Metal gear series for me, Splinter Cell takes itself too serious its not even funny, so slow gameplay wise slower than Metal gear, it has the habit of trial and error while Metal gear doesn't have, you could proceed to your missions in alot of different ways.
Gameplay, metal gear, like I said there are alot of ways to approach the missions, faster paced than SC's gameplay, alot of great and innovative futuristic gadgets, alot of creative ideas like getting the frequency of one of snake's comrades from the back of the game's box was an awesome thing to do, switching controllers to kill bosses,the boss battles, who doesn't like boss battles?
I mean I grew up gaming fighting bosses from the nes, snes era to this day, it gives a better experience and impact for the game because the player will remember those boss battles and those enemies you fought making the game more memorable.
Graphics, Metal gear, I don't think SC fans praise it for its graphics, even Conviction doesn't look that good for current gen 09 standards, it looks like a 05-06 game, on the other hand, Metal Gear always pioneered in the graphics department.
On the other hand, graphically and technically wise, I don't remember playing a MGS game with glitches, framerate issues or bugs even in this generation the only bug free game I've played thie gen is MGS, no patches no nothing, you play the game from start to finish smoothly.
Story its so obvious, MGS series are story driven games unlike SC, in SC the player play from mission to mission and don't care about the story and is irrelevant.
SC is good but it is no way near the MGS series.
Log in to comment