshadow the other versions
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#111 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

I undserstand phasing out backward compatibilty slowly on newer versions of PS3 as the PS3 library swells, but what is Sony's excuse for not providing BC along with the launch PS4's?

Now its not tottally hopeless though as SW emulation is still discussed...but a native BC would have been handy, what say guys?

Getting PS4 on launch though.....

Serioussamik
It would be even more expensive if they had to include the cell processor as well. SW emulation might be possible, but it seems Sony doesn't want to waste time or money to do it. I'm happen my PS3 is B/C. Microsoft could probably do it easier, but they may all pass on it. At this point, I don't care as even if I get a PS4 or XBox 720, i probably won't have many games for they right away and will have them hooked up to a different HDTV. It won't effect me to much. I'll still play my PS3 and XBox 360 more then the next-gen system initially anyways.
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#112 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

I never owned a PS3 so the PS4 having BC would have been great and would have given me more incentive to get the PS4. I'd be able to have access to two systems' libraries for the price of one. Would be damn awesome.

Even if I did own a PS3, BC would be great in that I could sell my hypothetical PS3 to get a bit more $$$, while giving myself one less console to have to lug around orr to take up space. Nothing bad-sounding here.

Sure, BC shouldn't be the primary reason to buy a console, and I can understand it would add to the price of the PS4 (would probably still be cheaper than having to buy both a PS3 and PS4, but whatever). But I can certainly see disappointment in the PS4 not having BC; it's a great feature. 

Avatar image for rilpas
rilpas

8161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 rilpas
Member since 2012 • 8161 Posts

I'd rather have the inconvenience of keeping an old console around than having to pay an extra $100 just to play old games on a new console.

JamDev
$100 today is $50 tomorrow and $25 the day after tomorrow
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#114 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

Not to worried about it I keep my consoles.

Avatar image for hiryu3
hiryu3

7313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#115 hiryu3
Member since 2003 • 7313 Posts

Omg why can't people just get the simple concept of the console architecture? Really, is it that hard? If you want backward compatibility that bad keep your ps3. Stop complaining because I don't know what the big deal is.

Elite-Realist
exactly
Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#116 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

No it isn't.

Unless you're a dullard that buys a current gen console to play last gen games.

06

Some people trade in their old console to pay for part of the new console. Their game collection is going to be worthless to them now. Yeah I think BC is somewhat important to people. If Microsoft is going to have the Next Xbox not have BC either I'll be mad at them too. 

Trade in... That whole $50 GameStop will give you for your old console, will that really stop someone from buying a new console?

 

trade in values for PS3 are like $150 and like $80 for a broken one. That's a lot of money, especially for a console that will eventually break sooner than later because Sony uses lead free solder.

Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#117 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

If you're so poor that you can't afford to keep your PS3 next to your QUAD, then you shouldn't even buy a QUAD. 

Dunno how these welfare gamers afford to even post on this forum. #sadlife

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#118 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

If you're so poor that you can't afford to keep your PS3 next to your QUAD, then you shouldn't even buy a QUAD. 

Dunno how these welfare gamers afford to even post on this forum. #sadlife

sanim02

shouldnt make fun or poke at people with lesser money..sometimes its just what youve been delt in life..

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#119 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
Unless you want to add $100 onto the console, there won't be BC. Sony intends to use Gaikai for BC anyways. Already have PS3 games ? keep your PS3. Don't have a PS3 ? use Gaikai.
Avatar image for ChaltierX
ChaltierX

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 ChaltierX
Member since 2009 • 1128 Posts

I've already expected no BC. Besides, I don't buy a current gen system to play last gen games. 

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#121 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.Murderstyle75

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Then perhaps you should just stay in the PS3 generation and forget about a PS4. Once PS4 games are in full swing, are you really going to have time for PS3 games? The only way I would be able to would be to quit my job and abandon my family.

 

You also have to think about it this way. What happened the last time Sony released an expensive Sku? Not only did we hear about it from Xbox fanboys who ignored the fact that there was a 500.00 sku that far exceeded the value of a 400.00 Xbox 360 and was only 30.00 more after a 1 year Live subscription and a play & charge to power the controller but the industry critics did the exact same thing. The last thing Sony needs is kind of criticism they would receive by releasing a 700.00 sku that plays last gen games. They would get flamed just as bad as they did with their 600.00 sku and the propaganda would again overshadow the other versions

 

PS3 was expensive because of the Cell R&D and the blu-ray not because of BC. And beside, I feel like playing whatever the hell I feel like it. I'm not a close minded dude-bro gamer that only play shooters and games with the best graphics, I play games from all generations and having 10 consoles under by TV when I could only have 1 is stupid. 

