Little Big Planet? Uncharted? MGS4? And I'm still playing and so are a lot of other people WarhawkI don't think so at all. There just have been a lack of truely memorable games on Sony's side this gen.
Wasdie
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Little Big Planet? Uncharted? MGS4? And I'm still playing and so are a lot of other people WarhawkI don't think so at all. There just have been a lack of truely memorable games on Sony's side this gen.
Wasdie
That's where opinions come into play, but it's fair to judge it off popular standards. I think titles KZ2, LBP, and Uncharted are very memorable. Then you have franchises such as R&C, Gran Turismo, and God of War, two of which haven't seen a current gen installment. Heavenly Sword not so much lol.I don't think so at all. There just have been a lack of truely memorable games on Sony's side this gen.
Wasdie
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"] HAZE-Unit has properly debunked this thread for the bullspit that it is.IronBassYou are taking it way too seriously. :| I love these types of posts. If you reply to the TC and do not agree, you are obviously taking it seriously and upset. :roll:
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Little Big Planet? Uncharted? MGS4? And I'm still playing and so are a lot of other people WarhawkYep , all those 3 of those Sony games are memorable and will looked at as some of the ps3's early classics likes Jak and Daxter , ICO , Ratchet and Clank , andSocom were for ps2. They just have that something special about them - whether it's the fun factor , soul , special ingredient , whateverit is ..... they just have the "it" factor.I don't think so at all. There just have been a lack of truely memorable games on Sony's side this gen.
EmperorSupreme
Not every game has to be MGS4 to be memorable games.
Little Big Planet? Uncharted? MGS4? And I'm still playing and so are a lot of other people WarhawkYep , all those 3 of those Sony games are memorable and will looked at as some of the ps3's early classics likes Jak and Daxter , ICO , Ratchet and Clank , andSocom were for ps2. They just have that something special about them - whether it's the fun factor , soul , special ingredient , whateverit is ..... they just have the "it" factor.[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
I don't think so at all. There just have been a lack of truely memorable games on Sony's side this gen.
Nike_Air
Not every game has to be MGS4 to be memorable games.
Now that I think about it. At least Sony is developing and publishing new IPs NEW IPs -owned and/or developed (half of which can be 'memorable'): - inFAMOUS -Uncharted - LittleBigPlanet - MAG - Resistance - Motorstorm - Heavenly Sword ----- Not to bash, but what new things have MS made besides Viva Pinata? I'm pleased with Sony's efforts (not to say 'm displeased with MS).[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]Yep , all those 3 of those Sony games are memorable and will looked at as some of the ps3's early classics likes Jak and Daxter , ICO , Ratchet and Clank , andSocom were for ps2. They just have that something special about them - whether it's the fun factor , soul , special ingredient , whateverit is ..... they just have the "it" factor.[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"] Little Big Planet? Uncharted? MGS4? And I'm still playing and so are a lot of other people WarhawkTREAL_Since
Not every game has to be MGS4 to be memorable games.
Now that I think about it. At least Sony is developing and publishing new IPs NEW IPs -owned and/or developed (half of which can be 'memorable'): - inFAMOUS -Uncharted - LittleBigPlanet - MAG - Resistance - Motorstorm - Heavenly Sword ----- Not to bash, but what new things have MS made besides Viva Pinata? I'm pleased with Sony's efforts (not to say 'm displeased with MS). Crackdown is a great new franchise you forgot. Not really memorable though.[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"] HAZE-Unit has properly debunked this thread for the bullspit that it is.IronBassYou are taking it way too seriously. :| Why? because he disagrees with the TC and agrees that my points are making more sense than the TC? There is fanboyish BS in this thread and you know it.
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"] HAZE-Unit has properly debunked this thread for the bullspit that it is.PoppaGamerYou are taking it way too seriously. :| I love these types of posts. If you reply to the TC and do not agree, you are obviously taking it seriously and upset. :roll: It has nothing to do with agreeing with the TC or not. He has pretty much insulted the TC one way or another practically in every post. That most certainly cIassifies as taking things too seriously.
Why? because he disagrees with the TC and agrees that my points are making more sense than the TC? HAZE-Unit
No. Because he has pretty much insulted the TC one way or another practically in every post.
Most of them were already modded, that's why they can not be seen right now.
