sony: we finished 3rd this gen.. launch price was to blame

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]@tenaka 1. he can't see it, 2. its oldsts106mat
I frankly fear for my a*** v******* when tenaka is around he knows he's ignored yet he keeps posting that picture I frankly find it very stalkerish I've got a pricing set for a complete security system and bars on my windows you just never know with someone like tenaka.

you cannot trust anyone who remotely associates themselves with pandas.

yeah grizzly bears for the win! oh and koala's.
Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#153 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

Not just price, the complex CELL kept development long when they needed games to come out. Long development cycles aren't really good business.

Spend years and years developing a game and then not marketing it well.

They made so many arrogant mistakes, it's silly to blame just te price.

Avatar image for UnrealLegend
UnrealLegend

5888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#155 UnrealLegend
Member since 2009 • 5888 Posts

At least they're admitting it. It probably means the PS4 will start out cheaper, which is good news for everybody.

Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#156 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

So i guess this confirms the next playstation wont be priced too high. good new for me

finalstar2007
My thoughts exactly
Avatar image for meatgrinderz
meatgrinderz

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#157 meatgrinderz
Member since 2010 • 1329 Posts

If they relized high price killed them early on, when did they repeat their mistake with the vita?

Also, the lack of games didn't help.

TopTierHustler

Bingo. Sony is finished.

Avatar image for meatgrinderz
meatgrinderz

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 meatgrinderz
Member since 2010 • 1329 Posts

If they relized high price killed them early on, when did they repeat their mistake with the vita?

Also, the lack of games didn't help.

TopTierHustler

Bingo. Sony is finished.

Avatar image for ebrezzy1
ebrezzy1

1427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 ebrezzy1
Member since 2012 • 1427 Posts

good ...

don't make your system so high priced and profits await Sony

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts

If they relized high price killed them early on, when did they repeat their mistake with the vita?

Also, the lack of games didn't help.

TopTierHustler

The PSP was $250 at launch and managed 70 million, so they probably thought they could repeat that again. When Nintendo set the 3DS launch price at $250, the Vita looked like good value. It was too bad for Sony that Nintendo needed to drop the price, leaving the Vita looking expensive and without much room to drop, unlike the 3DS which could take a large reduction and only lose a small amount of money on each unit sold.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

sony has admitted that they have finished 3rd this gen.. and they blame the high launch price of the system.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/sony-admits-ps3-price-was-a-factor-in-3rd-place-current-gen-finish/097791

TCHBO

ionusX
What i always say,if they would have release at $399 or less the story would have been allot different,sony make a few mistakes,while i think blu-ray was the right move in technology and was incredibly good for us the consumer,as a company sony shoot them self in the foot,a PS3 a DVD drive would have release on 2005,and not 2006,it would have release for less as well and the story now would have been completely different. That say i am thankful it turn out this way,because the move sony took was in favor of the consumer not them,unlike other companies,who will milk you dry.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....

Is 2012 all 2005,2006,2007,2008,and almost all 2009 consoles are out of warranty,maybe you think that when MS repair your console you get and extra 3 years,if you think that way wrong,if your unit was 2006 and was repair for RROD on 2009,you only have 1 year to go on your warranty,the 3 year warranty is not eternal for as long you own your 360,other wise it would be call eternal warranty or some crap like that. All fat 360 will RROD at some point,because even the more reliable ones did not eliminated the problem,they just were more resistant,but sooner or latter it would happen. By the way i am on my 2nd 360 bough,like i told you once your machine is repair you don't get 3 more years,and guess what most of the 360 our there are out of warranty by now,so if you have 30 games and your out of warranty 360 RROD,there is a no brainier what people will do buy a new 360,because selling for 30 games for almost nothing on gamestop and buying a PS3 is really not an option.
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#164 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

I still love my PS3 but yea 599 wasn't a good idea at all.

Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#165 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

Sony's problems:

1. Half of PS3 were bought only to be used as bluray, software sales were (and are) terrible.

b. Lack of software sales and overly expensive system meant that Sony didn't turn a profit.

III. Microsoft and Nintendo turned profits much earlier so even though it is a 2mil gap it is several millions different in currency.

Fourth: Exclusives sale well on 360, they sale poorly on PS3 so most sales are multiplats and money is lost to third party.

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

I doubt any of the companies are going to repeat this generations failures. I feel Sony will have their console priced well and Microsoft won't have the RROD.

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#167 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
The launch price wasn´t the only issue,the lack of great games for at least two years was also a major problem.Arach666
Not to mention PSN was a joke of a service for several years. Remember when you couldn't download things in the background? It was terrible!
Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts
Thank God they acknowledged that fact ... If this was 06 they would have probably blamed it on consumers being idiotic or poor or some off the wall comment like that. Hopefully this is a sign that Sony won't make the same pricing mistake and our wallets won't take such a beating next gen.
Avatar image for masiisam
masiisam

5723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 masiisam
Member since 2003 • 5723 Posts

I certainly believe launch price has something to do with it..but to squarely put the "blame" on why Sony is currently in third is still "political" at best.

Avatar image for svaubel
svaubel

4571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 133

User Lists: 0

#170 svaubel
Member since 2005 • 4571 Posts

Bought my PS3 when they were still $499. Was the last PS2-BC model they made so Im happy :P

Never paying that price for a console again though. Hope Sony learns that if you launch with a price that is out of the market people are not gonna buy the product.

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#171 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
Thank God they acknowledged that fact ... If this was 06 they would have probably blamed it on consumers being idiotic or poor or some off the wall comment like that. Hopefully this is a sign that Sony won't make the same pricing mistake and our wallets won't take such a beating next gen.W1NGMAN-
what do gamers want though? Great graphics or decent price?
Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#172 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13719 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"] PS3 Can't handle Splinter Cell:http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/86797-Splinter-Cell-producer-PS3-can-t-handle-AI-nearly-as-well-as-the-360 Ps3 can't handle Skyrim: http://roosterteeth.com/members/journal/entry.php?id=2839294 PS3 can;t handle Uncharted 4: http://gamerant.com/uncharted-4-ps3-ps4-hold-110635/ PS3 can;t handle rpgs: http://www.amazon.com/forum/video%20games?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1T1DM93QU4XL1&cdThread=TxDSL5IQ642LYF PS3 can;t run original Splinter Cell at 1080p: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/ps3_cant_even_run_the_original_splinter_cell_at_1080p The Gunstringer is not possible on PS3: http://n4g.com/news/844346/the-gunstringer-not-possible-on-wii-or-ps3 Mods are possible on Xbox but not Ps3: http://www.nextgenupdate.com/forums/universal-dumpster/532560-how-mods-possible-xbox-but-not-ps3.html Cross Game chat not possilble on PS3: http://article.wn.com/view/2011/08/20/Crossgame_chat_not_possible_on_PS3_coming_to_Vita/ Last Story not possible on PS3: http://www.vgchartz.com/article/83545/the-last-story-not-possible-anywhere-other-than-on-wii/ Super Meatboy not possible on PS3: http://www.psu.com/a010087/PS3-Super-Meat-Boy-not-at-all-possible,-says-dev-?page=0 This is enough proof to sure the PS3 had more problems with hardware and running games then the Xbox and I have more evidence than you do! Ha, the PS3 can;t run the GUNSTRINGER. Just sad really.Shockwave-DASH

Lol, you posted some opinionated forum pages in there. :lol: Go for real articles like I did.

Sorry but it seems that you have no proof so that you are forced to use other forums to back your argument up. However, some of your sources are good but they are not enough to compete with mine.

Both consoles indeed do have their strengths and weaknesses, but I got to admit that PS3 has more strengths than weaknesses unlike the 360, and those strengths are vital.