There is not excuse for Sony to not even emulate PS1 and PS2. There is a PS2 emulator made by enthusiast for free on the PC with the same architecture as the PS4 so why can't Sony do something about it? If BC wasn't a big deal there wouldn't be a market for HD collections and digital re-releases you know.

I'm pretty sure there must be ways around it but the thing is that you guys already showed Sony that they can bend you very easily.

Avatar image for Douevenlift_bro
Douevenlift_bro

6804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Douevenlift_bro
Member since 2013 • 6804 Posts

Dont care. I have every PS console

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
It doesn't matter why the PS3 was more expensive. It's the fact that it was more expensive and the harsh criticism that surrounded it. Who in the hell on being bent over? I don't really care about PS3 games on the PS4. That's why I own a PS3. If keeping backwards compatability out of the system can make it better, I am all for it. What I wouldn't plan on doing is wasting a ton of money on something to play games I can already play. But now of course since I have a job, family and social life beyond gaming, I couldn't even be able to juggle two generations of games let alone even care about it. It's a PS4. Not a PS3. Spending that kind of money to play old **** is sort of like bending yourself over.
Avatar image for Shielder7
Shielder7

5191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#124 Shielder7
Member since 2006 • 5191 Posts

$ony should introduce Emulation Software in the PS4 to play (at least) PS3 games. :cool:

dr_jashugan
I don't think that's possible for PS 3 game PS 2 game maybe but PS 3 game Emulation Software you would need a beast of a machine much more powerful than the PS 4.
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#125 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

There's a real simple solution to this. Keep your PS3.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
keep ur ps3 /all first world problems solved.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

Want backward capability pc is the only way to go, I can play any game from ps2 era and older no problem. Heck even the original doom or quake works fine.

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts
It's not disspointing.... it was expected since x86 rumors showed.... it will be pain to do BC of PS3 on that machine
Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

Want backward capability pc is the only way to go, I can play any game from ps2 era and older no problem. Heck even the original doom or quake works fine.

imprezawrx500
Thats because x86 and PC hardware didn't change fundamentily that much any new PC can run any executables from 20 years ago (i'm not sure how modern CPUs handle very old 16-bit x86 code, if they can then even 10years behind more). So it's even hard to call it backward compatibility, if any BC then software BC of the system that API are changeing
Avatar image for SonySoldier-_-
SonySoldier-_-

1186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 SonySoldier-_-
Member since 2012 • 1186 Posts

Perhaps im in the minority here but I could care less about bc. When I get a PS4, I want to get one to play PS4 games. Not to play last gen games that I already played to death. Plus I usuallykeep my old consoles anyway so its not a big deal to me.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45671 Posts

How funny this thread reads - cows, ya just got no shame what so ever. :P

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#132 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Because it's not as simple as just making the disc drive able to read PS3 discs. Entirely different architecture. Would have to literally have the PS3 hardware built into the Ps4, just sitting idle when not being used to play old games. That's how the early PS3s did it, and that's how the PS2 did it. Not feasible or logical to waste space and production costs doing it again. Just keep your Ps3.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#133 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

Want backward capability pc is the only way to go, I can play any game from ps2 era and older no problem. Heck even the original doom or quake works fine.

ShadowriverUB

Thats because x86 and PC hardware didn't change fundamentily that much any new PC can run any executables from 20 years ago (i'm not sure how modern CPUs handle very old 16-bit x86 code, if they can then even 10years behind more). So it's even hard to call it backward compatibility, if any BC then software BC of the system that API are changeing

Sort of, yes. The fundamentals of PC architecture haven't changed in a long while. And you can still run even older programs with modern systems through emulation. DOSBOX for the win.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#134 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="dr_jashugan"]

$ony should introduce Emulation Software in the PS4 to play (at least) PS3 games. :cool:

Shielder7

I don't think that's possible for PS 3 game PS 2 game maybe but PS 3 game Emulation Software you would need a beast of a machine much more powerful than the PS 4.

This too. That's why emulation isn't a viable solution for BC on consoles. The amount of extra power it takes to emulate a system is ridiculous, and makes it far, far, FAR more taxing to run those programs than it would have been on their original platforms. That's why you can get PS2 emulators for PC, but even modern systems struggle quite a bit to maintain decent framerates running the more taxing of Ps2 games. It's about as far from efficient as you can get.