[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"][QUOTE="IronBass"] You are taking it way too seriously. :|IronBassWhy? because he disagrees with the TC and agrees that my points are making more sense than the TC? There is fanboyish BS in this thread and you know it. No. Because he has pretty much insulted the TC one way or another practically in every post. Some of them were already modded, that's why there can not be seen right now. Hmmm...ok now I understand thanks for the input :)
TC has good points,people should attack his opinion and not him personally that is really low.McdonaIdsGuy
Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]TC has good points,people should attack his opinion and not him personally that is really low.HAZE-Unit
Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
Killzone 2 single player has no substance,is boring as hell and repetitive,the only good thing about KZ2 is the multiplayer which is the only thing i play(oh i have lot of fun with it,i play it everyday),Uncharted is too short and has no replay value,the others i can't comment because i haven't play them and don't appeal to me.[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]TC has good points,people should attack his opinion and not him personally that is really low.McdonaIdsGuy
Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
Killzone 2 single player has no substance,is boring as hell and repetitive,the only good thing about KZ2 is the multiplayer which is the only thing i play(oh i have lot of fun with it,i play it everyday),Uncharted is too short and has no replay value,the others i can't comment because i haven't play them and don't appeal to me. wow. replace killzone 2 with Halo3 and u get the game result to me.[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]TC has good points,people should attack his opinion and not him personally that is really low.HAZE-Unit
Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
Well I'd assume he singled out Sony because he likes MS's and Nintendo's first-party games more? As for MGS4, I'd assume that was "left out of the equation" because it isn't a first-party game.Why does SW have so much trouble with the concept that *gasp!* people can have different opinions?
[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"]
[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]TC has good points,people should attack his opinion and not him personally that is really low.PBSnipes
Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
Well I'd assume he singled out Sony because he likes MS's and Nintendo's first-party games more? As for MGS4, I'd assume that was "left out of the equation" because it isn't a first-party game.Why does SW have so much trouble with the concept that *gasp!* people can have different opinions?
Well assuming and mind reading people not gonna get you anywhere,his OP is full of crappy opinions about Sony's first party, his point of view is not a fact and I proved him wrong, thats why he didn't even respond to my op.
The fact that he bashed all Sonyfirst party games doesn't make any sense, the fact that he compared KZ2 to Halo 3 sales and popularity wisejust to say KZ2 is deadafter 2 months doesn't make sense, the fact that he said Sony first party games holds no interest in the gaming community doesn't make sense.
As for your other question, ask this question for the tc, btw there is a difference between making a point (opinion)and making nonsense.
[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"][QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"]Killzone 2 single player has no substance,is boring as hell and repetitive,the only good thing about KZ2 is the multiplayer which is the only thing i play(oh i have lot of fun with it,i play it everyday),Uncharted is too short and has no replay value,the others i can't comment because i haven't play them and don't appeal to me. wow. replace killzone 2 with Halo3 and u get the game result to me. Or either of the Gears games. Really. Just shows how one-sided some here want it to be. I guess they own no mirror's in the MS house. Uncharted is too short and no reply, huh? Bioshock anyone? Replyability is up to the gamer, McDonalds.Do you mean good points about bashing almost all of the best games on the PS3 and singling out Sony's first party instead of being neutral and say "do you think today's games are all flash and no substance?" that too doesn't make sense but it's at least better than singling out Sony and going more specific by pointing at Sony's first party to support his own idea and put MGS4 out of the equation to make it like it is the only good memorable game on the PS3 lol.
-snorlax-
wow. replace killzone 2 with Halo3 and u get the game result to me. Or either of the Gears games. Really. Just shows how one-sided some here want it to be. I guess they own no mirror's in the MS house. Uncharted is too short and no reply, huh? Bioshock anyone? Replyability is up to the gamer, McDonalds.[QUOTE="-snorlax-"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"] Killzone 2 single player has no substance,is boring as hell and repetitive,the only good thing about KZ2 is the multiplayer which is the only thing i play(oh i have lot of fun with it,i play it everyday),Uncharted is too short and has no replay value,the others i can't comment because i haven't play them and don't appeal to me.PoppaGamer
agree, ecip did a bad job with Gears 2, but to state that killzone 2 is even remotely close to Gears 1 is 100 % trolling
Well assuming and mind reading people not gonna get you anywhere,Lucky for me I don't have to assume or mind read -- I agree with him. I've had my PS3 for just over 4 months now, and with the exception of Flower not a single exclusive (first or third party) has been able to hold my attention. As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, whenever I think about playing a game on the PS3, the saying "where's the cream filling?" immediately comes to mind. For lack of a better term, the PS3's exclusives are lacking the "soul", the certain je ne sais quoi, that the games I enjoy and cherish feature. Granted I'd say that about most games these days regardless of platform, but the PS3's (and to a lesser extent, the PSP's) exclusives just don't do anything for me.his OP is full of crappy opinions about Sony's first party, his point of view is not a fact and I proved him wrong, thats why he didn't even respond to my op.