Sony knows how to design a proper gaming console.

The sources that are not from forums out number what you posted so i still win. They Can;t handle Splinter cell They Can't Handle the Gun Stringer. Valve Said it cn;t handle like 3 of their games, that's 5. They Can't handle Super Meat Boy PS3 can;t handle uncharted 4 PS3 can't handle A.I. like XBOX. So it has dev problems, AI problems, Graphics problems, Speed problems, and having problems rendering large 3D areas which explained RDR. Especially with A.I.

but splinter cell black list is coming to ps3.... and valve was always anti ps3....gabe newell was a 360pc fanboy that was too lazy to port anyway i think it is more difficult to develop for the ps3, but i don't think the developers don't give a crap enough to make decent ports because ps3 is different than 360
Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#173 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts
Thank God they acknowledged that fact ... If this was 06 they would have probably blamed it on consumers being idiotic or poor or some off the wall comment like that. Hopefully this is a sign that Sony won't make the same pricing mistake and our wallets won't take such a beating next gen.
Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

[QUOTE="nolson"]

[QUOTE="kingtito"] Yeah yeah cows keep claiming the 360 is more expansive yet it still sold more 6 years later when the PS3 was supposed to destroy the 360 at launch. Not to mention cows love to use the $600 price tad as the blame for the slow sales. So what is it, the 360 is more expensive or the PS3 is? Can't have it both ways. Don't blame the late start for being in last. That was Sony's decision, arogant as it was, and noone elses. They chose to come out a year later and they chose to give a $600 price tag. Since you want to play the "IF" game IF Japan bought 360's the lead would be insurmountable, not that they will be caught now. IF the 360 didn't have the RROD fiasco they'd probably be ahead of Nintendo (that's a big if) or it would be very close. Don't give excuses for Sony being in last, just accept it and move on. No point in blind loaylty to a company that really doesn't care about you one way or another other than to get what's in your wallet. WilliamRLBaker

360 is more expensive in the long run but just looking at them at launch it seemed cheaper. And LOL, if anything RROD made xbox sales INFLATED then what they should be. People bought 2 or 3 extra consoles because of that fiasco. Without RROD ps3 prob would be ahead lol. And I'm sorry you can't except the facts. It's not an excuse, it is a FACT that the ps3 has outsold 360 if you look at sales against time on the market. ps3 almost 6 full years 360 almost 7. Theres only a 2 million gap so its easy to see 360 would be last. its not a what if game, its a fact.

lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....

Do you have a stuttering problem?? Don't pretend like everyone went through Microsoft to repair the system for free. Plenty of people just went out and bought new systems either because they did not want to wait for it to be fixed or because it was out of warranty.

Avatar image for noscope-ak47
noscope-ak47

1318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 noscope-ak47
Member since 2012 • 1318 Posts

Sony is in 3rd place but less than 2 million units behind the 360 that is pretty good

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
and cows said it was on second place :lol:
Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#177 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13719 Posts

Sony is in 3rd place but less than 2 million units behind the 360 that is pretty good

noscope-ak47
damage control....sony based on their past gens shouldnt even be competing with other companies, it should have been competing with its past performance
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10943 Posts

[QUOTE="noscope-ak47"]

Sony is in 3rd place but less than 2 million units behind the 360 that is pretty good

jsmoke03

damage control....sony based on their past gens shouldnt even be competing with other companies, it should have been competing with its past performance

All companies eventually fall from their grace. Just take a look at Ninty. At least Sony know what's it's like to be winning. This is M$ 2nd console, and they NEVER been in 1st place in neither.

Avatar image for vincent380
vincent380

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#179 vincent380
Member since 2003 • 2244 Posts
I also paid $599 for my 60GB i have no regrets either.
Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

I also paid $599 for my 60GB i have no regrets either. vincent380

agreed. For the people who actually looked at the bigger picture at launch they would have seen that the ps3 would be cheaper in the long run. 360 launch users with live have now paid more than ps3 launch users.

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

I still believe the PS3 will outsell the X360 by the end of this generation.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#182 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I have no regrets.

Stop saying nonsense, and go and unscrew your PS3 out and see what's there. £425 is all there.

GamerwillzPS

I bought mine for $400 and it still hurts my wallet to this day (mainly cuz I could use $400 right now, im broke b*tch!). Spending $600 for a video game console is a bit ridiculous to me really, especially one that had no games untill 08

Well, gaming is my #1 hobby so it was worth spending all of that money. Why did I spend £425 for such a console? Simply because it's PlayStation. I knew that Sony will deliver, and they did. I have alot of faith in Sony.

PS4 will be a day 1 purchase no matter what, even the price.

Would you pay $1000 bucks for it?

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#183 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="nolson"]

360 is more expensive in the long run but just looking at them at launch it seemed cheaper. And LOL, if anything RROD made xbox sales INFLATED then what they should be. People bought 2 or 3 extra consoles because of that fiasco. Without RROD ps3 prob would be ahead lol. And I'm sorry you can't except the facts. It's not an excuse, it is a FACT that the ps3 has outsold 360 if you look at sales against time on the market. ps3 almost 6 full years 360 almost 7. Theres only a 2 million gap so its easy to see 360 would be last. its not a what if game, its a fact.

nolson

lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....

Do you have a stuttering problem?? Don't pretend like everyone went through Microsoft to repair the system for free. Plenty of people just went out and bought new systems either because they did not want to wait for it to be fixed or because it was out of warranty.

lol if someones so impatient they would spend several hundred on a new console rather than wait two weeks or less, they derserve to have their money taken.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....

Is 2012 all 2005,2006,2007,2008,and almost all 2009 consoles are out of warranty,maybe you think that when MS repair your console you get and extra 3 years,if you think that way wrong,if your unit was 2006 and was repair for RROD on 2009,you only have 1 year to go on your warranty,the 3 year warranty is not eternal for as long you own your 360,other wise it would be call eternal warranty or some crap like that. All fat 360 will RROD at some point,because even the more reliable ones did not eliminated the problem,they just were more resistant,but sooner or latter it would happen. By the way i am on my 2nd 360 bough,like i told you once your machine is repair you don't get 3 more years,and guess what most of the 360 our there are out of warranty by now,so if you have 30 games and your out of warranty 360 RROD,there is a no brainier what people will do buy a new 360,because selling for 30 games for almost nothing on gamestop and buying a PS3 is really not an option.

lol you are such a stupid moronic ****** you have never been worth the time. according to you no 360 was ever covered under rrod for longer then 2 minutes, you've also admitted to claiming that no 360 ever ran for longer then 5 minutes. I've yet to see you not only post something correct but something that wasn't an outright lie including what was posted here. blocked
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="nolson"]

360 is more expensive in the long run but just looking at them at launch it seemed cheaper. And LOL, if anything RROD made xbox sales INFLATED then what they should be. People bought 2 or 3 extra consoles because of that fiasco. Without RROD ps3 prob would be ahead lol. And I'm sorry you can't except the facts. It's not an excuse, it is a FACT that the ps3 has outsold 360 if you look at sales against time on the market. ps3 almost 6 full years 360 almost 7. Theres only a 2 million gap so its easy to see 360 would be last. its not a what if game, its a fact.

nolson

lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....

Do you have a stuttering problem?? Don't pretend like everyone went through Microsoft to repair the system for free. Plenty of people just went out and bought new systems either because they did not want to wait for it to be fixed or because it was out of warranty.

but but but but but but no one ever in the history of the 360 took advantage of the 3 year replacement policy on rrod and e74 all of them went out and purchased new 360's...Are you next going to claim that over 50% of 360 purchases were repurchases like some charlie sheens in this thread have claimed like the mortally stupid dip heads they are? *mortally stupid As in they likely have to live on life support because they are so brain dead they cannot eat or breath on their own*
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

Sony is in 3rd place but less than 2 million units behind the 360 that is pretty good

noscope-ak47

I thought it was 3 million.

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#187 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

The thing is, if Sony tried to keep the launch price down, there wouldn't be Blu-ray. Our exclusives would have been different and inferior like the 360.

I expect the PS4 to be priced reasonably as Blu-ray have been around for a while, so the price for the drive won't be as high.

I spent the launch price, and I have to say it was worth it. It's one hell of a console!

Nengo_Flow
you paid 599 US Dollars for a PS3? lol damn bro, I feel sorry for you son

word up
Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#188 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

The thing is, if Sony tried to keep the launch price down, there wouldn't be Blu-ray. Our exclusives would have been different and inferior like the 360.

I expect the PS4 to be priced reasonably as Blu-ray have been around for a while, so the price for the drive won't be as high.

I spent the launch price, and I have to say it was worth it. It's one hell of a console!

Nengo_Flow
you paid 599 US Dollars for a PS3? lol damn bro, I feel sorry for you son

word up
Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

[QUOTE="nolson"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] lol I always love this verging on ******** in the least completely moronic statement. but but but but but but 360 fans all purchased 3-4 extra 360's...because RROD wasn't fixed for free....WilliamRLBaker

Do you have a stuttering problem?? Don't pretend like everyone went through Microsoft to repair the system for free. Plenty of people just went out and bought new systems either because they did not want to wait for it to be fixed or because it was out of warranty.

but but but but but but no one ever in the history of the 360 took advantage of the 3 year replacement policy on rrod and e74 all of them went out and purchased new 360's...Are you next going to claim that over 50% of 360 purchases were repurchases like some charlie sheens in this thread have claimed like the mortally stupid dip heads they are? *mortally stupid As in they likely have to live on life support because they are so brain dead they cannot eat or breath on their own*

Guess that answeres my question about the stuttering. The maturity level sure is low around here can't even have a civil conversation like an adult. I didn't say no one took advantage of the program. I was simply saying not EVERYONE took advantage of the program. You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Quit twisting my words to fit what you wish they said.

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

sony has admitted that they have finished 3rd this gen.. and they blame the high launch price of the system.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/sony-admits-ps3-price-was-a-factor-in-3rd-place-current-gen-finish/097791

TCHBO

ionusX

I wasn't aware that this gen was over already? Where is the PS4 and Xbox 720? I can't find them anywhere at Gamestop:?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

lol you are such a stupid moronic ****** you have never been worth the time. according to you no 360 was ever covered under rrod for longer then 2 minutes, you've also admitted to claiming that no 360 ever ran for longer then 5 minutes. I've yet to see you not only post something correct but something that wasn't an outright lie including what was posted here. blockedWilliamRLBaker

Welcome to the blocked club, and yes I know I am blocked also :)

asdsad

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] lol you are such a stupid moronic ****** you have never been worth the time. according to you no 360 was ever covered under rrod for longer then 2 minutes, you've also admitted to claiming that no 360 ever ran for longer then 5 minutes. I've yet to see you not only post something correct but something that wasn't an outright lie including what was posted here. blockedsts106mat

Welcome to the blocked club, and yes I know I am blocked also :)

asdsad

deja-vu. seriously, thats older than ispeakfacts jelly bulcrap, and less than half as funny.

I think it is very sweet of you to constantly defend Willy, but he doesnt even see it unless you quote me.

Plus neck beards are unforgivable.

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#194 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="nolson"]

Do you have a stuttering problem?? Don't pretend like everyone went through Microsoft to repair the system for free. Plenty of people just went out and bought new systems either because they did not want to wait for it to be fixed or because it was out of warranty.

nolson

but but but but but but no one ever in the history of the 360 took advantage of the 3 year replacement policy on rrod and e74 all of them went out and purchased new 360's...Are you next going to claim that over 50% of 360 purchases were repurchases like some charlie sheens in this thread have claimed like the mortally stupid dip heads they are? *mortally stupid As in they likely have to live on life support because they are so brain dead they cannot eat or breath on their own*

Guess that answeres my question about the stuttering. The maturity level sure is low around here can't even have a civil conversation like an adult. I didn't say no one took advantage of the program. I was simply saying not EVERYONE took advantage of the program. You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Quit twisting my words to fit what you wish they said.

Maturity level? Attacking sales figures based on more theory than fact. People implying the amount of consumers who didn't take advantage of the extended warranty was so significant that it had a major affect on overall sales.

Exactly how seriously do you think this is going to be taken?

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#195 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts
Well yes... I agree with sony on that... I remember lurking into shops and e-shops and while seeing the infamous 699euros ( more than 800dollars at that time ) with no game and i was like WTF is goin on. Then the infamous "cuts" of the system , like backward compatibility and other goodies just to make it 599E ( around 620dollars ). This mess up made people to stay away. Even as we speak , i think PS3 as a very expensive system ( for 7 years old console it is ). I think they wont mess it up this gen and i might buy a playstation again. PS3 failed in every aspect as hardware and did nothing right as of what it was hyped before release. ( 1080p gaming , way better graphics than competition etc etc ).
Avatar image for SuperFlakeman
SuperFlakeman

7411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 SuperFlakeman
Member since 2011 • 7411 Posts

Blu-ray fcked them.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#197 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

I still believe the PS3 will outsell the X360 by the end of this generation.

omho88
Classic statement since 2008 2008 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2009 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2010 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2011 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2012 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2013 WHO cares... PS4/X720 are coming.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#198 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Well yes... I agree with sony on that... I remember lurking into shops and e-shops and while seeing the infamous 699euros ( more than 800dollars at that time ) with no game and i was like WTF is goin on. Then the infamous "cuts" of the system , like backward compatibility and other goodies just to make it 599E ( around 620dollars ). This mess up made people to stay away. Even as we speak , i think PS3 as a very expensive system ( for 7 years old console it is ). I think they wont mess it up this gen and i might buy a playstation again. PS3 failed in every aspect as hardware and did nothing right as of what it was hyped before release. ( 1080p gaming , way better graphics than competition etc etc ).AzatiS

PS3 went down to like £300 when the 40gb iteration dropped and definately wasnt 599E unless your living in the eastern bloc.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#199 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"]

I still believe the PS3 will outsell the X360 by the end of this generation.

AzatiS

Classic statement since 2008 2008 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2009 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2010 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2011 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2012 PS3 will surpass X360 --> never happened 2013 WHO cares... PS4/X720 are coming.

You are being nice buddy. That 'PS3 will surpass 360' agenda started in 2005.

Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

[QUOTE="nolson"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] but but but but but but no one ever in the history of the 360 took advantage of the 3 year replacement policy on rrod and e74 all of them went out and purchased new 360's...Are you next going to claim that over 50% of 360 purchases were repurchases like some charlie sheens in this thread have claimed like the mortally stupid dip heads they are? *mortally stupid As in they likely have to live on life support because they are so brain dead they cannot eat or breath on their own*HalcyonScarlet

Guess that answeres my question about the stuttering. The maturity level sure is low around here can't even have a civil conversation like an adult. I didn't say no one took advantage of the program. I was simply saying not EVERYONE took advantage of the program. You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Quit twisting my words to fit what you wish they said.

Maturity level? Attacking sales figures based on more theory than fact. People implying the amount of consumers who didn't take advantage of the extended warranty was so significant that it had a major affect on overall sales.

Exactly how seriously do you think this is going to be taken?

I feel it's a valid argument. Since when does an argument being considered valid or not equate to being mature. You think I'm wrong. That's fine it has nothing to do with being mature or not about it. However the adult going "but but but but but but but but but" is very immature.