Avatar image for caseypayne69
caseypayne69

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#135 caseypayne69
Member since 2002 • 5396 Posts
Get over it. It's for the good going forward. Sony is abandoning the Cell tech. We should be happy.
Avatar image for caseypayne69
caseypayne69

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#136 caseypayne69
Member since 2002 • 5396 Posts
You guys know PS3 PS2 and PS1 games will be playable through Galka or whatever it's called right? Not sure if you have to rebuy though.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

I know there are gamers who honestly find it a problem for a console not having BC.. However what i find stupid is fanboys use this as an excuse to bash a system..

When PS3 was out, the first models (like mine) offered BC, so basically at launch PS3 had a huge line-up of titles available but gamers were complaining about 1) the Price & 2) the lack of games.. 

So that shows when gamers get new consoles, they want new games running on the new hardware.. thats the main reason why gamers buy new consoles !!!

Those wanting to play PS3 games already have a PS3, so all we need to do is hook up the PS3 console to the tv when we want to play its games.. It doesnt take 2hrs to connect/disconnect a console with the tv.. eehhhhh

Avatar image for DISSESHOWEDO
DISSESHOWEDO

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 DISSESHOWEDO
Member since 2010 • 1775 Posts

Don't care about the BC ! If i want to play ps3 games, i'll just switch to HDMI-1 ! Heck i'm even thinking of getting a second ps3 just in case something happens to the old faithfull one !

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

Want backward capability pc is the only way to go, I can play any game from ps2 era and older no problem. Heck even the original doom or quake works fine.

ShadowriverUB
Thats because x86 and PC hardware didn't change fundamentily that much any new PC can run any executables from 20 years ago (i'm not sure how modern CPUs handle very old 16-bit x86 code, if they can then even 10years behind more). So it's even hard to call it backward compatibility, if any BC then software BC of the system that API are changeing

Any modern X86 CPUs includes a hardware translator i.e. translates CISC's variable length instructions into RISC's fix length instructions.
Avatar image for trollhunter2
trollhunter2

2054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#140 trollhunter2
Member since 2012 • 2054 Posts

Sad truth is that people buy new consoles to play new games :(. Look at the WiiU or the early ps3 models. BC doesnt make consoles fly off shelves at all

Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts
It's alittle disappointing but I understand why they don't add it But I can say I'll wait to buy a PS4 longer than I would have if it did have BC
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

Sad truth is that people buy new consoles to play new games :(. Look at the WiiU or the early ps3 models. BC doesnt make consoles fly off shelves at all

trollhunter2
Yep and even with emulation on the 360. Most people just did not care. Backwards compatability sounds really good however once people start buying and playing new PS4 games, they are not even going to really be paying attention to the PS3. I have a massive backlog that I'm working on right now for both the Xbox 360 and PS3. After I finish it, I'll buy a PS4. Now with huge selection of games I'm trying to finish, I never really got around to taking any kind of advantage of PS2 backwards compatability. Had I still been worrying about the PS2, there would have been a whole lot more current gen games that I could have never got around to. Sony also wants to sell you next gen games for a next gen console. These consoles sell at a loss and the money is made back up in software sales. You can't really make up that loss if everybody is buying for a platform that is going to soon be made up of preowned copies at Gamestop. There is really no money to be made off of backwards compatability and if anything, supporting it would come at a loss of income.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#143 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] Why? Why buy a next gen console if you are so worried about last gen games? There are only so many hours in a day anyway.Murderstyle75

 The same reason why pc gamers have played games over a decade old constantly.. Because they are good... And I pity console players who some how think its accetpable in lugging out their failing PS2 unit with out the features and social parts of their modern day console to enjoy them..   Not to mention there are games people MISS and would love to go back to last gen... Guess my standards are just too "high".. 

Then perhaps you should just stay in the PS3 generation and forget about a PS4. Once PS4 games are in full swing, are you really going to have time for PS3 games? The only way I would be able to would be to quit my job and abandon my family. You also have to think about it this way. What happened the last time Sony released an expensive Sku? Not only did we hear about it from Xbox fanboys who ignored the fact that there was a 500.00 sku that far exceeded the value of a 400.00 Xbox 360 and was only 30.00 more after a 1 year Live subscription and a play & charge to power the controller but the industry critics did the exact same thing. The last thing Sony needs is kind of criticism they would receive by releasing a 700.00 sku that plays last gen games. They would get flamed just as bad as they did with their 600.00 sku and the propaganda would again overshadow the other versions

  :roll:  And you are what I call the cancer of the industry.. You automatically assume because its newer and next gen its automatically better..  And I am talking about EVERY CONSOLE out there in which gamers seem to be lapping this sh!t up.. You are the cancer.. You are the person that automatically sees the shiny graphics on the screen and are "OMG IT'S AMAZING".. You are the gamer that accepts the same sh!t in new wrapping..  I have time for GAMING, what fvcking difference does it make what gen it comes from?  You are the themepark consumer that takes up the next flashiest thing based on little substance.. Congrats.