The fact that he bashed all Sonyfirst party games doesn't make any sense, the fact that he compared KZ2 to Halo 3 sales and popularity wisejust to say KZ2 is deadafter 2 months doesn't make sense, the fact that he said Sony first party games holds no interest in the gaming community doesn't make sense.
As for your other question, ask this question for the tc, btw there is a difference between making a point (opinion)and making nonsense.
HAZE-Unit
Quite simply, the PS3 is the only platform I've ever owned (and I've owned most of them since the SNES) that doesn't have a single game I can see myself playing years down the road.
[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"] Well assuming and mind reading people not gonna get you anywhere,
his OP is full of crappy opinions about Sony's first party, his point of view is not a fact and I proved him wrong, thats why he didn't even respond to my op.
The fact that he bashed all Sonyfirst party games doesn't make any sense, the fact that he compared KZ2 to Halo 3 sales and popularity wisejust to say KZ2 is deadafter 2 months doesn't make sense, the fact that he said Sony first party games holds no interest in the gaming community doesn't make sense.
As for your other question, ask this question for the tc, btw there is a difference between making a point (opinion)and making nonsense.
Lucky for me I don't have to assume or mind read -- I agree with him. I've had my PS3 for just over 4 months now, and with the exception of Flower not a single exclusive (first or third party) has been able to hold my attention. As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, whenever I think about playing a game on the PS3, the saying "where's the cream filling?" immediately comes to mind. For lack of a better term, the PS3's exclusives are lacking the "soul", the certain je ne sais quoi, that the games I enjoy and cherish feature. Granted I'd say that about most games these days regardless of platform, but the PS3's (and to a lesser extent, the PSP's) exclusives just don't do anything for me.Quite simply, the PS3 is the only platform I've ever owned (and I've owned most of them since the SNES) that doesn't have a single game I can see myself playing years down the road.
And what are the titles on 360 that do fit that bill. I'd be interested to hear what they have over the PS3 titles that somehow make them longer lasting. (grabbing popcorn)Lucky for me I don't have to assume or mind read -- I agree with him. I've had my PS3 for just over 4 months now, and with the exception of Flower not a single exclusive (first or third party) has been able to hold my attention. As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, whenever I think about playing a game on the PS3, the saying "where's the cream filling?" immediately comes to mind. For lack of a better term, the PS3's exclusives are lacking the "soul", the certain je ne sais quoi, that the games I enjoy and cherish feature. Granted I'd say that about most games these days regardless of platform, but the PS3's (and to a lesser extent, the PSP's) exclusives just don't do anything for me.[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"] Well assuming and mind reading people not gonna get you anywhere,
his OP is full of crappy opinions about Sony's first party, his point of view is not a fact and I proved him wrong, thats why he didn't even respond to my op.
The fact that he bashed all Sonyfirst party games doesn't make any sense, the fact that he compared KZ2 to Halo 3 sales and popularity wisejust to say KZ2 is deadafter 2 months doesn't make sense, the fact that he said Sony first party games holds no interest in the gaming community doesn't make sense.
As for your other question, ask this question for the tc, btw there is a difference between making a point (opinion)and making nonsense.
PBSnipes
Quite simply, the PS3 is the only platform I've ever owned (and I've owned most of them since the SNES) that doesn't have a single game I can see myself playing years down the road.
Opinions, opinions and more opinions... Halo 3 has as much substance like R2, which is very little...I cannot really see a MS 1st party game with "substance" none...Sony 1 st party , a few... One thing the Tc is right is that this gen I've seen lesser games with that "substance" (which contains a big portion of subjectivity) so here's another "opinion" which won't make more or less valid the op (cause it's simply put an opinion which a lot of people and videpgame sites disagree) but whateverAnd what are the titles on 360 that do fit that bill. I'd be interested to hear what they have over the PS3 titles that somehow make them longer lasting. (grabbing popcorn)PoppaGamerWhere did I say 360? Glad to see we're all keeping an open mind here. :roll:
Also, you'll notice that I said the games I enjoy have a certain je ne sais quoi (quite literally, "I don't know what" in French) that I've found PS3 titles to be lacking. Anyway, off the top of my head (this gen only, obviously):
360:
-Halo 3
-PGR 4
-Mass Effect
-Forza 2
-Rockstar Table Tennis
-Rainbow Six: Vegas
Wii:
-Super Mario Galaxy
-Metroid Prime 3
PC:
-STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl
-Company of Heroes
-Audiosurf
-Sins of a Solar Empire
-World of Goo
-Dawn of War 2
PSP:
-Patapon
-Patapon 2 (based on demo)
PS3:
-Flower
Of course it's my opinion, this whole goddamn thread is an opinion piece. Hell SW in and of itself is just one big opinion piece. Contrary to popular belief, you can't debate facts.Opinions, opinions and more opinions... Halo 3 has as much substance like R2, which is very little...I cannot really see a MS 1st party game with "substance" none...Sony 1 st party , a few... One thing the Tc is right is that this gen I've seen lesser games with that "substance" (which contains a big portion of subjectivity) so here's another "opinion" which won't make more or less valid the op (cause it's simply put an opinion which a lot of people and videpgame sites disagree) but whateverGiancar
Lucky for me I don't have to assume or mind read -- I agree with him. I've had my PS3 for just over 4 months now, and with the exception of Flower not a single exclusive (first or third party) has been able to hold my attention. As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, whenever I think about playing a game on the PS3, the saying "where's the cream filling?" immediately comes to mind. For lack of a better term, the PS3's exclusives are lacking the "soul", the certain je ne sais quoi, that the games I enjoy and cherish feature. Granted I'd say that about most games these days regardless of platform, but the PS3's (and to a lesser extent, the PSP's) exclusives just don't do anything for me.[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"] Well assuming and mind reading people not gonna get you anywhere,
his OP is full of crappy opinions about Sony's first party, his point of view is not a fact and I proved him wrong, thats why he didn't even respond to my op.
The fact that he bashed all Sonyfirst party games doesn't make any sense, the fact that he compared KZ2 to Halo 3 sales and popularity wisejust to say KZ2 is deadafter 2 months doesn't make sense, the fact that he said Sony first party games holds no interest in the gaming community doesn't make sense.
As for your other question, ask this question for the tc, btw there is a difference between making a point (opinion)and making nonsense.
PBSnipes
Quite simply, the PS3 is the only platform I've ever owned (and I've owned most of them since the SNES) that doesn't have a single game I can see myself playing years down the road.
Thats a good point of view, I don't mind it at all because you didn'tapply the experience you had with games you played for the whole world and made some generalization and pushed your opinion as a fact, hell, you didn't say the games were all about flash and had "no" substance.
So what games you didn't feel like they have the special impact other games did?
Hmm. I'll agree with Ninja in calling "Uncharted" mostly flash and not much substance. The gameplay was rather weak -- it felt like Tomb Raider and Gears of War had an ugly baby gameplay wise. The enemies are all hyped up on PCP, and the difficulty level can change on a dime from easy to excruciatingly difficult -- don't even get me started when you play at a higher difficulty, it's hard enough on the default difficulty. And any game which resorts to mutants in the plot is a sign of terrible writing. :PStevo_the_gamer
Yea a certain jungle game did that.. kinda annoyed me.
That was a bad anology. A summer action flick to Sony's 1st party games? Summer action movies are the best action movies of the year! You think about them more because they are relased in the summer. Every game "fizzles" out. That's when I buy games. Price drop. But it's MS 1st party game (Halo3) vrs. Sony's (all others)*. "Halo 3 doesn't seem to fizzle out." So one could say all other MS first party games fizzle out as well, besides Halo3 of course. This is a Halo 3 thread.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment