@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..
Here's one upset cow for you.
@mr_huggles_dog said:
*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*
So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.
Nice generalization though.
Jokes on you.
I'm not a cow.
The 660 GTX in my streaming computer can basically max out Battlefield 4. Chances are, a 960 GTX will near max this game out at 1080p. It's a 200 dollar card. You could build a 600 dollar system that could produce those graphics.
If you aren't a Cow, you sure are ignorant of the Frostbite engine and PC components.
@MirkoS77: Those are pre-alpha screen shots. Those are actually what the game looks like from a person with closed alpha access. Those are not dev screenshots.
@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..
Here's one upset cow for you.
@mr_huggles_dog said:
*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*
So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.
Nice generalization though.
Jokes on you.
I'm not a cow.
The 660 GTX in my streaming computer can basically max out Battlefield 4. Chances are, a 960 GTX will near max this game out at 1080p. It's a 200 dollar card. You could build a 600 dollar system that could produce those graphics.
If you aren't a Cow, you sure are ignorant of the Frostbite engine and PC components.
I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.
Edit: Just so you know....b/c obviously you don't....a TITAN is the only GPU that can run 4K at "DECENT" frames....and they cost $1000.
In FC4 a TITAN ran that game at like 55fps.
So yeah....unless games are going backwards in graphical quality....don't act so superior in knowledge.
Game looses something in screen shots, best seen in motion but clearly one of the best looking up coming games of the generation.
lol and whats with lemmings hiding behind PC to take shots at PS4's UC4 for in here? You guys are a sad jealous bunch of goofs. You guys try to turn any thread into an attempt to justify your feverish loyalty toward all things xbox and damage control against PS4.
Let me just say that if anything games to be compared and bashed against SWBF it's another FPS and since Halo 5 releases this holiday it's sad to see it looks 2 gens behind this in comparison but coming out at the same time.
@MirkoS77: Those are pre-alpha screen shots. Those are actually what the game looks like from a person with closed alpha access. Those are not dev screenshots.
Ok. Just after all these downgrade controversies, hard to know what to trust.
I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.
It's Frostbite 3... derp...
They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.
Derp.
Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?
What a huge surprise...
1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.
2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.
I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.
It's Frostbite 3... derp...
They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.
Derp.
Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?
What a huge surprise...
1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.
2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.
Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.
If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.
I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.
It's Frostbite 3... derp...
They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.
Derp.
Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?
What a huge surprise...
1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.
2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.
Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.
If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.
Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.
I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html
And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html
Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running 4K at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.
You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.
Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.
I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html
And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html
Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.
You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.
Sit down Nydac....you're out of your league.
Yeah, you're not too smart... I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra... Stick to what you know, which is **** all about computers...
The point is, if some are already able to get this running at 4k it means a lot of PC players will be able to play at 1080p at 60fps with the same graphics which is awesome.
PS4 should be able to play 1080p at 30fps and not loose too much on the gfx end which is also good.
xbone...should be able to load the game and run it in some form. lol
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get nearly 70 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering... Why are you being difficult...
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
I paid $550 for my 295x2
I paid $2 for my PS4.
Did I do it right?
Did I rekt somebody?
Whats your point with crossfire you can have up to 4 of any similar cards. You'll be surprised with the deals you can find if you shop around with a bit of patience. Building a pc is not about going to amazon and throwing your money at them. Anyway, I dont even know what you're trying to prove here, are you trying to imply rich pc gamers should feel bad? I can assure you they feel anything but that. 4k is becoming more affordable to pc gamers with every passing day while console gamers will not get to experience it for at least 10 more years. Life is way too short to wait 10 years for anything that you can have right now.
I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.
It's Frostbite 3... derp...
They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.
Derp.
Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?
What a huge surprise...
1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.
2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.
Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.
If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.
Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.
I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html
And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html
Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running 4K at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.
You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.
Sit down Nydac....you're out of your league.
I can run BF4 at 4k just fine at ultra settings or whatever is the highest.
I have 2 970s which cost me a little over 600USD for both of them together when I got them last year at release.
Also a 980ti is only a few percent weaker than a Titan X and costs 650USD.
Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?
What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...
That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.
Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.
Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.
Thats not a 295x2. At least thats not what it says. It says 295X.....with no 2. Crossfire ready means it can support another card.
Derpity derp dumb....rekt and all that stupid shit.
Are you fucking kidding me, no one can be this out of touch with reality... I've already explain this to you..
295X2 = Two 290X's on one PCB
290X = $269 x 2 = $539 = 295X2
My god in heaven...
Jesus....this was like pulling teeth.
It's not the same.
They aren't the same in price match up.
A 295x2 is a $1000 card genius. 2 290x by themselves can be bought for $600 IF FOUND ON SALE.
Jesus....maybe if you explained this shit better. First you show me a 295x2...then you link me a 290x and are like "SEE REKT". The ****? They aren't the same card..and expect me to follow you stupid "in your own mind" way of explaining shit.
Either way....you STILL need $600 GPUs which is last gen so yeah...thats fucking great now that the 300 series is either out or about to come out.
Good job...you need to spend $600 on a set of GPUs which aren't even the latest tech.
What a fucking blast it is to play at 4K on PC....this was all such a well oiled machine.
A 295x2 is a $1000 card genius. 2 290x by themselves can be bought for $600 IF FOUND ON SALE.
Jesus....maybe if you explained this shit better. First you show me a 295x2...then you link me a 290x and are like "SEE REKT". The ****? They aren't the same card..and expect me to follow you stupid "in your own mind" way of explaining shit.
Either way....you STILL need $600 GPUs which is last gen so yeah...thats fucking great now that the 300 series is either out or about to come out.
Good job...you need to spend $600 on a set of GPUs which aren't even the latest tech.
What a fucking blast it is to play at 4K on PC....this was all such a well oiled machine.
Don't get all butthurt because you can't understand extremely simple things, it's plain to see your PC experience is nill and you're a console gamer from top to bottom trying to discuss things completely out of your realm of understanding. My PC specs are in my signature for christ sakes, any PC gamer would have looked at what I posted and said "yeah you're right, you could.".... I mean how much more obvious did things need to be?
I posted the results of a 295X2 which was getting 69.8 FPS on Ultra settings at 4K, any PC gamer would know a 295X2 is two 290X's on a single PCB. I posted the results from a 290X which was getting 37 FPS average. I said "I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra.", I have two 290X's which is clear as day in my forum signature and has been, this isn't advanced physics huggles... I mean holy shit man, talking to you is like talking to an inanimate object, stop getting involved in PC discussions, you don't have a clue what in the hell you're talking about and are a pure annoyance...
@nyadc said:
Yeah, you're not too smart... I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra... Stick to what you know, which is **** all about computers...
Log in to comment