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
Read the paragraph I wrote after the edit. And if I'm really a cancer, f*ck the PS3 even and f*ck the PS2. Lets all go back to the PSOne and be happy. Next gen gaming is about quite a bit more than graphics. There were so many limitations with the PS3 thanks to cell and the lack of ram. Is Skyrim working right for you yet?
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Read the paragraph I wrote after the edit. And if I'm really a cancer, f*ck the PS3 even and f*ck the PS2. Lets all go back to the PSOne and be happy. Next gen gaming is about quite a bit more than graphics. There were so many limitations with the PS3 thanks to cell and the lack of ram. Is Skyrim working right for you yet?Murderstyle75

:|  Yeah really it so illustrated that with Killzone 4 on rails, leading to a small area shooter illustrating the same mechanics that have been going on for years..  that 8gb sure made a difference der!

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
But of course no consoles launch has even shown what a console is capable of. Not even close. Most 360 launch games were last gen ports even. And all that aside. You cry like babies saying I want, I want, I want. But the fact of the matter is, bringing PS3 games to the PS4 is in no way profitable since the majority of them will be sold from the used market. Perhaps it would be different if either A) the used market didn't exist or B) the console was going to be sold at profit. They are already pretty much giving you a charity by selling these things at a few hundred dollars below manufacturing costs. Backwards compatibility just hinders any kind of profit that can be made off the console. Unless of course you are willing to spend not only extra for backwards compatibility but even more so the the console is sold at profit while catering to your last gen needs which will be mostly sold used at GameStop. You would be looking at about a 1000.00 console to make it work. They are selling a PS4 to sell new 60.00 titles. Not to sell a bunch of preowned games and 20.00 platinum hits.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#147 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

But of course no consoles launch has even shown what a console is capable of. Not even close. Most 360 launch games were last gen ports even. And all that aside. You cry like babies saying I want, I want, I want. But the fact of the matter is, bringing PS3 games to the PS4 is in no way profitable since the majority of them will be sold from the used market. Perhaps it would be different if either A) the used market didn't exist or B) the console was going to be sold at profit. They are already pretty much giving you a charity by selling these things at a few hundred dollars below manufacturing costs. Backwards compatibility just hinders any kind of profit that can be made off the console. Unless of course you are willing to spend not only extra for backwards compatibility but even more so the the console is sold at profit while catering to your last gen needs which will be mostly sold used at GameStop. You would be looking at about a 1000.00 console to make it work. They are selling a PS4 to sell new 60.00 titles. Not to sell a bunch of preowned games and 20.00 platinum hits.Murderstyle75

  No instead they are going to sell the user sloppy "HD" ports of older games that they already own in one form or another..   I just find it hilarious the excuses people are making.. That may indeed not be possible with their current plan, that doesn't some ho wmake it above criticism.. And furthermore cry babies? You furhter illustrate the point that you willing to bend over for these companies.. Last I checked they aren't giving it to us for free, we are spending money for their product and services..   People have the right to be critical of said things, they are not giving it to us for free.. This is a mutual business relationship between producer and consumer..   And I am sorry but what? Where was Killzone 4 a port?  And I am sorry but what?  The graphics clearly look better then the PS3 but the gameplay HASN'T CHANGED what so ever.. It's same sh!t..   Extra ram, new shiny hardware isn't going to some how change the gameplay of the most popular genres.. Because it wasn't the thing that was holding it back to begin with..  Until people get this through their heads, expect to see the same sh!t in the next gen with a few meaningless twists.. 

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#148 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I think I've gone back and played my last gen consoles and games for about .1% of my total gameing playtime in the past 7 years.

So yeah... who cares.

Avatar image for Agent-Tojed
Agent-Tojed

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Agent-Tojed
Member since 2012 • 160 Posts

Do people realize that if BC is installed, the price would go higher? Around $75-$100 I believe.

Just keep your darn PS3. Or Gamecube. Or Virtual Boy. 

Avatar image for Caseytappy
Caseytappy

2199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Caseytappy
Member since 2005 • 2199 Posts

PS3 BC can only be done if you include PS3 hardware which they won't do for obvious reasons .

Did anyone really expect the PS4 to be powerful enough to emulate the PS3 in software :lol: